Mayo councillor makes no apology for motion seeking to ban clamping in Castlebar
Mr Gavin explained that the IPA has long campaigned for access to the National Vehicle Driver File (NVDF), which would allow fines issued by private parking companies to be legally enforced. Currently, only certain operators such as private toll companies have access, with the Department of Transport citing data protection concerns
He stressed that clamping is not the IPA's preferred method of enforcement, but remains the only viable option on private property, as parking officers there cannot issue enforceable fines without NVDF access.
Cllr Michael Kilcoyne, who proposed the motion to outlaw clamping in Castlebar, said his priority was to protect constituents rather than address industry concerns.
He cited numerous complaints from constituents, many involving the same privately owned car park near a pharmacy and Mayo University Hospital, where people were clamped under what he described as unreasonable circumstances.
'It's not our job to sort out the industry for them, it's our job to look after our constituents that vote for us and elect us,' he told the Irish Independent, 'A motion has been passed by the members directing officials to prepare a by-law and it will go out to consultation.'
Until the by-law is drafted and goes out for public consultation, Cllr Kilcoyne said he won't know exactly what is in it but stated that the public are very clear in their view that what is happening here is not acceptable.
One case he highlighted involved a woman who went to collect a prescription for her child from the pharmacy after just having seen a doctor. When she went to pay for a ticket but the machine was out of order, she took a photo of the message on the machine.
'I have a copy of the photo' said Cllr Kilcoyne, 'The woman decided to run into the pharmacy to collect her prescription, came out, there's a clamp on the car, and the guy was standing around the corner laughing. That's just not acceptable.'
He said this case was one of several in which motorists were clamped within minutes, often while carrying out urgent or essential tasks, with no allowance made for faulty ticket machines or genuine emergencies.
'These guys are merciless, they clearly don't realise that many people are in a situation where if they get clamped that is half their week's income. People on fixed incomes, pensioners, people with disabilities or people on job seekers. There is no mercy shown, no consideration of the facts.'
'I can't think of anything that's more lucrative than charging €150 for somebody who runs in to get a prescription for their child.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
What parts of Ukraine could Vladimir Putin ask for in exchange for an end to the war?
UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT VOLODYMYR Zelenskyy held talks with his US counterpart Donald Trump in Washington last night aimed at bringing about an end to Russia's war in his country. The meeting, which took place alongside several European leaders, was worlds apart from the disastrous scenes seen in February, when Trump and his vice president JD Vance rounded on Zelenskyy in the Oval Office. Despite assurances from Trump that Russian president Vladimir Putin accepted Western security guarantees for Ukraine at a summit in Alaska last week, there was little mention of any potential ceding of land by Ukraine. It is believed that Putin wants Ukraine to give up some of its territory in the east of the country in order for Russia to end the conflict. It's understood that in exchange for this, Moscow would agree to 'freeze' the front line in regions where Russian forces hold swathes of territory, but not the regional capitals. But what land is Moscow seeking, and how likely is it that Zelenskyy would even consider conceding territory? What territory does Russia want? Putin is understood to have told Trump last week that he wants Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions, also known as the Donbas. These areas have seen the deadliest battles of the war so far. The regions run from Mariupol in the south all the way up to the northern border with Russia. Before the invasion, they were home to over six million people, but the remaining population is now difficult to determine due to millions having left since the start of the war. During the Soviet era, the regions had a heavily industrialised industry, particularly for coal and steel production. They also have a significant proportion of farmland. A map of Ukraine marking the disputed territories in red, including Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, and parts of Zaporizhzhia. Shutterstock Shutterstock In September 2022, Russia held 'referendums' and illegally annexed Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – the same thing it did in Crimea in 2014. It has been trying to capture all of the Donbas since then, but it has never had any of the four regions fully under its control. Why does Putin want the Donbas? Donnacha Ó Beacháin, Professor of Politics at DCU who has worked and researched in the post-Soviet region for over two decades, told The Journal that Russia controls almost all of Luhansk and the majority of Donetsk. 'But there are important cities which they don't hold and haven't been able to take, despite the three-and-a-half years of full-scale invasion,' he said. He said that while both regions are predominantly Russian-speaking, they do not have an ethnic Russian majority. Advertisement 'There is this attempt by the Kremlin always to conflate Russian speaking with ethnic Russian. When I was there giving lectures for over a number of periods in Donetsk, the students I met there were Russian-speaking Ukrainians,' he said. 'That's borne out by census figures, it's borne out by opinion polls in terms of self-identification. Of course, there are people who identify as Russian as well, but the demographics have shifted a lot since the war. A lot of people have left.' Given their locations, Ukraine fears that Russia taking control of Donetsk and Luhansk would be detrimental to its defence and would allow Moscow to regroup and begin attacks deeper into the country. 'It's a substantial piece of territory, and it's very well fortified,' Ó Beacháin said. 'It includes cities like Kramatorsk and Sloviansk, which, if the Ukrainians were to hand them over to the Russians, it would mean that Ukraine would be much easier to attack in the future.' What are the conditions like under Russian occupation? For those still living in occupied Donetsk and Luhansk, the regions are treated as parts of Russia. The Russian constitution recognises them as Russian territories, and has forced Ukrainians in the regions to adopt Russian passports. Weather forecasts shown on Russian television will include those regions as part of Russia, even though they don't control all of the territory. Moscow has been encouraging people to move to some cities in the region in order to rebuild them, including Mariupol. The city was taken by Russian forces after a brutal siege three months into Russia's invasion. Ukraine estimates over 25,000 people were killed. Recently, Russian influencers have shared content from Mariupol suggesting that life there is normal, something that has been disputed by Ukrainian residents . Other recent reports show there are acute water shortages in some parts of Donetsk, with residents pleading with Russia for help . The brutality of what happened in Mariupol serves as a warning to others living in the occupied regions not to act out. 'As in any regime, some will cooperate. Some will keep their heads down. They won't resist, but they don't want the current situation,' Ó Beacháin said. 'Some will be actively trying to resist. But the difficulty in resisting, of course, is the punishment can often be death, so you don't get really active acts of defiance if people can avoid it.' Along with encouraging Russians to populate the regions, the educational curriculum has been completely changed to a Russian one, with the Ukrainian language banned. 'It's only recently acquired and they don't know how long they will hold it for, because the battle lines shift as time goes on. Some parts, like Kherson, were captured and then had to be handed back to the Ukrainians because of their military advances.' How likely is it that Zelenskyy will give up territory? Almost impossible, according to Ó Beacháin. The Ukrainian president has repeatedly said that he would not be willing to hand over any of his country to Putin. Ukraine's constitution outlines that changes to its territory can only be made through referendums. 'The Ukrainian constitution is quite clear in the territorial definition. You couldn't possibly have a situation where a President could sign over territory. It would be unconstitutional,' Ó Beacháin said. Related Reads Trump tells Zelenskyy and European leaders that Putin 'accepts' security guarantees for Ukraine Opinion: For Ukraine, it's a case of 'if you're not at the table, you're probably on the menu' 'It would be impossible in the foreseeable future to have a referendum of any legitimacy, because millions of people have left Ukraine. Many people are under occupation. How would you have a referendum that would be recognised and legitimate?' The chance that Russia would abide by a 'land for peace' agreement is low. The Budapest Memorandum in 1994 saw Russia agree to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and borders in return for Kyiv giving up its nuclear arsenal. It went on to invade Crimea. The subsequent Minsk agreements were also broken when Putin recognised Donetsk and Luhansk as Russian before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say you would have something approaching civil war in Ukraine, were any Ukrainian government just to hand over territory that was in Ukrainian hands now. Ó Beacháin added that doing this would also be 'political suicide' for Zelenskyy. 'I can't see him doing it, unless he feels that he could do it almost like an act of personal self sacrifice, recognising that his political career is over… but he doesn't strike me as somebody who would avoid responsibility at critical moments.' What happens next? Putin and Zelenskyy have both said they are prepared to meet each other after the meeting in the US yesterday – but whether a territorial swap is on the cards remains to be seen. French President Emmanuel Macron expressed that such a decision would potentially send the wrong message, even though it would be for Ukraine to make. Addressing whether Zelenskyy would be forced to give up territory to Russia, Macron said it was 'up to Ukraine'. 'Ukraine will make the concessions it deems just and right,' he said, but added: 'Let's be very careful when we talk about legal recognition.' 'If countries… can say, 'we can take territory by force', that opens a Pandora's box.' Part of the problem for Zelenskyy and Ukraine is a potential lack of American support from this point onwards. Ó Beacháin said the US 'already have one foot out the door' when it comes to supporting Ukraine. 'Essentially, Trump's big threat is 'we'll walk away', but it's clear that they're walking away anyway,' he said. 'To use Trump's terminology, [Zelenskyy] doesn't really have many cards with Putin or the Europeans or the Ukrainians.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues. We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Learn More Support The Journal
The Journal
5 days ago
- The Journal
Trump and Putin are meeting in Alaska today - what does each side want?
THE US AND Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are set to meet at a US air base in Alaska later today for talks about ending Russia's war on Ukraine. Expectations are high. It's the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years and Putin's first trip to a western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in a decade. But Russia and Ukraine are far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: Russia For Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the west since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its Nato ambitions, and for western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies — something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the 'rights and freedoms' of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the 'glorification of Nazism'. It also wants western sanctions lifted. Advertisement Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukraine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a 'personal victory' for Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States Trump promised he would end the war within '24 hours' after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book 'Trump: The Art of the Deal' said on Wednesday that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if it did not halt its offensive. Related Reads Today's Russia-US Alaska summit puts the fate of Ukraine 'in Trump and Putin's hands' Opinion: For Ukraine, it's a case of 'if you're not at the table, you're probably on the menu' The US leader initially said there would be some 'land swapping going on' at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Trump has said he would 'like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly'. But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a 'listening exercise' for the former reality TV star. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump said, hinting Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Europe Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. 'Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president,' French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Trump on Wednesday. Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected. © AFP 2025
RTÉ News
5 days ago
- RTÉ News
Putin-Trump summit: What each side wants
The US and Russian presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are to meet at a US air base in Alaska for talks on the Ukraine war. Expectations are high for the first summit between sitting US and Russian presidents in more than four years, but Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart in their visions on how to end the conflict. It will be Mr Putin's first trip to a Western country since launching his invasion in February 2022, as well as his first US visit in 10 years. Here is a look at what each side hopes to achieve from the talks: Russia For Mr Putin, who has faced years of isolation from the West since the invasion, the summit is an opportunity to press Russia's hardline demands for ending the conflict. In a draft peace plan published in June, Russia called on Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk regions that Moscow claimed to annex in 2022. Ukraine has rejected the idea. Russia has also called on Ukraine to halt its military mobilisation, abandon its NATO ambitions, and for Western countries to immediately stop weapon supplies - something critics say amounts to capitulation. In addition to territory, Russia wants Ukraine to ensure the "rights and freedoms" of the Russian-speaking population and to prohibit what it calls the "glorification of Nazism". It also wants Western sanctions lifted. Ukraine says Russia's allegations of Nazism are absurd and that it already guarantees rights to Russian speakers. Ukraine Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is not scheduled to take part in the summit, but has said there can be no peace deal without its involvement. He has called the meeting a "personal victory" for Mr Putin. Ukraine has called for an unconditional ceasefire on land, sea and sky as a prerequisite to peace talks. It wants both sides to release all prisoners of war and demanded the return of Ukrainian children it says Russia illegally kidnapped. Ukraine says Russia has forcibly transferred thousands of Ukrainian children into areas under its control since the war began, often adopting them into Russian families and assigning them Russian citizenship. Russia rejects the kidnapping allegations but acknowledges that thousands of children are on its territory. Ukraine says any deal must include security guarantees to prevent Russia from attacking again, and that there should be no restrictions on the number of troops it can deploy on its territory. It says sanctions on Russia can only be lifted gradually and that there should be a way of reimposing them if needed. United States Mr Trump promised he would end the war within "24 hours" after taking office in January. But eight months on, and even after repeated calls with Mr Putin and several visits to Russia by US envoy Steve Witkoff, he has failed to extract any major concessions from the Kremlin. The summit is his first opportunity to broker a deal in person. The US president, author of the book "Trump: The Art of the Deal" said on Wednesday that Russia would face "very severe consequences" if it did not halt its offensive. The US leader initially said there would be some "land swapping going on" at the talks, but appeared to walk back after speaking with European leaders on Wednesday. Mr Trump has said he would "like to see a ceasefire very, very quickly". But the White House has played down expectations of a breakthrough, describing it as a "listening exercise" for the former reality TV star. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Mr Trump said, hinting Mr Zelensky could take part in a subsequent summit. Europe Despite providing military support for Ukraine and hosting millions of Ukrainian refugees, European leaders have been sidelined from the peace talks that may affect the region's security architecture in the future. European representatives were neither invited to the past three meetings between Russian and Ukrainian officials in Istanbul, nor to the Russia-US talks in Riyadh in February. In a statement last week, the leaders of Britain, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the EU Commission warned there could be no meaningful peace without Ukraine's participation. "Territorial questions concerning Ukraine can be, and will be, negotiated only by the Ukrainian president," French President Emmanuel Macron said after speaking with Mr Trump on Wednesday. Mr Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer have signalled they are willing to deploy peacekeepers in Ukraine once the fighting ends, an idea Russia has vehemently rejected.
