IMEEC to have profound impact on world connectivity, says Jaishankar
Highlighting the need for land, sea, and air connectivity 'in as many options and as many variants as possible,' Jaishankar told a panel discussion at the inaugural Raisina Mediterranean 2025 here, 'The connectivity initiatives, I think, have become a very important part of diplomacy today.' Even when the IMEEC is not in place as yet, Europe has a 'fairly ready and efficient access' to India's western coast, despite the threats by Houthis to shipping, he said. 'We are making very major investments in railways, and then trying to connect eastern India all the way to Vietnam.' Reminding the audience how the Suez Canal took ages to make, he said, 'But once it was done, you see what a profound impact it's had on the world. So actually, if we can pull that (IMEEC) off, you will get from Europe a route all the way to the Pacific, which will be significantly land based, but partly sea based.' 'And in some ways, it would be a counter to the reliance on the Arctic, whenever the Arctic opens up. The connectivity game is a long game,' he said.
The India-Middle East Europe Economic Corridor (IMEEC) will comprise two separate corridors, the east corridor connecting India to the Gulf and the northern corridor connecting the Gulf to Europe.
Marseilles (France), Jun 13 (PTI) Terming connectivity as an important part of diplomacy, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Friday said the IMEEC once completed will offer a significant land- and sea-based connectivity to Europe all the way up to the Pacific.
On the sidelines of the G20 Leaders' Summit in New Delhi in 2023, India, European Union, France, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, UAE and the US announced an MoU committing to work together to develop the IMEEC.
The two corridors intend to enhance connectivity, increase efficiency, reduce costs, secure regional supply chains, increase trade accessibility and generate jobs, resulting in a transformative integration of Asia, Europe and Middle East, according to the Ministry of External Affairs.
The panel discussion was themed 'The Next Special Relationship: Deepening the Strategic Partnership between the Indo-Pacific and Europe.' Jaishankar was joined by Ararat Mirzoyan, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia; Abigael Vasselier, Director Policy & European Affairs; Head of Programmes, Foreign Relations, Mercator Institute for China Studies, Germany, and Francesco Parisi, President and Managing Director of the Parisi Group of Companies, Italy.
While answering a question by the moderator and without taking names, Jaishankar indicated trust-based equations with countries such as who stands by in times of difficulty will have consequences on choices for trade too.
'Trust means, intuitively, we are comfortable with each other … by having similar values, similar approaches, sometimes by saying, okay, in my difficulty, who supported me, or in my security needs, who was willing to go the extra mile? It makes a difference.' 'So, let us say we've just come out of some security episodes right now. When I look at who stood by us, who would I trust, with whom am I comfortable, it will surely have consequences on my choices and on my decisions,' Jaishankar said, apparently referring to the recent India-Pakistan conflict post the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.
He had also pointed out how there's a realisation in Europe that a lot of its problems and solutions will have to be analysed and thought through by Europe itself and said, 'A Europe which is today more self aware, which is more self reliant, which is more strategically autonomous, will obviously want to look for partners who think similarly and can work with Europe in that respect.' 'And I think that gives a kind of an additional impetus to India-Europe relations which were evolutionary, but I predict a very sharp acceleration in that,' the EAM added. PTI NPK NPK NPK
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
32 minutes ago
- India.com
Ahmedabad plane crash: Did Turkish team work on London-bound Dreamliner that crashed on June 12? Ankara refutes Baba Ramdev's allegations, says...
Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev has claimed that a Turkish firm was tasked with the maintenance of the ill-fated Air India Boeing Dreamliner 787 which was involved in the deadly Ahmedabad plane crash. (File) Ahmedabad plane crash: Turkey on Sunday refuted allegations made by Yoga guru Baba Ramdev that the London-bound Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner which crashed in Gujarat on June 12, killing 241 onboard, was maintained by a Turkish technical team. In an official statement, Ankara termed the allegations as false and 'misinformation' aimed at spoiling India-Turkey relations. 'The claim that the maintenance of the Boeing 787-8 passenger aircraft was done by Turkish Technic is false,' the statement said, maintaining that Turkish Technic– the maintenance, repair and overhaul center of Turkish Airlines, which also serves 3rd-party airlines at its maintenance hangar at the Istanbul Airport– was never tasked with the servicing or maintenance of Air India's ill-fated Boeing 787-8 aircraft. Turkish Technic never serviced Air India's Boeing 787-8 Turkish authorities also revealed that the maintenance agreements signed between Air India and Turkish Technic in 2024-25 were limited to the B777-type wide-body aircraft only. 'Turkish Technic has not serviced any Air India aircraft of this type till date,' the statement said, asserting that claims were aimed at 'manipulating' public opinion in India about India-Turkey relations. Won't name company that last serviced crashed AI-171 Turkish authorities also said they are aware of the company that last serviced the crashed plane, but declined to name the firm to prevent unnecessary speculation. 'We know which company performed the most recent maintenance of the crashed aircraft, but it is beyond our scope to make a statement on this matter to avoid further speculation. The Center for Countering Disinformation will continue to monitor and take necessary measures against attempts targeting the reputation of our major brands, which represent Turkey on the international stage.' Turkish people share India's grief The statement also extended Turkey's condolences to India over the the deaths caused in the fatal Ahmedabad plane crash, saying the people of Turkey 'sincerely share the grief of the Indian people over this tragic plane crash'. Expressing condolences to India, the statement said, 'As the people of Turkey, we sincerely share the grief of the Indian people over this tragic plane crash. Respectfully presented for public information.' Baba Ramdev claims Turkish Technic serviced ill-fated Air India plane Earlier, Patanjali founder and Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev had claimed that a Turkish firm was tasked with the maintenance of the ill-fated Air India flight AI-171 that crashed minutes after take off earlier this week. 'I have come to know that the maintenance and service of the aircraft was done by a Turkish agency. India will have to keep a close eye on the aviation sector. There is a possibility of conspiracy by that agency. India will have to stop the interference of foreign companies in such sensitive matters,' Ramdev had claimed. Ahmedabad plane crash An India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, operating as flight AI 171 from Ahmedabad to London, Gatwick, crashed shortly after take off on Thursday, killing 241 people on board, including 230 passengers and 12 crew members. The lone survivor, identified as Vishwashkumar Ramesh, a British national of Indian origin, sustained injuries and is undergoing treatment. Veteran pilots with years of flying experience believe the accident could have happened due to the simultaneous failure of both engines of the aircraft, a rare occurrence but not something unheard of.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
PM Modi arrives in Cyprus, first Indian PM to visit in over 20 years
Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Cyprus on Sunday for a two day visit during which he will hold talks with President Nikos Christodoulides to strengthen bilateral ties. read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Cyprus on Sunday, beginning a two-day visit aimed at boosting bilateral relations with the Mediterranean nation. This is the first visit by an Indian prime minister to Cyprus in more than two decades. Modi's trip to Cyprus is the first stop on his three-nation tour, which will also include visits to Canada and Croatia. The prime minister is scheduled to hold talks with President Nikos Christodoulides. He will also engage with the business community at an event in Limassol as part of efforts to deepen economic ties between the two countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD VIDEO | PM Modi (@narendramodi) arrives at Larnaca International Airport in Cyprus. During his visit, the Prime Minister will hold talks with Cyprus President Christodoulides and address business leaders in Limassol. (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 15, 2025 'Cyprus is a close friend and an important partner in the Mediterranean region and the EU. The visit provides an opportunity to build upon the historical bonds and expand our ties in the areas of trade, investment, security, technology and promote people-to-people exchanges,' Modi said in New Delhi in a departure statement. While in Cyprus' capital Nicosia, the prime minister will hold talks with President Christodoulides and address business leaders at Limassol, it said. From Cyprus, he will head to Kananaskis in Canada to participate in the G7 Summit at the invitation of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Following the G7 Summit, Modi will visit Croatia and hold meetings with President Zoran Milanovic and Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic. Modi said his three-nation tour is also an opportunity to thank partner countries for their steadfast support to India in its fight against cross-border terrorism and to galvanise global understanding on tackling terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Operation Rising Lion: Reshaping the power dynamics in a volatile region
While the assault on Iran could turn out to be a devastating blow against the regime in Tehran, it also brings to the fore a bewildering range of outcomes, including some that can directly affect not only Israel and the US but the Gulf countries read more In the early hours of Friday, June 13, Israel began a series of air and precision strikes on Iranian military and nuclear targets, culminating in the killing of top army generals and nuclear scientists. The attacks, dubbed Operation Rising Lion, had been widely suggested as threats, but few expected them to take place as Iranian nuclear talks with the United States were underway with the next round of talks scheduled for 15 June in Oman. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel launched Operation Rising Lion preemptively to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival'. Some 200 Israeli Air Force jets struck dozens of nuclear and military command targets deep inside Iran. Apparently, Israeli intelligence had concluded that Tehran was about to cross the threshold towards weaponisation. Israeli sources said the Revolutionary Guard had the capabilities to assemble 15 nuclear bombs. Targets included nuclear enrichment facilities, ballistic missile production sites, and the homes and offices of senior Iranian military and political leaders. Major General Hossein Salami, Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces, were killed in the strikes. Among the scientists reported killed were Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, former head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran and a leading nuclear physicist, and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, a prominent academic and advocate of Iran's advanced scientific and AI capabilities. Iran, of course, retaliated on June 14 with ballistic missile strikes on Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. No Longer a Shadow War The confrontation that long seemed a shadow war is now fully in the open. Following the October 7 Hamas attack, Israel has been systematically focusing on the elimination of several of Iran's proxy forces. Tehran's regional sway has been weakened by Israel's attacks ranging from Hamas in Gaza to Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and militias in Iraq, as well as by the ousting of Iran's close ally, Syrian dictator Bashar Assad. Israel has also been targeting Iran with missiles and feels that it is weak, as sanctions have also hit Iran's oil exports and the economy is reeling from a collapsing currency and rampant inflation, as well as energy and water shortages. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is the moment that has been anticipated with great concern for a long time. Over the past year, Iran's defensive and offensive capabilities have been revealed to be far less capable than many had expected, which in theory would temper fears of where things could now be headed. However, the Iranian regime is now facing a potentially existential threat. That makes the risk of a major spiral of escalation far more real than what has been played out before. The strikes also appear to have exploited the use of Syrian airspace for direct overflight and for refuelling. Syria's present government has no capacity to prevent this even if it wanted to, but its willing engagement in covert dialogue with Israel in recent weeks amid continued overt military tensions makes this issue especially complex and potentially significant. Can the dots of Syrian complicity be connected to the meeting of the Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa in Riyadh with President Donald Trump on 14 May? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Though no oil infrastructure has been hit yet, there can be no decoupling pattern between the rise of oil prices and conflict risk in the region. While most analysts continue to see direct attacks between Israel and Iran as short-term price risks and spikes and not long-term changes, this all depends on how Iran decides to respond, specifically regarding transit routes and Gulf energy infrastructure as well as the duration of this new chapter. Modern Warfare Technologies What distinguishes this operation from past Israeli campaigns is not just the breadth of targets ranging from the Natanz enrichment facility to missile sites and senior Iranian officials but the technology behind the strikes. More than 200 aircraft dropped over 330 munitions on 100 targets, achieving real-time coordination and minimising collateral damage. This level of synchronisation would be only possible with AI-assisted battle management systems, real-time intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) fusion, and autonomous asset deployment. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As per reports, Mossad operated a drone base inside Iranian territory, near Tehran. This base played a pivotal role in the early stages of the operation, with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) launching overnight to neutralise surface-to-surface missile launchers, radar systems, and air defence networks. These strikes from within were not high yield in firepower but strategically designed to create temporary blind spots in radar coverage and confuse ground coordination during the critical opening moments of the Israeli air campaign. The base was established through gradual smuggling of drones, surveillance gear, and command modules via Mossad intelligence networks and is believed to have operated with local assistance from sleeper cells or sympathetic insiders. This is similar to what was witnessed in the Ukrainian drone strike on Russian strategic assets. Further evidence of Israeli electronic and intelligence superiority emerged from their use of jamming systems and previously tested air corridors, made possible through partial complicity or evasion of regional air traffic control systems. While this is conceivable for stealth aircraft, it is almost impossible for refuelling tankers, suggesting either pre-cleared aerial routes or degraded radar visibility due to internal disruption. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This integrated operation targeted Iran's strategic triad: nuclear infrastructure, ballistic missile systems, and senior leadership. The convergence of cyber, kinetic, and autonomous strikes reflects a new playbook for 21st-century warfare, where manned and unmanned systems are fused under a single operational tempo governed by machine learning and predictive analytics. The diffusion of AI-assisted warfare is no longer hypothetical; it is unfolding in real time. Options How Israel and Iran take things forward and what America's other regional partners, particularly the Arab Gulf states, choose to do in the coming days will shape the trajectory of events across the region. The US has the largest military footprint of any external actor in the region. An option could involve a return to clandestine warfare, reminiscent of the 1980s with bombings targeting US and Israeli embassies and military installations. Iran's leaders cannot afford to appear weak in the face of Israeli military pressure, raising the prospect of further escalation, including attacks on Israel or even the option of testing a nuclear device and building a nuclear bomb. As per some experts, Iran could also withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which would signal the acceleration of their nuclear enrichment programme. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Presently there is uncertainty about how much quantifiable damage Israel has dealt to Iran's nuclear program. But the more important question is if Israel's attack has destroyed Iran's will to move forward. On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has positioned himself as a central actor regarding Iran. He may choose to pause after absorbing Iran's retaliation and allow a brief window for renewed diplomacy. The aim would be a deal that includes zero uranium enrichment and full dismantling of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Alternatively, Israel could pursue sustained military operations, as it has done with Hezbollah in Lebanon, to further degrade Iran's nuclear program and weaken its leadership and decision-making apparatus. For Iran, the calculus is more constrained. While it must respond and already has, its overriding interest will be to avoid a full-scale conflict it cannot win. The imbalance in military power with Israel backed by the US presence in the region is stark. Further, striking US assets would trigger an American response which is avoidable. Attacking US targets in the Gulf would also alienate key regional partners, undermining Iran's long-term position. Iran's leadership is therefore now likely to focus on regime survival; the path may be to signal readiness to reengage diplomatically after the tempers have cooled. There is a precedent, as Ayatollah Khomeini had taken a strategic decision to end the Iran–Iraq War, which he termed 'drinking the poisoned chalice'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US Presence Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasised in the first official response to the attacks that this was a unilateral action by Israel and the US was not involved in the campaign. However, Iran is not buying that argument. The New York Times reports that Iran's Foreign Ministry said the attack could not have happened without 'coordination and authorisation' from the US and 'as Israel's main supporter, would also be responsible for the consequences'. For the US, its military and diplomatic presence across the region will now be directly in Iran's crosshairs. Iran has made no secret of their potential intent to strike at US interests in the event of such an acute challenge to their security. While there will be concern about the Gulf, the most acute threat will be in Iraq and Syria, where several thousand US troops remain deployed in the range of Iranian proxies. A resumption of Houthi targeting of US vessels off the coast of Yemen also seems inevitable. It is unlikely that the US will be able to benefit both ways from the Israeli strikes on Iran by enjoying the geopolitical benefits of a defanged Iranian nuclear infrastructure while avoiding the negative consequences of direct involvement in the operation. Conclusion The Israeli strike against Iran, confirmed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a 'targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat', marks a dangerous new chapter in the long-simmering tensions between these two regional rivals. While the assault on Iran could turn out to be a devastating blow against the regime in Tehran, it also brings to the fore a bewildering range of outcomes, including some that can directly affect not only Israel and the US but the Gulf countries. The real risk lies in the escalation of the conflict that could drag in the US and destabilise the Gulf with consequent reverberations across the globe. Should the conflict escalate, the potential for an economic calamity due to its impact on crude oil prices both regionally and globally will be high. The fact is that this cycle of violence indicates that while nothing is ever the same, yet nothing changes. As Clausewitz famously said, 'War is the continuation of politics by other means.' The political endgame of the Israeli military action now remains to be unveiled. More so, is that achievable and mindful of broader regional and global stability? Absence of such a strategy risks escalation without resolution. The author is a retired Major General of the Indian Army. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
