What are Leaving Cert reforms and why are teachers considering strike? – Everything you need to know amid union concerns
TEACHERS are considering industrial action in a bid to push the government to act on concerns about proposed reforms to the Leaving Certificate.
The final set of exams in secondary
3
Helen McEntee has insisted 'we all want these changes'
Credit: Tommy Clancy
3
TUI President David Waters addressed the TUI conference
Credit: Tommy Clancy
Critics have argued that sitting one final exam for a given subject is too much pressure for
This year, talks began between the Teacher's Union of Ireland and the
But
And the talks, which began just last week, are already proving controversial for some.
READ MORE IRISH NEWS
Here, we have outlined everything you need to know about the proposed changes, when they are due to come into effect and why teachers are prepared to strike over their concerns.
WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED REFORMS?
The changes that have been put forward would see a move away from the one final exam system that's currently in place.
Instead, students would be graded on continuous assessment across a period of time.
It means that they would complete a number of tests, oral exams, and projects throughout the school year to be judged on.
MOST READ ON THE IRISH SUN
The completed portfolio would then count for 40 per cent of the final grade.
Watch emotional moment Leaving Cert student gets offered college course only 20 people get in every year
And it would be graded, not by teachers, but by the State Examinations Commission.
A similar move was made in the junior cert cycle in 2022, in the hopes that students would be under less pressure in schools.
WHEN WILL LEAVING CERT CHANGES START?
The proposed reforms are set to come in stages, with students going into fifth year in 2025 being the first to experience the new system.
The first subjects to see the changes will be the
Not all subjects will immediately see the continuous assessment model.
In the years 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2029, four more subject groups will see the change until the model for every subject is continuous assessment.
WHY ARE TEACHERS CONSIDERING STRIKE?
Two separate teacher's groups have voted in favour of a motion to take industrial action if the outcome of ongoing talks are not deemed acceptable.
Both TUI and The Association of Secondary Teachers of Ireland have argued that the changes are being introduced too quickly.
They are concerned that there won't be proper resources or staff training in place by the time the changes come into effect.
Unions are also worried about
ASTI voted in favour of the emergency motion at their annual conference in Co
They had previously pleaded with Minister for Education Helen McEntee to postpone the changes for a year.
ASTI general secretary Kieran Christie said the minister's refusal to delay the move brought "dismay and disappointment".
And TUI President David Waters said the decision not to delay was "disappointing" and "a serious mistake".
WHAT HAS THE MINISTER SAID?
Minister for Education
She said that she plans to engage with unions to see what can be done to support teachers.
And she claimed that "we all want these changes".
McEntee said: "We all know that they're coming in for the reasons that I've outlined to benefit young people and my focus now, in the next few weeks, is to make sure that whatever further support I can provide, I'll do that."
WHEN WILL A DECISION BE MADE?
Talks are set to resume after school restarts following the two week long Easter holiday.
McEntee said she hopes the talks will be wrapped up "by early May".
She said: "So really, in a matter of weeks."
Although the focus for now is on the conferences, the threat of a strike could mean that the outcome gets delayed.
3
Teachers Unions have voted in favour of a motion to strike
Credit: Tommy Clancy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
McEntee: Difficult to find special class places in Dublin
The Minister for Education says there have been difficulties finding a place in a special class for some children in Dublin. Helen McEntee has been taking questions in the Dáil about the provision of classes for children with additional educational needs. She says that 399 special classes (287 Primary, 112 Post-Primary) have been sanctioned for the next school year - bringing to 3700 the number of special classes throughout the country. Just under 3,300 children have been identified by parents to the Department of Education since mid-February, she said. Close to 4,000 places are being made available nationwide. The Minister told Sinn Féin's Education spokesperson, Darren O'Rourke, that the vast majority of special classes had opened for enrollment. "Schools have now been informed of their SNA allocations for September," she said. She said there will be over 23,000 SNAs this September, the highest ever amount. Mr O'Rourke said he wanted to drill down into the headline figures, saying they had been iterated for some time. He asked about children who don't yet have an appropriate school place for September, and whether that figure was available today. Mr O'Rourke said that "last year we were notified at the start of September that 126 children didn't have a place." He pointed out that at a protest last Saturday, it was said that 60 children still didn't have a place. Minister McEntee said she'd been meeting with the National Council for Special Education and that as of yesterday, over 92% of children had been allocated a place. She said that outside of Dublin, many counties had either allocated a place or had "pathways to a place." "The challenge is with Dublin", the Minister said. She said that schools were working hard, but admitted that the need was greater than it ever had been before. "Where schools had been sanctioned and haven't opened, they're being engaged with." 10.33 Mr O'Rourke said he hoped the Minister would keep the Dáil updated on figures. He also mentioned four children in Sligo, five in Kerry and some in other areas who had yet to get a place. "Any child that's known to the NCSE, be it in Kerry or anywhere else, as far as I'm concerned, there are places biggest challenge is in Dublin."
Irish Examiner
16 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: Department must respect decisions from ASTI
As a post-primary teacher, I am writing to express my concern regarding the accelerated timeline of the senior cycle redevelopment programme. I strongly urge education minister Helen McEntee to pause this acceleration and not to penalise ASTI members who have voted overwhelmingly (68% to 32%, 73% turnout) to reject the senior cycle redevelopment implementation support measures. In a separate ballot, ASTI members also voted 67% to 33% in favour of industrial action if necessary. This is a powerful signal of the profession's genuine and widespread concern. ASTI's position is based on well-researched and well-documented realities. Many schools, especially Deis and smaller rural schools, currently lack the capacity and resourcing to deliver such wide-ranging changes effectively. Teachers are being asked to take on significantly increased workload without adequate training, time, or infrastructure. The risks of insufficient authentication of additional assessment components (AACs), challenges around AI, and inequality of provision are very real and have not been sufficiently addressed. The department of education's press release outlines several measures, but these do not address the core issues raised by teachers. Moreover, the decision to accelerate this reform by a full year under Ms McEntee's predecessor has created deep mistrust. Teachers were not consulted on this change of pace, which is being imposed on a system already under strain. The current approach risks harming the very students it is meant to serve. Science, in particular, is already under-resourced in many schools, and introducing new specifications under these conditions will result in a postcode lottery of educational quality. The minister needs to: Respect the clear democratic decision of ASTI members; refrain from using the public service agreement to force through measures without consensus; and restore the original timeline to allow genuine consultation and proper preparation across all schools. The minister stated a commitment to supporting students, but sustainable reform cannot be achieved without bringing teachers along. Rushing ahead risks creating deeper divisions, damaging morale, and ultimately harming educational outcomes. I appeal to Ms McEntee to act with leadership and wisdom and pause the timeline, re-engage with teachers, and deliver a reform process that will truly serve students, teachers, and the wider system. Michael McGrath, St Augustine's College, Abbeyside, Dungarvan, Co Waterford Housewife column hits nail on head Jennifer Horgan's article 'Being a homemaker is hard, even harder when it's no longer valued' is an excellent and compelling piece of journalism. As a male clinician who, over the years, has heard countless women say that their roles are unappreciated, I am acutely aware of how challenging being a homemaker is. I totally get where Ms Horgan is coming from. I believe she is correct in saying: 'Irish society knowingly exploits women. We need their duties, but just can't mention them.' I do believe that, for many women, being a homemaker is thankless in that it's never-ending. It offers no salary and is a profession in which many women sacrifice just about everything in order to provide a home and upkeep for their families. With more women working outside the home, there is an increased demand for daycare and early pre-schools — which is very exacting and demanding. Fewer women today are able to stay at home and care for their children as a result of the high cost of living. However, there are some women who are still able to remain full-time homemakers — thus providing an atmosphere for their families that is seldom seen anymore. It is my contention that raising children and being a housewife is one of the hardest jobs for any one person. I find Ms Horgan's summation to be somewhat poignant and heartbreaking yet true when she says: 'As with every type of oppression women endure, we see but we don't see. Such is our way.' In response to the same, I would like to see society recognise the valuable contributions of our homemakers as their worth is essential for the wellbeing of families and communities. Homemakers provide the foundation for stable and loving homes, which are crucial for child development and overall societal wellbeing. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Are we a nation of animal lovers? It's a peculiar fact that the first known attempt to legislate against animal cruelty anywhere in the world was here in Ireland. In 1635, a law was enacted to criminalise the practice of pulling wool off sheep (as distinct from shearing them) and the equally cruel custom of attaching ploughs to animals' tails. It has been argued that the law was motivated as much by a desire to raise revenue as by concern for the unfortunate animals, but it's still a milestone. It represented a first tentative step towards humane treatment of animals. And in the 19th century, Irish MP Richard Martin of Galway founded the world's first animal protection society, as well as campaigning against the 'sports' of bull-baiting and bear-baiting. With this remarkable record, it's all the more baffling and abhorrent that animal cruelty is so widespread in Ireland today. Abandoned horses can be found weekly, dead or dying of neglect or ill-treatment, in fields or on roadsides nationwide. An RTÉ report exposed the selling of unwanted racehorses that ended up in the EU food chain, and the merciless flogging of horses in an abattoir. Livestock raised on Irish farms are sent on long, stressful sea journeys, profit trumping any objections to their sad and lonely plight. Animal shelters are full to overflowing with dogs and cats, animals that once happily dwelt in homes, only to be ejected from the company of those they adored. We applaud when efforts are made to reintroduce a long absent species of wildlife, only to read a few weeks or months later that they've been blasted out of the sky or poisoned. Illegal poaching has worsened over the past five years, with farmers living in fear of hunters who trespass to kill wildlife. The badger, a shy nocturnal mammal, can end up being snared as part of the bovine TB eradication scheme, if it's lucky enough to have avoided the baiting gangs or the loss of habitat due to building projects. Even as State wildlife rangers struggle to contain poaching, a State licence facilitates the setting of dogs on our supposedly 'protected' native hares. Hare coursing is almost unknown outside Ireland. The countries that once permitted it have long since consigned it to oblivion, with the exception of Pakistan and Iberia. And we retain the quintessential British tradition of fox hunting, which Britain has outlawed, so that our wild dogs can still be chased to exhaustion and death for fun. Despite that promising start back in 1635, I'm afraid we can no longer consider ourselves a nation of animal lovers. To reclaim our humane status, we need to enforce existing anti-cruelty laws and end the savagery of hare coursing, fox hunting, and badger snaring. We can be a light to the world; instead of a hell on Earth for the voiceless. John Fitzgerald, Callan, Co Kilkenny Cork GAA must act to arrest downward spiral in football As a lifelong Cork GAA supporter, it is worrying to see the continuing downward spiral at all levels of Gaelic football. History was created recently with defeat to Kerry at U20 level for the fourth year in a row. Never before has this happened. The minor statistics are even worse. The senior team continues to flounder in Division 2 of the National Football League with little hope of promotion to Division 1. The standard of Cork club football is appalling. If we thought the late 1970s or early 1980s at inter-county level was bad, this is a new low masked by a couple of close encounters with the arch enemy, Kerry, in the last few years — not on Saturday, May 31, though. The question must be asked what if any kind of plans are in place to bring Cork football back to the top level where it should be for a county with the most football clubs in the country. Finally, let's hope the Cork senior hurlers finally reach the holy grail this year with Liam McCarthy Cup returning after a 20-year absence. Tom Harrington, Connaught Avenue, Cork
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Could AI end grind schools?
With ASTI's rejection of proposals for Leaving Certificate reforms, there is now a realistic possibility that Ireland will be one of the first countries to witness industrial action over the use of artificial intelligence in education. Even if this impasse is eventually resolved, this foregrounds the genuine need for a discussion of what role we want AI to play in our education system. At the moment, this debate in education is polarised and it's the worst type of polarised debate – one where both sides are correct. On one side, many teachers, rightly, are concerned about the potential for students to cheat with AI and the completely impossible responsibility placed on them to detect this. On the other, supporters of the reforms, also quite rightly, can point to the benefits of project-based assessment and how experience of using AI will be an increasingly valuable life-skill. Between the hype and the handwringing, there's a very basic truth about AI in education: it's not the Messiah, but it's also not simply a very naughty bot. For a real discussion of AI in education, we need three ingredients: the first is an honest examination of the problems we have in our education system; the second is an informed discussion about what AI can and can't do; and the third is the real involvement of teachers and students. This should all start from a principle of 'Responsible AI'. In academia, it's difficult to move without some conference, grant proposal or job-ad mentioning 'Responsible AI'. Though this has diluted the meaning of quite a complex idea, there's a straightforward way to think about it: AI should solve problems we actually have and not problems that Big Tech, or AI itself, thinks we might have. Grind schools So, let's start with a glaring problem in our education system in Ireland: grind schools. These schools dominate our education system, both financially and mentally. Financially, this "shadow education" was estimated by the ESRI at €60m. Mentally, our discourse is dominated by their notes, study tips and predictions (though I've yet to see an audit on these predictions). This is all the more flagrant during exam season. There are several problems with these schools and there's a need for increased regulation, especially in the online space: one online school was recently caught peddling outdated material as a predicted paper and editing their own reviews. The education gap Beyond this, however, we have to ask if we really want an education system where a school, The Institute of Education, can sell for close to €130m? This is in a context where other schools are faced with a need to employ unqualified teachers (13,540 at post-primary and primary level). Indeed, the shortage of teaching staff between advantaged and disadvantaged schools in Ireland is one of the biggest in OECD countries. This is a social and a political problem, which needs to be addressed at a structural level. However, AI can make a contribution here: by making some tasks more efficient for teachers and by spreading educational resources to all students. Teachers and AI Three months ago, I launched a free essay corrector for the Leaving Certificate. We now have 1500 teachers and 3000 Leaving Cert students on the platform. As an academic, I've seen how disastrous AI can be in the classroom when let loose. Yet that doesn't mean we can't find a place for AI; when built with teachers, it can help improve education, especially in under-resourced schools. In the last three months, I've been in contact with well-over 100 teachers. These conversations, almost universally, featured two emotions: confusion and enthusiasm. Confusion at the current status of AI in schools; uncertainty as to how they were expected to deal with AI; and stress at the fact that this seemed to be all down to the individual teacher to determine when, how and why AI should be used. Quite rightly, these concerns are part of the basis for ASTI's rejection of the Leaving Certificate reforms. But what has stood out more than the confusion is the genuine enthusiasm from teachers to build responsible AI for their classrooms. What the debate around the Leaving Cert reforms on AI might mask is the real interest from teachers in these tools. From the newly qualified to those with 30+ years under the belt, I now get emails every day which show a real curiosity to learn more about this technology and an investment in making it better. Dr Cillian O Fathaigh: 'AI should solve problems we actually have and not problems that Big Tech, or AI itself, thinks we might have.' Importantly, this makes the real role of AI in education clear: it is a tool. It's a very powerful tool, but it is not a replacement for the inspiration and personal connection of teachers. It won't solve all the structural problems of education inequality, but it can help make teachers' and students' lives better. This enthusiasm points to a need for our discussion around AI and the Leaving Cert reforms to go beyond settings limits and rules. We also need to find ways for teachers and students to positively engage with AI and to be involved in actively shaping these tools. Responsible AI, in the end, won't build itself. Dr Cillian Ó Fathaigh is is an Assistant Professor in Philosophy at the Jagiellonian University Kraków and a Visiting Research Fellow at King's College London. He currently leads a survey of AI teaching across 7 European universities. In March, he co-created a Leaving Cert essay corrector and AI exam coach. Read More Ireland's data centres now consume more than a fifth of national electricity
