Ancient footprints from Australia reveal earliest-known reptile
Seventeen footprints preserved in a slab of sandstone discovered in southeastern Australia dating to about 355 million years ago are rewriting the history of the evolution of land vertebrates, showing that reptiles arose much earlier than previously known.
The fossilized footprints, apparently made on a muddy ancient river bank, include two trackways plus one isolated print, all displaying hallmark features of reptile tracks including overall shape, toe length and associated claw marks, researchers said. They appear to have been left by a reptile with body dimensions similar to those of a lizard, they said.
The footprints reveal that reptiles existed about 35 million years earlier than previously known, showing that the evolution of land vertebrates occurred more rapidly than had been thought.
"So this is all quite radical stuff," said paleontologist Per Ahlberg of the University of Uppsala in Sweden, who led the study published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.
The Australian footprints were preserved in a sandstone slab measuring about 14 inches (35 cm) across that was found on the banks of the Broken River near the town of Barjarg in the state of Victoria.
The story of land vertebrates started with fish leaving the water, a milestone in the evolution of life on Earth. These animals were the first tetrapods - meaning "four feet" - and they were the forerunners of today's terrestrial vertebrates: amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds. Footprints in Poland dating to about 390 million years ago represent the oldest fossil evidence for these first tetrapods, which lived an amphibious lifestyle.
These creatures were the ancestors of all later land vertebrates. Their descendants split into two major lineages - one leading to today's amphibians and the other to the amniotes, a group spanning reptiles, mammals and birds. The amniotes, the first vertebrates to lay eggs on land and thus finally break free of the water, cleaved into two lineages, one leading to reptiles and the other to mammals. Birds evolved much later from reptile ancestors.
The Australian footprints each are approximately 1-1.5 inches (3-4 cm) long. They appear to have been left by three individuals of the same reptile species, with no tail drag or body drag marks. No skeletal remains were found but the footprints offer some idea of what the reptile that made them looked like.
"The feet are rather lizard-like in shape, and the distance between hip and shoulder appears to have been about 17 cm (6.7 inches). Of course we don't know anything about the shape of the head, the length of the neck or the length of the tail, but if we imagine lizard-like proportions the total length could have been in the region of 60 cm to 80 cm (24 to 32 inches)," Ahlberg said.
"In terms of its overall appearance, 'lizard-like' is probably the best guess, because lizards are the group of living reptiles that have retained the closest approximation to the ancestral body form," Ahlberg added.
The modest size of the earliest reptiles stands in contrast to some of their later descendants like the dinosaurs.
This reptile probably was a predator because plant-eating did not appear until later in reptilian evolution. The bodies of herbivorous reptiles tend to be big and clunky, whereas this one evidently was lithe with long, slender toes, Ahlberg said.
The researchers also described newly identified fossilized reptile footprints from Poland dating to 327 million years ago that broadly resemble those from Australia. Those also are older than the previous earliest-known evidence for reptiles - skeletal fossils from Canada of a lizard-like creature named Hylonomus dating to around 320 million years ago, as well as fossil footprints from about the same time.
The reptile that left the Australian footprints lived during the Carboniferous Period, a time when global temperatures were similar to today's, with ice at Earth's poles but a warm equatorial region. Australia at the time formed part of the ancient supercontinent Gondwana and lay at the southern edge of the tropics. There were forests, partly composed of giant clubmoss trees.
"The tracks were left near the water's edge of what was probably quite a large river, inhabited by a diversity of big fishes," Ahlberg said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Mongolia's 'Dragon Prince' dinosaur was forerunner of T. rex
The newly identified dinosaur species Khankhuuluu mongoliensis is shown in the timeline of the dinosaur lineage called tyrannosaurs, which included Tyrannosaurus rex, in this illustration released on June 11, 2025. Jared Voris/Handout via REUTERS The newly identified dinosaur species Khankhuuluu mongoliensis is seen in front of three of its evolutionary descendants, including Tyrannosaurus rex (rear) in this handout illustration released on June 11, 2025. Masato Hattori/Handout via REUTERS A life reconstruction of the newly identified dinosaur species Khankhuuluu mongoliensis, which lived 86 million years ago in Mongolia, is seen in this handout illustration released on June 11, 2025. Julius Csotonyi/Handout via REUTERS A newly identified mid-sized dinosaur from Mongolia dubbed the "Dragon Prince" has been identified as a pivotal forerunner of Tyrannosaurus rex in an illuminating discovery that has helped clarify the famous predator's complicated family history. Named Khankhuuluu mongoliensis (pronounced khan-KOO-loo mon-gol-ee-EN-sis), it lived roughly 86 million years ago during the Cretaceous Period and was an immediate precursor to the dinosaur lineage called tyrannosaurs, which included some of the largest meat-eating land animals in Earth's history, among them T. rex. Khankhuuluu predated Tyrannosaurus by about 20 million years. It was about 13 feet (4 meters) long, weighed about 1,600 pounds (750 kg), walked on two legs and had a lengthy snout with a mouthful of sharp teeth. More lightly built than T. rex, its body proportions indicate Khankhuuluu was fleet-footed, likely chasing down smaller prey such as bird-like dinosaurs called oviraptorosaurs and ornithomimosaurs. The largest-known T. rex specimen is 40-1/2 feet long (12.3 meters). Khankhuuluu means "Dragon Prince" in the Mongolian language. Tyrannosaurus rex means "tyrant king of the lizards." "In the name, we wanted to capture that Khankhuuluu was a small, early form that had not evolved into a king. It was still a prince," said paleontologist Darla Zelenitsky of the University of Calgary in Canada, co-author of the study published on Wednesday in the journal Nature. Tyrannosaurs and all other meat-eating dinosaurs are part of a group called theropods. Tyrannosaurs appeared late in the age of dinosaurs, roaming Asia and North America. Khankhuuluu shared many anatomical traits with tyrannosaurs but lacked certain defining characteristics, showing it was a predecessor and not a true member of the lineage. "Khankhuuluu was almost a tyrannosaur, but not quite. For example, the bone along the top of the snout and the bones around the eye are somewhat different from what we see in tyrannosaurs. The snout bone was hollow and the bones around the eye didn't have all the horns and bumps seen in tyrannosaurs," Zelenitsky said. "Khankhuuluu had teeth like steak knives, with serrations along both the front and back edges. Large tyrannosaurs had conical teeth and massive jaws that allowed them to bite with extreme force then hold in order to subdue very large prey. Khankhuuluu's more slender teeth and jaws show this animal took slashing bites to take down smaller prey," Zelenitsky added. The researchers figured out its anatomy based on fossils of two Khankhuuluu individuals dug up in the 1970s but only now fully studied. These included parts of its skull, arms, legs, tail and back bones. The Khankhuuluu remains, more complete than fossils of other known tyrannosaur forerunners, helped the researchers untangle this lineage's evolutionary history. They concluded that Khankhuuluu was the link between smaller forerunners of tyrannosaurs and later true tyrannosaurs, a transitional animal that reveals how these meat-eaters evolved from speedy and modestly sized species into giant apex predators. "What started as the discovery of a new species ended up with us rewriting the family history of tyrannosaurs," said University of Calgary doctoral student and study lead author Jared Voris. "Before this, there was a lot of confusion about who was related to who when it came to tyrannosaur species." Some scientists had hypothesized that smaller tyrannosaurs like China's Qianzhousaurus - dubbed "Pinnochio-rexes" because of their characteristic long snouts - reflected the lineage's ancestral form. That notion was contradicted by the fact that tyrannosaur forerunner Khankhuuluu differed from them in important ways. "The tyrannosaur family didn't follow a straightforward path where they evolved from small size in early species to larger and larger sizes in later species," Zelenitsky said. Voris noted that Khankhuuluu demonstrates that the ancestors to the tyrannosaurs lived in Asia. "Around 85 million years ago, these tyrannosaur ancestors crossed a land bridge connecting Siberia and Alaska and evolved in North America into the apex predatory tyrannosaurs," Voris said. One line of North American tyrannosaurs later trekked back to Asia and split into two branches - the "Pinnochio-rexes" and massive forms like Tarbosaurus, the researchers said. These apex predators then spread back to North America, they said, paving the way for the appearance of T. rex. Tyrannosaurus ruled western North America at the end of the age of dinosaurs when an asteroid struck Earth 66 million years ago. "Khankhuuluu was where it all started but it was still only a distant ancestor of T. rex, at nearly 20 million years older," Zelenitsky said. "Over a dozen tyrannosaur species evolved in the time between them. It was a great-great-great uncle, sort of." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
01-06-2025
- Straits Times
Small but mighty: Study shows S'pore's seagrasses rank among top global carbon stores per hectare
Seagrass meadows in the Central Indo-Pacific region, which includes Singapore and Malaysia, can lock up an average of 86 metric tonnes of carbon per hectare – equivalent to the annual emissions from 22 cars. PHOTO: NATIONAL PARKS BOARD SINGAPORE – Singapore's seagrass meadows may be small, but the remaining patches of the ocean's only flowering plant here are punching above their weight when it comes to their ability to store carbon, a new study has found. Seagrass meadows in the Central Indo-Pacific region, which includes Singapore and Malaysia, can lock up an average of 86 metric tonnes of carbon per hectare – equivalent to the annual emissions from 22 cars. This is more than twice the global average of 38 metric tonnes per hectare, the study found. The research, which quantified carbon stocks in seagrass ecosystems globally, was done by researchers from academic institutions and organisations across the globe, including the National University of Singapore (NUS) and the Singapore-based International Blue Carbon Institute. Published in research journal Nature in May, the study identified the lagoons and small deltas of the Indo-Pacific as being among the top five regions globally with the highest organic carbon storage potential, alongside the Mediterranean, Colombia, Florida and South Africa. Organic carbon refers to carbon that comes from living things. While seagrass meadows are known to be natural carbon sponges that can soak up planet-warming carbon dioxide, there is still much uncertainty and knowledge gaps about these ecosystems, making their conservation challenging. The aim of the study, said the researchers, was to provide policymakers with greater understanding about the factors that affect the carbon storage potential of seagrass meadows. This could help guide the 'development, integrity and reliability of climate change policy, and financing to support seagrass conservation and restoration', they said. What are seagrasses? Seagrasses are aquatic plants that take in carbon dioxide through photosynthesis. This carbon is locked up in the plants' roots and underground stems, and the soil they grow in. Being anchored to the seafloor by their roots, these habitats can also 'trap' carbon-containing particles, such as bits of dead plants or animal faeces, carried by the currents, said Dr Siti Yaakub, senior director of the International Blue Carbon Institute and a co-author of the paper. As more of these particles eventually settle on the seabed, they get trapped in structures of the seagrass. As these layers accumulate, the carbon gets buried by new layers of sediment and moves deeper into the earth, said Dr Siti. Burrowing animals in the seafloor, such as clams and worms, also help bring the carbon to deeper layers of the sediment, she added. These characteristics make seagrass meadows a promising ally in humanity's fight against climate change. A separate study, also published in Nature in 2021, estimated that seagrasses are 40 times more efficient at capturing organic carbon than land forest soils. However, different environmental conditions and types of seagrass could affect how much carbon is stored at a particular site , resulting in a large variation globally . For example, Dr Siti said seagrass meadows near big rivers tend to contain a higher carbon content in the seabed due to the discharge of river sediment and carbon-rich organic matter. Heavy rain can also affect seagrass growth, as the rainfall could stir up sediment and prevent sunlight from reaching the plant. Similarly, high levels of nutrients in waters can cause algae blooms that reduce water clarity. Nutrient levels can go up when fish feed and waste materials are released from fish farms into the sea. The study is one of the first to map out the potential of seagrass meadows around the world to act as natural sponges that can soak up planet-warming carbon dioxide, Dr Siti said. S'pore's underwater carbon banks Through an analysis of 2,171 soil cores retrieved from seagrass beds around the world, the researchers found that the region's seagrass meadows had one of the world's highest carbon stocks on a per-hectare basis. 'As a region, we do have a slightly higher-than-average carbon stock because there is a lot of seagrass in shallow sheltered coastal waters that are also adjacent to river systems, so there's a good source of allochthonous (external) inputs,' said Dr Siti. 'If we lose all this seagrass with high carbon stocks, we will not be able to recover the carbon that is lost. It will take many decades to restore it.' Singapore is home to 12 of the 72 known species of seagrass globally, with some of the country's largest meadows found at Chek Jawa on Pulau Ubin, Pulau Semakau, Cyrene Reef and Changi Beach, said Dr Siti. Seagrass meadows in the Republic also act as shelters and nursery areas for numerous animals like seahorses, and serve as the primary food source for sea turtles and dugongs. The biggest threats to seagrass meadows in Singapore are coastal development and high sedimentation. Large amounts of sediment in the water can result in low light levels reaching the plant. A healthy ecosystem should have a balance of both sediment input and output to avoid erosion – which may result in the unearthing of buried carbon or burying of seagrass. But changes to coastlines from land reclamation projects may alter the dynamics of water and sediment movement. 'If you change the coastal environment such that it increases the rate of erosion, and block off sediments coming in from rivers, it becomes a double whammy, because sediments are now being washed away with no supply to replenish these systems,' Dr Siti noted. Efforts to protect seagrass meadows have been ramped up since 2007, when the National Parks Board (NParks) began working with Seagrass-Watch – the world's largest scientific seagrass assessment and monitoring programme – to monitor the health of seagrass on Singapore's shores. Singapore in 2024 also launched its first seagrass restoration project, in an effort by NParks and NUS. The project was fully funded by OCBC Bank. Dr Samantha Lai, deputy director of NParks' National Biodiversity Centre Coastal and Marine branch, said the board has also been working with NUS and NParks volunteers on separate projects that aim to study the health and conservation needs of seagrasses. Moving forward, Dr Siti said that a better understanding of the seasonal growth cycles of seagrass can help with better planning during dredging and reclamation activities to minimise stress on the seagrass population. 'For example, if there is dredging involved, there should be measures taken to contain the sediment plumes so that they don't spread to areas with seagrass and stress them out even more,' Dr Siti said. At the global level, the study provided some insight into the carbon storage potential of seagrass meadows in the region, she added. However, the large variation also shows that countries need to more closely study the quantity of carbon being sequestered in their own meadows. This is especially if they intend to tap the carbon storage abilities of these habitats in their plans to tackle climate change, she said. 'The issue with seagrass is that it's not very well mapped. For example, estimates of seagrass cover in Indonesia range between 300,000ha and three million ha, which is a huge range. This results in big uncertainty in calculating the climate mitigation potential of seagrass with respect to their climate commitments. But there are efforts under way to better understand seagrass cover and map them globally ,' Dr Siti said. Singapore can contribute to deepening this understanding, said local experts. Dr Ow Yan Xiang, a seagrass scientist and senior research fellow at the St John's Island National Marine Laboratory who was not involved in the latest research, said: 'This study shows that Singapore has one of the highest data density and sampling efforts for seagrass carbon stocks. Also, our seagrass population is holding steady, despite the region's seagrass declining at an average of 4.7 per cent per year.' The high data density refers to Singapore contributing a high amount of data, in proportion to its small coastline. Dr Siti said: 'This places Singapore at the forefront of carbon mitigation efforts because one, we have influence in climate negotiations, and two, we have the resources and expertise to facilitate or help other countries deploy natural climate solutions.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
26-05-2025
- Straits Times
Invasive species cost society over $2.8 trillion in damages, study shows
Farmers harvest corn in Jiayuguan, in China's Gansu province. Invasive wild hogs can cause agricultural damage to crops, cornfields and vineyards. PHOTO: REUTERS PARIS - From river-clogging plants to disease-carrying insects, the direct economic cost of invasive species worldwide has averaged about US$35 billion (S$45 billion) a year for decades, researchers said on May 26. Since 1960, damage from non-native plants and animals expanding into new territory has cost society more than US$2.2 trillion (S$2.8 trillion), 17 times higher than previous estimates, they reported in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. The accelerating spread of invasive species – from mosquitoes to wild boar to tough-to-eradicate plants – blights agriculture, spreads disease and drives the growing pace of species extinction. Earlier calculations based on highly incomplete data were already known to fall far short of reality. To piece together a more accurate picture, an international team of researchers led by Professor Ismael Soto, a scientist at the University of South Bohemia in the Czech Republic, compiled data on 162 invasive species whose costs have been well documented in at least a handful of countries. They then modelled the economic impact for 78 other countries such as Bangladesh and Costa Rica, for which no data was previously available. 'We expected an underestimation of invasion costs, but the magnitude was striking,' Prof Soto told AFP. Due mainly to high volumes of trade and travel, tens of thousands of animal and plant species have taken root, sometimes literally, far from their places of origin. Europe is by far the continent most affected by the phenomenon, followed by North America and Asia. 'Plants were the most economically damaging group, both for damage and management,' Prof Soto said. 'Cost hotspots include urban coastal areas, notably in Europe, eastern China, and the US.' Animals can cause devastating damage too. Wild boar, for example, destroy crops, cornfields and vineyards, while mosquitoes – with expanding ranges due to global warming – impose direct costs to human health by spreading diseases such as dengue and malaria. Another example is Japanese knotweed, an invasive plant that is very common in Europe and requires costly eradication programmes. 'Our study is based on only 162 species,' Prof Soto noted. 'Our figure is probably still an underestimate of a wider problem, and therefore the real economic costs could be even higher.' Using a broader definition – including indirect costs such as lost income – the UN's biodiversity expert group, IPBES, has calculated the total cost to society of invasive species at about US$400 billion annually. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
