Mzwanele Manyi ousted as MK chief whip, replaced by Colleen Makhubele
He has been replaced by former Johannesburg council speaker Colleen Makhubele, who has had a steady rise in the party.
The leadership change was communicated to party MPs by deputy leader John Hlophe, who said Manyi was to be 'relieved of his duties with immediate effect'.
'We thank him for his service and dedication to the MK Party and wish him the best in his future endeavours.'
Announcing Makhubela as his replacement, Hlophe called on party MPs to support this 'leadership transition'.
'We are confident she will lead with strength and vision as we continue to advance our collective mission. Let us rally together in support of this leadership transition and remain steadfast in our commitment to the party's goals.'
TimesLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
8 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Murder as a message: When assassins set the local government agenda
Killing fields: More people in local government are murdered in KwaZulu-Natal than anywhere else in the country. Photo: Paul Botes Let's not tiptoe around it — local government in South Africa has become a killing field. In the past five years alone, 37 municipal officials and 59 councillors have been murdered across the country, according to official data compiled by These statistics are not merely numbers; they represent a deeply disturbing signal of the erosion of democratic governance and public accountability at the very foundation of our state. The recent assassinations of municipal officials in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal — two of the most affected provinces — underscore the climate of fear that is spreading through local government. In Gauteng, 11 officials were murdered in the 2019-to-2024 period. In KwaZulu-Natal, the number climbs to 17. These figures do not include attempted assassinations, threats, or acts of intimidation, which are becoming chillingly routine. Such violence is not random. It is systemic and often politically motivated — used to silence whistleblowers, intimidate reformers and secure control over lucrative tenders and municipal budgets. South Africa's municipalities have become sites of both political patronage and contestation, where violence is increasingly a tool of influence. Local government is meant to be the sphere closest to the people, but in many places, it is also the most dysfunctional. The In recent cases, murdered officials have often been linked to procurement investigations, disciplinary processes and efforts to clamp down on corruption. In 2022, the killing of a municipal finance officer in Tshwane was reportedly tied to revelations about misallocated Covid-19 relief funds. Earlier, a whistleblower in Harry Gwala district municipality was gunned down after raising concerns about irregular housing tenders. Yet, even as these patterns emerge, arrests remain rare and convictions even more so. This impunity reinforces a dangerous message — violence pays in South African politics. To understand this crisis, one must examine not only who is being targeted, but also who is being protected. While councillors and municipal staff are frequently exposed and unprotected, high-ranking party operatives often benefit from enhanced state security. The lack of parity in protection reinforces existing hierarchies and undermines the professionalisation of local administration. A 2024 report by the The violence is enabled by a toxic culture of political patronage, in which local government jobs are awarded based on party loyalty rather than merit. According to These systems create a fragile loyalty network, where internal dissent is not only punished with demotion or expulsion, but increasingly with death. This pattern is especially visible in factional party structures, where internal competition can turn deadly. The failure of party-political mechanisms to manage these internal contests is pushing the contestation into the public arena — with tragic consequences. Every murdered official leaves behind a community further alienated from public service. In KwaZulu-Natal's Umzimkhulu municipality, the 2017 assassination of Sindi Dlathu, a courageous audit committee chairperson, remains unresolved. Her death left a void in financial oversight, with reports indicating a rise in irregular expenditure in the next two financial years. Local civil society groups, such as Despite the gravity of these attacks, South Africa lacks a coherent, nationwide local government protection framework. The Compare this to Colombia and Mexico — two countries with equally alarming patterns of local political violence. Both have specialised protection programmes for at-risk public officials, coordinated by national bodies that integrate intelligence, police protection and community liaison strategies. South Africa must develop a similarly targeted response, not only to protect lives, but to safeguard democratic institutions at the community level. What's perhaps most concerning is how normalised these killings have become in our public discourse. News headlines read more like gangland reports than governance alerts. Public outrage is often fleeting. The victims are frequently forgotten, their deaths buried beneath bureaucratic inertia or party spin. South Africa cannot afford to continue down this path. Protecting local government officials from violence is not only a matter of personal security, but one of national stability. A democracy where fear silences dissent is not a democracy at all. Municipal officials are the frontline workers of governance. Their murder is a message — and one we can no longer ignore. Dr Lesedi Senamele Matlala is a governance researcher and lecturer at the School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg. He writes on public policy, evaluation and digital governance in Africa.
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
Sassa defends pension grant suspensions as legal obligation
Grant recipients must inform Sassa about any changes in their circumstances. The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has defended its suspension of pension grants to elderly citizens. The agency says it is legally compelled to review grants when changes in beneficiaries' circumstances are suspected. Social Development Minister Nokuzola Sisisi Tolashe responded to parliamentary questions about the controversial suspensions. MK Party MP Zelna Saira Abader had questioned the legal and moral justification for suspending grants based on minimal additional income. Legal framework for Sassa grant reviews Tolashe cited the Social Assistance Regulations as the legal basis for Sassa's actions. 'In terms of the Social Assistance Regulations, section 30 (2) (a), Sassa is compelled to act on information where it suspects that a change in circumstance has occurred,' she stated. The regulations give Sassa a clear mandate to conduct reviews. 'The agency has an obligation to review social assistance at any time where it has reason to believe that changes in the beneficiary's financial circumstances may have occurred,' Tolashe explained. The minister emphasised that each case receives individual consideration. Every beneficiary undergoes review according to established eligibility criteria within the Social Assistance legislative framework. ALSO READ: Sassa sounds alarm over unlawful insurance deductions from social grants Suspensions not based on minimal income Sassa rejected claims that grants are suspended solely due to small amounts of additional income. 'Suspensions are not based solely on minimal or irregular additional income,' Tolashe stated. She explained that the agency follows a case-by-case approach. Beneficiaries receive opportunities to clarify all their income sources during the review process. The minister outlined specific grounds for suspension. 'A grant is not suspended unless there is evidence of fraud; the client no longer meets the eligibility criteria, and or there is non-compliance with the Social Assistance Act or its Regulations,' she said. Eligibility criteria and reviews The Social Assistance Regulations establish clear eligibility requirements. These criteria determine who qualifies for assistance and guide the review process. Tolashe explained the purpose of the older person's grant system. 'A social grant serves as a cornerstone of South Africa's broader social assistance programme, aimed at helping older persons live with dignity in their later years and other grant beneficiaries meet their basic needs,' she said. However, automatic qualification does not exist. 'Not everyone automatically qualifies for an older person's grant upon turning 60 years,' the minister noted. Individual assessment remains essential. Each application undergoes evaluation based on regulatory eligibility criteria. Regular reviews ensure only qualifying recipients receive grants. ALSO READ: Under review: Sassa fires off grant suspension warning Shared responsibilities According to Tolashe, the system operates on shared responsibility between Sassa and beneficiaries. Grant recipients must inform Sassa about any changes in their circumstances. Sassa maintains its review authority. 'Sassa has the right and responsibility to conduct reviews at any time, especially when changes in a beneficiary's situation come to light,' Tolashe explained. The minister defended the review process as necessary for system integrity. 'Reviews are never intended to cause harm nor deprive grant beneficiaries of the grant, but rather to uphold the integrity and fairness of the social assistance system,' she stated. READ NEXT: Sassa cracks down on beneficiaries flagged for not disclosing income
The Herald
10 hours ago
- The Herald
'He still has not come here': Mpofu says Ramaphosa still owes Marikana families an apology
Workers and Socialist Party (WASP) and Socialist Youth Movement (SYM) are demanding justice for the Marikana massacre victims and want the alleged killers prosecuted, including President Cyril Ramaphosa and police commanders. Saturday marked the 13th anniversary of the massacre when 34 mineworkers were killed by police during a strike at Lonmin Mine in Marikana in North West. Mineworkers had downed tools and participated in unprotected wage strikes. A total of 44 people lost their lives during the strike. Police allegedly shot 34 on August 16 2012. WASP and SYM believe the massacre was not a police operation that went wrong, claiming it was a deliberate act of violence to protect the profits of Lonmin (now Sibanye-Stillwater) and the capitalist mining industry. 'In its execution, it was premeditated. The ANC government, under Jacob Zuma, deployed police to crush worker resistance, proving once and for all that the ANC is no longer a movement for liberation but a bloody instrument of mining monopoly capital,' said WASP national executive committee member Mametlwe Sebei. Sebie said WASP and SYM were demanding the nationalisation of the mines under workers' control and a living wage for all workers — a R15,000 minimum wage now and a universal basic income grant of R1,500. He said Cosatu should break away from the ANC, as should all trade unions aligned with other capitalist parties, to unite into a united working class front, and a mass workers' party to fight for socialism. 'Even today, no-one has been held accountable. Cyril Ramaphosa, then a Lonmin director who called for 'concomitant action' against the strikers, is now president — showing the ANC's true allegiance. The Farlam commission was a whitewash and the police and politicians who ordered the killings remain free,' Seabi said.
