This mobility test takes just seconds — and it could predict how well you'll age
A recent study published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology has brought a surprisingly simple test into the spotlight. It is called the sitting-rising test.
Can you sit down on the floor and then stand back up again, without using your hands, arms, knees or the nearest bit of furniture for support?
Researchers found that people who could do this with little to no assistance were more likely to live longer than those who struggled. The test gives you a score out of 10, taking away points each time you use a hand or knee to steady yourself. Scoring low was associated with a greater risk of earlier mortality during the study period.
But before you start stretching on the living room rug, let's break down what this test is really measuring and how it could help you take stock of your overall health.
Why this matters to you
The sitting-rising test measures more than just mobility. It also challenges your strength, balance, and coordination, which are important movement skills you use every day without perhaps realizing.
Whether you have stood up while holding a toddler or gotten up after working on flat-pack furniture, your whole body needs to work smoothly together.
As we get older, moving with confidence and control becomes more and more important. Good balance and strength help reduce the risk of falls, make it easier to stay active, and help you maintain your independence.
So, how easily you can get off the floor now could give you a glimpse of how capable and mobile you are likely to be in the years ahead.
How to try the test
Clear a bit of floor space and begin by standing. You will then cross one leg behind the other and lower yourself down to a seated position on the floor. Then return to standing the same way. Try not to use your hands, knees or arms for support. Each time you do, subtract one point from your score out of 10.
Scoring seven or above is considered good. While anything lower might suggest an area worth improving. But don't panic if you don't pass with flying colors. This test is based on just one study, and while the results are interesting, it is not the be all and end all of your health.
This is simply a quick way to spot potential areas to work on so you can move more comfortably and feel stronger as you age.
How to improve your score
If your hips feel stiff, your balance is a little off, or your legs don't feel as strong as they used to, that can be a helpful place to begin. You are not alone in feeling that way, and the good news is that there are gentle ways to rebuild strength and confidence in how you move.
Functional strength workouts that focus on the legs and core can gradually help you feel more stable and supported. Likewise, adding short mobility sessions may ease stiffness and make everyday movement feel more comfortable. You might also find that something like yoga works well, as it combines balance, flexibility and strength in a way that can be adapted to your needs.
We have tested some of the best yoga mats to help make getting started a little easier. They are, of course, great for yoga practice, but also provide a comfortable and supportive base for all kinds of workouts and floor exercises.
More from Tom's Guide
Do ginger shots actually work? I took one every day for a week to find out
How running for 75 minutes a week could help you live longer — and feel younger
Forget hour-long workouts — new study says this 5-minute routine improves your strength and mental health
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'A little itch turned out to be skin cancer'
Two years ago, Tom Jones noticed a mole on his chest that he "didn't bother with". The head of hospitality in Herm said "it was a little itchy" every so often but otherwise caused him no trouble. A visit to the doctor confirmed it was a melanoma that had grown rapidly under the skin. "Don't think that little itch is nothing because it's what's underneath is the problem, not what's on top," he said. "It came back to haunt me." More news stories for Guernsey Listen to the latest news for Guernsey Mr Jones said he was now a "breast less" after the 4.5 inch melanoma under his right nipple needed to be removed. He said the growth on his chest "changed colour and it began to be quite an annoyance". He got checked over at the hospital and was told it had been there "an awful long time" and it had grown significantly under his skin. An operation which saw the full removal of his right breast. Mr Jones said: "It had been growing quite rapidly underneath the skin, so therefore it wasn't treatable with a small incision, it had to be taken out completely." The melanoma was successfully cut out but Mr Johns said he still goes for regular check-ups. He urged visitors to the island to take responsibility of their safety in the sun. "I'm personally more aware of that than anyone else because I have fallen foul to not protecting myself," he said. "Don't hesitate, get that sun cream on, and if you've got an itch, get it checked. "It's everyone's personal responsibility and it's really important for you to bring some protection with you [to the island]." This story is part of BBC Guernsey's Sun Safety Campaign. Follow BBC Guernsey on X and Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to More on this story Cancer diagnosis after beautician spotted change Wear SPF 50, warns islander with skin cancer How sun-conscious is our culture? Guernsey sun safety imperative, says charity Push for islanders to protect ears in the sun
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Check Your Kitchen—Experts Say These 10 Foods Contain The Most Microplastics
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Microplastics are found in many everyday foods like rice, tea, bottled water, and seafood. Early research suggests microplastics may contribute to health issues like oxidative stress, organ dysfunction, and metabolic or immune disruptions, though more studies are needed. Experts recommend reducing exposure by choosing loose-leaf tea, rinsing rice, avoiding plastic bottles, and opting for minimally processed or non-plastic-packaged foods. Almost everything we eat these days is transported or stored in plastic, and we've all zapped leftovers in the microwave in plastic containers. But you may not have realized that microplastics actually can be found inside the foods we eat. It's actually not a new topic. "Research into the effects of microplastic consumption has been ongoing for several decades," says Stephani Johnson, D.C.N., R.D.N., adjunct professor, Department of Clinical and Preventive Nutrition Sciences at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. "However, there is still much to learn regarding the average levels of human exposure, how long microplastics remain in the body, and their associated health consequences. What is currently known is that microplastics are ubiquitous in the environment, making complete avoidance virtually impossible." Studies have found microplastics throughout the human body, including in the brain, heart, colon, placenta, and more. "We are what we eat, and we are eating and being exposed to plastics in our food," Nicholas Mallos, vice president of conservation, ocean plastics, at the Ocean Conservancy, and co-author of a recent study on microplastics in commonly-consumed proteins. "While we need more research to know what exposure levels of plastics are causing human health problems, we should be concerned." What Are The Health Consequences Of Consuming Microplastics? Emerging evidence suggests that potential harm may depend on several factors, including the amount consumed, as well as the type, size, and shape of the microplastic particles. "At the cellular level, studies have shown that microplastics can contribute to oxidative stress, DNA damage, organ dysfunction, and disruptions in metabolic, reproductive, and immune functions, as well as neurodevelopmental toxicity," Johnson says. Unfortunately, there is still much we don't know about microplastics in food. "Our study demonstrates the need for further research to better understand microplastics in the most commonly consumed foods, including precisely where these microplastics are coming from and the potential human health risks," Mallos says. Ahead, the foods that research has found to contain a measurable amount of microplastics: Tea Many commercial tea bags are made with polypropylene, a type of plastic used to seal the bags and maintain their shape. "When steeped in hot water, these bags can release microplastics into the tea. To avoid potential ingestion of microplastics, using loose leaf tea with a stainless steel or other non-plastic tea infuser is a safer and more sustainable alternative," Johnson says. Rice "Studies have shown that rice can contain relatively high levels of microplastics, likely due to contamination of soil and irrigation water," Johnson says. Rinsing rice thoroughly before cooking has been found to reduce its microplastic content by approximately 20–40%. Ultra-Processed Foods There's evidence that food processing is a likely source of microplastic contamination. Research has found that highly-processed protein products, such as chicken nuggets, tofu, and plant-based burgers, contain significantly more microplastics per gram than minimally processed products, such as wild Alaska pollock and raw chicken breast, Mallos says. Bottled Water When exposed to heat—such as being left in a hot car—or subjected to physical stress, like squeezing, plastic water bottles can release microplastics into the water. "Among various types, single-use plastic bottles tend to release the highest amounts of microplastics, followed by reusable plastic bottles," Johnson says. "In contrast, stainless steel and glass bottles do not degrade or leach microplastics, making them a safer and more sustainable choice for drinking water." Salt Believe it or not, even salt—a naturally occurring mineral—isn't safe from microplastics. Research has found that salt can contain large amounts of microplastics, reflecting the broader problem of environmental pollution. Himalayan pink salt contains the greatest amounts, followed by black salt and sea salt, Johnson says. Fruits & Vegetables "Due to widespread environmental contamination, fruits and vegetables can contain measurable amounts of microplastics," Johnson says. Some types of produce are more susceptible than others, like root vegetables (such as carrots, potatoes, and beets), because they absorb microplastics from contaminated soil and rainwater through their root systems. But all types of plants can absorb microplastics through their roots. Honey Even honey may be contaminated by microplastics, which is also a concern due to widespread environmental contamination, Johnson says. Plant-Based Foods In the study co-authored by Mallos, microplastic particles were found in tofu, plant-based nuggets, plant-based fish sticks, and plant-based ground beef. Fresh Seafood Microplastics in the ocean accumulate in fish and shellfish, ultimately impacting humans, who consume seafood containing these particles, Johnson says. Bottom-feeding species, such as clams, mussels, oysters, catfish, halibut, flounder, and cod, tend to have higher concentrations of microplastics compared to other marine organisms. Processed Seafood Processed seafood fares no better. Research shows breaded shrimp, pollock fish sticks, and shrimp also contain microplastics, Mallos says. You Might Also Like Insanely Easy Weeknight Dinners To Try This Week 29 Insanely Delicious Vodka Cocktails Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Results: Siemens Healthineers AG Beat Earnings Expectations And Analysts Now Have New Forecasts
A week ago, Siemens Healthineers AG (ETR:SHL) came out with a strong set of quarterly numbers that could potentially lead to a re-rate of the stock. It was overall a positive result, with revenues beating expectations by 2.0% to hit €5.7b. Siemens Healthineers reported statutory earnings per share (EPS) €0.49, which was a notable 17% above what the analysts had forecast. Earnings are an important time for investors, as they can track a company's performance, look at what the analysts are forecasting for next year, and see if there's been a change in sentiment towards the company. We've gathered the most recent statutory forecasts to see whether the analysts have changed their earnings models, following these results. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. After the latest results, the 18 analysts covering Siemens Healthineers are now predicting revenues of €24.6b in 2026. If met, this would reflect a modest 5.4% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Per-share earnings are expected to climb 17% to €2.29. In the lead-up to this report, the analysts had been modelling revenues of €24.8b and earnings per share (EPS) of €2.34 in 2026. So it looks like there's been a small decline in overall sentiment after the recent results - there's been no major change to revenue estimates, but the analysts did make a small dip in their earnings per share forecasts. See our latest analysis for Siemens Healthineers The consensus price target held steady at €59.86, with the analysts seemingly voting that their lower forecast earnings are not expected to lead to a lower stock price in the foreseeable future. That's not the only conclusion we can draw from this data however, as some investors also like to consider the spread in estimates when evaluating analyst price targets. There are some variant perceptions on Siemens Healthineers, with the most bullish analyst valuing it at €65.00 and the most bearish at €50.00 per share. This is a very narrow spread of estimates, implying either that Siemens Healthineers is an easy company to value, or - more likely - the analysts are relying heavily on some key assumptions. These estimates are interesting, but it can be useful to paint some more broad strokes when seeing how forecasts compare, both to the Siemens Healthineers' past performance and to peers in the same industry. It's pretty clear that there is an expectation that Siemens Healthineers' revenue growth will slow down substantially, with revenues to the end of 2026 expected to display 4.3% growth on an annualised basis. This is compared to a historical growth rate of 9.0% over the past five years. Compare this against other companies (with analyst forecasts) in the industry, which are in aggregate expected to see revenue growth of 5.6% annually. So it's pretty clear that, while revenue growth is expected to slow down, the wider industry is also expected to grow faster than Siemens Healthineers. The Bottom Line The biggest concern is that the analysts reduced their earnings per share estimates, suggesting business headwinds could lay ahead for Siemens Healthineers. On the plus side, there were no major changes to revenue estimates; although forecasts imply they will perform worse than the wider industry. There was no real change to the consensus price target, suggesting that the intrinsic value of the business has not undergone any major changes with the latest estimates. Keeping that in mind, we still think that the longer term trajectory of the business is much more important for investors to consider. We have forecasts for Siemens Healthineers going out to 2027, and you can see them free on our platform here. And what about risks? Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Siemens Healthineers you should know about. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
