The Trump Family Is Quietly Building a Crypto Empire
Just a few years ago, Donald Trump called crypto a 'scam' and 'dangerous.' Today, from the Oval Office, he champions it as the future of finance. This dramatic pivot is backed by a rapidly growing ecosystem of cryptocurrency ventures tied directly to the Trump family, creating an unprecedented network of potential conflicts of interest.
While the President promotes crypto-friendly policies, his family and associated businesses are launching tokens, mining operations, and financial platforms that stand to benefit directly from those policies. Here's a look inside the Trump crypto empire.
The Stablecoin: World Liberty Financial ($USD1) The crown jewel of the operation appears to be World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a crypto firm that launched in September 2024. While the President was listed as 'co-founder emeritus,' until he took office, his sons—Donald Jr., Eric, and Barron—are all active co-founders. The company's stablecoin, USD1, is a digital token pegged to the U.S. dollar, which has already amassed a market value of $2.2 billion, according to data firm CoinGecko.com.
What's a Stablecoin? It's a type of cryptocurrency designed to hold a steady value. For every USD1 token issued, there's supposed to be one U.S. dollar held in reserve, making it a stable digital asset for payments and trading.
The venture is already wildly profitable. President Trump earned $57.4 million last year from his ownership of tokens tied to the project, according to his June 2025 Office of Government Ethics (OGE) disclosure.
The timing is also impeccable: the Senate just passed the 'Genius Act,' a bill that opens the door for widespread adoption of stablecoins, which could send the value of platforms like WLFI into the stratosphere. Adding to its legitimacy, USD1 is already being used as a payment method for the UAE's sovereign wealth fund, MGX.
According to Democratic lawmakers and critics, USD1 may be a way to curry favor with the Trump family and the president in particular.
'If Congress passes this bill, USD1 won't just be a coercive tool to pay off a corrupt President,' Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat of Massachusetts, said last month. 'It will be a financial instrument blessed by the United States Government. And this bill provides even more opportunities to reward buyers of Trump's coins with favors like tariff exemptions, pardons, and government appointments.'
The Memecoins: $TRUMP and $MELANIA In January, entities linked to the Trump Organization launched $TRUMP, a 'memecoin' on the popular Solana blockchain. Unlike stablecoins, memecoins have no intrinsic value and thrive on internet hype. The launch was a massive success, netting the Trump-linked companies over $350 million in transaction fees so far, according to research firm Chainalysis, with the token's market cap hitting $1.8 billion as of time of writing.
Not to be outdone, MKT World LLC, a company associated with First Lady Melania Trump, according to the June 2025 Office of Government Ethics (OGE) disclosure, launched $MELANIA just days later. While its purpose is vague—tied to 'appearance and speaking engagements and the sale of NFTs'—it has a market value of $128.3 million as of time of writing.
The Mining Operation: American Bitcoin Corp In March, Eric Trump teamed up with crypto mining firm Hut 8 to launch American Bitcoin Corp, which aims to be a major player in Bitcoin mining and accumulation.
What is Bitcoin Mining? It's the process by which new bitcoins are created. Powerful computers solve complex mathematical problems, and in return for their work, they are rewarded with Bitcoin. It's an energy-intensive but potentially lucrative business.
American Bitcoin Corp, where Eric Trump serves as chief strategy officer, went public in May and already holds about $22 million worth of Bitcoin, with plans to acquire more.
The Next Frontier: ETFs and NFTs The empire's reach continues to expand. The first venture began quietly, with a Trump-linked entity licensing his likeness for NFTs (non-fungible tokens, or unique digital collectibles), which earned the President over $1.1 million in 2024 alone, according to the June 2025 Office of Government Ethics (OGE) disclosure,
More recently, Trump Media & Technology filed to launch a combined Bitcoin and Ether ETF, a type of investment fund that would allow mainstream investors to easily buy into crypto.
A Web of Conflicts This sprawling crypto ecosystem, from stablecoins and memecoins to mining and investment funds, is deeply intertwined with Trump's presidency. His political shift from crypto skeptic to crypto evangelist aligns perfectly with his family's growing financial interests. With his campaign now accepting crypto donations, this network could double as a fundraising machine and a post-presidency payoff.
Whether it's driven by ideology, opportunism, or both, the Trump crypto empire is raising serious ethical questions. As the President pushes policies that could enrich his family's ventures, the line between governing and personal profit has never been more blurred.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says MAGA should drop ‘pathetic loser' Massie after pushback on US strikes
President Trump said on Sunday that the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement should drop Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) after the his pushback Saturday night against the U.S. strikes against Iran. In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform, Trump called Massie 'not MAGA' and 'a simple minded 'grandstander' who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon.' 'Massie is weak, ineffective, and votes 'NO' on virtually everything put before him (Rand Paul, Jr.), no matter how good something may be. He is disrespectful to our great military, and all that they stand for, not even acknowledging their brilliance and bravery in yesterday's attack, which was a total and complete WIN,' Trump said in his post. The president name-checked Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul (R) because both he and Massie have opposed the president's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Massie should drop his fake act and start putting America First, but he doesn't know how to get there — he doesn't have a clue! He'll undoubtedly vote against the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, even though non-passage means a 68% Tax Increase for everybody, and many things far worse than that. MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' he added. On Saturday, Trump announced that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Massie quickly posted on the social platform X that Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites was unconstitutional. On Tuesday, Massie introduced a war powers resolution to prohibit U.S. involvement in Iran as its conflict with Israel intensifies, signaling they may force a vote on the matter. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said he would co-sponsor the measure. The Hill has reached out to Massie and Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) office for comment.
CBS News
8 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado lawmakers respond to U.S. strikes on Iran, address security concerns
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis directs teams to remain vigilant in wake of attacks on Iran Colorado Gov. Jared Polis directs teams to remain vigilant in wake of attacks on Iran Colorado Gov. Jared Polis directs teams to remain vigilant in wake of attacks on Iran In the wake of the attacks by U.S. forces against three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday, many Colorado officials and representatives took to social media in both support and opposition. CBS The military community is a significant part of Colorado, with six military bases across the state. The F.E. Warren Air Force Base missile field also spans an area covering parts of Wyoming, Nebraska and Colorado. The base is one of three strategic missile bases in the U.S. responsible for the country's nuclear defense. Gov. Jared Polis took to Facebook on Saturday to reassure Coloradans that he is working to mitigate any safety concerns that may arise as the world waits to see how Iran will respond. "I met with my public safety team this evening and directed that they coordinate with state, local and federal partners and remain vigilant against all threats to Coloradans and the state's infrastructure and military assets. The state is actively monitoring for any unusual or heightened activity and threats." Many Colorado representatives in Congress condemned the decision to attacks, claiming it was outside of the president's authority to authorize them, while others praised the decision, stating the attacks are protecting the United States. Most reactions fell along party lines. Rep. Lauren Boebert, who represents Colorado's 4th congressional district, did not release a statement, but she reposted a tweet from the president depicting a U.S. flag, suggesting support for his decision. Rep. Brittany Pettersen, who serves Colorado's 7th District, condemned the president for not obtaining congressional approval for the attacks. "Only Congress may authorize war. And the last person I would trust to lead us through this is Donald Trump. As we watch to see the results of this strike, my primary concern is the safety and security American service members and diplomats across the region. For the good of America and the world, we must prioritize diplomatic de-escalation. " Meanwhile, Rep. Jason Crow, who served as an Army Ranger and now represents Colorado's 6th District, said he's seeking more information about the strikes and condemned the attack as executive overreach. "I'm seeking more information about the strikes against Iran, but here's what we do know: 1. Trump broke a promise to prevent America from entering new conflicts. 2. Trump has, once again, exceeded his authority. 3. Congress must act now & reclaim constitutional power over America's use of military force." Colorado's 3rd District Rep., Jeff Hurd, praised the attacks on X, stating, "The world is safer when America leads. I support efforts to protect U.S. security and stand with our allies. Grateful to our servicemembers for their professionalism and courage." Rep. Gabe Evans of Colorado's 8th District is also an Army veteran. He praised the military members who carried out the attack on X, stating: "I'm glad to see @POTUS take action to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. As a veteran of a Global War on Terror, I know we achieve peace through strength. Prayers and thanks to our brave men and women who carried out this necessary operation."
Politico
13 minutes ago
- Politico
With Iran Strikes, Trump is ‘Unchained'
Remember when Donald Trump was an isolationist? Yes, once upon a time, that's how many in the national security realm described this president. Plenty of his moves — from his digs at NATO to his use of the 'America First' slogan — seemed to justify the label. Officials, journalists and others, including myself, would sit around pondering questions like: 'Does America First mean America Alone?' In the years since he first took office, it has become increasingly hard to define the 'Trump Doctrine' for foreign policy. He has taken more and more contradictory moves while growing more confident in his Oval Office instincts. Foreign affairs luminaries have devoted many papers to trying to clarify the aims of a man who refuses to come into focus. He's a shallow transactionalist! He's a principled realist! He's an imperialist with a Western Hemisphere fixation! Trump himself once even said, 'I'm a nationalist and a globalist. I'm both.' Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites this weekend is the latest sign that he's now in a phase where he's willing to take enormous risks with little concern about the blowback. He has survived so much already — two impeachments, criminal convictions, two assassination attempts. He doesn't have to run for office again, and, as has been amply noted, his advisers won't restrain him the way they did in his first term. Even when Trump backs down (the TACO thing) he still redefines the parameters of the conversation. 'It's Trump unchained,' said Ilan Goldenberg, a Middle East specialist who worked for the Biden team, referring to the president's behavior. I've never been a fan of the race to define presidential doctrines. It feels unfair to try to box in leaders who face so many varying crises. But I sympathize with people who seek to impose coherence on Trump because, as humans, we all need some sense of order and clarity. When I asked several former officials and analysts what Trump's strikes on Iran meant about his foreign policy doctrine, their exhaustion at trying to understand the mercurial president came through. 'I have no idea what the doctrine is. Ask him,' an Arab analyst said. 'Seriously?' a Bush II administration official replied. I granted them anonymity to be frank about their uncertainty. Others took a shot. Trump 'stresses diplomacy but leaves little doubt that those diplomatic windows do not stay open indefinitely,' said Bill Cortese, a GOP operative close to the White House. 'The use of force is always on the table but the use of U.S. assets is limited, focused, and with an end goal — no more open-ended conflicts. And it must answer the ultimate question: Does this directly benefit the people of the United States?' Eddie Fishman, a sanctions expert who worked for the Obama administration, put it this way: 'Trump seems to believe that the quick and decisive application of U.S. power — be it economic or military — can achieve maximalist objectives. As Trump sees it, the disparity in power between the U.S. and other countries is so great that when we act boldly, others will capitulate.' Trump's decision to strike Iran will test these theories, as well as his risk tolerance. It also could determine how his 'doctrine' — as much as one can call it that — is ultimately defined. Trump has urged Iran not to retaliate and to use the U.S. strike as an opportunity to negotiate some sort of peace. But Iran has already threatened revenge, and nearly every U.S. official I spoke to expects it will fulfill that promise. On Sunday, there were reports that Iran may shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could spike oil prices and roil markets. The U.S. also has some 40,000 troops stationed across the Middle East, giving Iran many potential targets. If Trump's hope for a one-and-done strike devolves into an endless tit-for-tat, he will have led the U.S. into the very type of war he's long promised to avoid. So much for the 'isolationist.' For countries watching this from the sidelines, there are lessons to learn from how both Trump and Iran approached this conflict, which spiraled after Israel began striking Iranian targets more than a week ago. One is that Trump isn't bluffing about using force, even in an extreme way. While he carried out military strikes during his first term (on Syria, on an Iranian general who was in Iraq) those moves were arguably more calibrated than this weekend's bunker-buster bombing on Iranian soil. A second lesson is that he believes in diplomacy, but he doesn't have much patience for it. That's especially the case when it comes to an adversary he sees as much weaker than the United States. Iranian officials tried to use their usual delaying tactics as they negotiated with Trump's envoys. When Israel decided to strike Iran two days before Iranian and U.S. officials were due to meet, Trump, annoyed with Tehran's unwillingness to commit to zero enrichment of uranium on Iranian soil, didn't try very hard to stop the Israelis. 'They thought they were dealing with a different kind of leader, like the kinds of leaders they've been playing games with for the last 30 or 40 years. And they found out that's not the case,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio told CBS's 'Face the Nation' on Sunday. Another lesson is to be prepared for the worst-case scenario when it comes to Trump. He says he'll decide 'within two weeks' whether to bomb you? It probably means you'll get bombed, like, right now. 'Don't underestimate and dismiss when he says crazy things,' Goldenberg said. 'They might actually happen.' When it comes to Iran, Trump watchers can still revert to the phrase 'America First' in trying to capture his bedrock foreign policy belief. Trump naysayers can argue that he's abandoning 'America First' by entering a war that could lead to the loss of U.S. lives and resources. Trump supporters can say: What's more 'America First' than eliminating the nuclear threat from an avowed U.S. enemy? The great thing about 'America First' is that it is malleable, just like Trump himself.
