Dallas County Health loses $70M in federal funding
Dallas County Health and Human Services has lost two federal grants totaling $70 million.
It could mean layoffs for as many as 80 employees, including nurses, lab scientists, educators, and administrative support staff.
It may also mean a reduction in services related to immunizations and immunization research.
DALLAS - Dallas County's health department is scrambling to save jobs after losing two federal grants totaling $70 million.
The funding cuts could result in as many as 80 county employees losing their jobs. Public health services in Dallas County may also be impacted.
What we know
The federal grants that have been frozen or rescinded are part of the Trump administration's effort to reduce government spending.
Last week, Dallas County Health and Human Services got word from the Texas Department of Health Services that it would immediately lose funding from two federal COVID-19 grants.
The county was getting about $70 million from those two grants for immunizations and immunization research.
While the grants may have originated during the pandemic, the funding was being used for more than just the county's COVID-19 response.
The cuts are expected to impact flu vaccinations, childhood immunizations, and efforts to prevent HIV and STDs.
About 80 jobs will also be affected, including nurses, lab scientists, educators, and administrative support staff.
What they're saying
"This is a really big hit and we're one of the ones that's being impacted," said Dallas County Health Director Dr. Philip Huang. "There was no preparation, no way to scale down, no way to plan for this. It's really very shortsighted in the way this is being handled."
Commissioner John Wiley Price had been sounding the alarm for more than a month. However, no one was sure when or if the cuts would actually occur or what they might look like until last week.
"The anvil has been dropped, and we've got to make some very drastic kind of decisions," he said.
"There are definitely going to be local cuts. We're assessing the exact magnitude of it and looking at how we're going to be able to try to move forward. But definitely there are significant cuts that we're facing," Dr. Huang said.
What's next
Dallas County sent out notices on Friday about potential layoffs.
The county is exploring other grants that may be available to help save some, if not all, of the jobs.
Some vaccinations may also go unfilled so vital staff can stay in place.
The loss of the grants also means planned purchases are on hold right now.
The Source
FOX 4 reporter Shaun Rabb talked to Commissioner John Wiley Price and Dr. Philip Huang to gather information for this story. Some details also come from a notice the county received from the state health department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pandemic Babies Are Entering Kindergarten & We're Only Now Processing How Weird Their First Year Was
It's been five years since the pandemic first started, but parents who had kids in 2020 don't forget so easily. Especially now, as those 'pandemic babies' head off to kindergarten. As for me, my son was 8 months old when the pandemic started and daycare shut down. He learned how to crawl the same week he was home, and it was a mix of joy and panic as I juggled full-time work with no childcare. When daycare reopened, I worried he'd get sick, yes, but also that he wouldn't learn how to talk since all his teachers (and everyone he interacted with except for his parents) wore masks. Strangely enough, we didn't test positive for Covid until two years later, and fast forward to today with two more kids into the mix, and it turns out that my first one was the most verbal (and continues to be a total chatterbox). But those early days were definitely weird. I checked in with a couple of other moms whose children were also born during the pandemic, and here's what they shared. Pregnancy and Labor Sucked Big Time Katie was living in Brooklyn, NY when her son was born in March 2020. 'I delivered March 25, which was three days after NY State was put on pause…Most notably, I delivered during the week-long partner ban that NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital implemented. My husband was restricted access to the hospital, so he took me as far as he could. We said our goodbyes on the curb right outside of the entrance, and then I had to do the rest without him.' She recalls masked-up surgery, isolated recovery, nurses terrified to enter her room, and missing her husband most when her newborn wanted constant feeding. She was discharged 40 hours after delivery. 'That night, once my family had been reunited, we were all safely home and the boys were asleep—my body started shaking uncontrollably. My midwife suspected that was all the adrenaline I had stored up, releasing.' Across the ocean in London, Hannah described a similarly lonely birth experience in October 2020: 'Being in the UK we had very tough and strict restrictions throughout the whole of my pregnancy. It changed daily! In the end, my partner was not able to be in the delivery room with me until I was about to give birth. Then we had around one hour together before he was told to leave because of the restrictions and to come back the following day.' Leading up to delivery, Hannah recalls that the lack of in-person classes and support left her feeling isolated. 'Online antenatal classes aren't the same. And I really wanted to go to the store to test out all the pushchairs and make our decision together, but we didn't want to risk exposure so we bought everything online.' It Was Lonely and Anxiety-Inducing For many parents, the hardest part wasn't just the birth itself but the long, quiet aftermath. The missed 'village' of grandparents, friends and new mom groups. Ellen in Chicago, IL also delivered her baby in October 2020. 'I randomly was looking back at old notes in my Notes app the other day, and the ones from those early days are bat shit crazy. I had extreme anxiety about her health, breastfeeding, her weight, sleep safety, everything,' she tells me. Even small milestones—like introducing a new baby to friends—were fraught with anxiety or lost completely. I attended multiple baby showers and first birthday parties over Zoom that year and, well, it just wasn't the same as celebrating a tiny human in person ('you're on mute!'). As for us, we had one family come over for my son's first birthday party who we were bubbling with at the time, while other invitees came by our house and congratulated him and us from the street outside. The Kids Are Alright The other day I found one of my son's tiny face masks and asked if he remembered ever wearing it. (At one point the CDC recommended masks for kids ages 2 and up, though by the time he hit that milestone, restrictions had fortunately eased up and his school only advised, not mandated, them.) He just looked at me blankly—no recollection whatsoever. Katie reflects: 'He is a healthy, happy, funny, resourceful kid. I think one positive side effect of Covid was that my husband, who would usually travel a lot for work, was suddenly home all the time. Having him close helped to establish a very deep bond between him and both our boys.' Still, the immune system challenges were real. As Hannah recalls, once her daughter started daycare, 'Whatever she then caught she got bad—chicken pox, scarlet fever, even tiny colds took her ages to recover from. It was very scary!' These days when I have to keep a kid home from school, I try to remind myself that it will never be as bad as during the early days of the pandemic. There was a period in 2021 where my son went a full 19 weeks (I remember, I counted!) without actually making it through a full week, largely due to illness after illness and a very strict sick policy (you had to be fever-free for 48 hours, no green snot allowed, negative Covid tests, quarantine periods, etc.). But the Parents Won't Forget If the kids will grow up barely remembering, the parents are a different story. 'I think about [Covid] every year on my son's birthday,' Katie says. 'He is our goofy little Covid reminder. I still wish that my husband could have been in person at the delivery…He says that I should let this go…but I struggle with that.' Ellen echoes this. While her daughter is thriving, she admits the pandemic likely made her and her partner extra anxious beyond the normal 'this is my first kid' type of stress. 'It probably made us a little weird,' she says. (Remember when we were all wiping down groceries with Clorox wipes and hoarding toilet paper?) Ultimately, these pandemic babies have proven exactly what we hoped for—that they are resilient, adaptable and joyful despite the strangeness of their first year. But for the parents, the memories linger. It's not all bad, though. 'I can appreciate how strong our family is,' says Katie. 'We lived through something really hard and found the strength to do that in each other.' As I prepare to send my "pandemic kid" off into a new school year, I couldn't agree more. The Pandemic Taught Us That Kids Are Resilient. Parents Are Not.
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The Clashing Advice Over COVID-19 Shots for Kids
Should you give your baby a COVID-19 shot? The answer isn't as straightforward or as much of a consensus as it used to be: In an unusual move, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is recommending a different approach to childhood vaccination than the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both groups agree that families should make individual decisions in consultation with their doctors about whether kids should be vaccinated. But the AAP has a stricter stance for the youngest eligible children in the U.S., recommending that all of them get COVID-19 shots. The CDC stopped recommending COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children older than six months following guidance from the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in May. The CDC does, however, recommend the shot for children who are moderately or severely immunocompromised. A day after the AAP released its recommendations, Kennedy fired back at the organization on social media, accusing them of allowing pharmaceutical-company donors to guide their recommendations. AAP maintains that its recommendations are based on science. Here's what to know about the clashing advice regarding COVID-19 vaccines for kids. What does the AAP recommend in terms of COVID-19 shots for children? Whether most children should get a COVID-19 vaccine should be based on their particular risk, the AAP says—taking into account their underlying conditions, such as asthma, obesity, or diabetes, as well as whether they live in a household with people at high risk for developing severe disease. That risk is higher for the youngest eligible age group—ages 6 months to 23 months—which is why the AAP recommends that all kids in this age group get vaccinated. 'For the youngest kids, the hospitalization rate is similar to that for adults 50 to 64 years old,' says Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'It's not nothing. And that's for something that can be prevented by a vaccine, which has been better studied than any medical product in our history. We have a very strong level of confidence in the safety of the vaccine.' HHS did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Why are the recommendations different? Generally, the CDC sets the schedule for which vaccines people should get and at which ages. The CDC makes its decision based on advice from its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). ACIP is made up of independent experts who volunteer to review data, discuss their findings, and make recommendations to help guide the CDC. But Kennedy—a longtime vaccine-skeptic who now oversees the CDC as head of HHS—fired all members of ACIP in June, accusing them of following industry interests. Kennedy replaced them days later with people he had selected, 'many of them with strong anti-vaccine views,' says O'Leary. Read More: How Having a Baby Is Changing Under Trump After ACIP was replaced, AAP—which typically works closely with the advisory committee and other liaison groups in setting vaccination schedules—decided not to attend ACIP's first meeting under the new administration in the spring. 'We saw from that meeting that ACIP has gone off the rails, essentially, in terms of the way they are operating and the messaging from the new members, which is very much around sowing distrust about vaccines and not making evidence-based vaccine recommendations,' says O'Leary. Weeks later, the AAP and other liaison groups were asked to discontinue their participation in ACIP work groups, O'Leary says. 'We received an email un-inviting us,' he says. The reason provided, he says, was that the organizations represented 'special interest groups,' which O'Leary says is a 'poor interpretation of the rules. All of the organizations at the table have expertise, and there are a lot of reasons to have representation from professional societies.' Which advice will doctors and pharmacists follow? O'Leary says pediatricians are anticipating having to have more conversations with families about the conflicting vaccine advice, and that the AAP is providing guidance to help inform those discussions on its website and via emails to its members. 'Politics has entered the exam room in a way that it never has before,' he says. 'These discussions will be contextual, depending on how well the pediatrician knows the family, what relationship they have, and how frank they can be with them in the discussion.' Ultimately, he says, the message from pediatricians should be this: 'We are committed to the health of children, and our recommendations are based on the best available science.' Read More: What the New COVID-19 Vaccine Guidance Means For You Pharmacists must take a slightly different approach, since they are only allowed to vaccinate according to the CDC's recommendations, while doctors can vaccinate outside of strictly approved conditions or populations in so-called 'off-label' use. Since current CDC recommendations say that families should make their own decisions about whether their children receive the shot, pharmacists will vaccinate kids if parents want them to have the shots, but won't specifically recommend that people get them. 'Our guidance is to always follow what the CDC or HHS recommends,' says Rick Gates, chief pharmacy officer at Walgreens. If families come in with questions about whether their child should get the COVID-19 shot, pharmacists will probably refer them back to their pediatrician or family physician. Will insurance cover COVID-19 vaccines for kids if the CDC doesn't recommend them? It's still not clear how insurers will respond to the differing recommendations. 'This is a real concern,' says Dr. David Higgins, an infectious-disease expert at AAP. Traditionally, a recommendation from ACIP means that a shot will be covered, since any vaccines recommended by the committee have to be reimbursed by insurers under the Affordable Care Act. It's not clear how insurers will interpret the individual choice of families when it comes to vaccinating children. The AAP is urging insurers to continue covering the COVID-19 vaccine for infants six to 23 months, despite the fact that ACIP does not recommend the vaccine for all kids in this age group. 'The AAP is already engaging with private insurers and policymakers to ensure our evidence-based recommendations are covered,' Higgins says, 'and we will continue to advocate to make vaccines accessible to every child in every community.'
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
US Bankruptcies Hit Highest Level Since COVID
The U.S. saw a sharp increase in corporate bankruptcy filings in July, according to a recent report, reaching a post-COVID peak and placing 2025 on track to surpass last year's total. S&P Global Market Intelligence, the research and data arm of the credit-rating agency, found that filings by large public and private companies rose to 71 last month from 66 in June, marking the highest monthly tally since July 2020. So far in 2025, meanwhile, the total of 446 bankruptcy filings is the highest for this seven-month stretch since 2010. Experts told Newsweek that, when factoring in things like currency depreciation and corporate structures, statistics such as these are less alarming than they may initially appear. However, the notable increase in both business and personal bankruptcies in recent months has exacerbated existing concerns about the overall health of the U.S. economy. In its report, S&P Global cited the impact of high interest rates and "uncertainty" created by tariffs; but the economy is also grappling with elevated inflation, a precarious labor market and other headwinds that have prompted some economists to warn of an impending recession. Through the first seven months of the year, bankruptcies were heavily concentrated in the industrial and consumer discretionary sectors, totaling 70 and 61, respectively. Among high-profile bankruptcies, S&P Global noted three that had over $1 billion in assets and liabilities at the time of their July filings: Glucose-monitoring company LifeScan Global; canned goods company Del Monte Foods; and Genesis Healthcare, the Pennsylvania-headquartered nursing home and long-term care provider. With 446 bankruptcies recorded within the first seven months, 2025 is on track to surpass 2024's full-year total of 688. This compares to 634 in 2023, 373 in 2022, 405 in 2021 and 638 in 2020. For its tracking purposes, S&P Global defined "large" firms as public companies with at least $2 million in assets or liabilities, and private companies with at least $10 million at the time of the bankruptcy filings. However, Robert Lawless, a professor of law at the University of Illinois and co-author of Debt's Grip: Risk and Consumer Bankruptcy, said that this benchmark may result in comparisons that are not quite "apples-to-apples." "A dollar has lost 19 percent of its value since December 2020," he told Newsweek. "Similarly, a $2 million bankruptcy today is the same as approximately a $1.4 million bankruptcy in 2010." "Inflation over time will make it seem like there are more 'big' bankruptcies if an adjustment is not made," Lawless said. Newsweek has contacted S&P Global via email for clarification on its methodology. Lawless added that the report avoids a crucial issue by tracking bankruptcy filings rather than the number of entities filing for bankruptcy, as others have done recently. Earlier this month, bankruptcy information services platform Epiq AACER reported that commercial bankruptcy filings had jumped 78 percent year-over-year to 911 in July. However, as Lawless noted in a blog post, nearly a third of these filings were the result of the Genesis Healthcare bankruptcy. "The narrative focused on the number of entities filing for bankruptcy is not quite right," Melissa Jacoby, a law professor of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told Newsweek. "Many of those separate corporate entities are part of a common corporate group-companies partition themselves into separate business associations under state law, but they typically are an integrated whole in terms of thinking about a bankrupt business and are managed together in the bankruptcy process," she said. S&P Global, in the report, wrote: "Companies are contending with elevated interest rates as uncertainty from U.S. tariff policy pressures costs and supply chain resilience." "Companies could benefit from the [Federal Reserve] rate cut if such a move impacts U.S. Treasury yields or market sentiment," it said, adding that: "Treasury yields influence corporate debt interest rates more directly than the Fed rate." Moody's chief economist Mark Zandi, said earlier this month: "It's no mystery why the economy is struggling; blame increasing U.S. tariffs and highly restrictive immigration policy. The tariffs are cutting increasingly deeply into the profits of American companies and the purchasing power of American households." Despite rising bankruptcies, other signs point to resilience among large U.S. corporations. According to recent analysis by Goldman Sachs strategists, cited in Bloomberg, aggregate second-quarter earnings per share for S&P 500 companies are up 11 percent compared to last year, surpassing previous forecasts of a 4 percent gain. The Federal Reserve will make its next interest rate decision following the mid-September meeting. According to CME FedWatch, which predicts moves by the central bank based on interest rate trades, there is an 81 percent chance of a 25-basis points cut at this meeting. Related Articles Bed Bath & Beyond's 'Never Expire' Coupons to Be Accepted at New StoreMC Hammer Faces Financial Trouble After LawsuitClaire's Faces Stores Closing Across US As Retailer Files for BankruptcyAt Home Stores Closing: Full List of Locations 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
