Nvidia chips don't belong on the bargaining table
News that Nvidia Corp will not be able to sell its customised artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China caught both the company and markets by surprise.
The disclosure came just a day after Nvidia announced a half-trillion-dollar US investment commitment that was celebrated by President Donald Trump, and followed a media report saying that chief executive officer Jensen Huang had struck a deal safeguarding the H20 chips in China over dinner at Mar-a-Lago.
The confusion represented what is now a usual day in Washington as Trump plays out his chaotic trade games and increases pressure on China to negotiate. Beijing, meanwhile, has signalled that one of its chief concerns heading into potential talks are US policies designed to suppress its modernisation.
The scene is now set for Nvidia's H20 chips, made specifically to comply with export controls, to be turned into the ultimate tariff-related bargaining point.
An exemption would please the company, which has long argued that export controls are ineffective and give a boost to domestic players including Huawei Technologies Co. And while Beijing is not backing down, access to AI chips is one thing it desperately wants.
We have seen Trump blur the lines over tech national security concerns in the past. The various export controls on Nvidia predate his tariff blitz, and are meant to hold China back in the AI race over fears that Beijing's edge could give it military or economic advantages.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
But the president has ignored similar worries before: he extended a deadline for TikTok to be banned in the US, turning the China-owned social media platform into a key leverage on tariffs.
The White House may yet roll back the crackdown on AI chips in China. Regardless, it is a timely reminder that this trade war is risking America's hard-won gains in the race for tech supremacy. Washington cannot fight on two fronts.
Access to chips and computing power has been at the core of Silicon Valley's lead over China in AI, but that gap is closing fast. Washington's tightening chip restrictions have been porous, but they have no doubt bought time.
One thing we have learnt is that they are ineffective without international cooperation. The US had to convince the Netherlands and Japan, key allies who oversee parts of the semiconductor supply chain, to get on board for these policies to have a fighting chance at holding Beijing back. But Trump's 'America First' rhetoric and tariff antagonism do not provide much incentive for joint action any more.
DeepSeek, the Hangzhou-based AI startup that surprised the world earlier this year, shows that China is not as far behind on AI software development as many in the West thought. America's key lead now remains in hardware and namely, advanced chips. But the likes of Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp are working around the clock to produce domestic alternatives to Nvidia's AI processors.
Some analysis suggests that these local players are just a couple of years away from creating viable home-grown Nvidia alternatives to power China's AI boom (while still having dramatically lower performance that Nvidia's top-of-the-line offerings). This means that the window for how long these export controls can still have any impact is closing fast.
Perhaps the biggest indication that these chip restrictions have slowed China's AI ambitions, even if they have not stopped it, has come from DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng.
In a rare interview, he said that the biggest barrier for his company was not money, but access to high-end chips. And these H20s are still in high demand: Chinese tech giants including ByteDance, Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent Holdings have reportedly stockpiled orders in the first three months of this year, in preparation for the long-rumoured crackdown.
Much of the recent coverage of the latest Nvidia curbs frame it as more evidence that multibillion-dollar dealmaking with Trump offers no guarantees of tariff reprieve. But the reality is the chip war predated this trade war, and blurring the lines risks losing both.
Nvidia's AI chips should not have been turned into pawns. But they are increasingly looking like the biggest concession Trump now has to get himself out of the chaos he has unleashed. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
21 minutes ago
- CNA
Oracle beats quarterly results estimates on cloud services demand, shares rise
Oracle beat Wall Street estimates for fourth-quarter results on Wednesday, boosted by growing demand for its cloud offerings from companies deploying artificial intelligence, sending its shares up 7 per cent after the bell. The company's growth is largely nurtured by its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) solution and support for AI workloads. Analysts see the company becoming more of a cloud service provider that relies less on software growth. "We expect our total cloud growth rate — applications plus infrastructure — will increase from 24 per cent in fiscal year 2025 to over 40 per cent in fiscal year 2026," said CEO Safra Catz. Revenue for the quarter ended May 31 stood at $15.90 billion, compared with the analysts' average estimate of $15.59 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Quarterly revenue at Oracle's largest unit, cloud services and license support, grew 14 per cent to $11.70 billion from last year. Oracle has also been introducing AI assistants, advisers and agents. Its AI Agent Studio, announced in March, is designed to help customers and partners build their own customized AI agents.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
CoreWeave to offer compute capacity in Google's new cloud deal with OpenAI, sources say
CoreWeave has emerged as a winner in Google's newly signed partnership with OpenAI, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, in the latest example of the voracious appetite for computing resources in the artificial-intelligence industry and the formation of new alliances to meet them. The so-called neocloud company, which sells cloud computing services built on Nvidia's graphics processing units, is slated to provide computing capacity to Google's cloud unit, and Alphabet's Google will then sell that computing capacity to OpenAI to meet the growing demand for services like ChatGPT, the sources said. Google will also provide some of its own computing resources to OpenAI, added the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss private matters. The details of the arrangement, first reported by Reuters on Tuesday, highlight the evolving dynamics between hyperscalers like Microsoft and Google and so-called neocloud companies like Coreweave. Hyperscalers are large cloud service providers that offer massive-scale data centers and cloud infrastructure. The insatiable hunger for computing resources has generated major investment commitments and turned rivals into partners. Backed by OpenAI and Nvidia, Coreweave signed up Google as a customer in the first quarter. CoreWeave, Google and OpenAI declined to comment. CoreWeave, a specialized cloud provider that went public in March, has already been a major supplier of OpenAI's infrastructure. It has signed a five-year contract worth $11.9 billion with OpenAI to provide dedicated computing capacity for OpenAI's model training and inference. OpenAI also took a $350 million equity stake in CoreWeave in March. This partnership was further expanded last month through an additional agreement worth up to $4 billion, extending through April 2029, underscoring OpenAI's escalating demand for high-performance computing resources. Industry insiders say adding Google Cloud as a new customer could help CoreWeave diversify its revenue sources, and having a credible partner with deep pockets like Google enables the startup to secure more favorable financing terms to support ambitious data center buildouts across the country. This could also boost Google's cloud unit, which generated $43 billion in sales last year, allowing it to capitalize on the growth of OpenAI, which is also one of its largest competitors in areas like search and chatbots. It positions Google as a neutral provider of computing resources in competition with peers such as Amazon and Microsoft. CoreWeave's deal with Google coincides with Microsoft's re-evaluation of its data center strategy, including withdrawing from certain data center leases. Microsoft, once Coreweave's largest customer, accounting for about 62 per cent of its 2024 revenue, is also renegotiating with OpenAI to revise the terms of their multibillion-dollar investment, including the future equity stake it will hold in OpenAI. CoreWeave, backed by Nvidia, has established itself as a fast-rising provider of GPU-based cloud infrastructure in the AI wave. While its public debut in March was met with a lukewarm response due to concerns over its highly leveraged capital structure and shifting GPU demand, the company's stock has surged since its IPO price of $40 per share, gaining over 270 per cent and reaching a record high of $166.63 in June.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
US Secretary of State Rubio seeks probe into Harvard's possible sanctions breach
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is seeking an investigation into whether Harvard University violated federal sanctions by participating in a health insurance conference in China, according to a New York Times report published on Wednesday (Jun 11). Citing sources familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by the newspaper, the report said the conference may have included officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a Chinese state-run group that has been blacklisted by the United States. The New York Times reported that Harvard has launched an internal review of its role in the event. Rubio signed off on a recommendation to the Treasury Department last month to open an investigation, according to the report. Reuters has not independently verified the report. A spokesperson for the Treasury Department said it takes 'any allegations of sanctions violations extremely seriously' but declined to comment on possible or pending investigations. A State Department spokesperson also declined to comment. Harvard declined to respond to a Reuters request for comment and did not comment to the New York Times.
