U.N. report cites 'flagrant' violations by Russia and North Korea
July 17 (UPI) -- Russian and North Korean officials violated U.N. resolutions regarding arms, troops and refined petroleum shipments throughout 2024 and beyond, a U.N. report says.
Evidence shows North Korea many times shipped arms and material to Russia, which trained North Korean troops for combat against Ukrainian forces, Seth Bailey, the U.S. State Department's director for Korean and Mongolian Affairs, told U.N. members on Thursday.
In exchange, Russia shipped refined petroleum products, military equipment and military technology to North Korea, Bailey said.
The actions by both nations violate U.N. resolutions, as outlined in a 29-page U.N. report compiled by its Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team and published on May 29.
The report focuses on illegal military cooperation between North Korea and Russia and says the "rapid expansion of military, political and economic cooperation' between the two nations has caused "ongoing flagrant violations" of U.N. Security Council resolutions.
"Throughout 2024, North Korea and Russia engaged in myriad unlawful activities explicitly prohibited" by the United Nations, the report says.
The violations include the transfer of arms and material, including artillery, ballistic missiles and combat vehicles, from North Korea to Russia via sea, air and rail.
North Korea also sent troops to Russia, which the Russian military trained for direct support in its war against Ukraine, according to the report.
Russia also has shipped refined petroleum products to North Korea that "far exceed the yearly United Nations Security Council-mandated cap," with payments processed via banking relations between Russia and North Korea.
"These forms of unlawful cooperation between [North Korea]and Russia contributed to Moscow's ability to increase its missile attacks against Ukrainian cities, including targeted strikes against critical civilian infrastructure," the report says.
Russia's assistance has enabled North Korea to fund its military programs and continue developing its ballistic missiles program, which is banned by the United Nations.
North Korea also "gains first-hand experience in modern warfare in return for its military support to Russia against Ukraine," the report says.
Such military support includes the deployment of 11,000 North Korean troops to Russia since October.
"The official confirmation of North Korean military support to Russia by both governments in April 2025 suggests that, at least for the foreseeable future, North Korea and Russia intend to continue and further deepen their military cooperation in contravention of relevant UNSCRs," according to the report.
U.S., South Korea hold live-fire drills near DMZ
Spectators watch an explosion at a combined U.S.-South Korea live-fire exercise at Seungjin Fire Training Field in Pocheon, South Korea on May 25, 2023. Photo by Thomas Maresca/UPI | License Photo
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
6 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Rand Paul stalls Mike Waltz nomination for UN ambassador
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is standing in the way of Mike Waltz's nomination as ambassador to the United Nations, dealing a serious setback to Trump's former national security adviser, sources familiar with the matter tell Axios. Why it matters: Paul's resistance to Waltz forced the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to delay an expected Wednesday vote on the nomination. The committee is now in recess. Some Republicans are still hopeful that Paul can be convinced to support Waltz or that one or more Democrats will decide to back him in committee, according to people familiar with the matter. A key Waltz adviser expressed strong confidence that Waltz would garner bipartisan support in committee. What he's saying: When asked if he plans to support Waltz, Paul told Axios: "They pulled it for now, we're going to see what happens over the next week." "If you want to report my opinion," he continued, "I had an exchange in the committee last week — that's probably the best thing to report." Zoom out: Paul grilled Waltz in his confirmation hearing last week, demanding to know why he tried, as a House member, to force Trump to keep 8,000 troops in Afghanistan. "The idea that Congress should be involved with declaring war is sort of passé. It's old-fashioned. But when it comes to ending a war, you voted with Liz Cheney and the others to say that the president couldn't end the war," Paul said in a heated exchange. The intrigue: Some Democrats are privately concerned about who Trump might nominate if Waltz goes down, citing their deep misgivings about other rumored candidates, like Richard Grenell, Trump's ambassador to Germany in his first term. The bottom line: Waltz still might be reported out of committee in the coming days.
Axios
6 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump team hurls accusations at Obama over 2016 election interference
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard Wednesday continued to accuse former President Obama's administration of a "manipulation of intelligence" around Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The big picture: Nearly a decade after he won, President Trump remains fixated on disproving the thoroughly investigated and widely held conclusion that Russia interfered to aid his campaign. Back in 2020, the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee — including now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio — concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win but did not hack election infrastructure to manipulate cast ballots. State of play: Gabbard released a document Wednesday that she alleges undermines previous findings from the Obama-era intelligence community that Russia favored a Trump win in 2016. She wrote that the Obama administration was "promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election." Gabbard released another memo last week, with which she accused the Obama administration of a "treasonous conspiracy" to sabotage Trump's presidency in 2016. Driving the news: During a White House press briefing Wednesday, Gabbard again accused Obama and his national security team of directing "the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false." She alleged, "They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump when selling it to the American people as though it were true." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down on the claims, saying, "The truth is that Trump never had anything to do with Russia" and alleging that "the worst part of this is Obama knew that truth." Zoom out: Asked for comment Wednesday, Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush referred Axios to his Tuesday statement where he called the allegations "outrageous" and "bizarre." He said in that statement, "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." In response that statement, Gabbard said Wednesday that Obama's office is "trying to deflect away from their culpability in what is a historic scandal." Asked if the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity protects Obama from any possible prosecution, Leavitt said Trump "wants to see all those who perpetuated this fraud against our country, who betrayed our country and the Constitution to be thoroughly investigated and held accountable."
Boston Globe
6 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Protests flare in Ukraine as Zelensky reins in corruption watchdogs
Advertisement The law, which was passed by parliament deputies and signed quickly by Zelensky on Tuesday, places Ukraine's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the control of the general prosecutor's office. Critics say this will effectively abolish the two bodies' independence. The two institutions, which have previously functioned free of outside control, are the main anti-corruption bodies created since Ukraine's 2014 Maidan Revolution, when hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets in part because they were fed up with rampant corruption under Ukraine's president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych. On Wednesday, Zelensky met with the heads of the country's law enforcement and anti-corruption bodies, including NABU and SAPO, he wrote on social media. Advertisement 'We all hear what society has to say,' Zelensky wrote, adding that the group would draft an 'action plan' in two weeks time. However, after the meeting NABU and SAPO issued a joint statement, in which they said that the 'legislative changes adopted yesterday significantly limit' their independence. 'To restore full and independent work, clear and unambiguous steps are needed at the legislative level to restore the guarantees that were abolished by parliament,' the statement said. In Zelensky's regular evening address posted on social media, he framed the law as an effort to strengthen the work of the two bodies so that they can conclude cases more quickly. Criminal cases against officials have been 'hanging for years' without any results, he said. But Ukrainian lawmakers who voted against the legislation said Zelensky severely underestimated both the domestic and international response to the move, which critics see as an effort to rein in groups tasked with investigating legitimate corruption cases — including those that may be close to the president's inner circle. 'My assumption is that he probably thought that if he did it very quickly, it would just fade away,' said Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, a lawmaker from Ukraine's European Solidarity party who voted against the law and has worked extensively on Ukraine's bid to join the European Union. The move appeared to reflect Zelensky's growing distance from the generation that ushered in a new democratic era after the 2014 revolution — many of whom are now among those fighting on the front lines for the same democratic values they protested for more than a decade ago. Hearing her fellow lawmakers whoop and cheer as they passed a law she saw as scraping away the democratic foundations of Ukraine's society was surreal, Klympush-Tsintsadze said. 'It was the sound of revenge,' she said, from lawmakers who she believes were angry that anti-corruption groups were getting too close to them or Zelensky. Advertisement 'The scariest thing is that it will be used by our foes,' she said, to try to paint Ukraine as a nation that remains mired in corruption. Russia, which has long amplified the narrative of corruption in Ukraine, was quick to leap on the development. 'There is a lot of corruption in the country. The money of American taxpayers and European taxpayers has been plundered to a large extent. This can be said with a high degree of certainty,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Wednesday. Zelensky's signing of the law tested the unwritten agreement between Ukrainian society and government that there will not be a political uprising during wartime due to the shared understanding that Russia is the enemy, said Volodymyr Ariev, a lawmaker who belongs to the same party as Klympush-Tsintsadze. 'He really miscalculated the reaction of the society,' he said of Zelensky. 'We are fighting against Russia not only as a country but as a model.' The reaction by his fellow lawmakers when the bill was passed was like 'euphoria,' Ariev said — a feeling that deeply shook him. 'They are just talking about European integration but in their activities they are still dreaming of preserving the post-Soviet, pro-Russian model where they have impunity,' he said. 'I don't know whether Zelensky understands how seriously it could harm relations between Ukraine and the United States, and Ukraine and the European Union as well.' On Wednesday, President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen called Zelensky to convey 'her strong concerns about the consequences of the amendments' and 'requested the Ukrainian government for explanations,' a spokesperson for the European Commission said. Advertisement 'The respect for the rule of law and the fight against corruption are core elements of the European Union,' the spokesperson said. 'As a candidate country, Ukraine is expected to uphold these standards fully. There cannot be a compromise.' On Monday, agents from Ukraine's security service (SBU), general prosecutor's office, and State Bureau of Investigation raided NABU offices, claiming the existence of a 'Russian 'mole' in one of the bureau's elite units,' SBU head Vasyl Maliuk said. 'In the conditions of the full-scale war, the presence of Russian agents in any state agency is completely unacceptable,' Maliuk said in a meeting with representatives of the Group of Seven countries in Kyiv on Tuesday, according to the SBU website. Many Ukrainians flatly rejected the government's explanations for the legislation, however. The move against the agencies also comes just a month after NABU opened a criminal case against then-Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov on charges of 'abuse of office and receiving undue benefits in substantial amounts for himself and third parties,' it said in a statement at the time. It was one of the highest-level corruption cases since Zelensky became president six years ago, targeting one of the closest allies of his powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak. Chernyshov denied the charges, but he lost his position in last week's government reshuffle.
