logo
The best dating apps aren't even dating apps

The best dating apps aren't even dating apps

TechCrunch2 days ago
It's no longer taboo to meet your partner on the internet. The evidence is everywhere: it's on your refrigerator door, where you've hung up the wedding invitations of friends who met on Tinder. It's on your Instagram feed, where a friend shares a sappy post about her one-year anniversary with a woman she met on Hinge.
But when Zeke Rothfels tells people that she met her husband online, she's not talking about swiping left until she finally found the right guy. She's talking about cultivating a relationship across the U.S.-Canada border with a man she met in a Facebook meme group.
'I think we both felt kind of like, is this crazy?' Rothfels told TechCrunch. 'Do I acknowledge that this feels like something, or will that ruin it?'
It was crazy, but it was also real – six years later, Rothfels is reminiscing about meeting her husband after she's just put their two-year-old child to sleep.
'Do I acknowledge that this feels like something, or will that ruin it?'
Everyone is tired of dating apps. This mass disillusionment has sent the stocks of dating giants tumbling. The stock prices of Bumble and Match Group – the company behind 45 dating apps, including Tinder, Hinge, and Ok Cupid – have declined about 90% and 68% over the last 5 years, respectively. Together, these companies have shed $40 billion in market cap since 2021, struggling to capture the attention of Gen Z users.
But the internet's presence in our social lives won't just disappear. As singles grow weary of the slog of swiping, couples are getting to know each other on traditional social media sites — in the Tumblr 'Ask' box, in Reddit DMs, and even on newer platforms like Bluesky.
People may not turn to social media with the intent to find love, but these online spaces naturally forge connections, and sometimes, those connections grow beyond friendship. Here, people are no longer at the mercy of dating apps' mysterious algorithms and emphasis on physical appearance, nor do they have to face an inexplicable number of fish photos. It makes these unexpected digital 'meet-cutes' look more appealing than updating your Tinder profile again.
Swipe fatigue
Image Credits:Pew Research Center
By 2013, online dating had become the most popular way for heterosexual couples in America to meet, according to the longstanding 'How Couples Meet and Stay Together' study from Stanford. By 2019, about 40% of heterosexual couples had met online, doubling the number of couples who met through friends.
Today, about 30% of all American adults have used dating apps, a figure that increases to 52% among never-married adults.
With broader adoption, however, people were exposed to the darker sides of dating online. Seven out of ten online daters said it's common to encounter people lying on their profiles, and 66% of women ages 18-49 reported being harassed, according to Pew Research. Another 56% said they were sent sexually explicit images they didn't ask for.
Over time, people began to feel that their experiences on dating apps had become more frustrating than hopeful, and the future of the dating app giants was called into question.
Meanwhile, discouraged dating app users have begun to create online whisper networks where they can discover if others have had negative experiences with their date. The trend started on 'Are we dating the same guy?'-style Facebook Groups, where women would post screenshots of potential dates' profiles to find out if they were already seeing someone else.
Image Credits:Screenshot of Facebook by TechCrunch
The same concept also powers the newly viral dating advice app Tea, which claims to have 1.6 million users. Its sudden popularity has fueled online debate, where men accuse women of doxxing them, and women point to the necessity of sharing these warnings with others. After all, dating apps largely ignored serious safety concerns, like background checks, according to a 2019 investigative report by ProPublica and Columbia Journalism Investigations, which highlighted the presence of sexual predators on Match-owned dating apps.
Yet the solutions are often as bad as the problems they try to fix. Tea, for example, has seen its security breached twice, with users' selfies, private messages, and government IDs shared to 4chan, a notorious web forum.
It's not surprising, then, that some are giving up online dating altogether.
The new 'meeting online'
Rothfels didn't mean to fall in love with a guy from a Facebook meme group who lived in another country. The internet had other plans.
'I always thought he was hot,' Rothfels concedes. 'I liked his mustache.'
These absurdist communities, mostly populated with quick-witted, off-beat college students, often had thousands of members. Rothfels and her husband, Owen, had only interacted in passing, but she knew that they had similar senses of humor and political views – if not, they wouldn't have both spent so much time in these online spaces.
Owen lived in Minneapolis, and she lived in Toronto, so she never acted on her idle crush. Then, one morning in 2019, while she was hungover in bed after a party, she saw that Owen had posted on Instagram about the folk musician Woody Guthrie.
'I replied saying that I'm related to Woody Guthrie, which is true – distantly – and he replied saying 'marry me,'' she said. 'That exchange kind of kicked off us talking constantly for the next week… We basically never stopped messaging each other.'
Though their connection blossomed beyond their shared interest in 'elaborate dadaist memes,' the whimsical foundation of their relationship had proven to be the ultimate icebreaker.
'The knowledge that we had both spent a lot of time online making these dumb memes made it less daunting,' Rothfels said.
Elsewhere, demand for alternative ways to meet people is growing, like going to in-person speed dating events or mixers, turning to older methods like personal ads, trying apps for offline dating, or even joining running clubs, which have become a weirdly popular avenue for dating.
But like Rothfels, people are finding love in unexpected places – the forums and sites they use to pass idle time online, as opposed to those dedicated to online dating. There, they get to know each other in shared social settings, where the spectre of possible romance doesn't haunt each of their interactions from the first message.
Rudy, a 54-year-old who had never used traditional dating apps, met his wife by chance in an erotic pen pals forum on Reddit, where their identities were obscured by their personas of mythical creatures.
I think that Twitter has changed how we communicate and has definitely changed how we relate to other people… on Twitter, you could be dropping lore every five seconds.
'There's a great deal of safety thrown into those interactions, at least on Reddit,' Rudy (using a pseudonym), told TechCrunch. 'Throwaway Reddit accounts are effectively anonymous.'
Within their fantastical world, they wrote hundreds of thousands of words to each other, solely because they found it fun. Over the course of a year and a half, their fictional correspondence slowly became more real.
'We explained it as a creative writing forum,' Rudy said. 'My family is aware that I met her [online], they're just not aware that it was explicitly pornographic, 'Cthulu mythos' stuff.'
Explicit flirtations aside, their creative connection allowed them to get to know each other on a deeper level. Over time, they revealed details about their real lives, and they decided to meet in person. Soon, the woman who became Rudy's wife moved to the U.S. to be with him.
'My wife's wit and cleverness… She makes me laugh more than anybody, and I believe it's the same for her,' Rudy told TechCrunch. 'When we wrote, we wrote lots of poetry together and things like that. That just becomes a connection – we were locked in before we'd ever had any romantic encounter.'
Developing a connection with a friend – even an internet friend – can help speed up the 'getting to know you' process that typically comes with online dating, which users have begun to describe as 'admin work' or a second job. In contrast with dating apps, this way of meeting more naturally mimics the feel of meeting through friends.
James Cassar, a writer in their 30s, found a similar sense of common ground with their partner Nicole. The couple originally met on Twitter (which has since rebranded as X), where they followed each other because they posted about the same niche rock bands.
When they later matched on Tinder, they already recognized each other from the internet, allowing them to skip the small talk.
'When Nicole looked at my Tinder, she was like, 'You like Cheem? I don't know anyone that listens to Cheem,' and I was like, 'Then you must know that I'm that person [from Twitter],'' Cassar told TechCrunch. 'It's like a weird CAPTCHA – like, which underground indie band do you like?'
Though they had never spoken, they already knew a lot about each other, since they had been reading each other's posts for years. And often, people are more open about their thoughts and feelings when they're posting semi-anonymously to a crowd of internet strangers.
'I think that Twitter has changed how we communicate and has definitely changed how we relate to other people,' Cassar said. 'It bypasses a lot of the social contract of like, 'Oh, I'm gonna meet somebody in person, and we're gonna get a coffee or something, and then I'm not gonna tell them this embarrassing thing about me until seven or eight dates in.' Whereas on Twitter, you could be dropping lore every five seconds.'
With the internet permeating so much of our everyday lives, the separation between online and offline relationships can blur.
The internet provides beautiful connections of all sorts, all the time.
Recently, when a friendly stranger asked how I met my boyfriend, I was prepared to offer my canned version of the story: we were close friends for seven years, and after our friends pestered us about it long enough, we finally got together.
My boyfriend's answer was a bit more blunt.
'We met on a meme page,' he said.
With some surprise and amusement, I realized that his version of events was correct, too.
While we did start dating after many years of friendship, we first became friends because we were both moderators of a local Facebook meme group in 2017. We crossed paths in the irony-laden halls of 'weird Facebook,' the same collection of esoteric meme groups where Zeke and Owen met.
'There's always a responsible distance that people should put between their presence online and themselves,' Rudy said. 'But I think the internet provides beautiful connections of all sorts, all the time.'
It's a bit weirder than meeting on Hinge, but so far, it's working.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock?
I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock?

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock?

Let's be honest — most of us missed the boat on Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA). And by the time we realised just how vital graphics processing units (GPUs) would become to artificial intelligence (AI), the share price had already soared into the stratosphere. Over the past five years, the stock has climbed almost 1,600%. In the last six months alone, it's up almost 50%, adding over $1.5trn to its market value. It's now the most valuable company in the world, overtaking Microsoft and Apple in June. I have exposure to the stock through several ETFs and investment trusts, so I didn't entirely miss out on the action. But I certainly made nowhere near the gains I would have had I bought individual shares. Which makes me wonder, how did Nvidia get here, and what stock could be next? Crunching the numbers The numbers behind the hype are jaw-droppingly impressive. For the fiscal year ending January 2025, revenue reached $130bn, a staggering increase from $27bn just two years ago. Net income exploded from $4.3bn in 2022 to more than $70bn this year. And its margins are enormous — a return on equity of 115% and gross margins consistently above 70%. Yet despite the parabolic growth, I don't think it's entirely overvalued yet. In fact, I still think it's worth considering as a long-term investment. It's a world-class company with room to expand further and the global AI arms race is just getting started – with Nvidia at its core. Realistically, though, the biggest gains have already been made. Buying now means betting on continued dominance that may already be priced in, which is a risk. The stock trades at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 45 – not outrageous considering its growth, but not cheap either. So where should investors look if they want to catch the next killer growth stock before it becomes a trillion-dollar giant? Could SymphonyAI be next? One company on my radar is SymphonyAI, a private US firm reportedly preparing for a Nasdaq IPO later this year. It's not yet listed, but when it does go public, I'll be watching closely. Founded by billionaire Romesh Wadhwani, it specialises in applying AI to specific industry verticals – retail, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare. It doesn't build chips like Nvidia, but it builds the enterprise software that helps businesses harness AI to improve decision-making and productivity. Unlike many AI startups, SymphonyAI already has real revenues and customers. Its retail division serves over 1,200 brands, while its industrial arm works with giants like Nestlé and ArcelorMittal. While financials are still private, it reportedly generates hundreds of millions in annual revenue and is growing fast. If the IPO goes ahead this autumn, it could be one of the most closely watched tech listings of the year. Long-term mindset Nvidia's success was powered by timing, technology, and a growing reliance on data. It may still reward shareholders but the days of 10x returns are likely behind us. SymphonyAI might never reach Nvidia's heights but it could offer early-stage exposure to enterprise AI – the next leg of this growth story. If the valuation is right, it could turn out to be a once-in-a-decade opportunity. The post I missed Nvidia – could this be the next big US growth stock? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Mark Hartley has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Cloudflare Earnings: Big Deals and AI
Cloudflare Earnings: Big Deals and AI

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cloudflare Earnings: Big Deals and AI

Key Points Cloudflare beat expectations in the second quarter, with solid 28% revenue growth and an expanding net retention rate. Spending is rising as Cloudflare invests in growth and AI initiatives, which led to sluggish adjusted earnings growth and a drop in free cash flow. Cloudflare's outlook was strong, and the stock surged in after-hours trading. 10 stocks we like better than Cloudflare › Here's our initial take on Cloudflare's (NYSE: NET) financial report. Key Metrics Metric Q2 2024 Q2 2025 Change vs. Expectations Revenue $401.0 million $512.3 million +28% Beat Earnings per share (adjusted) $0.20 $0.21 +5% Beat Large customers 3,046 3,712 +22% n/a Dollar-based net retention rate 112% 114% +2 pp n/a Growing Customer Relationships Cloudflare (NYSE: NET) grew revenue by 28% in the second quarter, easily beating analyst expectations. The cloud computing company ended the quarter with 3,712 large customers spending at least $100,000 annually, up 22% year over year. Those larger customers accounted for 71% of total revenue. One driver of Cloudflare's revenue growth was a bump in the dollar-based net retention rate, which measures how quickly existing customers are expanding spending. This rate rose to 114% in the second quarter, up from 112% during the same period last year. While that's a small increase, it's a sign that customers are increasing their investments in Cloudflare's growing portfolio of products and services. "Demand remains strong, as our largest customers grow their investments with Cloudflare at the highest levels we've seen since 2022," said CEO Matthew Prince in the earnings release. Cloudflare beat analyst expectations for adjusted earnings per share as well, although that metric only grew by 5% year over year. The company's GAAP net loss more than tripled to $50.4 million as operating costs soared. Free cash flow dipped to $33.3 million, down 13% year over year, as the company ramped up its capital expenditures. For the third quarter, Cloudflare expects revenue to grow by 26% to 27% and adjusted EPS to come in at $0.23. The company expects to spend between 12% and 13% of revenue on capital assets related to its edge computing network for the full year. Immediate Market Reaction Shares of Cloudflare surged 6% in after-hours trading after the company handily beat analyst estimates across the board. Guidance calling for similar levels of revenue growth in the third quarter and for the full year likely helped the cause, as did a rising net retention rate. Cloudflare stock was up 93% year to date going into the second-quarter report. What to Watch One initiative that could prove significant for Cloudflare in the long run is the company's effort to enable customers to charge AI crawlers for access to their content. "Some of our most strategic wins have been centered around our work to help invent the new business model for content creators on the AI-driven internet," said Prince. Beyond helping customers get a handle on AI crawler traffic, Cloudflare is pushing its platform as the ideal choice for building AI agents. Having an enormous presence already, with more than 20% of websites sitting behind the company's platform, Cloudflare may have an edge over the competition. While Cloudflare didn't say what was driving customer expansion in the second quarter, AI was likely part of the equation. Helpful Resources Full earnings report Investor relations page Additional coverage Should you invest $1,000 in Cloudflare right now? Before you buy stock in Cloudflare, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Cloudflare wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $638,629!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,098,838!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Timothy Green has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Cloudflare. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Cloudflare Earnings: Big Deals and AI was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Jury awards over $240 million in damages against Tesla in Autopilot crash lawsuit
Jury awards over $240 million in damages against Tesla in Autopilot crash lawsuit

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Jury awards over $240 million in damages against Tesla in Autopilot crash lawsuit

A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to the victims of a 2019 fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver assist technology. The verdict which comes after a four-year long case could encourage more legal action against Elon Musk's electric car company. A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $240 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cellphone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves. (FRANCE 24 with AP)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store