logo
DY Chandrachud asked to vacate Delhi CJI bungalow: What are the rules?

DY Chandrachud asked to vacate Delhi CJI bungalow: What are the rules?

Hindustan Times12 hours ago
The Supreme Court administration has written to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) demanding the immediate repossession of Bungalow No. 5, Krishna Menon Marg in New Delhi, Hindustan Times reported earlier. Former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud continues to occupy the official CJI bungalow at Krishna Menon Marg in New Delhi, months after his retirement, prompting a formal request from the Supreme Court to vacate the residence.(HT Photo)
The property, officially designated as the residence for the serving Chief Justice of India (CJI), is currently occupied by former CJI DY Chandrachud, nearly eight months after his retirement in November 2024.
Why was DY Chandrachud asked to vacate
In its July 1 communication to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, cited in the HT report, the Supreme Court said that Chandrachud is to vacate the official CJI bungalow because the special permission granted to him and the maximum six-month period allowed under official rules had already expired.
'I am to request you to take the possession of Bungalow No. 5, Krishna Menon Marg, from Hon'ble Dr Justice DY Chandrachud without any further delay as not only the permission that was granted for retention... has expired on 31st May, 2025, but also the period of six months provided in Rule 3B of the 2022 Rules has expired on 10th May, 2025,' the top court's letter seen by HT read.
The July 1 letter also pointed out that Chandrachud had orally requested the CJI for permission to stay at the Type VIII Bungalow until May 31, 2025, after his retirement. The request was accepted with the condition that no further extension would be granted, as other newly elevated judges were either staying in guest houses or awaiting official accommodation.
The letter highlighted that the continued occupation of the bungalow went beyond both the approved timeframe and legal provisions.
What's the rule
According to Rule 3B of the Supreme Court Judges (Amendment) Rules, 2022, a retired Chief Justice is entitled to retain Type VII government accommodation (a level below the Krishna Menon Marg bungalow, which is Type VIII) for a maximum period of six months after demitting office.
The rule also states that a retired Chief Justice is entitled to retain a Type VII government residence for only six months post-retirement — a period that ended for Justice Chandrachud on May 10, 2025.
Though the rule allows only a Type VII bungalow, MoHUA made an exception, granting Chandrachud continued use of the Type VIII property from December 11, 2024, to April 30, 2025, at a nominal license fee of ₹5,430 per month.
Why was he overstaying
Justice Chandrachud attributed his extended stay to personal and logistical challenges, asserting that the Supreme Court administration was fully informed.
'I have already been allotted an accommodation by the government on rent, and that house is currently under renovation because it was shut for at least two years,' he said.
'I informed the Supreme Court about this allotment, making it clear I will shift the very next day that the house is ready.'
He further explained that his family situation required careful planning.
'I have two daughters with special needs, which is why it has taken me some time to look for a house appropriate for their needs,' he said.
'My daughters have severe comorbidities and genetic problems – particularly nemaline myopathy, for which they are being treated by specialists at AIIMS.'
Justice Chandrachud also cited an April 28 letter to then-CJI Sanjiv Khanna in which he requested an extension until June 30 while searching for suitable accommodation for his familial needs.
What the former CJI said
Justice Chandrachud said that the matter would be resolved shortly and reaffirmed his commitment to uphold the dignity of the office he once held.
'It is a matter of just a few days, and I will shift… I have occupied the highest judicial office and am completely cognisant of my responsibilities,' he said.
Justice Chandrachud maintained that the delay was not deliberate but necessitated by 'compelling personal circumstances,' which were transparently communicated to the court and the relevant authorities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel to issue 54,000 call-up notices to ultra-Orthodox students
Israel to issue 54,000 call-up notices to ultra-Orthodox students

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Israel to issue 54,000 call-up notices to ultra-Orthodox students

Israel's military said it would issue 54,000 call-up notices to ultra-Orthodox Jewish seminary students following a Supreme Court ruling mandating their conscription and amid growing pressure from reservists stretched by extended deployments. The Supreme Court ruling last year overturned a decades-old exemption for ultra-Orthodox students, a policy established when the community comprised a far smaller segment of the population than the 13% it represents today. Military service is compulsory for most Israeli Jews from the age of 18, lasting 24-32 months, with additional reserve duty in subsequent years. Members of Israel's 21% Arab population are mostly exempt, though some do serve. A statement by the military spokesperson confirmed the orders on Sunday just as local media reported legislative efforts by two ultra-Orthodox parties in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition to craft a compromise. The exemption issue has grown more contentious as Israel's armed forces in recent years have faced strains from simultaneous engagements with Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthis in Yemen, and Iran. Ultra-Orthodox leaders in Netanyahu's brittle coalition have voiced concerns that integrating seminary students into military units alongside secular Israelis, including women, could jeopardize their religious identity. The military statement promised to ensure conditions that respect the ultra-Orthodox way of life and to develop additional programmes to support their integration into the military. It said the notices would go out this month.

‘Will fight for people's rights,' says Delhi CM amid plan to move SC for overage vehicle ban review
‘Will fight for people's rights,' says Delhi CM amid plan to move SC for overage vehicle ban review

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

‘Will fight for people's rights,' says Delhi CM amid plan to move SC for overage vehicle ban review

The Delhi government is set to urge the Supreme Court to allow uniform rules on overage vehicles in the Capital in line with the rest of the country, Chief Minister Rekha Gupta said on Sunday. Asserting that the BJP government, during its four-month tenure in the Capital, has worked on several measures to curb pollution, the CM during a media briefing said, 'Just like we have requested the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to review its decision on overage vehicles, we will approach the Supreme Court to give a detailed overview of our preparation in the fight against pollution, and we will let the court know of public grievances. We will fight for the rights of people.' 'We want similar parameters in Delhi as the rest of the country. The government and administration will do their respective job. But people should not at inconvenienced,' she further added. This comes a day after Lieutenant Governor Vinai Kumar Saxena wrote a letter to the CM, asking the government to seek a review petition before the apex court against its 2018 order, which restricted petrol vehicles beyond 15 years and diesel vehicles beyond 10 years from plying in Delhi-NCR. 'How can a vehicle banned as unfit in Delhi run lawfully in other cities? This is against equal treatment,' the L-G stated. While addressing the media, the CM on Sunday said, 'When the CAQM had ordered that end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) would not be given petrol in the city… we were worried for Delhi at that time only,' the CM said while talking to the press. Attacking the previous governments, she added, 'The previous governments never worked on mitigating pollution. That was the reason why they were often slammed by the court. In the end, the court and the National Green Tribunal (NGT) had to take tough steps like this. But now things have changed.' A 2014 NGT order also prohibits the parking of vehicles aged over 15 years in public places. The CM referred to the letter written by Environment Minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa last week to the CAQM, where he stated that the Capital, at this time, cannot accommodate such a provision. 'The previous government did not prepare for enforcing such a rule. If this was enforced across NCR at the same time, that would have been different,' said Gupta, blaming the previous Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for not installing the ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras to keep a track of the ELVs. On Saturday, the L-G in his letter underlined that the move violates the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a central law. Under Section 59, only the central government can fix a vehicle's life span. The rule is applicable pan India, and does not allow different rules for different geographies, he said. Citing equality and socio-economic reasons, he underlined that such rules should be proportionate, non-arbitrary, and not solely based on a rigid age-based classification alone. He also said that the ban should be put on hold unless it is implemented across the NCR. He sought a comprehensive air pollution mitigation plan within three months. The L-G also stressed that he had received representations and calls from 'officials, concerned citizens, intelligentsia, environmental experts and public representatives' about challenges in implementing the fuel ban and 'its efficacy in abatement of air pollution'. Suggesting that the matter be taken up with the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, he said, 'There is also merit in the argument that defining EOL status based solely on the passage of time, without reference to a vehicle's mechanical fitness, emission performance, or usage, may not align with the broader legislative intent… A policy which does not distinguish between heavily polluting vehicles and well-maintained, low-use compliant vehicles, regardless of age, may also have disproportionate and regressive effects on the middle class and vehicle owners.' He also said that implementing the rule just in Delhi is inequitable. 'From a socio-economic standpoint, it is important to acknowledge that for people of the middle class, buying a vehicle is an investment of hard-earned life savings. It would be inherently inequitable to subject them, just because they are living in Delhi, to punitive measures of scrapping of their vehicles, merely on account of their residence within Delhi, particularly when the same vehicles remain lawful and roadworthy under identical statutory parameters in adjoining states… People in India have an emotional and sentimental attachment to vehicles that they have bought with their hard-earned money. It would be a travesty of justice to impound and scrap them even if they have run a few thousand kilometers and are perfectly maintained,' read the letter.

Caught in the Larousse trap
Caught in the Larousse trap

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Caught in the Larousse trap

America upsets people for various reasons today, though it's hard to resist the music, movies and much else. However, you can't help but approve of the American work ethic that made peanut farmers into Presidents (Jimmy Carter) and dirt-poor secretaries into glamorous magazine editors who defined a new way to be for working girls (Helen Gurley Brown). That's just two historical examples. Moreover, if you examine their upper class, the WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants), those 'Boston Brahmin' values were pretty sound, really. You had to study, you had to have accomplishments (in music, ballet, or foreign languages), and you had to be outdoorsy for body-mind balance. Besides wealth creation, you had to work on something that added to the sum of human knowledge; you had to support museums, universities, and good causes, grow gardens, and practise serious philanthropy. Most appealing, you had to practise thrift: use money for acquiring graces, not for showing off. An Austrian Jew who embodied these values was Justice Felix Frankfurter, a star of Harvard Law School, an advisor to President Franklin D Roosevelt, and a Supreme Court judge. I love his 'Advice to a Young Man Interested in Going to Law'; it's a life-bestowing mantra: 'No one can be a truly competent lawyer unless he is a cultivated man. If I were you, I would forget all about my technical preparation for law. The best way to prepare for the law is to come to the study of law as a well-read person. Thus alone can one acquire the capacity to use the English language on paper and in speech and with the habit of clear thinking, which only a truly liberal education can give. No less important for a lawyer is the cultivation of the imaginative faculties by reading poetry, seeing great paintings, in the original or in easily available reproductions, and listening to great music. Stock your mind with the deposit of much good reading and widen and deepen your feelings by experiencing vicariously as much as possible the wonderful mysteries of the universe and forget all about your career.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store