Nvidia chips don't belong on the bargaining table
News that Nvidia Corp will not be able to sell its customised artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China caught both the company and markets by surprise.
The disclosure came just a day after Nvidia announced a half-trillion-dollar US investment commitment that was celebrated by President Donald Trump, and followed a media report saying that chief executive officer Jensen Huang had struck a deal safeguarding the H20 chips in China over dinner at Mar-a-Lago.
The confusion represented what is now a usual day in Washington as Trump plays out his chaotic trade games and increases pressure on China to negotiate. Beijing, meanwhile, has signalled that one of its chief concerns heading into potential talks are US policies designed to suppress its modernisation.
The scene is now set for Nvidia's H20 chips, made specifically to comply with export controls, to be turned into the ultimate tariff-related bargaining point.
An exemption would please the company, which has long argued that export controls are ineffective and give a boost to domestic players including Huawei Technologies Co. And while Beijing is not backing down, access to AI chips is one thing it desperately wants.
We have seen Trump blur the lines over tech national security concerns in the past. The various export controls on Nvidia predate his tariff blitz, and are meant to hold China back in the AI race over fears that Beijing's edge could give it military or economic advantages.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
But the president has ignored similar worries before: he extended a deadline for TikTok to be banned in the US, turning the China-owned social media platform into a key leverage on tariffs.
The White House may yet roll back the crackdown on AI chips in China. Regardless, it is a timely reminder that this trade war is risking America's hard-won gains in the race for tech supremacy. Washington cannot fight on two fronts.
Access to chips and computing power has been at the core of Silicon Valley's lead over China in AI, but that gap is closing fast. Washington's tightening chip restrictions have been porous, but they have no doubt bought time.
One thing we have learnt is that they are ineffective without international cooperation. The US had to convince the Netherlands and Japan, key allies who oversee parts of the semiconductor supply chain, to get on board for these policies to have a fighting chance at holding Beijing back. But Trump's 'America First' rhetoric and tariff antagonism do not provide much incentive for joint action any more.
DeepSeek, the Hangzhou-based AI startup that surprised the world earlier this year, shows that China is not as far behind on AI software development as many in the West thought. America's key lead now remains in hardware and namely, advanced chips. But the likes of Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp are working around the clock to produce domestic alternatives to Nvidia's AI processors.
Some analysis suggests that these local players are just a couple of years away from creating viable home-grown Nvidia alternatives to power China's AI boom (while still having dramatically lower performance that Nvidia's top-of-the-line offerings). This means that the window for how long these export controls can still have any impact is closing fast.
Perhaps the biggest indication that these chip restrictions have slowed China's AI ambitions, even if they have not stopped it, has come from DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng.
In a rare interview, he said that the biggest barrier for his company was not money, but access to high-end chips. And these H20s are still in high demand: Chinese tech giants including ByteDance, Alibaba Group Holding and Tencent Holdings have reportedly stockpiled orders in the first three months of this year, in preparation for the long-rumoured crackdown.
Much of the recent coverage of the latest Nvidia curbs frame it as more evidence that multibillion-dollar dealmaking with Trump offers no guarantees of tariff reprieve. But the reality is the chip war predated this trade war, and blurring the lines risks losing both.
Nvidia's AI chips should not have been turned into pawns. But they are increasingly looking like the biggest concession Trump now has to get himself out of the chaos he has unleashed. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
23 minutes ago
- CNA
Trump to mark Army milestone as troops deployed to Los Angeles
FORT BRAGG, North Carolina: President Donald Trump celebrated soldiers in North Carolina on Tuesday (Jun 10) as he threatened force against Washington military parade protesters and deployed troops in a confrontation over US immigration policy. Trump's visit to Fort Bragg, home to some 50,000 active-duty soldiers, for long-scheduled commemorations of the US Army's 250th anniversary followed his move to deploy 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in an escalating response to street protests over his immigration policies. The Republican president defended the decision to reporters, saying it was needed to protect federal property and personnel. California's Democratic-led government has said the move is an abuse of power and an unnecessary provocation. Street demonstrations in Southern California have been underway since Friday, when activists clashed with sheriff's deputies. In North Carolina, Trump addressed troops after he and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth watched soldiers demonstrate a special forces assault on a building and use a long-range missile launcher on base. It was the first in a series of celebrations of the Army anniversary involving Trump, ahead of a major parade in Washington on Saturday. Trump on Tuesday warned against demonstrations against that parade, telling reporters, "they're going to be met with very big force". The FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have said there are no credible threats to the event. The week's Army commemorations combine Trump's penchant for patriotic pomp and his political positioning as a law-and-order president. Saturday's celebrations in Washington include thousands of troops, dozens of military aircraft and coincide with Trump's 79th birthday. The Army was established on Jun 14, 1775, more than a year before the Declaration of Independence. Earlier this year, Trump restored the name Fort Bragg to the base, one of the largest in the world, despite a federal law that prohibits honouring generals who fought for the South during the Civil War. His administration says the name now honours a different Bragg - Private First Class Roland Bragg, who served during World War Two. In 2023, the base had been renamed Fort Liberty, a change driven by racial justice protests. Since launching his second term in office in January, Trump has made the military a focus of his efforts, with his defence secretary working to purge transgender service members, top officials appointed under his Democratic predecessor, and even books deemed out of step. The president's cost-cutting government reforms have largely spared the Defense Department's nearly US$1 trillion annual budget. He has pledged to avoid international conflict while launching new weapons programs and increasing the use of the military domestically, including in immigration enforcement. Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the US-Mexico border, setting the ICE border enforcement agency a daily goal of arresting at least 3,000 migrants.
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
Gold's status from ‘theoretical' to ‘tactical' hedge
IN TODAY'S fragile political and financial environment, gold is regaining prominence in the strategies of warily observant reserve managers. 'Gold is good when other assets are not safe,' said a participant at the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum's (OMFIF) annual seminar in London, in partnership with State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) in May. The event brought together senior representatives from central banks, public pension funds and sovereign funds to discuss how geopolitical risks and shifting market dynamics are shaping reserve strategies. The remark, however, encapsulates a growing shift in how central banks perceive gold's role in an increasingly complex global environment. This change has brought gold back to the centre of reserve management strategy. A structural repositioning Central banks have now recorded three consecutive years of elevated demand for the metal, resulting in net purchases of 365 tonnes in the final quarter of 2024 – the highest quarterly figure on record, according to the World Gold Council. This follows annual purchases of more than 1,000 tonnes in both 2022 and 2023. Major buyers have included China, Turkey and India, while countries such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have also made notable additions relative to the size of their reserve portfolios. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The rationale behind this shift is not purely tactical. As explored in OMFIF's 2024 report Gold and the new world disorder, gold is once again being treated as a strategic asset, not because it offers yield or efficiency, but because of what it represents. It serves as a symbol of political neutrality and security in times of fragmentation and independence from the liabilities of any one issuer. That argument – once seen as a theoretical hedge – is increasingly propelling real changes in allocation. Political developments have added urgency to these shifts. With the return of US President Donald Trump to the White House this year, concerns over trade tensions, fiscal profligacy and the reliability of global partnerships have resurfaced. The US dollar's politicisation is also a growing concern even among traditional allies of the US. As one roundtable participant noted, the issue is not just what Trump might do, but how quickly markets react to tariff decisions and how long that uncertainty might linger. As a result, central banks are preparing for a more fractured global financial order. Gold as a portfolio stabiliser Across the OMFIF-SSGA discussion, there was broad consensus that structural volatility – driven by sanctions, shifting trade dynamics and rising geopolitical risk – has made diversification more urgent and gold more relevant. One panellist noted that the role of gold is evolving from a legacy asset into a core pillar of portfolio stability. Another panellist pointed out that gold has become what central banks turn to when other assets no longer feel safe, with record prices now seen as a reflection of trust rather than speculative excess. Another observed that reserve management is increasingly influenced by broader themes of strategic autonomy and long-term resilience. Gold, unlike other assets, is seen as consistent with both objectives. Meanwhile, other viable diversifiers to the US dollar remain limited. The euro faces structural challenges and remains institutionally incomplete. The renminbi, despite greater use in bilateral trade, lacks the convertibility, transparency and liquidity required of a global reserve anchor. Other currencies such as the yen, pound and Canadian or Australian dollars lack the scale and liquidity needed to absorb major reallocations. As one panellist remarked: 'This isn't mass de-dollarisation. It's a gradual repositioning driven by a structural loss of trust.' Absence of alternatives In this environment, gold has emerged as the only strategic fallback. It is not a currency, yet it functions as one in times of strain. The forthcoming Global Public Investor 2025 report, launching on Jun 24, examines whether this shift is now translating into a structural increase in gold's share of global reserves. For the past four years, our annual survey of central banks has consistently shown that reserve managers plan to increase their gold allocations. This has now materialised. For many central banks, there seems to be growing signs that this trend will continue as gold evolves from a tactical hedge into a long-term strategic asset. OMFIF The writer is an economist at the Economic and Monetary Policy Institute, OMFIF
Business Times
31 minutes ago
- Business Times
The G7 is at a critical crossroads
THE Group of Seven (G7) could well face an existential crisis at the Kananaskis summit because of US President Donald Trump. Whither the G7? In the 1980s and 1990s, the G7 – led by the US – steered the global economy. But with the rise of emerging market powerhouses, the G7's relative heft declined. The Group of 20's (G20) Pittsburgh summit in September 2009 declared the newer, bigger, broader G20 the premier forum for its leaders' international cooperation, assigning the G7 an informal role. Then, over the following 15 years, the G20 floundered. Economic performance in Russia and Brazil weakened, as did China's subsequently. Russia invaded Crimea and Donbas in 2014 and launched its horrific full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. US-China tensions mounted amid Chinese President Xi Jinping's increased authoritarianism and America's heightened focus on economic statecraft, including the first Trump administration's pursuit of a more protectionist and isolationist course. A reinvigorated role for the G7 As the G20 stumbled, the G7 gathered renewed momentum. It was not a smooth ride, as epitomised by the strained US relations with the rest of the G7 at the 2018 Charlevoix summit, when Trump shamefully disavowed the communique to which all had just agreed and launched verbal attacks on the summit's host, Canada's then-prime minister Justin Trudeau. The administration of former US president Joe Biden, however, helped revive the G7 as a cohesive, democratically aligned forum. The G7 rolled out sanctions on Russia, including blocking US$300 billion in Russian central bank and oligarch assets. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It helped raise support for Ukraine, including by transferring proceeds from Russia's immobilised assets, although unfortunately failing to seize and send all those Russian holdings to Ukraine. The G7 limited Russian energy revenues, including imposing a price cap on Russia's oil exports. Members worked together on tackling cybersecurity, which would not have been feasible by the G20 given the presence of Russia and China. The G7 adopted a hardened line against China's challenge to Western security. All this cohesion, trust and unity are unravelling as the Jun 15-17 Kananaskis summit approaches. US relations with its longtime allies in Europe have become highly strained. Trump is tearing apart the glue that holds the G7 together, and it now faces the question of whether it can even continue, or function properly, at least, over the next four years while Trump is president. It is hard to reach a positive answer for several reasons. Trump's attacks on the European Union (EU), claiming that the bloc was formed to 'screw' America, fly in the face of transatlantic unity and basic comity, and America's longstanding support for the EU. His tariff threats undermine the liberal trade policies that promoted decades of transatlantic prosperity. He is right in arguing that Europe must do more for itself, especially on defence. But shunning America's closest democratic allies while embracing Russian President Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian leaders undermines the cohesion underpinning the G7's revival. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, always an ardent pro-Atlanticist, shockingly said that his absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible in order to achieve independence from the US, because Americans under this administration are clearly indifferent to the fate of Europe. Other European leaders have echoed his startling remarks. Avoiding a fragmented future Trump seemingly wishes to abandon the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato), or disregard its responsibilities. He appears to see little value or have any interest in the G7 as a 'democracy' club, given his support for authoritarians. Indeed, he has again called for Russia to be readmitted to the G7, despite its barbaric war against Ukraine and Putin's dictatorship. Other G7 leaders have rejected Trump's call. Trump has shown utter disregard for Ukraine, even denying that Russia was the aggressor, notwithstanding the rest of the G7's steadfast strong support. His berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, supported by Vice-President JD Vance, sent chills up the backs of European leaders and was quickly rebuffed by them. Trump has turned America's policies on climate change on their head, while Europe continues to do its best to forge ahead. European officials have reservations about trusting and working with Trump's intelligence team. Moreover, Trump's deprecations and disdain for Canadian sovereignty will only exacerbate the underlying tensions surrounding the Kananaskis summit. The foundations supporting the Western alliance, Nato, liberal trade and the G7 – and, frankly, American global leadership – are being torn asunder by the current US administration. Whatever the status of these issues at Kananaskis, enormous damage has been done. The G7 Kananaskis summit may be a frigid affair, even if it is warm and sunny outside. OMFIF The writer is US chair of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum
