logo
If So Many People Have ADHD, Is It Really A Disorder?

If So Many People Have ADHD, Is It Really A Disorder?

Yahoo28-01-2025

Over the past few years, an increasing number of adults are getting ADHD diagnoses. Some seek out diagnosis and treatment for themselves after helping a child through the process. Others start to wonder about the possibility after seeing themselves reflected in stories shared on social media. In many cases, an official diagnosis comes as a relief after years of feeling like they just couldn't keep up, no matter how hard they tried. It offers an explanation for this struggle and opens the door to pharmacological help.
In 2022, 11.4% of children ages 3-17 had an ADHD diagnosis, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This represents 7 million children, with an increase of 1 million since 2016.
This means that more than 1 in 10 people will struggle with ADHD at some point in their lives. If ADHD is so common, does it really make sense anymore to call it a disorder (a stance some experts support)? Or could it be a part of normal human variation?
While most of us will find at least some of our own behaviors reflected in the diagnostic criteria for ADHD — who among us doesn't get distracted or try to avoid a difficult, tedious task? — this doesn't mean the struggles of folks who do have a diagnosis aren't real.
There are 'many contributing factors' leading to the spike in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnoses in recent years, Dr. Ralph Lewis, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, told HuffPost. These include: the spread of information on social media and online; pharmaceutical marketing interests; changes to diagnostic criteria; increased attentional demands on both students and workers; the way the pandemic brought struggles with attention to a head for many people; the availability of school and workplace accommodations; and the destigmatization of mental health issues, Lewis explained.
It's a confluence of an increased awareness of what the symptoms are and changes to our modern lifestyle that are bringing these symptoms to light.
In recent years, the people most frequently getting diagnosed are adults, and many of them are women whose symptoms may have been overlooked when they were younger because they did not fit the stereotypical profile of a boy who cannot sit still during class.
While increasing awareness, in part due to people talking about their experiences with ADHD on social media, has led to less stigmatization of the condition, this phenomenon also has its downside. One study published in 2022 analyzed popular TikTok videos about ADHD and found that 52% of the videos, most of which were not created by healthcare providers, qualified as 'misleading.'
The term 'executive function' refers to the way that people are able to 'set goals, plan and get things done,' according to Understood.org, an organization that advocates for people with learning and thinking differences, such as ADHD and dyslexia. Executive function is what allows you to break a big task into smaller components and decide in which order to tackle them. On the other hand, if you're left paralyzed and unable to approach a task because you can't figure out where to begin, faltering executive function may be your problem.
As challenges to executive function increase over the years, either in school or in a changing workplace, a person may find that they are no longer able to manage these challengeson their own, explained Sharon Saline, a psychologist who specializes in treating people with ADHD.
'There's a lot of distractions in our lives,' Saline told HuffPost, noting that our digitally connected lives stretch executive functioning to its limit.
'We all have executive functioning strengths and challenges,' she continued. 'For people with ADHD, those challenges are more numerous and more intense than they are for people who don't have ADHD, and ... those challenges are really impeding their ability to live their lives in ways that express who they are, their interests, [and] to manage the tasks of daily living effectively.'
An ADHD diagnosis is about having certain symptoms and also about the degree to which these symptoms impact a person's life.
Saline said that she believes the categories of mild, moderate and severe ADHD can be useful when gauging the intensity or disruptiveness of a patient's symptoms. 'People who have severe ADHD really struggle with the tasks of daily functioning and fulfilling responsibilities, paying bills on time [and] remembering appointments,' she said. They may also struggle with emotional dysregulation, Saline noted.
Lewis suggested thinking about the distribution of executive functioning skills on a bell curve — 'the graph that defines most human traits' — both behavioral and physical, from IQ to height to blood pressure.
'We're thinking about the entire population of humans, wherein some folks have a long attention span and quite strong executive function, and some have a short attention span or relatively weaker executive function,' he said. 'Most folks are in between the bulge of the bell curve.'
People who have ADHD, Lewis said, would represent about 10% of the population — those with the most difficulties around executive function. In a classroom of 30 students, you would expect about three of them to fall into this range, for example.
When someone receives a diagnosis of ADHD, that has to do with where we draw that line, Lewis explained. (He did note in a small number of cases that ADHD is caused by a genetic disorder, however.) It also means there are others right next to that line on both sides.
'Once you reconceptualize any disorder on a continuum, you will always run into this problem of the boundary cases, and it's a broad swath of that curve, that gray, fuzzy boundary zone. Is a diagnosis warranted or not?' he said.
This is where a clinician's judgment comes into play, and it also explains how a person might fall on different sides of the line depending on which grade they're in, how their classroom is set up or what line of work they go into.
Although he treats patients who have ADHD, Lewis explained that he has come to view it as more of a disadvantage than a disorder. He also thinks of medication, which for ADHD usually means a stimulant, as a performance enhancer.
It's 'helping that person to be less disadvantaged, more focused, more within the average range like their peers for those hours when they're needing to perform a very focused task, sitting in class or doing homework, or a focused type of work in your occupation,' he said.
However, Saline pointed out that a provider's reasons for prescribing medication will be different from one patient to the next. For instance, she noted that some children with autism who do not meet the full criteria for ADHD nevertheless respond well to medication, and that the same can be true for some patients who have experienced trauma.
We can think of ADHD as a disadvantage in our attention-demanding society in the way that being short might be a disadvantage in a world designed for tall people, Lewis explained. Those of us on the lower end of the height curve would need some sort of support, like shoe boosters, to help us accommodate for our disadvantage, in the same way that people with ADHD use stimulant medication to help them navigate the world as it's set up now.
'We have created an environment that favors people with high executive function and disadvantages people with low executive function in many, if not most, occupations and school environments,' Lewis said, noting that our Paleolithic ancestors may have benefited from being low executive functioning in a way that made them 'novelty-seeking hunters.'
There is another option, of course. Knowing that a good number of people are struggling, we could redesign the world to accommodate a wider range of executive functioning capabilities.
Because we all rely on executive function, Saline said that 'executive functioning skills need to be taught right along academic skills' for the benefit of every student.
Students can learn to work through the instinct to procrastinate by breaking a task down into smaller steps, for example. They can also be explicitly taught how to organize and prioritize.
'These are all things that are worth teaching all kinds of learners,' Saline said.
'The last executive functioning skill to develop is metacognition,' she added, which is a type of self-awareness. This can encompass things like teaching kids to think before they speak, and also encouraging awareness of themselves as thinkers and learners.
For example, Saline said that educators can help kids understand things like, 'What happens when I lose focus? What leads me to lose focus? How do I come back to my task? Do I like to do something easy first and warm up, and then take the hard task? Or do I like to get the hard thing out of the way and then maybe do something that's medium and then finish with something easy when I'm tired?' Learning the answers to these questions can help kids gain the kind of executive function skills they need to successfully tackle a night's homework load, a big social studies project, and, eventually, a load of college courses.
Sometimes, teachers will feel that there isn't time to insert this kind of learning when they are required to get through so much curriculum. But Saline believes that teaching executive function skills lays the foundation for everything else.
'Ideally we want kids to be more self-reliant,' she said, adding that these skills 'are good for anybody, but they're essential — they're lifesavers for people with ADHD. It's a matter of degree.'
7 Sneaky Signs Of ADHD In Women
We Have ADHD. These Are The Apps We Swear By.
12 Things Not To Say To Someone Who Has ADHD

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices
Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Federal cuts force families to make difficult, and potentially deadly, choices

A mother rushes into the emergency department cradling her 6-month-old baby. He is lethargic, seizing and in critical condition. The cause? Severely low sodium levels in his blood — a result of formula diluted with extra water to make it last longer. With grocery prices climbing and her SNAP benefits running out before the end of the month, she felt she had no other choice. This story is not an outlier. Pediatric clinicians across Wisconsin are seeing the real and devastating consequences of policies that fail to prioritize the health and well-being of children and families. And now, the situation could get worse. The Trump Administration's proposed 'skinny' budget for Fiscal Year 2026 includes deep and dangerous cuts to federal programs that form the backbone of public health in our communities. These proposed reductions include: $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health – stalling critical pediatric research and innovation $3.5 billion from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – compromising disease surveillance, immunization programs, and emergency response efforts $1.73 billion from the Health Resources and Services Administration – cutting access to essential primary and preventive care services for children and families $674 million from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services – threatening the Medicaid and CHIP programs that provide health coverage to nearly half of Wisconsin's children. Opinion: We asked readers about wake boats on Wisconsin lakes. Here's what you said. And as if that weren't enough, further reductions to SNAP and other nutrition support programs are also on the table. These aren't just numbers on a spreadsheet. These are lifelines. Vital services that help children survive and thrive. When families can't afford formula, when clinics lose funding for immunization programs, when children lose health coverage, the consequences are immediate and, in many cases, irreversible. As front-line providers, we witness this every day. We can do better. Our federal budget is a reflection of our national values. It should not balance its books on the backs of our youngest and most vulnerable. I implore Wisconsin's elected officials to reject this harmful budget proposal. Think of that infant in the emergency room. Think of the thousands of other children across our state whose health and future depend on robust public health infrastructure, access to care, and support for families in need. We urge lawmakers to work toward a bipartisan budget that invests in children, strengthens public health, and protects the building blocks of a healthy society. Wisconsin's children deserve every opportunity to grow up healthy and strong. Our chapter of the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners stands ready to partner in this effort. Let's move forward — not backward — when it comes to the health of our children. Christine Schindler is a critical care pediatric nurse practitioner at Children's WI, a clinical professor at Marquette University, and the President of the Wisconsin Chapter of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. She has been caring for critically ill and injured children for almost 30 years. All opinions expressed are her own. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Trump budget jeopardizes health of American children | Opinion

The potential benefits of the ‘Japanese walking' workout which fans claim is better than 10,000 steps a day
The potential benefits of the ‘Japanese walking' workout which fans claim is better than 10,000 steps a day

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The potential benefits of the ‘Japanese walking' workout which fans claim is better than 10,000 steps a day

There have been numerous walking workout trends that have circled social media in recent years. It's no wonder—walking has numerous benefits, including reducing heart disease risk, strengthening your joints and heart, boosting your mood, and potentially helping you live longer. The latest trend making the rounds across TikTok and Instagram is known as 'Japanese walking,' and one creator claims that in just 30 minutes, you'll get 10 times the benefits of hitting 10,000 steps a day. The workout originates from a 2007 study based in Japan where 246 participants were divided into three groups: no walking, moderate-intensity continuous walking (walking at a moderate effort and taking at least 8,000 steps per day four or more days per week), and high-intensity interval walking. The third group, doing the high-intensity intervals, were instructed to walk slowly for three minutes, then walk quickly at a hard effort for three minutes, and repeat five or more times for four or more days per week. The researchers discovered that this group experienced noticeable improvements in strength, endurance, and decreased blood pressure, more so than the moderate-intensity continuous walking group. This workout is what's now become known as 'Japanese walking.' Another study from 2018 observed participants who did this exact walking workout over the course of 10 years. They found that those who kept up with the workout for the duration of the study experienced a 20% improvement in their leg strength, and a 40% improvement in their peak exercise capacity. The researchers concluded that those participants had protected against age-associated declines in physical fitness. Even those who weren't able to maintain the workout for the full 10 years had those improvements partially preserved. Since you're getting your heart rate up during the harder walking intervals, your body gets the benefit of more moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity each week for most adults, or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity—and pushing the walking pace every so often could help you reach that target. Additionally, research shows that moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity is associated with lower risk of early mortality and improved cardiorespiratory fitness. For the higher-intensity intervals, your heart rate should be elevated to the point where you're just starting to feel out of breath, but not at your maximum effort. The researchers consider this 70% of your max effort capability. Meanwhile, the lower-intensity walking should be an easy effort, where talking is still comfortable. Alternate walking at each intensity for three minutes until you reach 30 minutes. Incorporate this workout in your routine four times per week. For more on walking: Walking is a super exercise. The truth about the number of steps you really need, and maximizing the benefits Walking faster may help you live longer. Experts say to aim for this pace Walking more could add as much as 11 years to your life, study says. Here's how This story was originally featured on

The Bulletin June 4, 2025
The Bulletin June 4, 2025

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

The Bulletin June 4, 2025

The rundown: Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. Here's how. Why it matters: Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Read more in-depth coverage: Health Experts Call Out RFK Jr. Policy Changes: 'New Inconsistency Every Day' TL/DR: Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. What happens now? Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. Deeper reading Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store