Commissioner: Miami-Dade budget is ‘Game of Thrones.' FIFA wins, nonprofits lose
When illness struck — uninsured and desperate — CHI's health clinics were our sanctuary. I grew up in concrete towers where we scraped for crumbs and hollow-eyed neighbors lost themselves to addiction. I sold candy in the scorching heat for pennies. Optimist Clubs shielded us from the streets.
These nonprofits weren't extras in my story — they were the only thing standing between me and the abyss. The budget, in its current form, turns what should have been a celebration into a siege.
In this real-life 'Game of Thrones,' the swords are sharpened not against enemies. They are wielded against our own — nonprofits, county workers and the families they serve.
As a child, I saw how vulnerable we were, and I benefited from investments in services. As a man, I refuse to believe the illusion that we must choose between survival and spectacle. We are now standing on a battlefield of false choices. And that battlefield is of our own making.
As a former prosecutor who watched nonprofits stand beside survivors, I see the proposed budget cuts being made to accommodate a $400 million shortfall, not as numbers on a page, but as blades to the heart of key lifelines: clinics, crisis centers, Optimist Clubs, drug programs, and veterans' services.
These aren't just services. They are the watchtowers of our community. And under this budget proposal, they begin to fall. This is no fiscal winter — it is carnage. When we gut nonprofits, we unleash a tide of suffering.
Children roam without support of mentors where Optimist Clubs once anchored hope. Drug addicts return to alleyways. Veterans are left to fight their issues alone. Loyal county workers are cast out. If this budget stands, the final verdict will be clear: compassion has been dethroned, and power handed over to spectacle.
The budget also funds support money for FIFA. This is not about punishment — it's about priorities. This is no attack on FIFA. I championed the World Cup — I even voted for it. Its economic promise is real, and I'll proudly cheer with my children in those glittering stadiums. We want the World Cup! But what changed my position was the rollout of the mayor's proposed $12.7 billion budget.
This siege must end. Our communities are in crisis. We must raise our voices — not in battle, but in unity — to slay the dragon of false choice.
I respect our mayor and her visions for our county. I support FIFA. And I stand with our nonprofits. This isn't a war of sides — it's a test of values, compromise, and smart investments. We don't have to choose between them, but we do have to reorder our priorities.
We can find a way to support our nonprofits and our workers while welcoming FIFA to share its global inspiration through competitions in our beautiful county.
What began as a moment of celebration does not need to become a battlefield of false choices. With our multicultural minds, we can find a solution with dignity for all.
I am the sum of every nonprofit that reached a hand into the fire and pulled me out. I am the product of our nonprofits. Their survival is not just policy — it's personal.
Kionne L. McGhee is the vice chairman of the Miami-Dade commission.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
a day ago
- New York Times
EU court rules CAS decisions can be reviewed by national courts
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled Friday that decisions made by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) can now be reviewed by national courts to ensure compliance with European Union (EU) law. The ruling means that certain decisions from governing bodies such as FIFA can be challenged outside of Switzerland. If the legislation or rules of world football's governing body are deemed to 'prevent the national courts or tribunals from exercising their powers,' said courts or tribunals are now 'required to disapply that legislation or those rules'. Advertisement CAS, an institution independent of any sports organisation, handles significant legal sporting cases such as doping and contract disputes. The court is based in Lausanne, Switzerland. Officials and clubs had previously been bound to accept verdicts made by CAS. Switzerland's supreme court decides upon CAS verdicts which have been challenged, but have rarely overturned the verdicts. The ECJ said in a statement that national courts or tribunals of member states 'must be empowered to carry out, at the request of individuals or of the court's or tribunal's own motion, an in-depth judicial review as to whether arbitral awards made by CAS are consistent with EU public policy'. The verdict directly relates to the 10-year legal battle between FIFA and Belgian club RFC Seraing, who, alongside Maltese investment fund Doyen Sports, opposed the governing body's rules on third-party ownership of the economic rights of players. FIFA imposed several registration bans and a fine of 150,000CHF ($184,700) on Seraing, sanctions which were upheld by CAS and the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. The club subsequently put the case before the Belgian court of first instance and court of appeal, but found it could not carry out a new assessment of the compatibility of the verdict with EU law, with CAS' decision holding the authority of res judicata — effectively meaning it cannot be pursued further. After the club put the case before the court, the ECJ ruled that such authority is incompatible with EU law. It said: 'The application of rules of this kind deprives individuals of the possibility of obtaining, from the courts or tribunals of the Member States, effective judicial review of such arbitral awards.' In quotes carried by the Associated Press, Seraing's lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont said the club should be compensated for the sanctions imposed on it by FIFA and said the implications of the ECJ ruling challenge the legality of all 'forced arbitrations' by mandated international sports federations. Advertisement 'In summary, the (court) has definitively ended the procedural deception used by international sports federations to evade the proper application of EU law through the imposition of compulsory arbitration outside the EU,' Dupont said. CAS issued a statement Friday saying it acknowledges the ECJ's ruling that its awards 'should be limited to EU public policy only' while adding that only six per cent of the court's decisions are appealed to the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT). 'ICAS also acknowledges recognition by the CJEU that sports arbitration is a legitimate mechanism ensuring a uniform treatment of sporting disputes and a consistent application of sporting rules,' the statement added. The ECJ's ruling on Friday marks another landmark verdict under EU competition law. In the last two years, it challenged the authority of UEFA and FIFA by ruling the governing bodies acted unlawfully in blocking the creation of the proposed Super League, while ruling last year in the Lassana Diarra case that some FIFA rules regarding players transfers were acting contrary to EU law in relation to freedom of movement. FIFA declined to comment when approached by The Athletic.

2 days ago
Top EU court rules that soccer governing body FIFA's decisions can be challenged outside Switzerland
BRUSSELS -- The European Union's top court ruled on Friday that the decisions of world soccer's governing body FIFA can be challenged outside Switzerland, opening up a system that currently binds athletes, officials and clubs to accept verdicts there. A statement from the European Court of Justice said that tribunals in the 27 EU member states 'must be able to carry out an in-depth review of those awards for consistency with the fundamental rules of EU law.' The ECJ ruling in Luxembourg means that EU national courts should be able to review verdicts from the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Switzerland is not a member of the European Union. 'The awards made by the CAS must be amenable to effective judicial review," the statement said. It said that 'national courts or tribunals must be empowered to carry out ... an in-depth judicial review' to ensure that CAS rulings "are consistent with EU public policy.' There was no immediate comment from FIFA or CAS. The decision could end a decade-long legal fight by Belgian soccer club RFC Seraing and Maltese investment fund Doyen Sports. They opposed FIFA rules prohibiting third-party ownership of a player's registration and transfer rights, and in 2015 asked a commercial court in Brussels to review if those rules breached EU law. CAS was created in 1984 to give sports a unified and binding legal forum for settling disputes and appeals based in the International Olympic Committee's home city Lausanne in Switzerland. The ruling marks a new legal blow to the authority of sports bodies in Switzerland. The same European court in Luxembourg has handed down two other major rulings in the last two years under EU competition law — in the Super League case and Lassana Diarra transfer dispute — that challenged the authority of soccer bodies FIFA and UEFA. ___


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Top EU court rules that soccer governing body FIFA's decisions can be challenged outside Switzerland
BRUSSELS (AP) — The European Union's top court ruled on Friday that the decisions of world soccer's governing body FIFA can be challenged outside Switzerland, opening up a system that currently binds athletes, officials and clubs to accept verdicts there. A statement from the European Court of Justice said that tribunals in the 27 EU member states 'must be able to carry out an in-depth review of those awards for consistency with the fundamental rules of EU law.' The ECJ ruling in Luxembourg means that EU national courts should be able to review verdicts from the Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Switzerland is not a member of the European Union. 'The awards made by the CAS must be amenable to effective judicial review," the statement said. It said that 'national courts or tribunals must be empowered to carry out ... an in-depth judicial review' to ensure that CAS rulings "are consistent with EU public policy.' There was no immediate comment from FIFA or CAS. The decision could end a decade-long legal fight by Belgian soccer club RFC Seraing and Maltese investment fund Doyen Sports. They opposed FIFA rules prohibiting third-party ownership of a player's registration and transfer rights, and in 2015 asked a commercial court in Brussels to review if those rules breached EU law. CAS was created in 1984 to give sports a unified and binding legal forum for settling disputes and appeals based in the International Olympic Committee's home city Lausanne in Switzerland. The ruling marks a new legal blow to the authority of sports bodies in Switzerland. The same European court in Luxembourg has handed down two other major rulings in the last two years under EU competition law — in the Super League case and Lassana Diarra transfer dispute — that challenged the authority of soccer bodies FIFA and UEFA. ___