
Hope for stomach, brain cancer? Cancer-fighting immune therapy works on solid tumours in early trials
Despite a failed bone marrow transplant, Delhi's Dr (Col) VK Gupta beat his blood cancer after receiving CAR T-cell therapy at Tata Memorial Hospital. Not only did he recover, he was able to go back to work in his outpatient clinic. He is among those with blood cancer who has benefitted from this cutting edge cancer treatment that re-engineers the body's own immune cells, enabling them to fight the cancerous ones. Can this therapy now work for solid and hard-to-treat tumours as well?
Earlier this month, there was good news on this front with two studies indicating increase in life span. Positive results from the first ever phase II trial of CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers — those in the form of gastrointestinal tumours — were published from China. Another early study on the impact of a double target CAR T-cell therapy on a very difficult-to-treat brain cancer was also published in the US. 'With so many people working on the problem, it is possible that we could soon see CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers. While the results are unlikely to be as dramatic as we have seen with blood cancers, any hope is good when survival otherwise is just a couple of months,' says Dr Hasmukh Jain, a specialist of blood cancers from Tata Memorial Hospital. He collaborated with the IIT Bombay team that developed the country's first CAR T-cell therapy.
CAR T-cell therapy essentially uses a cancer patient's own immune T-cells and engineers them in a laboratory to add receptors that can bind specifically with the cancer cells only. These engineered cells are then multiplied and infused in the patient. Usually, the cancerous cells have the ability to hide from the unmodified T-cells. However, with the new receptors on the T-cells, they cannot. The body's immune system then kills the cancer cells.
This, experts say, is because it is much more difficult to target solid cancers than blood cancers. 'One of the biggest problems with CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers is that there aren't enough good targets. Several of the solid cancer markers are also found on normal, healthy cells, so they cannot be used. There have been cases of pulmonary toxicity with therapies whose target was expressed in small quantities in the lungs. Or, take for example, the BRCA gene mutations in breast cancers; these are expressed by other healthy cells as well,' says Dr Mayank Singh, associate professor of medical oncology at AIIMS-New Delhi.
Another challenge is that the same type of cancer may be molecularly very different in different patients — or even within the same patient — making it extremely difficult to find a suitable target for CAR T.
Besides, solid tumours are a more complex disease, says Dr Jain. 'Unlike blood cancers, other cancers are not in the blood where the T-cells are. So, they have to find the tumour and enter it. This is difficult as the T- cells are not able to effectively penetrate the tumour microenvironment or the immediate area round the tumour,' he explains. This is hostile towards immune cells and can deactivate them, including the modified T-cells given to patients.
The phase II study from China showed that the outcome was better with the new CAR T therapy as compared to the therapy generally prescribed by the physician. Patients with gastrointestinal cancers carrying a specific mutation called CLDN18.2 — having received two unsuccessful treatments previously — were given either the new therapy or existing treatments. The study found that 35 per cent of the patients given the new treatment responded as compared to 4 per cent of those on existing treatments.
Those on the new therapy also lived 2.4 months longer on average as compared to the control group.
Another new CAR T-cell therapy, which used two targets instead for a very difficult to treat brain tumour called glioblastoma, showed promise in a trial conducted at University of Pennsylvania. The tumours became smaller in nearly two-thirds of the patients with recurrent glioblastoma who received the novel therapy. And, several of the patients have already lived 12 months or longer, which is significant considering that people with this type of cancer typically survive only for six to ten months.
Importantly, the researchers also found evidence to suggest that the modified T-cells remained in the patients' immune system and continued to prevent tumour growth over time.
Experts say that studies on brain and spinal cancers called gliomas and those targeting CLDN18.2 are probably at the most advanced stages of development and may be approved within a few years. 'Now, researchers are using AI to identify suitable targets for CAR T therapies. This is the reason for the recent increase in trials,' says Dr Singh.
The IIT Bombay-incubated start-up ImmunoACT is also working on a therapy that can work on brain and nerve cell cancers called glioblastoma and neuroblastoma. Another therapy that it is pursuing will work on the gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers — the same cancers as the Chinese trial looked at.
Anonna Dutt is a Principal Correspondent who writes primarily on health at the Indian Express. She reports on myriad topics ranging from the growing burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and hypertension to the problems with pervasive infectious conditions. She reported on the government's management of the Covid-19 pandemic and closely followed the vaccination programme.
Her stories have resulted in the city government investing in high-end tests for the poor and acknowledging errors in their official reports.
Dutt also takes a keen interest in the country's space programme and has written on key missions like Chandrayaan 2 and 3, Aditya L1, and Gaganyaan.
She was among the first batch of eleven media fellows with RBM Partnership to End Malaria. She was also selected to participate in the short-term programme on early childhood reporting at Columbia University's Dart Centre. Dutt has a Bachelor's Degree from the Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, Pune and a PG Diploma from the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. She started her reporting career with the Hindustan Times.
When not at work, she tries to appease the Duolingo owl with her French skills and sometimes takes to the dance floor. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Superfoods in our kitchen, yet India's cholesterol profile is alarming
ICMR-INDIAB study found 79% of urban Indians have at least one lipid abnormality Garlic is packed with allicin, a compound known to lower LDL cholesterol It's not what we eat, but how we use it that makes the difference No, this is not just another health crisis; it's an awareness, apathy, and aggressive food marketing problem. We are aware that Indian kitchens are troves of ingredients that are now labelled as 'superfoods.' Be it curcumin from turmeric, or soluble fibre from oats and barley, allicin in garlic, polyphenols in tulsi and green tea, all of these aren't imported wellness trends any more but are a part of our culinary DNA! Given this premise, a couple of questions naturally arise: Why is India's lipid profile mirroring the patterns of fast-food-heavy Western societies? Indians are developing coronary artery disease almost a decade earlier than people in the West. Why is that the case? Internal data is damning too. A 2024 survey by a popular diagnostic firm revealed that "six in 10 Indians have abnormal levels of LDL cholesterol". The highest prevalence is amongst people aged 31 to 40 â€' hardly the age group one would associate with heart risk. Meanwhile, the ICMR-INDIAB study found that 79% of urban and 72% of rural Indians have at least one lipid abnormality. A 2023 AIIMS study on heart attacks in young adults showed that over 70% had high LDL, with most unaware of their cholesterol status before the attack. While there's no surefire way to pinpoint the exact cause of India's lipid problem, experts broadly attribute it to a few key factors. NOT DOING IT RIGHT Sure, we are a country rich in superfoods, but the way we use them today dilutes their benefits. Take the case of garlic, for example. It's packed with allicin, a compound known to lower LDL cholesterol and support heart health, but allicin is fragile. It forms only when garlic is crushed raw and left to rest before cooking. Instead, we toss garlic straight into hot oil, absolutely killing its medicinal properties. The same holds for turmeric â€' most of its benefits are unlocked only with the right fat and black pepper, yet we drown it in deep-fried gravies or consume it in barely-there amounts. It's not just what we eat, but how we use it that makes the difference. BIG MODERN BETRAYAL Today's modern plate is at best a mash-up. We have calorie-dense desi staples overloaded with carbs, combined with processed snacks, sugary drinks, and ultra-refined seed oils. It is the wholesome, balanced thali that has been replaced by hyper-palatable fusion food and late-night takeaways. Fasting, which was once a natural part of Indian life, is now dismissed as unscientific. To make matters worse, movement is down, screen time is up. The end result is a generation that is growing up believing that wellness lies in a pill, or a protein bar, or even a 21-day detox challenge â€' not in a plate of home-cooked dal-chawal or a bowl of millet khichdi. KNOWLEDGE DEFICIT The other problem is that understanding of cholesterol is very poor. Most people don't know what LDL is, or why the HDL:LDL ratio matters more than total cholesterol alone. Few realise that 80% of cholesterol is produced by the liver, not directly from dietary fat. What's worse, we still treat health check-ups as something reserved for the sick or the elderly. Preventive health, especially lipid screening in your 20s and 30s, is not yet a part of India's cultural consciousness. The good news is that the solution is simpler than we make it out to be. NEEDED: CHOLESTEROL MOVEMENT We need to demystify cholesterol, educate young people, and normalise preventive blood tests. There's no point waiting for chest pain to realise something is off. This is because the real tragedy isn't that Indians are falling sick; the real tragedy is that we already have the tools to stay well â€' we're just not using them. No, this is not just another health crisis; it's an awareness, apathy, and aggressive food marketing problem. We are aware that Indian kitchens are troves of ingredients that are now labelled as 'superfoods.' Be it curcumin from turmeric, or soluble fibre from oats and barley, allicin in garlic, polyphenols in tulsi and green tea, all of these aren't imported wellness trends any more but are a part of our culinary DNA! Given this premise, a couple of questions naturally arise: Why is India's lipid profile mirroring the patterns of fast-food-heavy Western societies? Indians are developing coronary artery disease almost a decade earlier than people in the West. Why is that the case? Internal data is damning too. A 2024 survey by a popular diagnostic firm revealed that "six in 10 Indians have abnormal levels of LDL cholesterol". The highest prevalence is amongst people aged 31 to 40 â€' hardly the age group one would associate with heart risk. Meanwhile, the ICMR-INDIAB study found that 79% of urban and 72% of rural Indians have at least one lipid abnormality. A 2023 AIIMS study on heart attacks in young adults showed that over 70% had high LDL, with most unaware of their cholesterol status before the attack. While there's no surefire way to pinpoint the exact cause of India's lipid problem, experts broadly attribute it to a few key factors. NOT DOING IT RIGHT Sure, we are a country rich in superfoods, but the way we use them today dilutes their benefits. Take the case of garlic, for example. It's packed with allicin, a compound known to lower LDL cholesterol and support heart health, but allicin is fragile. It forms only when garlic is crushed raw and left to rest before cooking. Instead, we toss garlic straight into hot oil, absolutely killing its medicinal properties. The same holds for turmeric â€' most of its benefits are unlocked only with the right fat and black pepper, yet we drown it in deep-fried gravies or consume it in barely-there amounts. It's not just what we eat, but how we use it that makes the difference. BIG MODERN BETRAYAL Today's modern plate is at best a mash-up. We have calorie-dense desi staples overloaded with carbs, combined with processed snacks, sugary drinks, and ultra-refined seed oils. It is the wholesome, balanced thali that has been replaced by hyper-palatable fusion food and late-night takeaways. Fasting, which was once a natural part of Indian life, is now dismissed as unscientific. To make matters worse, movement is down, screen time is up. The end result is a generation that is growing up believing that wellness lies in a pill, or a protein bar, or even a 21-day detox challenge â€' not in a plate of home-cooked dal-chawal or a bowl of millet khichdi. KNOWLEDGE DEFICIT The other problem is that understanding of cholesterol is very poor. Most people don't know what LDL is, or why the HDL:LDL ratio matters more than total cholesterol alone. Few realise that 80% of cholesterol is produced by the liver, not directly from dietary fat. What's worse, we still treat health check-ups as something reserved for the sick or the elderly. Preventive health, especially lipid screening in your 20s and 30s, is not yet a part of India's cultural consciousness. The good news is that the solution is simpler than we make it out to be. NEEDED: CHOLESTEROL MOVEMENT We need to demystify cholesterol, educate young people, and normalise preventive blood tests. There's no point waiting for chest pain to realise something is off. This is because the real tragedy isn't that Indians are falling sick; the real tragedy is that we already have the tools to stay well â€' we're just not using them. Join our WhatsApp Channel


Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
Hope for stomach, brain cancer? Cancer-fighting immune therapy works on solid tumours in early trials
Despite a failed bone marrow transplant, Delhi's Dr (Col) VK Gupta beat his blood cancer after receiving CAR T-cell therapy at Tata Memorial Hospital. Not only did he recover, he was able to go back to work in his outpatient clinic. He is among those with blood cancer who has benefitted from this cutting edge cancer treatment that re-engineers the body's own immune cells, enabling them to fight the cancerous ones. Can this therapy now work for solid and hard-to-treat tumours as well? Earlier this month, there was good news on this front with two studies indicating increase in life span. Positive results from the first ever phase II trial of CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers — those in the form of gastrointestinal tumours — were published from China. Another early study on the impact of a double target CAR T-cell therapy on a very difficult-to-treat brain cancer was also published in the US. 'With so many people working on the problem, it is possible that we could soon see CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers. While the results are unlikely to be as dramatic as we have seen with blood cancers, any hope is good when survival otherwise is just a couple of months,' says Dr Hasmukh Jain, a specialist of blood cancers from Tata Memorial Hospital. He collaborated with the IIT Bombay team that developed the country's first CAR T-cell therapy. CAR T-cell therapy essentially uses a cancer patient's own immune T-cells and engineers them in a laboratory to add receptors that can bind specifically with the cancer cells only. These engineered cells are then multiplied and infused in the patient. Usually, the cancerous cells have the ability to hide from the unmodified T-cells. However, with the new receptors on the T-cells, they cannot. The body's immune system then kills the cancer cells. This, experts say, is because it is much more difficult to target solid cancers than blood cancers. 'One of the biggest problems with CAR T-cell therapy for solid cancers is that there aren't enough good targets. Several of the solid cancer markers are also found on normal, healthy cells, so they cannot be used. There have been cases of pulmonary toxicity with therapies whose target was expressed in small quantities in the lungs. Or, take for example, the BRCA gene mutations in breast cancers; these are expressed by other healthy cells as well,' says Dr Mayank Singh, associate professor of medical oncology at AIIMS-New Delhi. Another challenge is that the same type of cancer may be molecularly very different in different patients — or even within the same patient — making it extremely difficult to find a suitable target for CAR T. Besides, solid tumours are a more complex disease, says Dr Jain. 'Unlike blood cancers, other cancers are not in the blood where the T-cells are. So, they have to find the tumour and enter it. This is difficult as the T- cells are not able to effectively penetrate the tumour microenvironment or the immediate area round the tumour,' he explains. This is hostile towards immune cells and can deactivate them, including the modified T-cells given to patients. The phase II study from China showed that the outcome was better with the new CAR T therapy as compared to the therapy generally prescribed by the physician. Patients with gastrointestinal cancers carrying a specific mutation called CLDN18.2 — having received two unsuccessful treatments previously — were given either the new therapy or existing treatments. The study found that 35 per cent of the patients given the new treatment responded as compared to 4 per cent of those on existing treatments. Those on the new therapy also lived 2.4 months longer on average as compared to the control group. Another new CAR T-cell therapy, which used two targets instead for a very difficult to treat brain tumour called glioblastoma, showed promise in a trial conducted at University of Pennsylvania. The tumours became smaller in nearly two-thirds of the patients with recurrent glioblastoma who received the novel therapy. And, several of the patients have already lived 12 months or longer, which is significant considering that people with this type of cancer typically survive only for six to ten months. Importantly, the researchers also found evidence to suggest that the modified T-cells remained in the patients' immune system and continued to prevent tumour growth over time. Experts say that studies on brain and spinal cancers called gliomas and those targeting CLDN18.2 are probably at the most advanced stages of development and may be approved within a few years. 'Now, researchers are using AI to identify suitable targets for CAR T therapies. This is the reason for the recent increase in trials,' says Dr Singh. The IIT Bombay-incubated start-up ImmunoACT is also working on a therapy that can work on brain and nerve cell cancers called glioblastoma and neuroblastoma. Another therapy that it is pursuing will work on the gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers — the same cancers as the Chinese trial looked at. Anonna Dutt is a Principal Correspondent who writes primarily on health at the Indian Express. She reports on myriad topics ranging from the growing burden of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and hypertension to the problems with pervasive infectious conditions. She reported on the government's management of the Covid-19 pandemic and closely followed the vaccination programme. Her stories have resulted in the city government investing in high-end tests for the poor and acknowledging errors in their official reports. Dutt also takes a keen interest in the country's space programme and has written on key missions like Chandrayaan 2 and 3, Aditya L1, and Gaganyaan. She was among the first batch of eleven media fellows with RBM Partnership to End Malaria. She was also selected to participate in the short-term programme on early childhood reporting at Columbia University's Dart Centre. Dutt has a Bachelor's Degree from the Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, Pune and a PG Diploma from the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai. She started her reporting career with the Hindustan Times. When not at work, she tries to appease the Duolingo owl with her French skills and sometimes takes to the dance floor. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
8 hours ago
- Business Standard
Doctor warns against these 6 everyday foods that may raise cancer risk
You might want to take a closer look at what's on your plate, because some everyday favourites could be quietly increasing your risk of cancer. Dr Saurabh Sethi, a gastroenterologist based in California and trained at Aiims, Harvard, and Stanford, recently shared on social media the foods he considers most harmful when it comes to cancer risk. Drawing from his clinical experience and research, Dr Sethi warns that many people unknowingly increase their long-term health risks by regularly eating foods they consider harmless. What are the top foods linked to increased cancer risk? 'Did you know that some of the most common everyday foods are scientifically linked to increased cancer risk? Here are some major food culprits that you must reduce or eliminate from your diet, especially if you're serious about long-term health,' said Dr Sethi in his post. ALSO READ | Processed meats: Worst food for overall cancer risk Processed meats such as sausages, bacon, ham, and salami are preserved through smoking, curing, or the addition of chemical preservatives. These contain nitrates and nitrites, which can convert into carcinogenic compounds in the body. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies processed meats as Group 1 carcinogens, placing them in the same risk category as tobacco and asbestos. Sugary drinks like sodas, sweetened juices, and energy drinks cause spikes in blood sugar and insulin levels, leading to chronic inflammation and weight gain—both known cancer risk factors. Excessive sugar intake may also fuel cancer cell growth. Health experts recommend avoiding added sugars and choosing water, unsweetened teas, or naturally flavoured drinks instead. Deep-fried foods: Worst food for inflammation Foods such as French fries, fried chicken, and pakoras are often cooked at high temperatures using reused oils. This process generates harmful compounds like acrylamide, which has been linked to DNA damage and oxidative stress. Dr Sethi recommends baking, roasting, or air-frying as safer alternatives. Charred or burnt meats: Worst food for DNA damage Grilling or barbecuing meat at high temperatures can produce heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are linked to DNA damage and increased cancer risk. The more charred the meat, the higher the levels of these compounds. Marinating meat and avoiding direct contact with open flames can reduce exposure. Alcohol: Worst food for hormone-related cancers Alcoho l breaks down into acetaldehyde in the body—a toxic compound that damages DNA, impairs immunity, and reduces nutrient absorption. Even moderate consumption has been linked to cancers of the breast, oesophagus, liver, and colon. Experts recommend limiting alcohol and opting for alternatives like kombucha, buttermilk, or fruit-infused water. Ultra-processed foods: Worst food for chronic inflammation Packaged snacks, instant noodles, processed cereals, and ready-to-eat meals often contain added sugars, trans fats, and preservatives, offering little nutritional value. These disrupt gut health, contribute to inflammation, and are associated with obesity—all of which raise cancer risk. Whole, minimally processed foods are a safer choice. ALSO READ | This new blood test could spot cancer up to 3 years before symptoms What can you eat instead to reduce your cancer risk? According to global health agencies, building a diet around fibre-rich, anti-inflammatory whole foods is key to reducing cancer risk. Recommended options include: Leafy greens such as spinach, kale, and broccoli Whole grains like oats, brown rice, and quinoa Legumes and pulses including lentils, chickpeas, and beans Healthy fats from nuts, seeds, and avocados Fermented foods like yoghurt and kanji for gut support Unsweetened coffee and coconut water Experts emphasise gradual changes over perfection. Small, consistent dietary shifts can make a significant impact over time.