Watering Utah's child care ‘deserts'
Republicans have advanced a bill incentivizing employers to offer child care, while Democrats have advanced a bill multiplying the number of child care centers throughout the state.
Whether either or both bills are passed, many statistics say that such a bill is a long time coming.
In 2024, a Bankrate study found that 75% of Utah exists in a child care 'desert,' where there are not enough day cares to serve the population. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce also estimated that child care issues create around a $1.36 billion loss for Utahns every year.
Here's a look at the two new bills due for debate in the Utah Legislature. HB389 is sponsored by House Majority Whip Karen Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, while SB189 is headed by Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City.
Together, the two women co-chair the Legislature's Women and the Economy Subcommittee. These bills have been under bipartisan and bicameral discussion for three years and support one another, rather than compete, the sponsors say.
Republican-headed HB389 expands child care access by providing tax credits for corporate and individual employers who provide childc are for their employees.
The legislation, which would take effect Jan. 1, 2026, if approved by both Utah's House and Senate, offers:
A 20% tax credit for employers who contract with outside day cares.
A 50% tax credit for employers who run their own child care.
The higher tax credit for in-house child care reflects the lack of adequate child care facilities already available to most Utahns.
HB389 represents a free-market approach to Utah's child care needs — an industry already struggling in a state where families have historically relied less on child care outside the home, according to 2023 research from Utah State University.
Though the number of Utah moms who work falls below the national average, this is trending to change. Two-thirds of Utah moms with children under age 18 work, but more would if they could find high-quality, affordable child care.
Nevertheless, as the Deseret News previously reported, many Utah employers resist building child care centers out of cost and maintenance concerns.
'I discovered a couple of years ago in Utah that businesses were staying away from the topic — didn't even want to talk about it — because they figured it was all or nothing: 'I'd have to build a child care center.' But there are so many things in between,' said Susan R. Madsen, a professor and child care researcher with the Utah Women & Leadership Project at Utah State University.
HB389 could be one of these in-between options — making it more profitable for businesses to contract with child care centers or build their own.
Lisonbee has discussed her bill with multiple employers already, but said she could not publicly disclose the names of those employers at this time.
Sen. Escamilla's Child Care Capacity Expansion Act wants to address child care shortages with unused state buildings.
The program, which, if passed, would launch on May 7, would:
Retrofit obsolete state-owned buildings as child care facilities, which could then be leased at no cost to qualifying employers.
Cover maintenance and utility costs with state funds.
Require that 40 percent of child care spots be reserved for local community members.
Provide discounts to low-income families.
As the Deseret News previously reported, Escamilla advanced a near-identical bill in last year's legislature session. Her bill came in response to a loss amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars in federal child care funds.
Escamilla's 2024 proposal carried a $5 million price tag and centered on empty offices in six state buildings in Salt Lake County. Gov. Spencer Cox endorsed her proposal by including it in his 2024 budget, per media reports.
The bill successfully passed Republican scrutiny in the Utah Senate before dying in the House with little explanation.
'(That) is the nature of the beast here... So we're back. I mean, I'm a Democrat, so I'm used to coming back,' Escamilla said. '(But) I think it's good policy and it's a good way to invest in infrastructure.'
Escamilla still recognizes a dramatic gap in Utahns' child care needs and resources available to them.
'Utah is facing one of the worst child care crises in the nation, and we need your support,' she shared in a recent post to Instagram.
Other child care-related bills this session include:
HB207 'Sexual Offense Revisions' (Rep. Stephen Whyte, R-Mapleton): This bill expands the definition of sexual exploitation of children and strengthens sentences against offenders.
HB365 'Mental Health Care Study Amendments' (Rep. Stewart Barlow, R-Fruit Heights): This bill requires that the University of Utah conducts a study on barriers preventing children from seeing therapists.
HB413 'Child Custody Proceedings Amendments' (Rep. Mike Kohler, R-Midway): This bill specifies that caseworkers can't take action on child custody situations based on the actions of parents and that courts can't adjust child custody arrangements based on certain actions by their parents.
SB173 'School Meal Amendments' (Sen. Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City): This bill creates a free meals program for all public-school students.
SB221 'Child Care Revisions' (Sen. Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City): This bill requires licensing and certification for child care providers and restricts the number of children that one provider may take care of at a time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Texas Republicans set to approve Trump-backed new congressional map after lengthy fight
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Texas Republicans on Wednesday will take up a new state congressional map intended to flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats in next year's midterm elections, after dozens of Democratic lawmakers ended a two-week walkout that had temporarily blocked its passage. Republican state legislators have undertaken a rare mid-decade redistricting at the behest of President Donald Trump, who is seeking to improve his party's odds of preserving its narrow U.S. House of Representatives majority despite political headwinds. The gambit has triggered a national redistricting war, with governors of both parties threatening to initiate similar efforts in other states. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom is advancing an effort to neutralize Texas' move by redrawing his state's map to flip five Republican seats, pitting the nation's most populous Democratic state against Texas, its most populous Republican one. The Texas map aims to flip five Democratic seats. Other Republican states including Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri are moving forward with or considering their own redistricting efforts, as are Democratic states such as Maryland and Illinois. Redistricting typically occurs every 10 years after the U.S. Census to account for population changes, and mid-decade redistricting has historically been unusual. In many states, lawmakers manipulate the lines to favor their party over the opposition, a practice known as gerrymandering. Texas' new map was listed on Wednesday's schedule for the state House, though it was not clear how quickly Republicans could move to approve it. The bill is still subject to debate on the floor, and Democrats can also introduce amendments to be voted upon. Democrats fled the state earlier this month to deny the Texas House a quorum. In response, Republicans undertook extraordinary measures to try to force them home, including filing lawsuits to remove them from office and issuing arrest warrants. The walkout ended when Democrats voluntarily returned on Monday, saying they had accomplished their goals of blocking a vote during a first special legislative session and persuading Democrats in other states to take retaliatory steps. Republican House leadership assigned state law enforcement officers to monitor Democrats to ensure they would not leave the state again. One Democratic representative, Nicole Collier, slept in the Capitol building on Monday night rather than accept a police escort. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged that the new map is aimed at increasing their political power. The party currently controls 25 of the state's 38 districts under a Republican-drawn map that was passed four years ago. Democrats and civil rights groups have said the new map dilutes the voting power of racial minorities in violation of federal law and have vowed to sue. Nationally, Republicans captured the 435-seat House in 2024 by only three seats. The party of the president historically loses House seats in the first midterm election, and Trump's approval ratings have sagged since he took office in January. (Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Daniel Wallis)


Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Minnesota Rep. Kristin Robbins announces run for governor
Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins (R-Maple Grove) is running for governor. The big picture: Robbins, who announced her bid Wednesday morning, joins a GOP primary field that already includes 2022 gubernatorial candidates Scott Jensen and Kendall Qualls. DFL Gov. Tim Walz is expected to announce whether he'll seek an unprecedented third consecutive term after Labor Day. State of play: Republicans haven't won a statewide office in Minnesota since 2006, and top election forecasters rate the 2026 race as "likely Democratic." But recent polls have found voters split on whether Walz should run again, raising the prospect that the state's highest elected office could be in play. Bio in brief: Robbins, a four-term legislator from the north metro, has made headlines this year as chair of the House's new Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee. She won a district that was essentially evenly split between President Trump and Kamala Harris by 14 points in 2024. Zoom in: Robbins' role as the new fraud committee chair has given her a platform to interrogate and criticize the Walz administration on one of his most vulnerable issues. The issue featured prominently in her campaign launch video, with Robbins saying, "mismanagement of our state has created an epidemic of fraud" in government-run programs. The intrigue: Robbins' support for Nikki Haley over President Trump in the 2024 GOP primary could complicate any effort to win the Minnesota Republican Party endorsement — and subsequent GOP primary. Her announcement release didn't say whether she'll agree to abide by the endorsement and end her campaign if GOP delegates pick someone else next spring. What we're watching: Whether Walz runs again— and how that influences who else jumps in the race. Walz, who won by over 7 percentage points in 2022, told reporters Tuesday that he is "still assessing" his decision. Other Democrats seen as likely to run if he doesn't seek another term include Attorney General Keith Ellison and Secretary of State Steve Simon.


Indianapolis Star
18 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school's recording ban is an assault on parents' rights
It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told IndyStar. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' Opinion: School choice wars miss the point. Data can't dictate our values. The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Hicks: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere.