Ministers fail to rule out scrapping school plans for Send pupils despite campaigners' concerns
Ministers have not ruled out scrapping education plans for children with special educational needs, sparking further worry among campaigners, parents and MPs.
Education Minister Stephen Morgan attempted to quell concerns by saying the government will work to "build confidence with parents to make sure they trust the system and children get the right support in the right place."
However, he could not guarantee that education, health and care plans (EHCPs) - which are currently issued to give children specialist classroom support - would remain in place.
It comes after Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson failed to rule out scrapping EHCPs over the weekend.
In a letter shared with the Guardian newspaper, campaigners say that without EHCPs in mainstream schools, 'many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether'.
The education minister sidestepped the question when asked on Monday if the support plans will be abandoned.
He told ITV News: "We're working really hard listening to experts, to MPs, and others to get this system right for the future.
"It's really clear from the conversations I have when I visit schools and nurseries that early identification and intervention on Send makes a big difference."
When pressed again on the EHCP rumours, he replied: "I'm not going to get into the metrics today, obviously a review is underway. We'll be publishing a white paper later this year."
He added that the government has put £1 billion extra into Send support, as well as additional support for places in mainstream settings, as the government announced its new Early Years Strategy on Monday.
An EHCP is a legally binding document that must be followed by local authorities and schools, which outlines the required support for children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities.
A spokesperson for the Save Our Children's Rights campaign, who contributed to the letter, called on the government for transparency around the EHCP plans and said the rumours of them being scrapped are "really worrying".
Catriona Moore pointed to the government's plans to have more children with special educational needs attending mainstream schools.
"The only way that's going to work is if they have very clearly defined support and obviously the resources to make that happen," Ms Moore told ITV News.
"The fact that ministers have allowed rumours and speculation to dominate this conversation is really upsetting for parents of children with special educational needs and disabilities who already have to fight so hard to get what their children need."
From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...
On Sunday, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson would also not be drawn on whether the plans will be retained.
'What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children,' she told the BBC.
Requests for Send support have risen year-on-year. In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January 2025 - up 10.8% on the same point last year.
The number of new plans which started during 2024 also grew by 15.8% on the previous year, to 97,747.
Requests for children to be assessed for EHCPs rose by 11.8% to 154,489 in 2024.
The concerns come amid mounting pressure and another potential rebellion from backbenchers - following the staunch opposition from Labour MPs against the welfare reforms - to scrap the two-child benefit cap, which critics argue is one of the main drivers for keeping children in poverty.
Director of Policy at Child Poverty Action Group, Sara Ogilvie, told ITV News that the government must consider the impact these plans could have on families already struggling to make ends meet.
"There is a huge intersection between families who have got someone living in the household with a disability, families where there's a child with a special educational needs, and families in poverty," she said.
"The government needs to think about all these issues in the round. If there's an approach that sees these as competing priorities rather than all things working towards the same ambition to give every child the best start in life, then it's not going to make kind of progress it wants."
Liberal Democrat education spokeswoman Munira Wilson said: 'The Send system urgently needs fixing, but ministers mustn't use that as an excuse to balance the books on the backs of disabled children.
'The government is ignoring the concerns of special needs families and campaigners, and is in serious danger of sleepwalking into another crisis – just like they did with the welfare Bill.
'Bridget Phillipson must listen to those concerns and come up with a proper solution that protects the most vulnerable in our communities, rather than throwing their support out the window.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Phillipson: Family hubs will give parents freedom to focus on loving children
Family hubs offering support and youth services will give parents 'the freedom to focus on loving their children', Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said. The Government announced there will be a Best Start family hub in every local authority in England by April 2026, with £500 million targeted at disadvantaged communities. This comes alongside plans to offer £4,500 to specialist teachers, in a bid to attract staff to nurseries. Officials have also said that Ofsted will inspect all new early years providers within 18 months of them opening from next April, under the Best Start In Life strategy announced on Monday. The Education Secretary has said she wants to 'make sure every child has the chance to succeed', as ministers look to drive up quality and access in early education. In a statement to the Commons on Monday, Ms Phillipson said: 'We'll introduce a new Best Start Family Service delivered through Best Start family hubs, the first step to a national families service that ensures they can get the right support for their children from conception to age five, giving parents the freedom to focus on loving their children.' She added: 'Best Start family hubs will be open to all, rooted in disadvantaged communities. 'They will work with nurseries, childminders, schools, health services, libraries and local voluntary groups – a whole community coming together around one goal: to give children the best possible start in life. 'And Our Best Start digital service means we're ready for the future, linking families to their local Best Start Family Hub, and exploring how the power of AI (artificial intelligence) can help parents find the right information.' According to the Department for Education, some one in 10 nurseries have an early years teacher. The new incentive scheme of a government-funded and tax-free £4,500 payment will look to keep 3,000 more teachers in nurseries. These will be targeted in the 20 most disadvantaged communities, the department said. There will also be a shift towards Ofsted inspections every four years for early years providers, rather than the current six-year cycle. Officials have also said there will be more money to fund partnerships between nurseries and schools to make transition periods easier. The announcements have been welcomed by the sector, but one figure has said the 'devil will be in the detail'. Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Early Years Alliance, said: 'We're clear that this strategy will only work if it is backed up with the tangible support – financial or otherwise – that early years providers and other bodies and professionals need to build an early years system that works for all families. 'But after years of calling for a long-term vision for the early years, there's no doubt that this is a positive development, and we look forward to working with Government to turn vision into reality.' Sarah Ronan, director of the Early Education and Childcare Coalition, has described Monday's strategy as 'a turning point in how we value early education'. 'Change won't happen overnight but it starts today with a shared mission to give every child the best start in life,' she said. Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said 'the rhetoric does not match the reality' because early-years providers were suffering from the impact of increased national insurance contributions (Nics). She told Ms Phillipson: 'Nurseries across the country are on the brink because of decisions her Government have made. 'While it is welcome that the Government has continued the roll out of our early years offer, the lack of compensation for the Nics increase is forcing providers to either hike fees or shut their doors.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Is Starmer prepared to launch mother of all battles with SEND parents after his humiliating welfare reform climbdown?
THE Government can't say we didn't warn them. For years mums and dads of children with special educational needs and disability (SEND), like me, have flagged that the system meant to support our kids is broken. 3 3 And we have asked ministers to listen to the real experts in SEND — families and young people themselves — about what should be done to fix it. The issue exploded this week after Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson failed to deny rumours that education, health and care plans (EHCPs) are being ditched. This is kryptonite for parents because If EHCPs go, our worry is that so do the legal rights of disabled children. That means hundreds of thousands of kids could lose the help they need to learn and live. After the humiliating climbdown over welfare reform, is the Government really prepared to launch the mother of all battles with parents who are already in fight or flight mode after being gaslit by councils? Cost-cutting exercise And also with MPs who are either SEND parents themselves or are inundated with SEND issues from constituents? EHCPs are legal documents written by experts such as educational psychologists, speech and language therapists, teachers and doctors. They set out what the targets are for a child who might be physically disabled or has a condition such as autism, or be deaf or blind. The EHCP describes what help they might need to achieve those targets, who will provide the help and who will pay for it. They are agreed by a child's local authority, school, parents and the child themselves if they are old enough. Changes to UC & PIP payments in full as Labour reveals bruising welfare bill concessions in bid to quell rebellion They are really hard to qualify for and most are asked for by schools, rather than parents. With school and local authority budgets stretched to breaking point, head teachers know that the funding that comes with EHCPs is often the only way they can educate what is now a large number of pupils in each class. Some children only need the education part of that plan, perhaps so that they can have one-to-one support from a teaching assistant. Others, like my daughter, require more help. In her case, a special needs school, a wheelchair, a walking frame, speech and language therapy and physiotherapy. We've faced enormous battles just to get Elvi, now 23, the right schools, college and equipment despite her complex needs and her EHCP. Fighting on her behalf took up so much of my time I had to step down from a job I loved. Phillipson's mantra of 'inclusive mainstream' is an admirable goal for many children but only works if schools are truly inclusive and can be held to account if they are not. Sam I would still defend to the death her legal right to have ordinary things like an education, a chance to make friends and enough assistance to learn and live well. So how have we ended up with what is a necessary document for more than 600,000 vulnerable children dragging Labour into a potential confrontation with backbenchers and voters? Because for all the world this looks, from the outside, like a cost-cutting exercise rather than a proper rebuilding of a system that no one argues is in need of reform. The number of children requiring help to learn has risen since Covid, with speech and language issues and social and emotional problems rising more than most other conditions. But the problem here is not the plans. That's looking down the wrong end of the telescope. It's giving schools and councils resources to obey the existing law. To be fair to Bridget Phillipson, some of the ideas she has already implemented are good. Early intervention for children? Tick. Training in SEND for all teachers? Tick. Making school buildings more accessible? Tick. The worry is that these steps are being put in place piecemeal. Phillipson's mantra of 'inclusive mainstream' is an admirable goal for many children but only works if schools are truly inclusive and can be held to account if they are not. Parents have been so undermined, denied and frequently lied to by authorities that all trust has gone. Expecting families to believe that things will get better while taking away legal rights is a gamble we are not prepared to take. Family breakdown So the same bear traps that led to the U-turn on welfare lie in wait for ministers. Lack of meaningful consultation with those most affected by the changes and no impact assessment, giving the impression that reforms are being rushed through. I believe Bridget Phillipson when she says she wants to lift children out of poverty and give every child the best chance in life. The Government must learn the lessons of the welfare bill. Some public funding IS expensive because it has to be. Sam But if these reforms go ahead without mainstream nurseries, schools and colleges being trained and resourced to welcome more SEND children, she risks more families falling into poverty because parents can't work. The Government must learn the lessons of the welfare bill. Some public funding IS expensive because it has to be. But if you put in the right legally-guaranteed support at the right time you will save on costly interventions later on. You will give those young people who can, the skills and opportunity to work and you will prevent family breakdown. Engagement needs to be more than lip service. Talk to MPs and organisations that work on the ground and know their stuff. Most importantly, talk to families who know what must be done to create a system that works for all children. 3
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Before the government overhauls special educational needs, lessons must be learnt
Whatever else may be said about the government's plans for the education of children with special needs, they cannot be handled in the same, calamitous way as were the reforms to personal independence payments (PIP). As has been said with enormous force during the low-key commemoration of Labour's first year in office, lessons must be learnt. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, is the lead minister in preparing the schools white paper in October, which will include proposals for changes to the special needs framework. She has already caused some concern by refusing to rule out changing the system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), and the rights groups and backbench MPs in her party have mobilised in response. In fairness, Ms Phillipson and her colleagues have talked about changes to EHCPs in the past. However, the recent welfare reform bill fiasco has both sharpened anxieties and bolstered the confidence of Labour backbenchers that they can defy the party leadership and block reform. The Labour general election manifesto was also oblique on this point. An element of fear, if not paranoia, has entered the debate, and Ms Phillipson's task has been much more difficult because of the mistakes made by her colleagues – Rachel Reeves as chancellor, Liz Kendall as work and pensions secretary, and the prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer. Ms Phillipson is one of the brighter stars in the Labour firmament, but she will be fortunate if she emerges from this process with an improved EHCP regime or her reputation enhanced. Trust has been eroded. For any government of any party, reforming the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision for children and young people presents particular challenges, and rightly so. These are among the most vulnerable of people, and they cannot be subject to discriminatory treatment, both as a matter of law and of morality. As a society, there is a duty to provide for children and young people with physical and learning disabilities, and to offer them the best start in life, maximising their independence and life chances. Their parents need and deserve support, and any failure to do so is unconscionable. In contrast to the PIP reforms, there must be no feeling that reform is solely or even primarily driven by the Treasury and the need for savings, though there is no escaping the financial realities. As Ms Reeves and Ms Kendall discovered to their cost, there are red lines that this generation of Labour MPs will not cross solely for the sake of meeting fiscal rules. Ms Phillipson, therefore, must win the arguments – and, as far as possible, carry all those concerned with her as she reshapes the regime and improves it. Therefore, the various groups representing SEND children and parents need to be closely involved in each stage of policy development. This is something she is now well placed to do, given recent events. In any case, because of what happened with PIP entitlements, she has no alternative. The parliamentary Labour Party, emboldened as it now is, will insist on being consulted. When the time comes to publish the white paper, there should be no nasty surprises. If there are, it will be just as doomed as the welfare reform bill. Secondly, this process cannot be rushed, or perceived to be rushed. The deadline of October for the schools white paper is a reasonable one but it should not take precedence over good policy. If the sections on SEND are not ready to be published, then they should be postponed. Indeed, there is a strong case for giving SEND policy a comprehensive study and white paper of its own, given the sensitivities and complexities involved. Again, the lesson of recent events is that a late policy is preferable to a bad policy. There is also a real need for a better understanding – entirely separate from the cost – of the merits of special schools or children's inclusion in the general school system, which will, of course, vary by individual cases. It is also wrong, as seems to be the case now, that variations in provision across different local authorities can be so stark – a postcode lottery. Thirdly, there does have to be some cognisance of the financial trends: why they are happening and how they will evolve. These are not all well understood even by the experts. Many more children are being given statutory rights under their hard-won EHCPs, but the reasons for the sharp increase of some 70 per cent in less than a decade are less transparent. Next year, the projected annual cost of support for children with learning difficulties or disabilities is set to reach £12bn. The system of finance also needs to be changed. At the moment, the costs of statutory SEND obligations are met by school managements and local authorities in the first instance, and they tend to squeeze other important, albeit less vital, priorities. This will put local councils into a large cumulative deficit of £8bn by 2027, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. In other words, more councils will go bust, which helps no one. It would be far more satisfactory if there were a national system of SEND funding based on consistent criteria. Finally – and, again, drawing on an important lesson – the system for SEND and EHCPs should be founded on a cross-party consensus. This, admittedly, is unlikely, but for obvious reasons it would help children and parents, as well as schools and local authorities, to plan ahead and avoid stigmatisation if those with special needs were 'weaponised' for political advantage. That may prove beyond Ms Phillipson's abilities, but she must surely know that she and her government cannot afford another such debacle. This time around, unlike Ms Kendall, she can remind Sir Keir and Ms Reeves of certain political realities.
