Aldi brings home delivery to WA as supermarket war heats up
Just weeks after launching a trial in Canberra, the German supermarket says the service will now be available in most of its 52 stores in WA from Tuesday.
Aldi is promising its range of more than 1800 products — including fruit, vegetables, meat, seafood, dairy, bread and household essentials — at a few clicks of a button.
WA becomes the second location to have the service available, with the company planning to roll it out more nationally in the coming months.
It comes as online delivery and click-and-collect services quickly become key areas of growth for larger rivals Coles and Woolworths. In the half-year, Coles and Woolworths recorded a 22.6 per cent and 20 per cent increase, respectively, in online sales, outpacing in-store growth.
Coles and Woolworths are already available on DoorDash.
Aldi Australia chief commercial officer Jordan Lack said the supermarket's mission was to deliver high quality groceries at the lowest prices.
'Through our partnership with DoorDash, we can now literally deliver on this mission directly to Aussies' doorsteps in an exciting new way that we know our customers have been seeking,' Mr Lack said.
'We're thrilled that customers will be able to shop with Aldi from the comfort of their homes, bringing our 'Good Different' shopping experience to more and more people in the tap of an app.'
DoorDash APAC vice president Simon Rossi said the partnership represented an exciting step forward in how it was redefining how Australians shopped for groceries.
It is the last major supermarket chain to make home delivery available, after Costco announced a similar partnership with DoorDash in early February to bring bulk-buy goods to Australians' doorsteps.
US supermarket giant Costco signed a similar deal with DoorDash in February, making same-day delivery available across Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Brisbane.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Tuesday's winning Oz Lotto numbers: 11, 32, 40, 42, 38, 29, 34, supps 15, 3 and 47
Life's about to change for at least two lucky Aussies who hold the winning tickets in Tuesday's Oz Lotto's draw, sharing the division one $30m jackpot. The winning tickets are worth $15m each. It is not yet known where the winning tickets were purchased. The winning numbers in Tuesday's draw are: 11, 32, 40, 42, 38, 29, 34 and the supplementaries are 15, 3 and 47. Six tickets across Australia will also share in the division two prize pool worth $448,521. Last month, a Tasmanian man become that state's biggest Lotto winner when he claimed the $70m jackpot. There have been 310 division one winning Lotto tickets across Australia this year taking home almost $1bn in prize money. NewsWire Aussie travellers are being warned rabies infections are on the rise in Bali with popular tourist spots identified as red zones. NewsWire One Nation leader Pauline Hanson reveals the wild reason why she rejected Welcome to Country ceremonies in the Senate.
7NEWS
4 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Kmart dragged into landmark legal case over alleged links to Uyghur forced labor in China
In an Australian legal first, Uyghur community leaders have launched Federal Court action demanding transparency from retail giant Kmart over its potential links to forced labour in China. The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association (AUTWA) has filed a motion demanding Kmart hand over internal documents related to two of its clothing suppliers allegedly involved in forced Uyghur labour in the Xinjiang region. Both suppliers are listed in Kmart's 2024 and 2025 factory disclosures, AUTWA said. The legal action, led by Maurice Blackburn Lawyers and supported by the Human Rights Law Centre, aims to test whether Kmart's ethical sourcing claims hold up under scrutiny. Speaking outside the court in Melbourne on Tuesday, AUTWA President Ramila Chanisheff said the case marks a historic milestone. 'We just filed a document into the Federal Court asking for records from Kmart about two supply chains that could be linked to Uyghur forced labor,' she told 'It is the first of its kind in Australia to bring a case against an Australian retailer, and it's not just a small retailer, it's actually a major. 'We want to make sure that the products that are made in China and sold in Kmart are not linked to forced labour.' Kmart publicly markets itself as an ethical business. 'We aim to provide great products at the lowest prices for our customers while respecting human rights,' the retailer states on its website. Kmart said it is continually working to improve its ethical sourcing standards and processes, and is collaborating with suppliers, NGOs, trade unions, and government representatives to help improve working conditions in the regions where it sources its products. The court action now centres around whether the company may have breached Australian Consumer Law by engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct about the sourcing of its products. AUTWA is seeking access to documents that could demonstrate what Kmart knew — or should have known — about the origins of products made in factories with ties to Xinjiang, where widespread human rights abuses, including state-sponsored forced labour, have been well-documented. 'If it's found that Kmart's products are linked to forced labour, they must divest from those supply chains, not just in Xinjiang, but across China, where Uyghur people are often trafficked into mainland labour camps,' Chanisheff said. The goal is not only to hold Kmart accountable, but to put other industries on notice, she added. 'Australians deserve to make informed choices.' Retailers on notice Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis, who is leading the case, said the legal action aims to hold Kmart accountable for its ethical sourcing claims. She said the company must be transparent about its supply chain practices, especially given the known risks of forced labour in Xinjiang. 'Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights — but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang,' Kanis said. 'Documents will be sought from Kmart to determine whether it engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct about this issue.' She added the Federal Court will be asked to compel Kmart to provide evidence of what due diligence it has conducted on suppliers with links to the region. Associate legal director at the Human Rights Law Centre Freya Dinshaw said the case underscores significant weaknesses in Australia's approach to modern slavery. 'The alarm bells have been ringing for a long time in relation to the risk of forced labour in the Chinese garment sector, and Australian retailers have been on notice,' she said. 'This court case is about Kmart coming clean on whether it is really doing everything it claims to be doing to ensure that its products are slavery free.' Dinshaw argued it should not be up to the public to force companies into transparency through legal action and called for stronger laws that require businesses to investigate and prevent forced labour. She also noted that, unlike countries such as the US and Canada, Australia has not banned the importation of goods made with forced labour, allowing them to reach store shelves unchecked. What happens next? The Federal Court will consider AUTWA's request in the coming weeks. If successful, the outcome could pave the way for further legal action against Kmart or other major retailers. 'Kmart, and all companies, must ensure they are not profiting from forced labour in China.,' Chanisheff said. The case is expected to fuel growing public pressure on retailers to lift the veil on their offshore operations.
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Fury after JobSeeker payments illegally cut
The administers of JobSeeker have been savaged in a report by the Commonwealth watchdog, which found actions taken by the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) and Services Australia likely had a 'catastrophic impact' on vulnerable Aussies. Between April 2022 and July 2024, 964 JobSeeker recipients had their payments automatically cancelled under a specific clause in the Target Compliance Framework (TCF) after it was amended in 2022. The framework is an automated system to get JobSeeker recipient to undertake compulsory tasks such as attending job appointments and actively search for work, with those who repeatedly fail to meet the mutual obligations subjected to financial penalties. Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson was scathing of DEWR secretary Natalie James and Services Australia, saying they 'failed to take adequate steps to ensure the TCF was implemented in accordance with the 2022 amendment,' resulting in an 'unlawful decision' to cancel income support payments. The move was done 'without consideration of the job seeker's circumstances' and the 'failure to exercise … discretion … (posed) potentially significant, if not catastrophic, consequences for vulnerable job seekers', he wrote. It also noted a further 45 job recipients had their payments automatically cancelled despite Ms James' decision to pause cancellations on September 2024 – the fifth IT error catalogued by the department. The Commonwealth Ombudsman was scathing of the federal entities responsible for administering JobSeeker payments. NewsWire/ Emma Brasier Credit: News Corp Australia 'We also found that the agencies failed to take all of the steps required under those amendments to safeguard job seekers,' the report set to be released on Wednesday found. Critically the report also states a Digital Protection Framework, despite having the legal requirement to do so. Mr Anderson also noted the automation failures happened after the Robodebt Royal Commission which highlighted the 'serious impact' automated processes can have on 'highly vulnerable people'. Ms James also took nearly 10 months between April 2022 to September 2023 to pause the automated cancellations after it was raised by external legal advisers, with Mr Anderson questioning the 'apparent lack of urgency' over the 'significant issue'. As of March 21 this year, reductions and cancellations in income support payments have been paused pending ongoing legal and IT reviews. 'We do not consider a delay of over three years, coupled with an indefinite commitment to future action, is reasonable,' the report said. 'It does not satisfy the legislative requirement in the SPROM Act that the Secretary establish the DPF. 'In our view, if parliament imposes an obligation on an agency head without specifying a time frame (as was the case here), the agency head should aim for implementation as soon as reasonably practicable.' While the department has accepted all seven recommendations issued by Mr Anderson, the ombudsman issued an urgent warning to all government agencies, calling on them to ensure all 'automated decision-making is aligned with law and policy and is subject to ongoing testing and assurance'. 'Implementation of the recommendations is an important step towards restoring the confidence of the public, parliament and above all the people affected, that automated decisions are being made responsibly and according to law,' he said. The report said the department failed to exercise discretion, which led to potentially 'catastrophic' consequences for vulnerable Aussies. NewsWire/ Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Antipoverty Centres spokesperson Kristin O'Connell urged more action, including the permanent removal of the TCF. 'It is not enough for the government to implement the Ombudsman's recommendations and move on,' she said. 'The release of this damning report is a significant moment for every person who has been subjected to compulsory activities while on a Centrelink payment and for those who have spoken up about the abuse they experienced. 'For the first time, welfare recipients may feel their experiences are being taken seriously and their lives being treated as valuable by someone in a position of power.' Greens' social services spokeswoman Penny Allman-Payne said the report should be a 'wake up call for change'. 'Despite clear warnings that the TCF is cruel and unlawful, Labor has continued to allow suspensions of payments to be used as a weapon against welfare recipients, to the benefit of so-called employment service providers who profit from poverty,' she said. 'It is clear that the TCF is an expensive hangover from a conservative government which has been heartlessly prolonged by this Labor government for far too long.' During Senate estimates in February, Ms James apologised and took full responsibility for the IT outages which resulted in the cancellations. 'I absolutely and unreservedly apologise on behalf of the department that we cannot have full confidence in this system delivering what it's intended to deliver,' she said. 'It's not acceptable, and it is my responsibility and not the minister's (Murray Watt), in this respect, although he may wish to add his own commentary but I will say that I am responsible, legislatively and administratively, for overseeing this process.' At the time her comments resulted in welfare advocates calling for a half to the TCF framework, with Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie lashing the system as 'overly punitive and in need of a complete overhaul'.
