Could AI end grind schools?
With ASTI's rejection of proposals for Leaving Certificate reforms, there is now a realistic possibility that Ireland will be one of the first countries to witness industrial action over the use of artificial intelligence in education.
Even if this impasse is eventually resolved, this foregrounds the genuine need for a discussion of what role we want AI to play in our education system. At the moment, this debate in education is polarised and it's the worst type of polarised debate – one where both sides are correct.
On one side, many teachers, rightly, are concerned about the potential for students to cheat with AI and the completely impossible responsibility placed on them to detect this. On the other, supporters of the reforms, also quite rightly, can point to the benefits of project-based assessment and how experience of using AI will be an increasingly valuable life-skill.
Between the hype and the handwringing, there's a very basic truth about AI in education: it's not the Messiah, but it's also not simply a very naughty bot.
For a real discussion of AI in education, we need three ingredients: the first is an honest examination of the problems we have in our education system; the second is an informed discussion about what AI can and can't do; and the third is the real involvement of teachers and students.
This should all start from a principle of 'Responsible AI'. In academia, it's difficult to move without some conference, grant proposal or job-ad mentioning 'Responsible AI'.
Though this has diluted the meaning of quite a complex idea, there's a straightforward way to think about it: AI should solve problems we actually have and not problems that Big Tech, or AI itself, thinks we might have.
Grind schools
So, let's start with a glaring problem in our education system in Ireland: grind schools. These schools dominate our education system, both financially and mentally. Financially, this "shadow education" was estimated by the ESRI at €60m.
Mentally, our discourse is dominated by their notes, study tips and predictions (though I've yet to see an audit on these predictions). This is all the more flagrant during exam season.
There are several problems with these schools and there's a need for increased regulation, especially in the online space: one online school was recently caught peddling outdated material as a predicted paper and editing their own reviews.
The education gap
Beyond this, however, we have to ask if we really want an education system where a school, The Institute of Education, can sell for close to €130m? This is in a context where other schools are faced with a need to employ unqualified teachers (13,540 at post-primary and primary level).
Indeed, the shortage of teaching staff between advantaged and disadvantaged schools in Ireland is one of the biggest in OECD countries. This is a social and a political problem, which needs to be addressed at a structural level.
However, AI can make a contribution here: by making some tasks more efficient for teachers and by spreading educational resources to all students.
Teachers and AI
Three months ago, I launched Pulc.AI: a free essay corrector for the Leaving Certificate. We now have 1500 teachers and 3000 Leaving Cert students on the platform.
As an academic, I've seen how disastrous AI can be in the classroom when let loose. Yet that doesn't mean we can't find a place for AI; when built with teachers, it can help improve education, especially in under-resourced schools.
In the last three months, I've been in contact with well-over 100 teachers. These conversations, almost universally, featured two emotions: confusion and enthusiasm.
Confusion at the current status of AI in schools; uncertainty as to how they were expected to deal with AI; and stress at the fact that this seemed to be all down to the individual teacher to determine when, how and why AI should be used.
Quite rightly, these concerns are part of the basis for ASTI's rejection of the Leaving Certificate reforms.
But what has stood out more than the confusion is the genuine enthusiasm from teachers to build responsible AI for their classrooms. What the debate around the Leaving Cert reforms on AI might mask is the real interest from teachers in these tools.
From the newly qualified to those with 30+ years under the belt, I now get emails every day which show a real curiosity to learn more about this technology and an investment in making it better.
Dr Cillian O Fathaigh: 'AI should solve problems we actually have and not problems that Big Tech, or AI itself, thinks we might have.'
Importantly, this makes the real role of AI in education clear: it is a tool. It's a very powerful tool, but it is not a replacement for the inspiration and personal connection of teachers. It won't solve all the structural problems of education inequality, but it can help make teachers' and students' lives better.
This enthusiasm points to a need for our discussion around AI and the Leaving Cert reforms to go beyond settings limits and rules. We also need to find ways for teachers and students to positively engage with AI and to be involved in actively shaping these tools. Responsible AI, in the end, won't build itself.
Dr Cillian Ó Fathaigh is is an Assistant Professor in Philosophy at the Jagiellonian University Kraków and a Visiting Research Fellow at King's College London. He currently leads a survey of AI teaching across 7 European universities. In March, he co-created www.pulc.ai: a Leaving Cert essay corrector and AI exam coach.
Read More
Ireland's data centres now consume more than a fifth of national electricity
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The numbers say we need private rental investment to address housing crisis
Some of our most challenging social and economic problems arise from the success of the economy . For example, if the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis had been much slower, there would have been fewer jobs to attract back emigrants, or skilled employees from round the world. The huge rise in employment since 2013, and the related rise in the population – up 8 per cent between 2016 and 2022 – has filled the government's tax coffers and raised living standards for all. However, it has put severe pressure on the housing market . We have yet to find a solution that will deliver the major increase in housing stock needed for a successful economy. Almost a decade ago, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) highlighted a need, at the time, to build 30,000 houses a year. We have averaged just two-thirds of that over the intervening period. READ MORE However, the ESRI also pointed to a funding gap. Unlike the madness of the 2000s, households are now constrained to borrow in a prudential fashion, limiting how many people could become homeowners. That has meant a substantial financial gap – one that, if 30,000 houses were to be built, could only be met by Government investment or by private investment in rental property. Last March's ESRI Quarterly Economic Commentary returned to the theme. Now, with the continuing success of the economy, there is a need to build at least 50,000 houses a year but it's likely that those who can afford to buy their own home will account for just a little more than half of these. The Government has also to fund a major increase in water and transport infrastructure to allow the expansion of the housing stock. [ Housebuilding in Dublin to stall within three years if wastewater plant not delivered Opens in new window ] Thus, without a massive increase in taxation, a prudent government can only finance, directly or indirectly, a minority of the required new builds. As a result, the private rental sector will be essential to fund a large chunk of the required new homes. Without willing institutional investors, we will have no prospect of solving the housing crisis. As noted yesterday by the Central Bank governor, this is not happening. The introduction of rent controls a decade ago has made it increasingly difficult to attract commercial investment. Potential returns on investment in Ireland have been lowered by rent caps, by uncertainty around planning, by building costs, and by politicised rent controls. Those who could fund the extra homes can choose to invest in other countries instead. The experience worldwide with rent controls is that they are good for existing tenants but that, over time, the supply of new apartments dries up as they cannot be financed, given the impact of rent controls on investor returns. The impact is exacerbated when population, and thus demand, is growing strongly. More than a century ago, as a wartime measure, Ireland introduced rent controls on unfurnished accommodation. My wife grew up in a rent-controlled house that her parents had moved into in 1941. However, over time, new supply of unfurnished rental accommodation vanished, and only furnished tenancies – outside the rent control system – became available. [ Explainer on rent changes: How will tenants be impacted by the plans for Ireland's rental market? Opens in new window ] Particularly as inflation took off in the 1970s, real rents in the controlled sector plummeted. This rent control was found unconstitutional in 1981. The latest proposals from the Government don't deal effectively with the challenge of encouraging private investment in homes to rent. Without private capital, there will continue to be a funding gap relative to the need, and ambition, for new homes. That means the housing crisis, caused by the gap between high demand and low supply, will continue. If we want to build 50,000 or more homes a year, rent for new lets should be unrestricted. For those currently protected, it would be traumatic to revert immediately to market rents so that a continuation of some restrictions on rents for existing protected tenants is warranted. Initially, if rent controls were ended for new builds, there would be little effect on protected tenants. However, rents on new builds could rise more rapidly than consumer prices. What would put a lid on ever-increasing rents would be the resulting supply response. If investors were convinced that by building lots of apartments they would get their money back, supply would, over time, increase to meet the needs of the economy, choking off any surge in rents. From the 1930s to the 1950s, in much more difficult economic circumstances, Ireland built tens of thousands of social homes, and ended the tenement scourge. Today's housing challenges are different, but we should have the know-how and the imagination to tackle this most urgent of social problems.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Letters to the Editor: Department must respect decisions from ASTI
As a post-primary teacher, I am writing to express my concern regarding the accelerated timeline of the senior cycle redevelopment programme. I strongly urge education minister Helen McEntee to pause this acceleration and not to penalise ASTI members who have voted overwhelmingly (68% to 32%, 73% turnout) to reject the senior cycle redevelopment implementation support measures. In a separate ballot, ASTI members also voted 67% to 33% in favour of industrial action if necessary. This is a powerful signal of the profession's genuine and widespread concern. ASTI's position is based on well-researched and well-documented realities. Many schools, especially Deis and smaller rural schools, currently lack the capacity and resourcing to deliver such wide-ranging changes effectively. Teachers are being asked to take on significantly increased workload without adequate training, time, or infrastructure. The risks of insufficient authentication of additional assessment components (AACs), challenges around AI, and inequality of provision are very real and have not been sufficiently addressed. The department of education's press release outlines several measures, but these do not address the core issues raised by teachers. Moreover, the decision to accelerate this reform by a full year under Ms McEntee's predecessor has created deep mistrust. Teachers were not consulted on this change of pace, which is being imposed on a system already under strain. The current approach risks harming the very students it is meant to serve. Science, in particular, is already under-resourced in many schools, and introducing new specifications under these conditions will result in a postcode lottery of educational quality. The minister needs to: Respect the clear democratic decision of ASTI members; refrain from using the public service agreement to force through measures without consensus; and restore the original timeline to allow genuine consultation and proper preparation across all schools. The minister stated a commitment to supporting students, but sustainable reform cannot be achieved without bringing teachers along. Rushing ahead risks creating deeper divisions, damaging morale, and ultimately harming educational outcomes. I appeal to Ms McEntee to act with leadership and wisdom and pause the timeline, re-engage with teachers, and deliver a reform process that will truly serve students, teachers, and the wider system. Michael McGrath, St Augustine's College, Abbeyside, Dungarvan, Co Waterford Housewife column hits nail on head Jennifer Horgan's article 'Being a homemaker is hard, even harder when it's no longer valued' is an excellent and compelling piece of journalism. As a male clinician who, over the years, has heard countless women say that their roles are unappreciated, I am acutely aware of how challenging being a homemaker is. I totally get where Ms Horgan is coming from. I believe she is correct in saying: 'Irish society knowingly exploits women. We need their duties, but just can't mention them.' I do believe that, for many women, being a homemaker is thankless in that it's never-ending. It offers no salary and is a profession in which many women sacrifice just about everything in order to provide a home and upkeep for their families. With more women working outside the home, there is an increased demand for daycare and early pre-schools — which is very exacting and demanding. Fewer women today are able to stay at home and care for their children as a result of the high cost of living. However, there are some women who are still able to remain full-time homemakers — thus providing an atmosphere for their families that is seldom seen anymore. It is my contention that raising children and being a housewife is one of the hardest jobs for any one person. I find Ms Horgan's summation to be somewhat poignant and heartbreaking yet true when she says: 'As with every type of oppression women endure, we see but we don't see. Such is our way.' In response to the same, I would like to see society recognise the valuable contributions of our homemakers as their worth is essential for the wellbeing of families and communities. Homemakers provide the foundation for stable and loving homes, which are crucial for child development and overall societal wellbeing. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Are we a nation of animal lovers? It's a peculiar fact that the first known attempt to legislate against animal cruelty anywhere in the world was here in Ireland. In 1635, a law was enacted to criminalise the practice of pulling wool off sheep (as distinct from shearing them) and the equally cruel custom of attaching ploughs to animals' tails. It has been argued that the law was motivated as much by a desire to raise revenue as by concern for the unfortunate animals, but it's still a milestone. It represented a first tentative step towards humane treatment of animals. And in the 19th century, Irish MP Richard Martin of Galway founded the world's first animal protection society, as well as campaigning against the 'sports' of bull-baiting and bear-baiting. With this remarkable record, it's all the more baffling and abhorrent that animal cruelty is so widespread in Ireland today. Abandoned horses can be found weekly, dead or dying of neglect or ill-treatment, in fields or on roadsides nationwide. An RTÉ report exposed the selling of unwanted racehorses that ended up in the EU food chain, and the merciless flogging of horses in an abattoir. Livestock raised on Irish farms are sent on long, stressful sea journeys, profit trumping any objections to their sad and lonely plight. Animal shelters are full to overflowing with dogs and cats, animals that once happily dwelt in homes, only to be ejected from the company of those they adored. We applaud when efforts are made to reintroduce a long absent species of wildlife, only to read a few weeks or months later that they've been blasted out of the sky or poisoned. Illegal poaching has worsened over the past five years, with farmers living in fear of hunters who trespass to kill wildlife. The badger, a shy nocturnal mammal, can end up being snared as part of the bovine TB eradication scheme, if it's lucky enough to have avoided the baiting gangs or the loss of habitat due to building projects. Even as State wildlife rangers struggle to contain poaching, a State licence facilitates the setting of dogs on our supposedly 'protected' native hares. Hare coursing is almost unknown outside Ireland. The countries that once permitted it have long since consigned it to oblivion, with the exception of Pakistan and Iberia. And we retain the quintessential British tradition of fox hunting, which Britain has outlawed, so that our wild dogs can still be chased to exhaustion and death for fun. Despite that promising start back in 1635, I'm afraid we can no longer consider ourselves a nation of animal lovers. To reclaim our humane status, we need to enforce existing anti-cruelty laws and end the savagery of hare coursing, fox hunting, and badger snaring. We can be a light to the world; instead of a hell on Earth for the voiceless. John Fitzgerald, Callan, Co Kilkenny Cork GAA must act to arrest downward spiral in football As a lifelong Cork GAA supporter, it is worrying to see the continuing downward spiral at all levels of Gaelic football. History was created recently with defeat to Kerry at U20 level for the fourth year in a row. Never before has this happened. The minor statistics are even worse. The senior team continues to flounder in Division 2 of the National Football League with little hope of promotion to Division 1. The standard of Cork club football is appalling. If we thought the late 1970s or early 1980s at inter-county level was bad, this is a new low masked by a couple of close encounters with the arch enemy, Kerry, in the last few years — not on Saturday, May 31, though. The question must be asked what if any kind of plans are in place to bring Cork football back to the top level where it should be for a county with the most football clubs in the country. Finally, let's hope the Cork senior hurlers finally reach the holy grail this year with Liam McCarthy Cup returning after a 20-year absence. Tom Harrington, Connaught Avenue, Cork
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
'Accessible' Leaving Cert history exam will have left some students 'bitterly disappointed'
Students who were hoping to see Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott appear on this year's Leaving Cert history will be 'bitterly disappointed' with an otherwise accessible exam. The Leaving Cert 2025 exams continued on Wednesday afternoon with history. This year's higher level paper, which requires students to tackle one document-based question as well as three essay-style questions, was 'accessible', according to ASTI subject spokesman Philip Irwin. "I thought it was a good paper for students.' In particular, he liked this year's documents question, which focused on the Jarrow March of 1936. 'That was one of three case studies in the dictatorship and democracy in Europe section. The other two are the show trials in Stalin's Russia, which came up last year, and the Nuremberg rallies," Mr Irwin said. 'I would suspect that students were more looking for the Nuremberg rallies [to appear on the exam].' The sources supplied in the question were good, he added. This included a government statement issued at the time, and the other an extract from a newspaper report about the Jarrow March. 'The questions on it were also good, with one asking students to compare and contrast the documents. It was an interesting question overall, and I think that students would have found it accessible and doable. The Irish history section included some good general questions, but students may have found a question on Éamon de Valera's leadership more challenging, he added. Students were asked to discuss how effective his leadership was during the Treaty negotiations, Civil War, and during the Second World War. 'Quite a bit to deal with there, sometimes those questions are either or, so that was more challenging.' Another challenging question appeared in the US history section, which asked students to discuss how and why religion became an increasingly powerful force in American life between 1945 to 1989. Many students will have been surprised not to see questions on Charles Stewart Parnell or the Montgomery Bus Boycott appear on the higher-level paper, according to teacher and Studyclix subject spokesman Jamie Dockery. 'Those who placed all their bets on these topics, undoubtedly a sizeable number, will be bitterly disappointed," Mr Dockery said. However, there was much to be pleased with in this paper. The ordinary level paper should also have been generally well received by students and teachers, Mr Dockery added. The Jarrow March was also the focus of the documents question, he added. 'I very much welcome the higher and ordinary level exam having similar questions, particularly considering that the average senior history groups will have higher and ordinary Level students learning together in the one class.' "Many of the main personalities from Irish history found their way into the exam, he added. This including O'Connell, Yeats, Cosgrave and de Valera. 'Women will also well represented in the guise of Hanna Sheehy-Skeffington and Countess Markievicz and Maureen O'Hara, among others. "As a history teacher, my hope for any exams is that it will give the diligent and hardworking student a chance to show off all they know, and this exam certainly did that.' Read More Tough French comprehension exam challenges Leaving Cert students
