Mum accused of killing three people with poisonous mushrooms weeps in court
Why you can trust Sky News
An Australian woman accused of murdering three of her estranged husband's relatives with poisonous death cap mushrooms wept in court as she admitted lying about medical issues.
Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, in a case that has gripped the public.
She is also charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
Prosecutors say Patterson knowingly served the guests lethal death cap mushrooms in a Beef Wellington at her home in Leongatha, Victoria, in July 2023.
She denies all the charges, claiming the deaths were a "terrible accident".
1:39
Patterson continued speaking in her own defence on Wednesday as her trial in Morwell, Victoria, continues, repeatedly weeping in court as she said she may have accidentally included foraged mushrooms into the food she served.
"Now I think there was a possibility there were foraged ones in there," she said as she was questioned by her own barrister, Colin Mandy.
The court also heard that Patterson had invented medical issues partly to elicit sympathy from her estranged husband's relatives, from whom she said she felt she was growing apart.
"I didn't want their care of me to stop, so I kept it going. I shouldn't have done it," she told the court.
"Did you lie to them?" Mr Mandy asked. "I did lie to them," Patterson replied, through tears.
The prosecution argues that Patterson invented medical issues - the trial has heard she lied about a cancer diagnosis - in order to lure the victims to the meal - a claim Patterson denies.
The defence does not dispute that Patterson lied about having cancer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major development in case of missing 21-year-old man - after his family used a drone to send him a desperate plea to return home
The mother of a missing man was heard begging him to come home in a message blasted from a drone above the search zone just hours before his body was located. Finn Coyle, 21, was last seen at his family's home on Tanner Road in Carmel, in the hills east of Perth, about 2.30pm on Friday. In a sad update on Thursday, Queensland Police said officers had located a deceased male on a property in Carmel about 8.30am. 'Whilst formal identification is yet to take place, police believe the male to be missing 21-year-old man Finn Coyle. The death is not being treated as suspicious and a report will be prepared for the coroner,' the statement read. It comes just hours after Finn's mother shared a pre-recorded message with her son using a drone above the search area on Wednesday. 'It's mum here. The police and volunteers are looking for you,' she said. 'You're not in any trouble. If you hear or see the drone, please walk towards it.' 'Hopefully (his mum's) voice of comfort will draw him out from the bush,' Forrestfield police officer-in-charge Brad Robinson said. His older brother Conor said while Finn was suffering mental health problems, it was 'completely out of character' for him to disappear. 'Finn's been missing since Friday... we're all very worried for his wellbeing and his welfare, he's known to spend a lot of time in the local bush, in the hill's area,' he said during a press conference on Tuesday. 'He's very resourceful and he's a great young man, but he's suffering a lot of mental health (problems).' More than 50 people joined the search for Mr Coyle with locals on rural properties have been asked to check their sheds, outhouses and the surrounding bushland. Lifeline 13 11 14
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, UK and US?
A multi-billion dollar submarine deal between long-standing allies - Australia, the UK and the US - has come under the spotlight after the Trump administration said it was reviewing how the deal fits in with its heavily-touted "America First" agenda. The Aukus security pact, Australia's biggest ever defence project, is set to play a key part in the country's ability to replace its ageing Collins-class submarine fleet - and, crucially, its military standing in the region. The 30-day review will be led by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus. In a speech last year, he questioned why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". A US defence spokesperson said the review is about ensuring "this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda".Fears the review may torpedo the deal have been downplayed by the UK and Australia, with both saying the review is a normal process when a new government takes power. What is Aukus? Billed as a trilateral security partnership, the Aukus deal - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) over 30 years - involves two so-called pillars. Pillar 1 is about the supply and delivery of nuclear-powered attack submarines. Australia will buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US from 2032 with options to purchase two that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three 2 is about the allies collaborating on their "advanced capabilities". This involves sharing military expertise in areas such as long-range hypersonic missiles, undersea robotics and AI. What's the purpose of the deal? At its core, the deal is believed to be about countering China's growing presence in the Indo-Pacific region, and its role in rising tensions in disputed territories such as the South China none of the allies have directly pointed at China as a reason for the deal, the three countries have spoken about how regional security concerns have "grown significantly" in recent condemned the agreement as "extremely irresponsible" when it was first ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said it "seriously undermines regional peace and stability and intensifies the arms race". Who negotiated it? The deal was unveiled in September 2021 by three former leaders: Australia's Scott Morrison, the UK's Boris Johnson and the US's Joe Biden. The UK reviewed the security pact last year after Sir Keir Starmer's Labour government won the general election. What does Australia get out of it? For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country is set to become just the second to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology, after the submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet. They would also mean Australia would be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first the deal, sailors from the Royal Australian Navy are due to be sent to US and UK submarine bases to learn how to use the nuclear-powered submarines. What do the UK and US get out of it? From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western will also create about 7,000 jobs in Britain, with the design and construction of the new fleet of nuclear-powered submarines set to take place in the UK. The benefits for the US are less obvious - but sharing its defence technology could give the nation an opportunity to grow its presence in Asia-Pacific. Arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region that is far from their own.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans
Long-time Donald Trump ally and China hawk Elbridge 'Bridge' Colby will spearhead a US government review of the AUKUS submarine deal, as speculation mounts that the arrangement will be scrapped. The appointment, confirmed by a US defence official on Thursday, heightened expectations that the Trump administration will end or at least alter the deal under which Australia was to acquire nuclear-powered submarines to replace its current ageing fleet. Defence Minister Richard Marles downplayed the significance of a review, describing it as 'natural' given the policy was introduced by the Biden administration. But Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor has expressed serious reservations in the face of threatened abandonment. 'If AUKUS falls over, it is Australia that pays the price,' he said. 'We would face a dangerous gap in capability at a time when we lack the capacity to go it alone.' Australia jettisoned a deal to acquire French-made submarines - despite having spent almost $2.5billion - to instead join the deal with the US and UK governments. A collapse of the AUKUS deal would leave Australia to start from scratch in finding its next generation of submarines, with such deals taking many years between commissioning and completion. US Under Secretary of Defence Policy, Mr Colby will be at the helm during the period of review, as first reported by British publication the Financial Times. He has publicly spoken of his doubts about the strategic and cost value of the AUJUS deal. 'AUKUS, in principle, it is a great idea, but I have been very skeptical in practice,' Mr Colby posted on X in August last year. 'I remain skeptical, agnostic, as I put it, but more inclined based on new information I have gleaned. 'It would be crazy to have fewer SSNs Virginia class in the right place and time.' Asked to address this during a Senate hearing in March this year, prior to being approved as under secretary, he doubled down. Mr Colby said repeated that it was a 'great idea' but that the hope for an 'Australian capacity' for US military could not be dragged out over a lengthy time period. However he also referred to Australia as 'perhaps our closest ally in the world', noting that the Australian government has supported the US 'even in our less advisable wars'. 'It is a great idea for (Australia) to have attack submarines,' he told the committee. 'I think it should be the policy of the United States Government to do everything we can to make (AUKUS) work. 'This is getting back to restoring our defense industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies.' As of Thursday, he has not commented on his role overseeing the review of AUKUS but took to X to back the messaging of US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. '(Mr Hegseth's) Shangri-La Dialogue speech highlighted the Department of Defense's commonsense approach in the Indo-Pacific to achieve President Trump's Peace Through Strength and America First agenda.' He also fulfilled the label of 'China hawk' which media companies have given him, highlighting his concerns for the country's expanding influence in the Indo-Pacific region - an issue AUKUS was set up to counter. 'China's actions undermine peace and stability in the region,' he said, referencing its military build up and operations in the South China Sea and near Taiwan. 'These are the reasons driving the United States assessment that China is the most serious and pressing military threat,' he said. But, as a caveat, Mr Colby then quoted Mr Hegseth's recent statement that the US does not seek war or to 'dominate or strangle China'. The messaging is similar to that of the American defence official who confirmed to Daily Mail Australia that there would be a review of the AUKUS pact - and why. 'This review will ensure the initiative meets these common sense, America First criteria,' they said. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs,' the official said. In the seven-part thread, Mr Colby identified the US as an Indo-Pacific nation, commenting that prosperity and security of Americans is 'vitally linked with those of our allies and partners in the region'. Whatever his view on AUKUS, Mr Colby is not enthusiastic about formalising defence ties with a 'NATO-like' alliance in the region. 'I am not theologically opposed to it, Senator, but I have been skeptical,' he told the March hearing. 'Something may be building up to have more multilateralization in the region, but not the huge ambition of an Asia NATO,' he added. 'Especially because you have got Japan over here, India over here, Australia down here. Their circumstances are quite distinct.' Mr Colby is a long-time loyalist to Donald Trump and the US President's view of the world which is strongly critical of American involvement in overseas conflicts that do not serve US interests. During Trump's first term, he served from 2017 to 2018 as a deputy assistant secretary of defense. The key aim of his role was the reorientation of the defence department to prioritise the threat posed by China towards the US. Between Trump's terms, Mr Colby co-founded think tank The Marathon Initiative in 2019, which focused on preparing the US for an 'era of sustained great power competition'. A statement from the organisation when he was appointed back into the defense department praised Mr Colby's work shifting foreign policy away from the Middle East and Europe, towards China. 'He has worked persistently, persuasively, and intelligently to keep China at the forefront of the U.S. national security debate,' it said in April. 'His consistent message has been that America must prioritize the top threat facing the country—and that doing so will require tradeoffs. 'Bridge has sought to equip the United States with a coherent framework for ensuring its safety and prosperity against the most formidable rival in our history.'
