Affirmative-action measures must ‘not go too far', argues DA in court
The DA takes on 13 respondents in court over the Employment Equity Amendment Act.
Picture for illustration. Residents from the predominantly coloured community of Westbury march against the proposed Employment equity act that which they say has been put into place to prevent them from getting work, 12 June 2023, Westbury, Johannesburg. Protestors peacefully marched to different government and private businesses in the area to hand over their memorandum. Picture: Shaun Holland
The DA's legal representative, Ismail Jamie, has argued that the Employment Equity Amendment Act is rigid and a one-size-fits-all, and that it should not be allowed to proceed in its current state.
President Cyril Ramaphosa signed the Employment Equity Amendment Act into law in April 2023.
The Presidency said at the time that the Act's aim was to reduce the regulatory burden for small employers, allowing them to focus on job creation.
ALSO READ: Employment Equity Act amendments to come into effect on 1 January 2025
Small businesses that employ fewer than 50 employees are no longer bound to comply with Chapter III of the Employment Equity Act, 1998 (EEA), for example, regarding the submission of their EE reports starting from the 2025 EE Reporting period.
The Act also empowers the labour minister to regulate the sector-specific numerical EE targets.
On Tuesday, the DA was in the High Court in Pretoria, challenging thirteen respondents, including the minister of Employment and Labour, Commission for Employment Equity, speaker of the National Assembly, chairperson of the National Council of Provinces and all premiers.
ALSO READ: Changes to Employment Equity Act will cut legislative red tape for small businesses
The Amendment Act is not yet in effect.
Employment Equity Amendment Act: 'Be careful'
The DA argued in court that although the constitution permits the adoption of affirmative-action measures to realise the constitutional promise of substantive equality, it must be approached with caution.
'Affirmative-action measures must be approached with caution because they can invade the dignity of those who are not preferred by them,' argued the DA.
ALSO READ: Government set to revise employment equity targets
The party said these measures must 'not go too far' and unduly invade the human dignity of those affected by them
'Whether an affirmative-action measure is constitutionally permissible depends on the context, and so, rigid or one-size-fits-all approaches are generally unconstitutional.'
The Act, in its unamended state, requires every employer with 50 or more employees to conduct an analysis of its workforce to determine the extent to which people from designated groups (i.e., people of colour, women and people with disabilities) are underrepresented at various occupational levels.
It calls on employers to prepare and implement an employment equity plan, which must include numerical goals to remedy any underrepresentation identified in the analysis.
ALSO READ: White dominance in top jobs sparks union outcry
'Currently, and crucially, this obligation is context-sensitive. Every designated employer is required to formulate and implement numerical targets which are responsive to its unique position, including the degree of underrepresentation in its workforce and the availability of suitably qualified people from designated groups to remedy that underrepresentation,' argued the DA.
Amendment Act in 'rigid'
However, the Amendment Act would replace this approach with one that is 'rigid and one-size-fits-all', argued the DA.
'If the Amendment Act comes into effect, every designated employer would have to follow 'numerical targets' set by the labour minister, regardless of the degree of underrepresentation it suffers from and its ability to remedy that underrepresentation.'
If an employer fails to make its workforce fit the particular demographic composition required by the relevant ministerial target, the employer will face severe penalties, including the inability to do business with the state, the cancellation of existing state contracts, compelling orders and fines.
The case continues.
READ NEXT: Ramaphosa admits SA is falling short in fixing economic inequality
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law
The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) calls on Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson to disclose all state bodies empowered under the Expropriation Act. The Expropriation Act allows property to be seized below market value, raising concerns about property rights in South Africa. Makone Maja of the IRR says more than 400 state entities may already hold expropriation powers. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni residents to face new tariff hikes IRR polling shows 68% of South Africans oppose the Expropriation Act. The IRR will this week write to Macpherson, seeking clarity on how many public entities have been granted the power to expropriate property under the recently enacted Expropriation Act. The act grants expropriating authorities broad powers to seize property, including land, homes, and business assets, potentially at below-market value. It provides limited legal recourse for owners to challenge such actions in court. The IRR has raised concerns over the lack of transparency about the number of government bodies authorised to carry out expropriations. Makone Maja, the IRR's strategic engagements manager, said the law is unpopular among South Africans and poses a significant threat to property rights. 'Our polling conducted in March and April shows that 68% of registered voters oppose the Expropriation Act,' said Maja. 'The act is so broadly worded that all forms of property – including savings and pensions – are now vulnerable.' According to the IRR, at least 426 public entities currently have the authority to expropriate property under the Act. However, the organisation believes the actual number may be closer to 1 000. ALSO READ: Issues plaguing Edenvale tackled in a heated meeting 'It is the height of policy recklessness for such vast powers to be granted to an unknown number of authorities,' said Maja. 'If the number is unclear, how can citizens have confidence that these powers will not be abused?' The IRR argues that uncertainty around expropriation powers could undermine investment, economic growth and food security. In its Blueprint for Growth policy series, the institute emphasises the importance of secure property rights as a foundation for economic empowerment. Maja added that South Africa's history of corruption and abuse of power makes the lack of oversight especially troubling. ALSO READ: Court orders the removal of illegal billboard on Gillooly's 'We have seen how state power can be misused,' she said. 'It is deeply irresponsible to empower a vast and unaccountable network of officials to take property without clear safeguards. 'The minister must urgently disclose which entities have been given this authority and explain how abuse will be prevented.' The IRR has called on the government to publish a full list of authorised expropriating entities and to provide clarity on how the act will be implemented to protect constitutional property rights. For more information, visit At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
Limpopo DA lays charges over GNT pension crisis
LIMPOPO – On Monday, May 26, the Democratic Alliance (DA) in Limpopo laid criminal charges against the CEO of Great North Transport (GNT) and the Limpopo Economic Development Agency (LEDA), the sole shareholder of GNT. The charges, filed at the Polokwane Police Station, relate to the non-payment of employee pension fund and medical aid contributions. Jacques Smalle, DA Limpopo provincial spokesperson for economic development, environment, and tourism, said LEDA, as the sole shareholder, holds both statutory and fiduciary responsibilities for GNT's financial management. 'The scale of the crisis became clear during an urgent sitting of the Limpopo Portfolio Committee on Economic Development, Environment and Tourism on Friday, May 23,' Smalle explained. 'This meeting, which followed the DA's repeated calls for GNT and LEDA to account, revealed unpaid contributions to three pension schemes totalling R6.78 million and affecting 945 employees. In some cases, employee memberships have already been suspended. If at least R1 million is not paid by the end of May, all memberships could be suspended, potentially resulting in permanent loss of pension benefits.' Smalle attributed the crisis to 'years of corruption, mismanagement, and lack of accountability' at GNT. He added that the company's failure to implement a viable turnaround strategy further deepened its financial troubles. 'The situation at GNT is dire; it has become an unsustainable entity,' Smalle said. 'The charges laid include theft, fraud, and violations of both the Pension Funds Act and the Medical Schemes Act, all of which are criminal offences.' In response to the allegations, Mthunzi Dlamini from LEDA acknowledged the outstanding contributions and said efforts were underway to settle the payments within the week. 'GNT has faced ongoing financial constraints in meeting its obligations,' Dlamini said. 'However, strategic steps have recently been taken, including the procurement of new buses to replace the ageing fleet and the launch of a bus lease programme aimed at increasing operational capacity.' LEDA CEO Thakhani Makhuvha said the LEDA is committed to resolving the issue. 'As the shareholder, LEDA has decided to step in and ensure that all outstanding pension and medical contributions are brought up to date,' Makhuvha said. 'We recognise the severity of the situation and apologise to affected employees. This is deeply regrettable.' At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Eyewitness News
15 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Political parties split over calls to fire NPA boss Batohi
CAPE TOWN - Political parties in Parliament are split on whether the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Shamila Batohi, should be fired. While ActionSA said Batohi should leave the position due to high-profile failures by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), the Democratic Alliance (DA) said it doesn't support her removal. But the DA said the NPA is in desperate need of a massive overhaul and has introduced a 'reform package' for the NPA that includes passing the DA's 'Scorpions 2.0' bill to create an independent anti-corruption commission. ActionSA parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, called for the immediate removal of Batohi and demanded a full parliamentary inquiry into the NPA's ongoing prosecutorial failures. READ: NPA shouldn't be let off the hook for faltering on several cases: GL community safety committee In a statement, Trollip said the NPA had once again 'exposed its deep dysfunction, either through incompetence or wilful neglect', with the latest disgrace being the collapse of the asbestos corruption case involving Former Free State Premier Ace Magashule and his former personal assistant, Moroadi Cholota. But DA Justice spokesperson, Glynnis Breytenbach, said earlier that her party would not support a motion to remove Batohi because the problems go deeper than just leadership. 'We certainly wouldn't table such a motion, and we certainly wouldn't support it. The national director is not the problem at the NPA. It's not a one-man job or a one-woman job, and while I think she possibly could have things differently, she's not doing a bad job.' She said the failures of the NPA are not attributable to her alone, saying she has less than a year left in office, which is more of a concern for the DA. ALSO READ: NPA's hopes of trying rape-accused Omotoso suffer blow after his voluntary departure
