Israel solidarity walk in Toronto needed amid rising antisemitism, organizer says
The Jewish community has felt increasingly isolated after the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and a dramatic increase in antisemitism in Canada since then, said Sara Lefton, chief development officer for the UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, which hosts the walk.
"We want our neighbours, friends and colleagues in Toronto to stand with us because it is a horrific time for our community," she said.
Statistics Canada reports a 71 per cent increase in hate crimes targeting the Jewish population between 2022 and 2023, with the largest increase seen after the Oct. 7 attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza.
Meanwhile, Toronto police said they have received reports of 43 "antisemitic occurrences" so far this year — representing 43 per cent of all reported hate crimes in 2025. That's a 48 per cent decrease in reports compared to this time last year, police said on Sunday.
The solidarity walk took place days after two Israeli Embassy employees were shot and killed outside a Jewish museum in Washington, D.C. Investigators and leaders around the world have denounced the killings as a targeted, antisemitic hate crime.
"Watching the horrific murders in Washington, D.C., is really a dose of reality for all of us of what can happen when hate is left unchecked," Lefton said.
WATCH | UJA Federation of Greater Toronto held vigil to mark 1st anniversary of Oct. 7 attacks:
About 56,000 people participated in Sunday's walk, the UJA said in a news release.
Stuart Lewis said he joined the event because the right to live as Jews in Israel and Toronto is "under attack."
"I'm here to support our rights here in Toronto, Canada and in Israel," he said.
Israel's National Security Council upgraded its travel alert for Canada on Sunday from Level 1, which means no travel warning, to Level 2, which means "potential threat level."
The council said planned counter-protests to pro-Israel rallies on Sunday have resulted in discourse, "including what could be understood as calls to violently harm Israelis and Jews at these events."
It recommended "that those attending the support rallies listen to security personnel and local police at the events, obey their instructions and avoid any friction with the anti-Israel protests."
But Molly Kraft, an advocate with the Jews Say No to Genocide Coalition, said she is offended by the idea the walk is "somehow for Jewish trauma or Jewish safety."
"As a Jewish person, I believe in fighting antisemitism as well, but I think [the walk is] about supporting a military superpower that's hell bent on occupation, genocide and destroying Palestinian life," she said. Israel has repeatedly denied claims of genocide in its war in Gaza, which has led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people.
Sunday's walk began at Temple Sinai Congregation of Toronto synagogue and continued north on Bathurst Street, ending with a festival at UJA's Sherman Campus. There was a heavy police presence along the route, including a number of officers on bicycles.
Toronto police had said on Saturday there would be a "strong presence" at the event, including police from York, Durham and Peel regions, as well as the OPP.
A 57-year-old man was arrested at about 12 p.m. after allegedly yelling antisemitic slurs at people attending the walk, Toronto police said. He has been charged with mischief interfering with property and causing a disturbance. The investigation is being treated as a suspected hate-motivated offence, police said.
The UJA's website said that as of Sunday afternoon, the walk has raised more than $670,000. That's more than in previous years, Lefton said.
"The event today is really about families coming together to celebrate our identity and stand united," she said. "It's not a political event."
But Kraft objected to this description.
"You cannot have this walk for Israel as this casual, family hangout for a state that is enacting one of the most violent genocides that we've ever seen," she said.
The event took place after the leaders of Canada, Britain and France warned on May 19 that their countries could take punitive action if Israel does not stop a renewed military offensive in Gaza and lift aid restrictions to the population.
"The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching international humanitarian law," a joint statement released by Prime Minister Mark Carney's office said.
Earlier this week, Israel began allowing humanitarian aid trucks into Gaza, after placing a nearly three-month blockade on aid supplies that brought people in the enclave to the brink of famine. But aid groups have said supplies still haven't reached Palestinians in need.
The United Nations has warned that 14,000 children in Gaza are at risk of severe malnutrition over the next 11 months if critical aid doesn't arrive.
The UJA Federation said in a news release that funds raised during Sunday's walk "will support urgent humanitarian relief and long-term recovery efforts in Israel, with a focus on aiding families and communities still rebuilding after the trauma of October 7th."
Lefton said the money will go in part toward supporting the mental health of Israelis with PTSD and rebuilding homes destroyed in the Hamas-led attack.
Hamas-led militants attacked Israeli communities near Gaza's border on Oct. 7, 2023, killing about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and seizing 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Hamas is still holding 58 captives, about a third of whom are believed to be alive after most of the others were returned in ceasefire agreements or other deals.
Israel's retaliatory war has killed more than 53,000 Palestinians and reduced much of Gaza to ruins, Gaza's Health Ministry says. Most of them are civilians, including more than 16,500 children under the age of 18, Gaza health officials say.
WATCH | Palestinians struggling to survive amid delays in getting aid:
Omri Kohavi, a survivor of an attack at the Nova music festival on Oct. 7 that killed more than 360 people and saw dozens taken hostage, attended Sunday's walk.
He was in Toronto with the Nova Exhibition, an international touring exhibit recounting the events of that day.
He said he came to the walk to support Israel and was happy to see the "partying and good vibe."
"I'm very proud. It makes me strong," he said.
Suzanne Wintrob said her cousins were living in a kibbutz in Israel on Oct. 7. Half of their friends were killed in the attacks, she said.
"They have survivor's guilt.... They'll never be the same," she said. "The whole country is in trauma."
Wintrob was among several people at the walk holding posters of hostages still in captivity. She said she is praying for safety and peace.
"Everyone wants peace on both sides of this conflict," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canadian shipyard slams B.C. Ferries' contract with Chinese shipbuilder
The largest and oldest shipyard in Canada says it didn't stand a chance in bidding against a Chinese company to build four new vessels for B.C. Ferries. It's the latest criticism levelled at the ferry operator following its decision to purchase the vessels from Chinese-state owned CMI Weihai Shipyards. That criticism and China's punishing new tariffs on Canadian agriculture products have renewed calls for the contract to be cancelled. "Unfortunately, the procurement criteria were heavily weighted toward the lowest price, effectively favouring Chinese shipyards," James Davies, CEO of Davie shipyard, wrote in a letter this month. The letter was sent to Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval, the vice-chair of the House of Commons transport committee, which is scrutinizing the $1-billion loan B.C. Ferries received from the Canada Infrastructure Bank to finance the purchase of the new electric-diesel ships. Davies said the company asked B.C. Ferries to "balance the procurement criteria by requesting recognition of Canadian content and innovation," a request that was rejected. "Due to inherent price disadvantage caused by massive state subsidies for Chinese shipyards, coupled with low wages, weak environmental standards, and minimal labour protections, no Canadian or Western shipyard could reasonably compete, leaving us with no choice but to withdraw."Neither Davie nor any other Canadian company bid on the contract. B.C. Ferries says it would have cost $1.2 billion more to go with a European shipbuilder. B.C. Ferries CEO Nicolas Jimenez was not available for an interview. In a statement, Jeff Groot, B.C. Ferries' executive director of communications, disputes Davie shipyard's characterization of the bidding process. "Contrary to Davie's claims that we 'summarily rejected' their proposals, we are not aware of any concrete requests or suggestions from Davie to amend our procurement criteria," Groot says. "Price was only a secondary factor, representing less than one-third of the score, with shipyard technical considerations making up more than half of the evaluation," the statement adds. "The RFP also showed that Canadian content was a scored consideration and set high safety and environmental standards that every proponent had to meet, regardless of shipyard location or nationality."B.C. Ferries' decision to award the contract to the Chinese state-owned shipyard has received national attention. Federal Transport Minister Chrystia Freeland said she was dismayed by the decision, especially in the face of China's "unjustified tariffs" on Canadian goods, including canola products, seafood and pork. Freeland also raised concerns about potential threats to security, including cybersecurity, with B.C. Transportation Minister Mike Farnworth. China has now imposed a new 75 per cent tariff on Canadian canola seed, which has renewed calls to cancel the ferry contract entirely. The federal Conservative Party and B.C. Conservatives have repeated calls for the federal or provincial government to step in and force B.C. Ferries to cancel the contract."When we're in a situation where a jurisdiction like China is intentionally damaging our agriculture sector, our aquaculture sector with these new tariffs … all these things that are very damaging to us here in British Columbia and to Canada, you don't turn around and reward them with a contract for a billion dollars plus to build ferries," said B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad. Dan Albas, a Conservative MP for Okanagan Lake West-South Kelowna who sits on the transport committee, says Canadians have a right to be concerned about the contract, especially in the face of new tariffs from China. He's calling for the $1 billion loan to B.C. Ferries from the Canada Infrastructure Bank to be rescinded. "The People's Republic of China, they subsidize their steel, they subsidize their shipbuilding practices. And yet here we have the Canadian infrastructure bank is further subsidizing with a billion-dollar loan those industries," Albas told CBC News. Eric McNeely, president of the B.C. Ferry and Marine Workers' Union, says he's not surprised by the issues raised in Davies' letter. "I think it really highlights that domestic shipbuilding wasn't factored in as a priority and there was a preference for the lowest sticker price," he said. "I think it is a real problem that a billion dollars of federal infrastructure bank money is earmarked to go to a hostile trading partner."The union launched a campaign called Build Them Here, which urges people to contact their MP and MLA to demand ferries be built in Canada. McNeely said at a time when Canada is fighting trade wars with the United States and China, it can't afford to send nearly $1 billion in public money overseas. B.C. Ferries has given no indication it's going to reverse course. "Nearly 80 per cent of our operating costs are funded directly by our customers, so every procurement decision must balance technical capability, quality, environmental standards, and cost to keep fares as affordable as possible," Groot said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Conservatives say the justice system favours non-citizens. Experts disagree
The Conservatives want to change the Criminal Code to eliminate what they say is a double standard in the justice system that allows non-citizens to get lighter sentences than Canadians who have been convicted of the same crime. "When it comes to sentencing non-citizens, Canada has essentially adopted a form of two-tier justice," Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said Wednesday in Ottawa. "This offends all principles of fairness that should be foundational to our justice system." Deportations are automatically scheduled to allow time for appeal, but certain criminal sentences remove the right of the offender to challenge their removal. "Removing non-citizens convicted of serious crimes is a no-brainer," Rempel Garner said. "Becoming a Canadian is a privilege, not a right." But immigration experts say the Conservatives' characterization of Canada's justice system as being biased in favour of non-citizens is simply false. They say the law is designed to ensure the sentence fits the crime, regardless of the offender's status. WATCH | Conservatives want judges to stop considering immigration status in sentencing: Rempel Garner said her party will introduce a private member's bill when the House of Commons returns in September, promising the change will "restore the value of Canadian citizenship." The bill "will expressly outline that any potential impact of a sentence on the immigration status of a convicted non-citizen offender, or that of their family members, should not be taken into consideration," the Conservative Party says in a statement. Rempel Garner's suggestion that Canada has "two-tier" sentencing provisions is, she said, the direct result of a 2013 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that clarified sentencing guidelines. One of several factors to consider In the ruling, Canada's top court said that when sentencing a non-citizen, a judge can use an offender's immigration status as one of several factors when considering what sentence to impose. "That's what judges do in sentencing. They take into account factors that are individual that are relevant; this is just one more of them," said Audrey Macklin, a law professor at the University of Toronto. Macklin said other factors commonly considered during sentencing are whether the offender has a substance abuse issue; whether they are a single parent and what will happen to their child; or the prospects that they can be rehabilitated. "Sentencing always takes into account factors unique or specific to that individual," she said. "It's a misrepresentation to suggest that this is two-tier justice." Macklin said the 2013 ruling also clarified that while immigration status can be considered, it could not be used to reduce the sentence below the standard minimum. Losing the right to appeal deportation Under the law in Canada, a person who has been ordered to be removed from the country cannot appeal their deportation order if: They were convicted of a crime in Canada and given a sentence of six months or more. They were convicted of a crime outside Canada punishable in Canada by a sentence of 10 years or more. They were involved in organized crime. They violated human or international rights law, by, for example, committing war crimes. Toronto immigration lawyer Pantea Jafari says she has argued similar cases. She told CBC News that the 2013 ruling was crafted to ensure the consequences of a sentence are proportional to what the judge intends. In a case where a judge may think someone has committed a minor offence and only deserves a slap on the wrist, Jafari said the judge may decide to give them a six-month sentence. For a Canadian citizen, the punishment would be six months in jail. But for a non-citizen, it could result in deportation without the ability to appeal. Jafari said the 2013 ruling simply gives the judge in her example the authority to lower the sentence to six months less a day so they can still appeal their deportation. She said this would ensure a citizen and non-citizen receive comparable sentences. "When [a judge] is considering a sentence, they can't be blind to the fact that this person is not a naturalized Canadian, is still an immigrant and therefore will have additional consequences as a result of the sentence," Jafari said. "To have [this provision] scrapped is really problematic and something that I would vigorously defend against."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SIU charges York Regional Police officer with sexual assault, breach of trust
Ontario's Special Investigations Unit says it has charged a male York Regional Police officer with sexual assault and breach of trust in connection with alleged incidents that reportedly happened in Vaughan over a year ago. In a news release on Wednesday, the SIU said its director, Joseph Martino, has "reasonable grounds" to believe that the officer committed criminal offences in December 2023. According to the SIU, it was notified by police on Feb. 7, 2024 of the alleged offences. The SIU then launched an investigation, which resulted in the two charges. The SIU did not say when the charges were laid. The release does not name the officer or list his rank. The SIU said the officer made his first court appearance in a Newmarket courtroom on June 24, 2025 and his next court appearance will be at the same courthouse on Sept. 16, 2025. The charges were not announced earlier out of concern for the alleged victim, the SIU added. "The SIU delayed this news release announcing the charges against the officer because of concerns raised about the potential impact on the complainant's mental health caused by public disclosure of the charges," the SIU said in the release. "Pursuant to section 33(2) of the Special Investigations Unit Act, 2019, the SIU is also omitting the official's name from this public notice because of concerns that disclosure of the name may result in the identification of the complainant." The SIU said it would not comment further on the investigation because the matter is before the courts and out of consideration of the "fair trial interests" of the accused. The SIU is an independent agency that investigates the conduct of police officers in incidents that may have resulted in death, serious injury, the discharge of a firearm or allegations of sexual assault.