Zelensky arrives in Albania for European Political Community summit
President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Albania on May 16 to attend a summit of the European Political Community, presidential spokesperson Serhii Nykyforov said, according to the state news channel Freedom TV.
The sixth meeting of the European Political Community will focus on Europe's security, including Russia's ongoing full-scale war against Ukraine, among other topics.
The summit comes as Ukrainian and Russian delegations are expected to hold talks in Istanbul for the first time since 2022. Turkish and U.S. officials will also reportedly join the series of discussions.
Zelensky's visit follows his trip to Turkey, where he met with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Although a face-to-face meeting between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin was anticipated in Istanbul, Putin instead sent a delegation led by his aide, Vladimir Medinsky.
Kyiv and its partners have urged Moscow to adopt an unconditional 30-day ceasefire as the first step toward a broader peace deal, a move that Russia continues to reject.
Read also: 'It's a mess' — after all the hype, Ukraine-Russia peace talks in Istanbul descend into name-calling shambles
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
European Defense Buildup May Cause Supply Chain Delays And Shortages
French Air Force Rafale jet fighters patrol the airspace over Poland as part of NATO's response to ... More Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Photo by NICOLAS TUCATBy Sebastian Janssen and Ben Martin Reznik The surge in European defense spending that began in earnest two years ago may begin to disrupt industrial supply chains in aerospace and other sectors as military contracts compete for parts and materials with civilian industries. Europe's military expenditures are set to rise as much as 80% between 2024 and 2030, reaching between €650 billion and €750 billion. The increased spending is driven by countries like Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, but European Union member nations in general are increasing their defense budgets as part of the EU's 'Rearm Europe' plan. The 2024 spending was around €417 billion, while 2023's defense budgets were about €354 billion. Increases in European military spending began with the 2014 seizure of Crimea by Russia and rose significantly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. While only about one-third of the total EU defense allocation will go for equipment, this rapid aerospace and defense expansion will still pose challenges for an already squeezed European industrial supply chain, which will likely struggle to keep pace with this new growth. Evidence of a squeeze on parts and material has already been seen in aerospace production shortfalls over the past several years. By the end of 2024, aerospace manufacturers rolled out fewer than 1,300 commercial airliners — 30% below its 2018 peak, based on Oliver Wyman's Global Fleet and MRO Market Forecast 2025-2035. Making matters worse, suppliers may be inclined to prioritize defense contracts over those from other industries as pressure from governments to rapidly ramp-up may prompt defense contractors to pay higher prices for the large quantities of parts and materials they seek. Government contracts like this are particularly attractive as they tend to be longer term programs. Since the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, European nations have been beefing up their air forces ... More and militaries. The sectors that will feel the squeeze most Our analysis, based on publicly available data of more than 600 secondary suppliers predominantly focused on the European market, reveals critical vulnerabilities. Overall, we see significant overlaps between the supplier networks for defense contractors and various adjacent industrial sectors, especially involving electrical components, electronics, and mechanical parts. Some more complex components, such as pneumatic and hydraulic systems, may become scarce depending on the industry. In the industrial machinery sector, bearings, sensors, mechatronics, hydraulics, and simple system components emerge as having a high overlap with aerospace and defense manufacturers. These essential components, vital for the operation of machinery, could become increasingly scarce as suppliers begin to service, and potentially prioritize, defense applications. The rail industry faces a similar fate, with printed circuit boards and housing assemblies, semiconductors, microelectronics, and control units among the most vulnerable subsegments. In the automotive sector, the stakes are even higher. A potential shift in supplier priorities toward defense contracts — or even the simple addition of more demand from defense — could severely impact an already strained supply chain. Among the vital automotive components that may become scarce are simple electrical components, such as harnesses and cables and connectors, as well as sensors and hydraulic systems. The energy sector is also not immune. Key components such as wire harnesses, cables and connectors, and bearings are at risk of becoming harder to source[BR1] . Strategies to mitigate supply chain risks These findings underscore a pressing need for manufacturers like automakers, as well as machinery and rail manufacturers to proactively address these vulnerabilities. It remains uncertain how quickly parts and raw material suppliers can scale up production in response to the escalating demand from air, land, and naval defense contractors and governments. Understanding and mitigating the risks will be crucial for maintaining operational continuity and competitiveness in an increasingly volatile landscape. In recent years, supply chain departments have already faced numerous disruptions. These included the semiconductor crisis from 2020 to 2023, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the COVID pandemic, and the recent threat of global trade wars and tariffs. Despite this decade of challenges, most supply chain departments still engage in reactive problem-solving rather than proactive planning. It is crucial for organizations to anticipate and mitigate supply chain risks, given already tight conditions for many parts and materials and the explosive outlook for demand. Among the tactics manufacturers can use: identify and qualify alternative suppliers to diversify the supply base, increase transparency with suppliers so end users can provide hands-on crisis management if necessary, and establish an internal, cross-functional task force that monitors the real-time marketplace, similar to a tactic used during the semiconductor shortage. Supply chain disruptions have become increasingly frequent and are now considered the new normal. Factors such as geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and fluctuating trade policies contribute to an unpredictable environment, challenging the resilience of various sectors. To thrive in this landscape, companies must develop capabilities that allow them to proactively address and manage these disruptions. This includes investing in advanced data analytics for real-time visibility, establishing agile and flexible supply chain strategies, and fostering robust partnerships with suppliers to ensure continuity and adaptability. By enhancing their resilience, end users can not only mitigate risks but also seize opportunities for growth and innovation in an ever-changing world. Sebastian Janssen is a partner and the head of Oliver Wyman's global supply chain team, while Ben Martin Reznik is a principal in the firm's Transportation and Advanced Industrials practice. Nick Schlomka, an associate with TAI, contributed research and insights to this article.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Expect more "reshuffling" in Army's transformation
Thousands of feet in the air, returning to D.C. from Georgia, U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll told Axios of his housecleaning ambitions — the "cobwebs and bullsh*t" that need sweeping. "Complacency right now is going to be rewarded with failure and death in the short- to medium-term," he said. The big picture: The Army Transformation Initiative's opening salvo landed May 1 with the backing of Driscoll and others, including Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. It jarred Congress and industry alike with its cuts (M10 Booker), consolidation (Futures and Training and Doctrine commands) and urgency. A second push, colloquially known as "2.0," is now in the works. It focuses on "procurement, reorganizing and reshuffling, and firing," Driscoll said, as well as funding "good ideas" plucked from the minds of soldiers and small- and medium-sized businesses. Nothing is sacred, it appears. "We should be held accountable if we're not willing to look at everything." Driving the news: Driscoll spent Monday at Fort Stewart, in the swampy southwest of Savannah, inspecting armored vehicles and drones and workout regimens and barracks. He sought feedback from troops on what desperately needs fixing — and warned them of how radically different war looks today. Axios was the only media in tow. Zoom in: Fort Stewart is home to the 3rd Infantry Division. Two armored brigade combat teams there are involved with Transforming in Contact, meant to quickly arm soldiers and test commercially available kit. That initiative predates and informs ATI. Soldiers are experimenting with robotics to clear battlefield obstacles, aerial drones to make first contact with an enemy, and tools to better understand and leverage the electromagnetic spectrum, which is key to communications and weapons guidance. Friction point: Congress has not been happy with the level of detail the Army has thus far provided concerning its overhaul, said to save $48 billion over five years. "We don't serve either the taxpayer or the common defense with blank checks for vaguely defined priorities," Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said at a June 18 appropriations hearing. "We want to see the analysis behind the specific bets the Army wants to place on ATI," he added. "We want to understand the second-order effects on industry, other services and allies." The other side: Driscoll promised to show the service's work in 10 days. The information had not been relayed as of Monday evening. The bottom line: "We believe the decision to not act is actually riskier than the decision to act and get it wrong," Driscoll said. The Russia-Ukraine war, a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan and a constant simmer in the Middle East consume Beltway thinking. "The existential factors and threats that are occurring today make it a very credible statement to say 'We're either going to do this in a wartime footing or we're going to do it in a pre-wartime footing,'" Driscoll added.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Zelensky's Wartime Leadership Provides 7 Crisis Management Lessons
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy holds a press conference at the forum 'Ukraine. Year 2025' ... More in Kyiv, Ukraine, on February 23, 2025 (Photo by Maxym Marusenko/NurPhoto via Getty Images). Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky's leadership skills have been constantly tested since Russia invaded his country in 2022. How he has led Ukraine during a challenging and stressful time in its history provides important crisis leadership lessons for corporate executives. 'Zelensky hasn't just held Ukraine together, but forged a leadership archetype built on resilience, clarity, and moral velocity. This is not just a a model suitable for wartime…It's a new standard for leading through chaos,' Irina Tsukerman, president of Scarab Rising which provides political risk assessment and geopolitical analysis, told me via email. One of Zelensky's initial leadership lessons is the importance of having the right priorities when a crisis strikes. Soon after Russia attacked Ukraine, Zelensky turned down an offer from the United States to be evacuated from the capital city of Kyiv, CNN reported. 'The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride,' Zelensky told the U.S. Another of his early crisis management lessons is to set the record straight when others try to distort the facts of a crisis. A video that showed 'a rendering of the Ukrainian president appearing to tell his soldiers to lay down their arms and surrender the fight against Russia, [was] Zelensky responded to the disinformation by posting his own video entitled 'do not believe the fakes,' in which he announced that 'I am here. We are not putting down arms. We will be defending our country, because our weapon is truth, and our truth is that this is our land, our country, our children, and we will defend all of this.' An important part of leading a country or a company during a crisis is to be seen and heard during the crisis. The Ukrainian president has generated international headlines by telling his side of the story about Russia's invasion, which included speaking to a joint session of Congress. Zelensky's leadership 'is anchored in visibility. In times of [an] existential crisis, he made himself omnipresent. Far from limiting himself to control rooms or back channels, he was ubiquitous in the eyes of his people and the world. He was there in fatigues, on the street, in the ruins. That visibility became its own kind of power. For business leaders navigating disruption, the takeaway is clear: presence matters. Inertia erodes trust. Visibility builds it,' Tsukerman of Scarab Rising noted. Adapt Circumstances can change quickly in war and corporate crisis situations. That is why it is a leadership crisis management best practice for political and business leaders to adapt and react appropriately to developments before matters get worse. Zelensky has not hesitated to alter his strategies, tactics, and tactics depending on what was happening on the battlefield or in the world of diplomacy. The surprise drone attack this month that destroyed several Russian aircraft deep within enemy territory is one example. 'The attack, a headline-grabbing show of strength carried out on the eve of the second round of peace talks between the warring countries in Istanbul, targeted at least four Russian military air bases, the furthest of which from Ukraine is the Belaya base in the Siberian region of Irkutsk, around 4,850 km (3,000 miles) from Kyiv,' Reuters reported. 'In business terms, [Zelensky] is a CEO who learned how to pivot not because the market shifted, but because the building was literally on fire. His responsiveness didn't dilute his mission but actively reinforced it,' according to Tsukerman. Set Egos Aside Since the war with Russia began Zelensky has consistently found 'new ways to engage with partners, allies, and even frenemies. He's willing to compromise his ego in the pursuit of better opportunities for his country's prospects, highlighted by his tense and sometimes adversarial relationship with President Trump,' Jeff Le, a Fellow at George Mason University's National Security Institute and managing principal at 100 Mile Strategies, a communication and policy consultancy, told me in an email message. The Ukraine president 'continues to emphasize self-reliance and creative know-how on the battlefield and in negotiations, operating on the assumption that they may, at times, be on their own,' Le observed. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky meet in the Oval Office at the ... More White House on February 28, 2025 (Photo by) Prepare For All Scenarios Business executives should not be surprised when others challenge or disagree when they attempt to tell their side of the story about a crisis. That's why preparation is critical to help ensure that messages about a crisis are communicated successfully. A case in point was the disastrous televised confrontation at the White House earlier this year between Zelensky, President Donald Trump, and other administration officials. The session was a worst-case communication scenario that became a nightmare reality for Zelensky and his country's supporters. The purpose of Zelensky's visit to Washington was to sign an agreement with Trump that would give the U.S. rights to rare minerals in Ukraine. Zelensky attempted to tell his side of the story about Russia's invasion of Ukraine but was interrupted by a combative and argumentative Trump, who repeatedly accused the Ukrainian president that he was 'gambling with World War III.' 'Crisis communication is a crucial part of crisis leadership. Listen to your advisors. Get strong media training. I often think back to Zelensky'[at that meeting] with Trump [in the Oval Office]. Although he had advisors, he wasn't fully prepared for that high-stakes moment,' Barbara Bell, Captain USN (ret), an adjunct professor of leadership and ethics at the U.S. Naval Academy, told me an in email interview. 'With a well-developed risk communication strategy—and disciplined focus on key messages—the outcome might have been very different.' Bell recalls the important lessons she learned about communicating messages effectively about crisis situations.'Years ago, during my own risk communication training, I learned a core principle: develop three key messages for any high-risk communication, each with three supporting points. The goal is to consistently bridge back to your core messages—and stay there,' she concluded. Depending on the nature of a crisis, business leaders should be ready for the long haul. Now more than three yeas later, Ukraine's war with Russia continues to rage. It highlights another important leadership lesson: the longer a crisis lasts, executives may have to make increasingly difficult decisions, know the lengths to which they will defend their companies, and what lines they will or won't cross to address and end the crisis. Since the war began 'Zelensky has faced that question many times. All leaders must. Crises don't always resolve quickly. You must be ready for the long haul. Zelensky has disrupted conventional warfare while enduring tremendous human loss—potentially an entire generation of young men. Leaders must define their red lines—and then, in some cases, decide whether they're willing to compromise,' Bell of the U.S. Naval Academy warned. 'Transitioning from a comedian to a wartime president, Zelensky has demonstrated an extraordinary ability to inspire and unite his country….Zelensky's leadership is a testament to the fact that true leaders are forged in the fires of adversity. History will treat him well. That adversity shows no signs of letting up for Zelensky. In April, Trump criticized Zelensky 'for his comments that Ukraine wouldn't recognize Russian control of Crimea, calling the remarks 'very harmful to the Peace Negotiations with Russia,' CNN reported.'It's inflammatory statements like Zelensky's that makes it so difficult to settle this War. He has nothing to boast about! The situation for Ukraine is dire—He can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years before losing the whole Country,' he posted on Truth Social. The longer the war continues—and the longer Zelensky leads his country—the more likely it is that business executives could learn yet more leadership lessons from Ukrainian president.
