Nvidia chips don't belong on the bargaining table
News that Nvidia Corp will not be able to sell its customised artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China caught both the company and markets by surprise.
The disclosure came just a day after Nvidia announced a half-trillion-dollar US investment commitment that was celebrated by President Donald Trump, and followed a media report saying that chief executive officer Jensen Huang had struck a deal safeguarding the H20 chips in China over dinner at Mar-a-Lago.
The confusion represented what is now a usual day in Washington as Trump plays out his chaotic trade games and increases pressure on China to negotiate. Beijing, meanwhile, has signalled that one of its chief concerns heading into potential talks are US policies designed to suppress its modernisation.
The scene is now set for Nvidia's H20 chips, made specifically to comply with export controls, to be turned into the ultimate tariff-related bargaining point.
An exemption would please the company, which has long argued that export controls are ineffective and give a boost to domestic players including Huawei Technologies Co. And while Beijing is not backing down, access to AI chips is one thing it desperately wants.
We have seen Trump blur the lines over tech national security concerns in the past. The various export controls on Nvidia predate his tariff blitz, and are meant to hold China back in the AI race over fears that Beijing's edge could give it military or economic advantages.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
But the president has ignored similar worries before: he extended a deadline for TikTok to be banned in the US, turning the China-owned social media platform into a key leverage on tariffs.
The White House may yet roll back the crackdown on AI chips in China. Regardless, it is a timely reminder that this trade war is risking America's hard-won gains in the race for tech supremacy. Washington cannot fight on two fronts.
Access to chips and computing power has been at the core of Silicon Valley's lead over China in AI, but that gap is closing fast. Washington's tightening chip restrictions have been porous, but they have no doubt bought time.
One thing we have learnt is that they are ineffective without international cooperation. The US had to convince the Netherlands and Japan, key allies who oversee parts of the semiconductor supply chain, to get on board for these policies to have a fighting chance at holding Beijing back. But Trump's 'America First' rhetoric and tariff antagonism do not provide much incentive for joint action any more.
DeepSeek, the Hangzhou-based AI startup that surprised the world earlier this year, shows that China is not as far behind on AI software development as many in the West thought. America's key lead now remains in hardware and namely, advanced chips. But the likes of Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp are working around the clock to produce domestic alternatives to Nvidia's AI processors.
Some analysis suggests that these local players are just a couple of years away from creating viable home-grown Nvidia alternatives to power China's AI boom (while still having dramatically lower performance that Nvidia's top-of-the-line offerings). This means that the window for how long these export controls can still have any impact is closing fast.
Perhaps the biggest indication that these chip restrictions have slowed China's AI ambitions, even if they have not stopped it, has come from DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng.
In a rare interview, he said that the biggest barrier for his company was not money, but access to high-end chips. And these H20s are still in high demand: Chinese tech giants including ByteDance, Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent Holdings have reportedly stockpiled orders in the first three months of this year, in preparation for the long-rumoured crackdown.
Much of the recent coverage of the latest Nvidia curbs frame it as more evidence that multibillion-dollar dealmaking with Trump offers no guarantees of tariff reprieve. But the reality is the chip war predated this trade war, and blurring the lines risks losing both.
Nvidia's AI chips should not have been turned into pawns. But they are increasingly looking like the biggest concession Trump now has to get himself out of the chaos he has unleashed. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
Consortium's privatisation offer for Amara closes with 97.74% valid acceptances
[SINGAPORE] The privatisation offer for hotel and property group Amara finally succeeded on Tuesday (Jun 10), with valid acceptances representing 97.74 per cent of the total shares. As at the close of the offer at 5.30 pm on Tuesday, the total number of shares owned, controlled or agreed to be acquired by DRC Investments, together with valid acceptances of the offer, amounted to 562 million shares. DRC, a consortium led by property developer Hwa Hong, will exercise its right to compulsorily acquire all remaining shares at the offer price of S$0.895 a share. Amara will subsequently be delisted from the Singapore Exchange. DRC said it has no intention to preserve the group's listing status and will instead make it a wholly owned subsidiary. DRC is a special-purpose vehicle that is 35 per cent held by a fund sponsored by formerly Singapore-listed Hwa Hong and Malaysia-based Newfields. Another 35 per cent shareholder is a wholly owned subsidiary of local developer Wing Tai. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Albert Teo, Amara's chairman and chief executive officer, and his daughter, chief operating officer Dawn Teo, hold the remaining 30 per cent of DRC. The S$0.895 offer price represents a 27 per cent premium over Amara's closing price of S$0.705 on Apr 23, ahead of the trading halt called by the company the following day. It is also a 33 per cent premium over Amara's net asset value per share as at end-December 2024. In a previous bourse filing, DRC cited low trading liquidity and challenging macroeconomic conditions for Amara's privatisation. This includes a rise in protectionist policies and shifting trade agreements, which could disrupt supply chains and increase costs for businesses. These may result in higher operations costs, squeezing profit margins and affecting long-term growth prospects, it said. 'The offer represents a unique cash exit opportunity for shareholders to liquidate and realise their entire investment at a premium, an option which may not otherwise be readily available due to the low trading liquidity of the shares,' it added. The latest privatisation offer was the second time Amara was the target of a privatisation deal. In 2023, the group received a voluntary cash offer at S$0.60 a share from Amethyst Assets, a consortium linked to Albert Teo, other members of his family and private equity investor Dymon Asia. But the attempt fell short of the 90 per cent threshold for acceptances, at 88.39 per cent in shareholding interest.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US agencies tracked foreigners visiting Musk's properties in 2022 and 2023, WSJ reports
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk attend a press conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo WASHINGTON - U.S. government agencies tracked foreign nationals' visits to Elon Musk's proprieties amid concerns over possible attempts to influence the tech billionaire, The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter. The investigation, which tracked the foreigners in 2022 and 2023, included the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department, according to the report. It focused on people visiting the Musk from countries in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, the Journal said. Musk, who runs five companies and has sensitive government contracts, has had unprecedented access to top government officials from countries around the world. The U.S. investigation focused on possible attempts to influence Musk, the Tesla chief executive, the newspaper said. No charges were filed and the status of the probe was not clear, according to the Journal. The world's richest person, Musk was tapped by President Donald Trump to lead what became a chaotic drive to slash the federal government. He was a top adviser to Trump until the two men had a public rupture last week. Officials at several agencies including the FBI have been briefed on the investigation, which predated the Trump administration, the newspaper reported. The Journal said Musk did not respond to requests for comment and the FBI declined to Comment. The Trump administration has expressed concern about possible foreign influence in the United States. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Marines arrive in LA under Trump orders as protests spread to other cities
Broken glass lies on the floor after stores were looted following days of protests against federal immigration sweeps and the deployment of the California National Guard and U.S. Marines, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder Marines stand near vehicles as they prepare to depart for Los Angeles, at an unknown location, in this handout picture released on June 9, 2025. U.S. Northern Command via X/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. NO RESALES. NO ARCHIVES. MANDATORY CREDIT Marines stand near vehicles as they prepare to depart for Los Angeles, at an unknown location, in this handout picture released on June 9, 2025. U.S. Northern Command via X/Handout via REUTERS Marines arrive in LA under Trump orders as protests spread to other cities LOS ANGELES - Hundreds of U.S. Marines arrived in Los Angeles overnight and more were expected on Tuesday under orders from President Donald Trump, who has also activated 4,000 National Guard troops to quell protests despite objections from California Governor Gavin Newsom and other local leaders. The city has seen days of public outrage since the Trump administration launched a series of immigration raids on Friday, though local officials said the demonstrations on Monday were largely peaceful. About half of the roughly 700 Marines that Trump ordered to Los Angeles arrived on Monday night, and the remaining troops will enter the city on Tuesday, a U.S. official told Reuters. The U.S. military did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told KABC that more than 100 people had been arrested on Monday but that the majority of protesters were nonviolent. Over the weekend, protesters threw rocks and other objects at officers and vehicles and set several cars ablaze. Police responded by firing projectiles like pepper balls as well as flash bang grenades and tear gas. Trump has justified his decision to deploy active military troops to Los Angeles by describing the protests as a violent occupation of the city, a characterization that Newsom and Bass have said is grossly exaggerated. Newsom said that Trump's deployment of National Guard troops has only inflamed the situation and made it more difficult for local law enforcement to respond to the demonstrations. In a statement on Monday, Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said the department had not been notified that any Marines were traveling to the city and that their possible arrival "presents a significant logistical and operational challenge" for police. Trump's decision to mobilize 700 Marines based in Southern California escalated his confrontation with Newsom, who filed a lawsuit on Monday asserting that Trump's deployment of Guard troops without the governor's consent was illegal. The Guard deployment was the first time in decades that a president activated the Guard absent a request from a sitting governor. While the Marines are only tasked with guarding federal property temporarily until the full contingent of 4,000 Guard troops arrives, the use of active military to respond to civil disturbances is extremely rare. "This isn't about public safety," Newsom wrote on X on Monday. "It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Jack Reed, said he was "gravely troubled" by Trump's deployment of active-duty Marines. "Since our nation's founding, the American people have been perfectly clear: we do not want the military conducting law enforcement on U.S. soil," he said. In a post on Tuesday morning on Truth Social, Trump claimed Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground right now" if he had not deployed troops to the city. DEMONSTRATIONS AND ARRESTS The raids are part of Trump's sweeping immigration crackdown, which Democrats and immigrant advocates have said are indiscriminately breaking up families. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged on Monday to carry out more operations to round up suspected immigration violators. Trump officials have branded the protests as lawless and blamed state and local Democrats for protecting undocumented immigrants with sanctuary cities. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on Monday outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles where immigrants have been held, chanting "free them all" and waving Mexican and Central American flags. National Guard forces formed a human barricade to keep people out of the building, and late on Monday, police began dispersing the crowd using gas canisters and arrested some protesters. At dusk, officers had running confrontations with protesters who had scattered into the Little Tokyo section of the city. As people watched from apartment patios above street level and as tourists huddled inside hotels, a large contingent of LAPD and officers and sheriff's deputies fired several flash bangs that boomed through side streets along with tear gas. Protests spread to neighboring Orange County on Monday night after immigration raids there, with demonstrators gathering at the Santa Ana Federal building, according to local officials and news reports. Protests also sprang up in at least nine other U.S. cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to local news reports. In Austin, Texas, police fired non-lethal munitions and detained several people as they clashed with a crowd of several hundred protesters. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
