AI chatbots using reason emit more carbon than those responding concisely, study finds
A study found that carbon emissions from chat-based generative AI can be six times higher when responding to complex prompts, like abstract algebra or philosophy, compared to simpler prompts, such as high school history.
'The environmental impact of questioning trained (large-language models) is strongly determined by their reasoning approach, with explicit reasoning processes significantly driving up energy consumption and carbon emissions,' first author Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences, Germany, said.
'We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more (carbon dioxide) emissions than concise response models,' Dauner added.
The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Communication, evaluated how 14 large-language models (which power chatbots), including DeepSeek and Cogito, process information before responding to 1,000 benchmark questions — 500 multiple-choice and 500 subjective.
Each model responded to 100 questions on each of the five subjects chosen for the analysis — philosophy, high school world history, international law, abstract algebra, and high school mathematics.
'Zero-token reasoning traces appear when no intermediate text is needed (e.g. Cogito 70B reasoning on certain history items), whereas the maximum reasoning burden (6.716 tokens) is observed for the Deepseek R1 7B model on an abstract algebra prompt,' the authors wrote.
Tokens are virtual objects created by conversational AI when processing a user's prompt in natural language. More tokens lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions.
Chatbots equipped with an ability to reason, or 'reasoning models', produced 543.5 'thinking' tokens per question, whereas concise models — producing one-word answers — required just 37.7 tokens per question, the researchers found.
Thinking tokens are additional ones that reasoning models generate before producing an answer, they explained.
However, more thinking tokens do not necessarily guarantee correct responses, as the team said, elaborate detail is not always essential for correctness.
Dauner said, 'None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO2 equivalent achieved higher than 80 per cent accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly.' 'Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in (large-language model) technologies,' the author added.
The most accurate performance was seen in the reasoning model Cogito, with a nearly 85 per cent accuracy in responses, whilst producing three times more carbon dioxide emissions than similar-sized models generating concise answers.
'In conclusion, while larger and reasoning-enhanced models significantly outperform smaller counterparts in terms of accuracy, this improvement comes with steep increases in emissions and computational demand,' the authors wrote.
'Optimising reasoning efficiency and response brevity, particularly for challenging subjects like abstract algebra, is crucial for advancing more sustainable and environmentally conscious artificial intelligence technologies,' they wrote. PTI KRS KRS MPL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
David Sacks 'warns' US, says DeepSeek 'proof' China can advance AI chips despite restrictions
David Sacks David Sacks , the White House's AI and crypto czar, has warned that the United States' overly strict chip export rules could weaken its long-term tech dominance, potentially boosting Chinese rivals. He pointed to January's " DeepSeek moment " where the launch of the AI model revealed China was perhaps only "three to six months behind" in AI capabilities, a much smaller gap than previously believed. In a Bloomberg Television interview (via Business Insider), Sacks emphasised that China is rapidly closing the AI gap, urging the US to rethink its chip export controls if it intends to maintain its leading edge. He pointed to a "DeepSeek moment" in January, where the launch of the Chinese AI model revealed China was perhaps only "three to six months behind" in AI capabilities, a much smaller gap than previously believed. Sacks says Chinese companies moving fast in AI chip-making Despite current "supply-constrained" conditions for chip production in China, Sacks predicts this will change quickly. While he estimates China might be one and a half to two years behind the US in chip design, companies like Huawei are "moving fast" to catch up. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cặp EUR/USD: Đà Tăng? IC Markets Undo "Even before they fully caught up, I think you will see them exporting their chips for the global market," Sacks cautioned. He warned that if the US becomes "overly restrictive in terms of US sales to the world," it risks a future where "Huawei is everywhere." Sacks' concerns echo sentiments from other prominent tech leaders. At the Computex Taipei tech conference in May, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated that US chip export rules were a "failure" because they spurred Chinese tech development. Huang noted that Nvidia's market share in China has plummeted from 95% four years ago to 50%, attributing this decline directly to the export controls. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
11 hours ago
- Economic Times
AI chatbots using reason emit more carbon than those responding concisely, study finds
A study found that carbon emissions from chat-based generative AI can be six times higher when responding to complex prompts, like abstract algebra or philosophy, compared to simpler prompts, such as high school history. "The environmental impact of questioning trained (large-language models) is strongly determined by their reasoning approach, with explicit reasoning processes significantly driving up energy consumption and carbon emissions," first author Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule Munchen University of Applied Sciences, Germany, said. "We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more (carbon dioxide) emissions than concise response models," Dauner study, published in the journal Frontiers in Communication, evaluated how 14 large-language models (which power chatbots), including DeepSeek and Cogito, process information before responding to 1,000 benchmark questions -- 500 multiple-choice and 500 model responded to 100 questions on each of the five subjects chosen for the analysis -- philosophy, high school world history, international law, abstract algebra, and high school mathematics. "Zero-token reasoning traces appear when no intermediate text is needed (e.g. Cogito 70B reasoning on certain history items), whereas the maximum reasoning burden (6.716 tokens) is observed for the Deepseek R1 7B model on an abstract algebra prompt," the authors wrote. Tokens are virtual objects created by conversational AI when processing a user's prompt in natural language. More tokens lead to increased carbon dioxide equipped with an ability to reason, or 'reasoning models', produced 543.5 'thinking' tokens per question, whereas concise models -- producing one-word answers -- required just 37.7 tokens per question, the researchers tokens are additional ones that reasoning models generate before producing an answer, they more thinking tokens do not necessarily guarantee correct responses, as the team said, elaborate detail is not always essential for said, "None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO₂ equivalent achieved higher than 80 per cent accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly." "Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in (large-language model) technologies," the author most accurate performance was seen in the reasoning model Cogito, with a nearly 85 per cent accuracy in responses, whilst producing three times more carbon dioxide emissions than similar-sized models generating concise answers."In conclusion, while larger and reasoning-enhanced models significantly outperform smaller counterparts in terms of accuracy, this improvement comes with steep increases in emissions and computational demand," the authors wrote. "Optimising reasoning efficiency and response brevity, particularly for challenging subjects like abstract algebra, is crucial for advancing more sustainable and environmentally conscious artificial intelligence technologies," they wrote.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 hours ago
- Business Standard
AI chatbots that reason emit more carbon than ones with simple reply: Study
A study found that carbon emissions from chat-based generative AI can be six times higher when responding to complex prompts, like abstract algebra or philosophy, compared to simpler prompts, such as high school history. "The environmental impact of questioning trained (large-language models) is strongly determined by their reasoning approach, with explicit reasoning processes significantly driving up energy consumption and carbon emissions," first author Maximilian Dauner, a researcher at Hochschule Mnchen University of Applied Sciences, Germany, said. "We found that reasoning-enabled models produced up to 50 times more (carbon dioxide) emissions than concise response models," Dauner added. The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Communication, evaluated how 14 large-language models (which power chatbots), including DeepSeek and Cogito, process information before responding to 1,000 benchmark questions -- 500 multiple-choice and 500 subjective. Each model responded to 100 questions on each of the five subjects chosen for the analysis -- philosophy, high school world history, international law, abstract algebra, and high school mathematics. "Zero-token reasoning traces appear when no intermediate text is needed (e.g. Cogito 70B reasoning on certain history items), whereas the maximum reasoning burden (6.716 tokens) is observed for the Deepseek R1 7B model on an abstract algebra prompt," the authors wrote. Tokens are virtual objects created by conversational AI when processing a user's prompt in natural language. More tokens lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions. Chatbots equipped with an ability to reason, or 'reasoning models', produced 543.5 'thinking' tokens per question, whereas concise models -- producing one-word answers -- required just 37.7 tokens per question, the researchers found. Thinking tokens are additional ones that reasoning models generate before producing an answer, they explained. However, more thinking tokens do not necessarily guarantee correct responses, as the team said, elaborate detail is not always essential for correctness. Dauner said, "None of the models that kept emissions below 500 grams of CO2 equivalent achieved higher than 80 per cent accuracy on answering the 1,000 questions correctly." "Currently, we see a clear accuracy-sustainability trade-off inherent in (large-language model) technologies," the author added. The most accurate performance was seen in the reasoning model Cogito, with a nearly 85 per cent accuracy in responses, whilst producing three times more carbon dioxide emissions than similar-sized models generating concise answers. "In conclusion, while larger and reasoning-enhanced models significantly outperform smaller counterparts in terms of accuracy, this improvement comes with steep increases in emissions and computational demand," the authors wrote. "Optimising reasoning efficiency and response brevity, particularly for challenging subjects like abstract algebra, is crucial for advancing more sustainable and environmentally conscious artificial intelligence technologies," they wrote.
