Eskom to pay R1 billion penalty over Koeberg steam generator dispute
Image: Supplied
Power utility Eskom must pay French nuclear power company Framatome nearly R1 billion in a contractual dispute over the replacement of steam generators at the Koeberg Nuclear Power Station.
Eskom hauled the company formerly known as Areva to the Western Cape High Court to challenge adjudicator Peter Ramsden's decisions on the merits and the quantum delivered in December 2022 and March 2023, respectively.
The entity's contention was that both decisions were beyond his jurisdiction and failed to apply the rules of natural justice.
Eskom complained that Ramsden failed to take into account its submissions, issue a reasoned decision and decide the issues that he was required to decide.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In addition, Eskom stated that the adjudicator failed to receive and take into account its response to Framatome's amended claim as well as its submissions when determining the quantum.
Eskom was also unhappy that the adjudicator accepted the amounts in the company's amended claim without having enquired into the supporting documents or the details of the claim, failed to issue a reasoned decision and/or follow the procedure he laid down by himself.
The dispute dates back to 2014 when the parties concluded an agreement to replace the steam generators at Koeberg.
In terms of the contract, Framatome work included the supply and installation of two sets of three replacement steam generators, with one set to be installed in each of the reactor buildings at units one and two at Koeberg during their separate planned outages.
The work of replacing the steam generators can only be performed during maintenance and refuelling outages when the power station is offline and the outages are planned in advance and around Eskom's operational requirements.
Eskom had scheduled the outage dates and planned to replace the steam generators but then twice postponed for a later date.
The power utility then informed Framatome that it would not be continuing with the steam generator replacement work during one of the outages.
However, the company notified Eskom of an event which required it to notify the power supplier of such an event and that it required compensation after the postponement. This was acknowledged by the project manager.
Eskom then unsuccessfully approached the adjudicator, claiming that both decisions were unenforceable as contractual obligations and need not be complied with as he exceeded his powers.
It later filed an application for several declarators, which acting Judge Renata Williams dismissed with costs on Thursday.
Framatome succeeded in its counter-application and Eskom was ordered to pay the company €35,288,582 (about R729 million) exclusive of value-added tax (VAT) and subject to the price adjustment for inflation pursuant to secondary option clause of the contract.
Payment is also pursuant to certain clauses of the contract, interest thereon calculated at the London Interbank Offered Rate applicable at the time for amounts due in other currencies
Additionally, Eskom must pay Framatome more than R256.6m exclusive of VAT and subject to the price adjustment for inflation pursuant to secondary option clause of the contract and pursuant to certain clauses including interest.
The power utility was also ordered to pay the costs of Framatome's counter application including the costs of the company's France-based attorneys.
'There is no basis to set aside the decisions of the adjudicator which are valid and binding. In terms of the parties' contract Eskom was obliged to comply therewith,' acting Judge Williams ruled.
Eskom spokesperson Daphney Mokwena did not respond to requests for comment on Saturday.
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Bye bye MultiChoice: R53 billion takeover by French media giant Canal+ approved
French media giant Canal+ has received regulatory approval from South Africa's Competition Tribunal to proceed with its multibillion-rand takeover of MultiChoice, paving the way for one of the most significant media mergers on the African continent. The deal, valued at around R53 billion, will see Canal+ acquire full control of MultiChoice, best known for its DStv and Showmax platforms. While the approval from the Competition Tribunal is a major milestone, the merger still needs clearance from other regulatory bodies, including Icasa, the JSE, the Takeover Regulation Panel, and the Financial Surveillance Department. 'It is a hugely positive step forward in our journey to bring together two iconic media and entertainment companies,' said Canal+ in a statement. As part of the approval, the Tribunal imposed conditions designed to protect South African interests: Ongoing investment in local sports and general entertainment content. Measures to support Historically Disadvantaged Persons (HDPs) and SMEs in the local broadcasting sector. Guarantees to maintain South Africa's influence over content and access decisions through the continued independence of MultiChoice (Pty) Ltd, which services local subscribers. 'We look forward to executing the remaining processes and to building something extraordinary – a global media and entertainment company with Africa at its heart,' said Calvo Mawela, CEO of MultiChoice Group. Despite the approval, Canal+ and MultiChoice must still navigate legal and policy hurdles, including South Africa's laws on foreign ownership of broadcasters. As part of the transaction structure, MultiChoice's South African business will be carved out and maintained independently to comply with these restrictions. Customers and viewers are not expected to be affected during the ongoing approval process, and both companies have committed to maintaining current services. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SMME focus: Why storytelling is the secret weapon of SA's small businesses
South Africa's small businesses face a market obsessed with speed and scale, yet some are thriving by leaning into craft, storytelling, and human connection. In a studio in Woodstock, Cape Town, a group of women crochet hats from hemp and cotton, their movements slow and deliberate. Months later, those same hats sit in a Dior lookbook, worn by models striding Paris runways. This is the improbable story of Earth Age, a business that began with three friends during lockdown and ended up collaborating with one of the most recognisable names in fashion. Their story is also a blueprint for small business in South Africa trying to make sense of a market that rewards sameness and speed over meaning and craft. The fight for value The 'never say die' spirit of a small business is often romanticised. The reality is that the market is tough and only getting tougher. Consultancy company Kantar's annual Mzansi Consumer Barometer tracks national consumer behaviour. Its latest findings show that South Africans are concerned about unemployment, corruption, crime, spiralling living costs, and load shedding. The survey also found that household income was unpredictable in our country, as the sources of income varied from month to month, making it difficult for businesses to plan sales, said Stacey Saggers, commercial growth director at Kantar. When the money does come in, it doesn't stretch far. South Africans are consuming less essential items, Saggers added. Consumers are cutting back on things like luxury food items, alcohol, entertainment, going out and clothing. Lurking in the background are juggernauts like Shein and Temu, peddling fast fashion at prices local makers can't dream of matching. According to Saggers, 75% of South Africans surveyed have shopped on these platforms, and 48% admitted to doing so more in the last year than the one before. Against this backdrop selling a R1,500 handmade jacket feels almost reckless, until you understand the industry shift that's modifying perceptions of value. Story as currency 'People want to purchase something more than just a piece of product. I think it adds value to it when they understand that it comes with so much meaning.' These are the words of Harmonie Mbunga, founder of apparel and accessory brand Udo & Harmony. She observed that customers were initially drawn to the beauty and craftsmanship of her products, and upon learning the story behind them, discovered 'so much more meaning'. This wasn't always the case. Erica Elk, CEO of the Craft and Design Institute (CDI), recalled that 24 years ago, when the CDI was established, there was an expectation that craft products should be cheap because they were made by hand. 'What we tried to do as an organisation with the businesses that we supported was actually to shift that narrative,' she said. 'To say that because they're made by hand, and because they're an expression of an individual person and their creativity, you should be paying more.' The market would respond, she argued. 'Somebody is going to come in and they're not going to want to pay the price, but there will be customers that will come and they will appreciate the quality and the position and the value.' Elk said this was because craft and design weren't products, but rather the 'process of making'. 'When you understand that it's a process of making, then you're opening up market opportunities.' Lessons from the frontlines Brands like Hannah Lavery know this firsthand. In the early days, Lavery's clothes hung on racks in the V&A's Watershed, a Cape Town craft and design marketplace. Their first year was challenging, Lavery said, as the Watershed was a new space and their product 'wasn't that cheap'. Her persistence, however, paid off. 'We gradually got traction and we figured out our product and our messaging,' she said. Before Covid-19, Lavery's online store was an afterthought. 'We knew it was important to have one,' Lavery said, 'but we never actually had any sales come through.' Sometimes it was only one order every three months. Lockdown forced a pivot to online, and with it, a new approach. Lavery stepped in front of the camera. 'I got in front of the camera and, through our social media channels, told the story of what we are and what we do and who my team is.' That human connection led to the growth of her brand and its sales. Luck, strategy and a Dior email Earth Age's founders, Elektra Georgiadis, Ashley Wagner and Amy Kunz, began with restless ambition, dabbling in everything from apparel to homeware before finding their lane. 'We realised, hold on a second, this is impossible! We need to hone in on one product and figure that out,' Georgiadis explained. They chose sustainability as their anchor, reaching for hemp and cotton and making hats their hero product. The hats are crafted by a team of Zimbabwean women using techniques passed down through generations. Then came an email that looked a lot like spam: Dior wanted to collaborate. 'We got this message from someone saying they're from Dior… We all thought we were being scammed,' Georgiadis recalled. The collaboration has propelled Earth Age to explore international markets, now selling their products in London. Winning in a digital world Today, countless small brands are lost in an algorithm-fed blur of sameness. This is because online engagement is exploding. 'Instant messaging and email as well as online video and social networks are absolutely ridiculously getting bigger and bigger every single year,' Saggers said. Podcasts are booming too. In South Africa, one in four people listened to a podcast daily, Saggers said, and 55% listened to a podcast weekly. For small businesses, this could translate into opportunity. 'If you can find a podcast that mirrors what you do with your brand, you have a very big opportunity to amplify awareness of your brand and position yourself as an expert,' she said. The opportunity here was agility. Big brands couldn't do what smaller businesses could, Sagger said. 'They will nod and nod… but none of them change their behaviour. They can't do it because there are too many sign-offs that need to happen, and there's too much risk to their brands to do anything adventurous or entertaining.' Where the opportunities lie Nearly half of South Africans believe the country will be in better shape in five years, Kantar's survey found. Two-thirds expect their personal finances to improve within the next 12 months. That optimism creates a window for the brands that can articulate why they matter. 'There's a juggling act,' Saggers noted as consumers balanced essentials with small indulgences. They would down-trade in some categories to spend on what they truly loved. According to her, the solution was to provide a 'meaningful difference'. In a hyperinflationary environment, consumers would pay up to 14% more for brands they believed in, Saggers added. In South Africa, local mattered. Unlike some African markets, Saggers said, 'Made in South Africa' signalled artisanal, sustainable and something to be proud of. Paired with meaning and digital fluency, it was a potent differentiator. DM
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Beyond the balance sheet: Costs and benefits of broad-based BEE
Any discussion about black economic empowerment must weigh up its benefits, addressing historical injustices and the costs of not transforming the economy. Photo: File The current media debate around broad-based black economic empowerment (broad-based BEE) has brought fresh attention to the policy's effect on the economy — raising important questions about its effectiveness, costs and outcomes. As this conversation grows louder, it's worth taking a closer look at some of the arguments being made. An example from the debate is a recent study released by Solidarity and the Free Market Foundation (FMF), which arguably overlooks certain key economic implications of B-BBEE. Titled The Costs of B-BBEE Compliance, the report estimates that broad-based BEE may reduce South Africa's GDP growth by as much as 1.5 to 3% annually, potentially resulting in 96,000 to 192,000 fewer jobs each year. It further contends that the policy disproportionately benefits a narrow elite while imposing undue compliance costs on the broader economy. While such figures demand scrutiny, they also warrant a critical examination of the underlying assumptions, methodology and, crucially, the broader socio-economic context in which broad-based BEE operates. One of the most significant concerns with the report is its presentation of correlation as causation. The paper attributes specific percentages of GDP loss and job losses directly to broad-based BEE but does not demonstrate how these effects were isolated from South Africa's myriad economic problems. South Africa's macroeconomic environment remains deeply constrained by structural impediments such as: Chronic electricity and water shortages, including load shedding; Global economic headwinds; Endemic corruption; and Policy uncertainty and governance deficits. Attributing complex macroeconomic trends solely to broad-based BEE risks simplifies a nuanced reality and underestimates the multifactorial nature of South Africa's growth constraints. Equally important is the report's limited treatment of the potential benefits of broad-based BEE. Many of which manifest over the medium to long term and are difficult to quantify through conventional compliance cost frameworks alone. Equity equivalent programmes (EEPs) enable multinational corporations, constrained by global ownership structures, to achieve ownership points through local investments in enterprise development, skills transfer and innovation. Far from being passive mechanisms, EEPs represent substantial, targeted injections into the domestic economy. IBM, for example, committed R700 million over 10 years to enterprise development, research and education. This included support for 74 black-owned businesses and fully funded bursaries for dozens of students from disadvantaged backgrounds in critical fields of information and communication technology. Samsung also made a substantial commitment, launching a R280 million equity equivalent investment programme (EEIP) in May 2019, projected to contribute nearly R1 billion to the South African economy over its 10-year duration. This programme aimed for a measurable effect on job creation, specifically targeting the creation of 262 direct jobs and supporting 13 black-owned and women-owned businesses. A notable focus of Samsung's investment is on industrialisation by black people through e-Waste recycling and beneficiation research and development, including the establishment of the first black-owned and operated e-waste beneficiation plant in Africa. These company-specific statistics, alongside broader programmes such as JP Morgan's Abadali EEIP, which aims for an additional 1,000 permanent jobs and R2 billion in financing transactions, underscore the crucial role of EEPs in boosting small and medium enterprises (SMEs), particularly black-owned businesses, by providing essential funding, business support and mentorship. Furthermore, these programmes significantly advance skills development, with more than 2,500 beneficiaries receiving critical skills training, and facilitating technology transfer, aligning with South Africa's national development goals and fostering a more inclusive and skilled workforce. The YES programme directly targets South Africa's intractable youth unemployment crisis. Since its inception in 2018, YES has facilitated more than 186,000 quality work experiences for young people, injecting nearly R11 billion in salaries into the economy. About 45% of participants secure permanent employment after placement, and 17% establish their own businesses, multiplying the long-term economic benefit. The initiative also encourages private sector participation by offering measurable broad-based BEE recognition for companies that create these opportunities. Enterprise and supplier development (ESD) remains a cornerstone of the broad-based BEE framework, driving significant investment into the SMME sector. South African corporates reportedly channel R20 billion to R30 billion annually into ESD programmes, helping integrate black-owned businesses into supply chains and enabling sustainable growth. For instance, the Shoprite Group's CredX programme has provided R10 billion in working capital to suppliers, while its Next Capital initiative has invested R20 million to support new black-owned enterprises. Collectively, such interventions empower black entrepreneurs, expand the tax base and generate employment in communities historically excluded from meaningful economic participation. Why broad-based BEE still matters Perhaps the most profound omission in the Solidarity and FMF report is its decontextualised approach to broad-based BEE's rationale. Apartheid was not merely a political system; it was an economic design that systematically dispossessed black South Africans of land, capital, skills and opportunities. This entrenched economic disenfranchisement cannot be dismantled simply by repealing discriminatory laws. Broad-based BEE emerged as a policy instrument to facilitate redress, promote equitable economic participation and mitigate the persistent structural inequality that threatens social cohesion and long-term stability. Any analysis that fails to account for this historical imperative and the potential socio-economic cost of neglecting it, is incomplete. There is little doubt that broad-based BEE can and should be improved. Calls for greater transparency, genuine empowerment outcomes, and tighter controls to prevent fronting and inefficiency are well-founded. But presenting a one-sided narrative that focuses exclusively on compliance costs while disregarding significant economic and social returns undermines the opportunity for a more balanced, evidence-based debate. As South Africa grapples with the problems of inclusive growth, any meaningful conversation about the future of broad-based BEE must extend beyond a narrow cost-benefit calculus. It must weigh the policy's role in addressing historical injustices, its measurable and often intangible benefits, and the opportunity costs of not transforming the economy. A policy of this nature should not be romanticised or demonised without context. Instead, it demands honest, nuanced discussion, one that prioritises national development, social cohesion and sustainable, broad-based participation in the economy. The question should not be whether broad-based BEE has costs but rather whether we are collectively doing enough to ensure that its benefits are fully realised and that it continues to evolve to serve the South Africa we aspire to build. Safiyya Patel is a managing partner at Webber Wentzel.
