Exclusive-Trump administration memo urges countries to reject plastic production caps in UN Treaty
GENEVA/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States has sent letters to at least a handful of countries urging them to reject the goal of a global pact that includes limits on plastic production and plastic chemical additives at the start of U.N. plastic treaty talks in Geneva, according to a memo and communications seen by Reuters.
In the communications dated July 25 and circulated to countries at the start of negotiations on Monday, the U.S. laid out its red lines for negotiations that put it in direct opposition to over 100 countries that have supported those measures.
Hopes for a "last-chance" ambitious global treaty that tackles the full life cycle of plastic pollution from the production of polymers to the disposal of waste have dimmed as delegates gather for what was intended to be the final round of negotiations.
Significant divisions remain between oil-producing countries— who oppose caps on virgin plastic production fueled by petroleum, coal, and gas — and parties such as the European Union and small island states, which advocate for limits, as well as stronger management of plastic products and hazardous chemicals.
The U.S. delegation, led by career State Department officials who had represented the Biden administration, sent memos to countries laying out its position and saying it will not agree to a treaty that tackles the upstream of plastic pollution.
"We will not support impractical global approaches such as plastic production targets or bans and restrictions on plastic additives or plastic products - that will increase the costs of all plastic products that are used throughout our daily lives," said the memo Reuters understands was sent to countries who could not be named due to sensitivities around the negotiations.
NAIROBI MEETING
The U.S. acknowledged in the memo that after attending a preliminary heads of delegation meeting in Nairobi from June 30 to July 2, "we plainly do not see convergence on provisions related to the supply of plastic, plastic production, plastic additives or global bans and restrictions on products and chemicals, also known as the global list".
A State Department spokesperson told Reuters each Party should take measures according to its national context.
"Some countries may choose to undertake bans, while others may want to focus on improved collection and recycling," the spokesperson said.
John Hocevar, Oceans Campaign Director for Greenpeace USA, said the U.S. delegation's tactics under Trump marked a "return to old school bullying from the U.S. Government trying to use its financial prowess to convince governments to change their position in a way that benefits what the U.S. wants".
One of the world's leading producers of plastics, the U.S. has also proposed revising the draft objective of the treaty to reduce plastic pollution by eliminating a reference to an agreed "approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastics", in a proposed resolution seen by Reuters.
A source familiar with the negotiations told Reuters it indicated that the U.S. is seeking to roll back language that had been agreed in 2022 to renegotiate the mandate for the Treaty.
The U.S. stance broadly aligns with the positions laid out by the global petrochemicals industry, which stated similar positions ahead of the talks, and a number of powerful oil and petrochemical producer countries that have held this position throughout the negotiations.
Over 100 countries have backed a cap on global plastic production.
In the U.S., the Trump administration has numerous measures to roll back climate and environmental policies that it says place too many burdens on industry.
Plastic production is set to triple by 2060 without intervention, choking oceans, harming human health and accelerating climate change, according to the OECD.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
More than 20 arrested in DC on day one of Trump's crime crackdown
Fox News' David Spunt reports the latest on President Donald Trump's crackdown on crime in D.C. 'Fox & Friends Weekend' co-host Charlie Hurt also weighs in on the push for law and order in the nation's capital.

Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scott Bessent floats rolling out export tax to more industries
US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent has raised the prospect of the White House rolling out the unprecedented revenue-sharing agreement it
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas could lose political clout in census that would exclude undocumented immigrants
"Texas could lose political clout under Trump's call for a new census that excludes undocumented immigrants" was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization. WASHINGTON — As Texas moves to redraw its congressional map at the behest of President Donald Trump, the White House is pushing ahead on another proposal to safeguard GOP power in Washington that could have major implications for Texas. Last week, Trump said he had ordered the Commerce Department to start working on a new census that does not count undocumented immigrants. Excluding 'people who are in our Country illegally,' as Trump declared on social media, would fulfill a longtime conservative priority and mark a reversal from the longstanding practice of counting all people residing in the United States, legally or not, in the once-a-decade headcount. With an estimated 1.7 million undocumented immigrants living in Texas, the move could have major ramifications for the state's political sway. One of the main motivations for White House officials in pushing forward a new census is the potential to reallocate political power, including Electoral College votes, from Democrat-dominated states to ones controlled by Republicans, according to two people with knowledge of the effort who were granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations they were not authorized to publicly speak about. The White House also sees a new census as an opportunity to correct an overcount of people in predominantly blue states from the 2020 census, which they argue gave too much political power to Democratic strongholds. The push comes as Texas' GOP-controlled Legislature is attempting to overhaul the state's congressional lines to net Republicans up to five more seats — a process left in limbo by Democratic lawmakers' departure from the state. Blue states — including California, New York and Illinois — have threatened to retaliate by crafting new districts of their own that would kick Republican lawmakers out of power. Trump's census proposal is all but certain to face constitutional challenges and logistical hurdles, and it would require cooperation from the U.S. Census Bureau and its staff of largely apolitical career civil servants. But in his seven months in office, Trump has shown an unparalleled ability to bend the levers of power to his will and push the norms that have restrained previous presidencies. How does the census determine political power? Planning a national census is a yearslong process that typically happens once per decade, generating population and demographic data that is used to determine how billions of federal dollars are allocated and how many seats each state gets in Congress. States receive the number of districts that correspond to their total population, so that the more people living in a state, the more representatives they get to send to the U.S. House. The census headcount also dictates each state's footprint in the Electoral College, which is used to decide presidential elections and is based on how many House members a state elects, plus their two senators. Texas, for example, has two senators and 38 House members, giving it a whopping 40 Electoral College votes. This distribution has long been based on the total number of people living in a given state, irrespective of citizenship. Under the Trump-backed proposal, only those residing in the country legally would be counted. Such a change would have ripple effects across the nation. States with higher undocumented populations could see some of their congressional districts redistributed to states with fewer undocumented residents. It's not immediately clear how this would change the country's political balance. California, Texas, New York and Florida — a mix of red and blue states — are among those with the highest number of unauthorized immigrants, according to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank. Texas comes in at No. 2 behind California, with 1.7 million undocumented immigrants as of 2019, according to the think tank's estimates. Red states that are home to a disproportionate number of undocumented immigrants, like Texas and Florida, could see a decrease in their counted population, thwarting their political power and throwing a wrench in Republicans' plans, some experts believe. 'I don't understand how illuminating them is going to be advantageous to Republicans,' said Jennifer Van Hook, a sociology and demography professor at Pennsylvania State University. But blue states, most notably California and New York, have seen a population exodus in recent years, primarily to Republican-controlled states. The Democrats' top redistricting organization, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, has said it expects to see California, New York, Illinois, Rhode Island and other blue states lose seats under the traditional apportionment that will follow the 2030 census. Meanwhile, Texas, Florida, Arizona and Georgia could add districts thanks to their massive population growth, the NDRC predicts, noting that Texas could see a three-seat pickup. Republicans are betting population increases in red states with large undocumented populations would outweigh the losses they can expect by not counting those undocumented residents. Referring to an overcount of some Democratic states in the 2020 census, Vice President JD Vance asserted that if the Trump administration conducted a new census, 'you'd have 10 additional Republican seats and 9 fewer Democrat seats,' forecasting states like Ohio and Florida could gain political clout. But not everyone is convinced a new census that omits undocumented residents would benefit one party over the other. Robert Warren, a demographer at the Center for Migration Studies, created hypothetical electoral maps for each census dating back to 1980 that did not count undocumented immigrants. His research found that excluding the undocumented population had little to no effect on how congressional districts are doled out. 'It wouldn't shift enough seats to make any difference, and that's been true for five straight censuses,' he said in an interview with The Tribune. Constitutional and procedural concerns Paul Mitchell, a redistricting expert working in California Democratic politics, believes that not counting all people who live in a particular state runs afoul of the 14th Amendment, which requires House seats to be allocated based on the 'whole number of persons in each state.' 'The Constitution very clearly says that apportionment is determined by the number of people, not citizens,' he said. If Trump's plan is carried out, it is all but certain to face legal challenges. Trump's firing of the head of Bureau of Labor Statistics over poor job numbers he claimed were inaccurate has disturbed some demography experts, who worry about what it portends for the accuracy of any census data obtained through atypical means. The president's announcement said the new data would be calculated from 'modern day facts and figures,' including 'information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024.' While it remains unclear exactly how this would work, Van Hook said there's been a fast-growing push to carry out an 'administrative record census.' This new type of count would use data from other federal agencies — such as tax records, Medicare records and other government databases — to create a model of the nation without a full-fledged census survey. But these databases are complex and incomplete, potentially proving inaccurate. An administrative records census could 'leave out a lot of people who are not in official record systems,' Van Hook said, including undocumented immigrants and 'people who don't really want to be found.' Even if the accuracy met census standards, carrying out such a complex new project could prove difficult before the 2028 election. 'The Census Bureau is a giant aircraft carrier, and they have to turn everything around, and it takes them months and months and months and months to do that,' Van Hook said. 'It doesn't seem plausible.' Some legislation has been proposed to ameliorate the concerns, or at least lay the legal groundwork for an unconventional quick-turn census. A bill by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, would require a revamp of the census before the 2026 elections. It would also give the bureau latitude to obtain the data through any method approved by the commerce secretary, 'including the use of sampling procedures and special surveys.' Another proposal, the 'Equal Representation Act,' would implement a citizenship question on the 2030 census and exclude non-citizens from being counted in the apportionment of House seats and Electoral College votes. A version of the bill passed the House last year with broad support from Texas Republicans but failed to advance in the Senate. This article originally appeared on Corpus Christi Caller Times: Texas could lose clout in census that would exclude undocumented people