logo
Abilene's Vietnam veteran recalls Operation Babylift and Fall of Saigon

Abilene's Vietnam veteran recalls Operation Babylift and Fall of Saigon

Yahoo01-05-2025
ABILENE, Texas () – A retired Vietnam veteran shares stories and tragedies from the final days of the Vietnam War, including his account of the Fall of Saigon.
April 30, 1975, marks the day Saigon fell to North Vietnamese troops, signaling the official end of the Vietnam War. Now, 50 years later, the stories shared by those who served often reflect a mixture of duty, heroism, and loss. It is crucial to understand what these brave men and women faced during the pivotal final moments of the Vietnam conflict.
One of those heroes is retired U.S. Army First Sergeant Larry Gordon, who served as a radio operator during multiple tours in the Vietnam War and was present during the Fall of Saigon. Gordon now lives in Abilene, but in the 1960s, he was stationed in Hawaii with his wife and two children.
Gordon was attached to many significant missions during his deployment, but recalls one particular mission, Operation Babylift. The goal of this mission was to transport over 3,000 Vietnamese children, who had been orphaned due to the conflict, to secure locations outside of Vietnam to later be adopted. This mission began tragically when the first flight out of the country on an Army C-5A carrier plane, carrying over 300 babies, small children, and American crew members, crashed due to mechanical issues. This accident resulted in about 150 fatalities, an event that Gordon recalls.
'The same plane that we got off of was the same plane they had loaded the orphans on. I remember when I was in the DAO compound, which is sometimes called Pentagon Far East, I happened to be there when the pilots and crew came in from the crash. And I'll never forget the look on their faces… the horror of what they went through… trying their best to land that plane safely with all those precious lives… I still have that etched in my memory,' Gordon said.
When the evacuation order for troops in Saigon finally arrived, Gordon recalls his actions on the final day and the challenges they faced in leaving the country.
'I was probably the last person manning the satellite system when other people were evacuating. I was there to make sure, until the very last minute, because there was so much communication being, even there at the last minute when it was over. So, on the way out, they tried to bring us down with everything they had: small arms fire. You could hear the pinging on the body of the helicopter as the rounds hit,' Gordon said.
Gordon's journey back to American soil and his family was a long one. After leaving Vietnam, he was transported to a secure location in the Philippines, where he spent a brief and confusing time waiting to return to Hawaii. During his time in the Philippines, Gordon's wife was not updated on his status and was told that he was missing in action. Finally, Gordon returned to the United States and recalls his reception and the struggles that came after.
'When I arrived back in Hawaii, there was no fanfare. There was nobody to meet me except for my wife. That's all I needed. It took me days to realize that I was back home, you know—a loving wife and two loving kids. We tried our best to do everything that would get my mind off of that,' Gordon said.
Because of the recent loss of his wife, Gordon joined a grief counseling group with his local church. After some time of sharing his grief, Gordon feels that he now has clarity on why his life was spared during the Vietnam War, and says that with that clarity comes a new purpose.
'I just lost my wife not too long ago, and that's where I got involved. Now I'm involved in helping other people, and I'm sitting there telling myself, 'God, this is where you wanted me. You saved me for this,' said Gordon.'
Gordon explained that he doesn't believe his story is any more special than any of the others who've served, but he feels it is important to share these experiences not only for personal health but also so that others may better understand our past.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

See where this Green Bay building ranked in survey of 'ugliest' public buildings in U.S.
See where this Green Bay building ranked in survey of 'ugliest' public buildings in U.S.

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

See where this Green Bay building ranked in survey of 'ugliest' public buildings in U.S.

Green Bay City Hall, built in 1956 at 100 N. Jefferson St., is considered the 33rd "ugliest" public building in America, according to a 3,012-person survey conducted in July by a New Jersey real estate brokerage firm. The New Jersey Real Estate Network asked 3,003 respondents "based on age, gender, and geography" to give their opinions on what America's most unattractive civic buildings were, compiling a ranking of 100 buildings. It concluded, "There's something oddly democratic about this list. These aren't tourist sites or architectural darlings ... They're workhorses, not showpieces. But as this survey makes clear, design still matters to residents." Only the top five buildings got blurbs detailing their perceived unattractiveness with the Flint, Michigan, Municipal Center at No. 1. There was no accompanying description or explanation for Green Bay City Hall, the sole building from Wisconsin on the list, slotted 33rd place. But from the explanations that were given for the top five places, a common architectural theme ran through the buildings that were supposedly harsh on the eyes: boxy-silhouettes cut from stark, straight lines with little details or ornamentation. Such a description describes Green Bay's steel-framed, brick-clad City Hall in a site file to the National Register of Historic Places available through the Wisconsin Historical Society. "The architectural firm of Foeller, Schober, Berners, and Jahn was responsible for the contemporary, box-like style design of the building," read the site file. The building was constructed after a 1953 fire in the old City Hall Annex left several city departments, state offices, civic groups, and some renters homeless, a 1957 Green Bay Press-Gazette article reported. To make way for the new building, the former City Hall — built in 1901 in the colonial revival style popular at the time with an arched entrance, ionic columns, and a bell tower — was razed in late 1956 and became the parking lot for the current City Hall, according to the Wisconsin Historical Society. It stands six stories tall, the first story made of polished red granite. Almost all window openings in the upper floors are identical, and the windows are in regular grids on the sides of the building. "The building ... is an excellent example of mid-century, contemporary style architecture with high-end material finishes," the site file concludes, referring to the mid-century modernist style popular in American federal buildings from 1950 to 1979 for their lack of ornamentation, flat roofs, smooth walls, massive scale, exposed walls meant to project functionality and simplicity. Here are the top 10 ugliest public buildings, according to the survey: City of Flint Municipal Center (Flint, Michigan) Fresno County Superior Court (Fresno, California) Buffalo City Court (Buffalo, New York) Jackson County Courts Building (Pascagoula, Mississippi) Philadelphia Municipal Services Building (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Akron Municipal Court (Akron, Ohio) Atlantic City Municipal Court (Atlantic City, New Jersey) Bentonville Public Works Maintenance Facility (Bentonville, Arkansas) Tuscaloosa County Public Works Building (Tuscaloosa, Alabama) El Paso County Court Administration Building (El Paso, Texas) Jesse Lin is a reporter covering the community of Green Bay and its surroundings, as well as politics in northeastern Wisconsin. Contact him at 920-834-4250 or jlin@ This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: See Green Bay public building ranked in top 100 ugliest in U.S. Solve the daily Crossword

To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care
To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care

I watched my son walk to my car last Friday after school. I love picking him up; there's something about seeing him with his friends and the visceral relief you see in their smiles. It's nostalgic since I remember feeling the same way, but I love watching him and seeing him in a space different than the one he's in when he's with me and when he doesn't think I'm paying attention. My son doesn't care how he dresses and his room is a mess As he gets closer, I notice something smeared all over his white T-shirt. I have no idea what it is, but I'm sure he doesn't care. He slept at his father's last night, and as I ask him what's all over his shirt, his brother and sister chime in. 'He went to school like that,' they tell me simultaneously. Of course, I could say something to his dad about it and fault him for letting his son arrive at school in such a state, but I don't. I know how their morning went well because I've had many confrontations with him about his clothing if he's taken a shower or done his homework on time, and he doesn't care. Not even a little bit. It doesn't bother him if he walks into school with stained clothing, an oversized whitehead on his nose, or the same pants he's worn the last three days in a row. I don't understand it, and we had many throwdowns about this and other subjects at a very early hour. He keeps his room looking like a nightmare, and when I tell him to clean it up, it consists of him bringing down a sink full of dirty dishes and throwing everything else under the bed. He doesn't try hard in school He doesn't try hard in school despite being an intelligent kid who is excellent in math and science. At 15, I can't read his penmanship, and he doesn't put any effort into projects — he doesn't care. I've tried; I've taken him to counseling; I've loved him hard, and I've backed off. And then… There have been moments I've screamed at him, trying to get across how much I want him to care, how much I want him to live up to his potential, but it doesn't help. Nothing does. If your teen doesn't seem to care, you're not alone I'm telling you this because I want you to know that you aren't alone if you have a teen who doesn't give a flip about many things. I know so many teenagers out there are thriving and thinking about college and how many goals they will score in tonight's game, and then there's your kid. They are good and kind and can be sweet, and, of course, you love them — it's guttural and huge. But you wish they would care. You wish they'd shower more and not treat their room like a junkyard. You wish they would live up to their potential in school and play ball because they have skills they are hiding. You've tried it all, and nothing you do works, and it brings you to tears. You wonder if it's something you've done, if you've pushed too hard or not enough. But I have to tell you; it is not just your child. So many moms are feeling this way despite what they post on social media or what they see on the field. Those are snippets from a highlight reel; it's certainly not the whole story. I know my son has gifts; he's found a few but not all of them. I know he will in time; he's not ready yet, and I've realized I can't squeeze them out of him. I'm not giving up on him I'm not giving up; I've committed myself that I'd let him be because what I'm doing now, what his father is doing now, isn't working. We are both baffled; we both did well in high school and couldn't wait to go to college. Honestly, I wouldn't have been caught dead walking around high school in a stained shirt, and if my room looked like his, I'd cry. We raised him to be a good kid and a good adult; you have raised your kid to be a good human, too. I know you have. That doesn't stop because all our efforts are being blatantly ignored, but maybe we can give ourselves a damn break and realize we can't force them to care about things they don't. We want it to happen organically, of course, and I don't think it's going to if I keep shoving cleanliness, organization, working harder in school, and acne pads down his throat. My son is lovely. He doesn't skip school; he gets his work done by the skin of his teeth, and he takes care of me when I get sick since his father moved out. But he doesn't want to play sports; he couldn't care less if he was wearing clean clothes or has deodorant on or if all his friends are in the National Honor Society, and he could be too if he tried just a bit more. He lacks desire and motivation. My son doesn't care about many things right now, and if your child doesn't either, let's try and remember (together because I need support here) there are worse things. As his mom, I've worried other people will notice his nonchalant attitude and think it means I haven't shown up for him. Maybe you're worried about that too. Perhaps you are worried about it at this very moment. But mother to mother, let's let go of that thought and the fact they could be doing so much more with their life right now despite our support and our nagging and focus on the positive things they bring to the table because there are many. Please know, though, you aren't alone; your child is not alone, and I feel they will be just fine. The writer wishes to remain anonymous. More Great Reads Mom and Dad, Please Stick With Me SaveSave SaveSave The post To the Mom With a Teen Who Just Doesn't Seem to Care appeared first on Grown and Flown. Solve the daily Crossword

US Army Paratroopers to See Major Pay Change
US Army Paratroopers to See Major Pay Change

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

US Army Paratroopers to See Major Pay Change

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. Army is restructuring its airborne forces, leading to pay changes for thousands of parachutist positions. According to a report from the American military newspaper Stars and Stripes, an administrative message delivered to service members on July 30 announced that more than 22,000 paratroopers will no longer receive their monthly $150 "jump pay." This is due to reclassifications of paid parachutist positions which will take effect in the upcoming fiscal year. The reduced number which will remain eligible for the payments will comprise those deemed more likely to deploy these capabilities in combat operations in the foreseeable future, Newsweek understands. When approached for comment, U.S. Army Spokesman Major Travis Shaw told Newsweek: "The decision resulted from a 16-week study, which concluded that transformation was needed because the previous structure exceeded the operational requirements." Why It Matters The removal of jump pay for more than 22,000 parachutists—a significant portion of the roughly 50,000 the army keeps on its rolls—signals a major shift in its priorities, emphasizing the need for combat readiness and resource management over the maintenance of a large and permanent airborne force. What To Know Jump pay—also known as Parachute Duty Pay—is an extra monthly bonus awarded to soldiers who are parachute-qualified and actively serving in airborne roles. The upcoming change will allow soldiers to attain their parachuting qualifications but will not require them to keep these up to date or take part in jump operations. Soldiers are generally required to jump once every three months to maintain jump status, a baseline considered inadequate among Army leadership for achieving proficiency. This change was discussed earlier this year. Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, head of the 18th Airborne Corps, told Army Times in April that dozens of branches had been discussing how to improve the readiness of airborne operations since September. "We started to assume risk with the high-end forces that have to be ready to go tonight," Anderson told the outlet. "This is not about saving money; it's about getting readiness to where we need it." Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. Paratroopers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in Europe take part in the military exercise Swift Response 2025 at the military base in Rukla, Lithuania, on May 16, 2025. AFP via Getty Images/Petras Malukas Anderson added that limited aircraft had led to a broad "decline in collective airborne proficiency," and that devoting resources to over 50,000 airborne positions had reduced the readiness of assault forces. "We're trying to prop up a very big structure of 56,000 with dwindling resources, we're spreading those resources out, and we're undermining our own readiness goals," Anderson said during a podcast appearance in April. He added that many of those currently receiving jump pay are not currently meeting their "proficiency requirements." Major Shaw told Newsweek that removing 22,000 from paid active jump status "will refocus training and resources on critical forces to strengthen operational effectiveness." Soldiers who remain eligible will see an increase in this extra monthly allowance, as announced by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth in May, with jump pay is set to increase from $150 per month to $200 for paratroopers. In addition, jumpmasters, who are responsible for training and leading airborne operations, "are going to receive an additional $150 a month in incentive pay," Hegseth told the audience of current and active members of the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. Major Shaw told Newsweek that this will mean jumpmasters will be paid an additional $350 per month for these duties, and that this pay bump is in recognition of "the essential role of jumpmasters in developing combat-ready forces." What People Are Saying Lieutenant General Gregory Anderson, during an episode of the From the Green Notebook podcast, said: "Here's the big change: we're going to reduce the number of paid parachuter positions by 22,000. So currently, as of today, we have 56,000 paid parachuter positions in the Army. For historical context, the 101st and the 82nd at Normandy dropped fewer than 13,000 into Normandy." "It's not about the money per se, it's literally about—for the forces that will jump in the alpha echelon and fight off a potentially contested drop zone—we want them at the highest level of readiness," he added. "And three jumps … is not going to get us the readiness we need." One Redditor on the r/army forum, a community for current and former recruits as well as enthusiasts, wrote: "Even as someone who was Airborne I think this makes sense. The Army was paying over 20,000 people to be on jump status who realistically weren't going to be used as such. By having them still be Airborne qualified though they can quickly recreate Airborne units by having them go through refresher training if they ever needed. Sounds like they aren't going to save all that money though because they are going to boost the pay for the remaining Airborne troops and jumpmasters." What Happens Next? The changes are set to take effect in the 2026 fiscal year which begins October 1.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store