French President Emmanuel Macron and wife sue Candace Owens for defamation
The suit alleges that Owens spread false claims for profit and publicity, including that Brigitte Macron is a man and that President Macron is controlled by the CIA.
According to the legal filing, Owens began publicly accusing Brigitte Macron of being transgender in early 2024 and intensified her claims through an eight-part podcast titled Becoming Brigitte. The Macrons state that these claims are 'demonstrably false' and have caused severe emotional and reputational harm.
Hear that?
That's the sound of Candace Owens shitting her pants. pic.twitter.com/ttwlAgrjCZ — That Gay Guy Candle Co. 🇺🇸 (@gayguycandleco) July 23, 2025
The lawsuit outlines how the couple issued multiple legal notices demanding retractions, which Owens reportedly mocked. The suit accuses her of using their responses to generate more content and escalate the conspiracy theories. Specific accusations included claims of identity theft, incest, CIA mind control, and document fraud.
Represented by prominent defamation firm Clare Locke, the Macrons say they've suffered global humiliation and spent considerable resources to counter the disinformation. They argue the campaign has led to relentless bullying and invasion of privacy, both online and in public life.
Owens responded through a spokesperson, framing the lawsuit as a violation of her First Amendment rights and alleging foreign interference in American journalism. She is expected to address the issue on her show.
This lawsuit marks a rare case of a sitting world leader suing a foreign media figure, highlighting the growing challenges posed by misinformation and social media-fueled conspiracies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's moment in Washington
In a rare shift of focus from its usual marginal position in American discourse, Pakistan has recently found itself in the headlines in the United States for all the right reasons. Normally overshadowed by stories of political chaos, power tussles, and institutional heavy-handedness against dissent, the narrative has now turned toward Islamabad's surprising diplomatic maneuvering and its growing importance in Washington's strategic calculations. While Pakistan's domestic politics remain fraught—with Imran Khan and his party under relentless state pressure and critics of the 'deep state' still facing crackdowns—the country has suddenly carved out space on the global stage. This pivot began in earnest just before the United States carried out precision strikes on Iran's Fordow and other nuclear sites. The catalyst was an unprecedented meeting: on June 18, 2025, President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, for a private lunch at the White House, an event widely covered by international media. It was one of the most significant diplomatic engagements of Trump's second term and the first time a U.S. president hosted Pakistan's military chief without civilian leadership present. At the press briefing following the meeting, Trump openly acknowledged Munir's role in averting disaster during the recent five-day India-Pakistan conflict, saying: 'The reason I had him here… I wanted to thank him for not going into the war… ending it. Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war.' (NDTV, June 2025) This meeting reverberated across South Asia, creating political tremors in India. Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition Congress Party, seized the moment in a fiery parliamentary speech, lambasting Prime Minister Modi's government for failing to secure equivalent US attention. In India's parliament, even some pro-government lawmakers admitted that New Delhi had been outmaneuvered diplomatically, losing ground to Islamabad in Washington's halls of power. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Stories of terrorism
Listen to article I was once a graduate student in a Texas university and later for a brief period of time a PhD candidate here at the University of Houston. During lectures and discussion sessions in class, every time the issue of terrorism would come up, people sort of paid attention to what I had to say because the killing of Osama bin Laden had just happened a few years ago. And everyone knew that I was from Pakistan. The leading newspapers at the time dedicated an enormous amount of space to stories of terrorism, Taliban, Al Qaeda, and so forth mostly having a connection with Pakistan. While that reporting has died down with time, what has rather emerged recently is the most bizarre and direct connection that terrorism always has had with either the CIA or the FBI. I have written in this space back in March that the cult leader Charles Manson and the notorious Manson family murders had a CIA connection. The CIA wanted to understand the extent of how much a human being could be converted into a human robot, where it would follow the command to go and kill innocent people without thought or remorse. Theodore John Kaczynski aka Ted Kaczynski aka Unabomber went from being a Harvard genius to a terrorist that killed innocent people because of the extreme methods his mind was subjected to by the CIA as part of what was called Project MKUltra. We all know who the makers of Al Qaeda are and how Bin Laden was treated as a hero while he was fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan. The 90s decade is very interesting. Sheikh Omar Abdul Rehman, the blind cleric who ran away from Egypt, indoctrinated young Muslims in New York and New Jersey areas, to attack America. Ramzi Yousaf and his friends executed a bomb attack targeting the World Trade Center on February 26, 1993. Two days later, in Texas, the FBI unleashed an attack against a religious cult known as Branch Davidians. At the end of the 51-day siege, the FBI ended up killing innocent people, including 21 children. This Waco siege made one former US soldier, a Gulf War veteran, extremely angry at the federal government for its tyrannical tendencies and actions against private citizens. His name was Timothy McVeigh. He decided to take revenge. Two years after the Waco debacle, McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma city, killing 168 people. This remains the deadliest act of domestic terror in US history. McVeigh was arrested, tried, and killed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001. That was three months before the most famous terrorist attack of our time. McVeigh's case was handled with sheer alacrity and the case was ended creating a foul smell of a cover-up. There was an accomplice of him, which was never identified or found. It has been 30 years since that deadly terrorist attack and no effort has resulted in unmasking his identity. There is a video of the actual bomb delivery when McVeigh and his accomplice were carrying out the attack. That video has never been shown. It wasn't even shown at the trial of McVeigh. It only makes common sense for an investigative agency to get to the bottom of the story and find all those involved in the most deadly domestic terrorist attack of the nation's history. And that is when it all starts to smell of a cover-up. The Epstein story smells of the same cover-up. The man is said to have killed himself in a jail cell and everything just was accepted on its face. Epstein's brother, however, hired a private investigation, which disagrees with the findings of the government that Epstein hanged himself in his jail cell awaiting trial. I guess we will never know the truth of so many of these things. But in every story of terrorism, people should only look at the CIA and FBI, not just to find the truth and safeguard the nation but also to ask, "Do you have something to do with this one too?"
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
US to initially impose ‘small tariff' on pharma imports, Trump says
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the United States would initially place a 'small tariff' on pharmaceutical imports before hiking it to 150% within 18 months and eventually to 250% in an effort to boost domestic production. 'In one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump told CNBC in an interview. He did not specify the initial tariff rate on pharmaceuticals. Trump said last month that pharmaceutical tariffs could reach as high as 200%. He said in February that sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductor chips would start at '25% or higher,' rising substantially over the course of a year. Trump said on Tuesday that he plans to announce tariffs on semiconductors and chips in the 'next week or so,' but gave no further details. The United States has been conducting a national security review of the pharmaceutical sector, and the industry has been preparing for possible sector-specific tariffs. The administration has not announced when the results of that probe will be released. Several drugmakers have pledged multibillion-dollar investments in US manufacturing as Trump threatens import tariffs, with AstraZeneca recently committing $50 billion to expand its American operations. PhRMA, the main lobbying group for the industry, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A framework agreement between the United States and the EU sets out that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are currently zero, but if the United States raises tariffs following its import investigation, they will be capped at 15%.
