
What is the coalition of the willing?
– What is the coalition of the willing?
At least 31 countries have signed up to help defend a peace deal in Ukraine, once one is struck, in an effort to ward off a future attack by Russia.
The UK is among those 'willing', with the Government prepared to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air', Sir Keir said when he unveiled plans for the coalition at London's Lancaster House in March.
But it is not the first of its kind.
Former US president Bill Clinton suggested in 1994 that sanctions could be imposed by a 'so-called coalition of the willing', to quell North Korea's nuclear ambitions, and his successor George W Bush announced a similar alliance in the early-2000s to disarm the then-Iraqi president Saddam Hussein.
– Who has signed up?
Leaders from the UK, France, Germany, Finland and Italy have all indicated their willingness to defend a peace deal in Ukraine.
They joined Donald Trump, who has not signed up to the coalition, and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House this month.
A total 31 countries are in the coalition, according to the Government's National Security Strategy 2025. Beyond Europe, it has attracted support from the Canadian and Australian prime ministers Mark Carney and Anthony Albanese.
– Will British troops go to Ukraine?
After Sir Keir's commitment to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air together with others' to militarily defend a peace deal, No 10 unveiled its support for a Multinational Force Ukraine, in an effort to help regenerate Ukraine's own armed forces.
Military chiefs have previously met in Paris to agree a strategy for the force, and to coordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners from 30 international partners.
And in Washington, European leaders discussed early-stage proposals for a security guarantee, similar to Nato's article five principle – that an attack one member is an attack on the entire bloc.
– What has the coalition achieved?
'The coalition of the willing has been successful in advocating for Ukraine and communicating with Trump and the US administration during its outreach to Russia,' says Edward Arnold from the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) think tank.
'Moreover, it has undertaken lengthy military planning and has established a leadership and command structure. However, much remains uncertain, especially the nature of any agreed ceasefire or whether a broader peace process is on the cards.'
But the US's commitment is 'far from certain', he told the PA news agency, and warned that 'European planners cannot progress the planning until the US position is agreed'.
– What is Nato's role?
Nato's Mark Rutte has attended meetings of the coalition of the willing, and Mr Trump appeared pleased with his efforts at their meeting when he described the secretary general as 'a great, great political leader'.
But Mr Arnold warned that an article five-style mutual defence deal could amount to 'de facto' membership of the bloc for Ukraine, something which Russian president Vladimir Putin 'is unlikely to agree to'.
He said: ''Nato article five-style' guarantees are being talked about but Nato is a unique alliance which is not able to be replicated for Ukraine.
'Moreover, if any coalition of the willing member signed a mutual defence clause with Ukraine, and then Ukraine was attacked further, that could conceivably draw that Nato member into direct conflict with Russia, thereby potentially triggering article five.'
Sir Keir has welcomed 'some sort of article five-style guarantees', which he said 'fits' with some of the coalition's work, and Mr Trump who met Mr Putin in an Alaska summit claimed Moscow will 'accept' multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
15 minutes ago
- ITV News
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump battles sinking public image over DC takeover while National Guard pose with tourists
resident Donald Trump's D.C. takeover is now well into its second week. Washingtonians are in agreement: they're officially sick of it. Wednesday dawned in the nation's capital with news of more chaos in the District of Columbia, this time indisputably caused by Trump's executive order — which the administration is increasingly finding it hard to prove is not a publicity stunt. More and more National Guard troops pour into the city from around the country, though arrests aren't going up, and most of the troops appear to be standing around snapping photos with tourists. In the early morning hours, an armored, mine-resistant tactical vehicle slammed into the side of a civilian vehicle, sending one person to the hospital. The crash occurred downtown, where federal agents and National Guard troops are increasingly piling up in high-traffic tourist areas. A morning report from Fox 5 quoted residents in the higher-crime area of Anacostia, in the city's southeast, saying that law enforcement resources weren't reaching them. Meanwhile, video after video shows bored federal agents patrolling luxury shopping and dining areas, or tourist destinations like the Washington Monument. As Vice President J.D. Vance and Trump adviser Stephen Miller arrived at a Shake Shack at Union Station — one of those low-crime areas where Guard troops have milled around aimlessly — for a meet-and-greet with a few visiting troops on Wednesday, the pair were loudly heckled by locals. Then they bizarrely accused the hecklers of having come from out of town to mock them. Around the city, graffiti appeared honoring a resident arrested after angrily tossing a Subway sandwich at federal law enforcement agents, a since-fired DOJ employee who has become a folk hero around town. 'I'll tell you, a couple of years ago, when I brought my kids here, they were being screamed at by violent vagrants, and it was scaring the hell out of my kids,' Vance said. He denied the validity of a comment from a reporter referring to the area as low crime, and again cited those 'vagrants' as evidence during his Q&A. Union Station is a major arrival point for many tourists in the capital and for many years has struggled with the attraction that the spacious transit center and shopping mall's public facilities provided for homeless D.C. residents. An encampment once existed a few steps from the station's front doors, and inside the station benches and other public amenities were removed in order to dissuade loitering. The Covid pandemic, which accelerated housing insecurity, also led to closures of Union Station businesses which traded reasons for their misfortune including a rise in homeless activity around the station. But vagrancy by itself is not a crime, and Vance's comments, combined with the increase in encampment sweeps around the city the past few days, suggest that Trump's crime-fighting campaign is actually a beautification campaign meant to push an aesthetic that isn't necessarily felt by D.C. residents with roots in the city. Polling shows that Americans who call the city home agree. A resounding eight in 10 D.C. residents told Washington Post pollsters in a survey released Wednesday that they opposed the federal takeover of the city, which is now being fought in the courts as city leaders try to retain control of the Metropolitan Police Department. A similar share, 78 percent, said that they felt extremely or somewhat safe in their own neighborhoods. While arrests aren't surging and city residents don't say they feel safer, it's very clear which community is being impacted the most. U.S. Park Police officials told the New York Post on Wednesday that the agency has cleared 75 homeless encampments around the city in just the short period since Trump announced his takeover. Washington social media channels remain alight with reports of activity from ICE and other federal agencies. Checkpoints have repeatedly been swarmed by hundreds of residents, shouting angrily, until law enforcement agencies pack up and leave. Week two of the takeover also coincided with DC's annual summer Restaurant Week, though dining spots around the city report that the presence of the Guard and federal agents are hurting business as reservations plunged year-over-year. While city leaders are largely paralyzed as they await decisions in the courts, there are already clear signs that this episode could backfire for the president. News channels and social media platforms continue to spread images and video depicting an occupied American city clearly in conflict with its new guests. The unpopularity of Trump's takeover could quickly become an issue in the Virginia governor's race, where a conservative diehard is running against a centrist Democrat with strong DC ties. It's also energized the progressive left, long dormant in city politics thanks to the populations of federal workers and transplants who have elected center-left leadership for years. On Tuesday evening, several hundred people attended the campaign launch of a democratic socialist candidate running for city council, Aparna Raj. In the end, Donald Trump may accomplish little more than juicing up the American left's will to fight back.


Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The public is sick of the Government's failure to tackle illegal migration
SIR – The Home Office is said to be furious that migrants can no longer be housed at the Bell Hotel in Eppi ng (report, August 20), after the council was granted a temporary injunction by the High Court. This fury is hardly surprising, as it means that the Home Office will have to come up with an idea to stop the boats that actually works. At the very least, it will have to speed up deportation proceedings. This will probably be a complete and utter surprise to the Government, but the British public is heartily sick of its inertia and reluctance to stop illegal immigration. Charles Penfold Ulverston, Cumbria SIR – Local councillors are acting in the interests of the people they represent and in the na tional interest ('Other councils expected to submit their own legal challenges ', report, August 20). Government ministers should try it. Gary F S Knight Colchester, Essex SIR – Not taking effective action, with or without good reason, seems to be the stock in trade of the Home Office. In July, you reported on the progress of a dinghy escorted by the French Navy to the point in mid-Channel where our Border Force 'taxi' was waiting. The French even demanded the return of the life jackets loaned to the illegal migrants, so that they might be reused. If the Home Office has a policy, it is clearly not 'to smash' these gangs. Wilfred Attenborough Lincoln SIR – With 50,000 illegal migrants needing to be accommodated somewhere in the UK, Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, must now be back at square one. She might look at sites like RAF Scampton in Lincolnshire, which was decked out at great expense under the Tories and then closed before housing anyone. Put simply, the 'one in, one out' scheme doesn't reduce the numbers coming to our shores. This Government, already short of ideas, has run out of road. Immediate deportation of illegal migrants back to the country they first arrived at is now the only option. Jonathan Williams Pickworth, Lincolnshire SIR – Last Sunday, hundreds of citizens gathered in Ashington, Northumberland, to protest against housing illegal immigrants in the area. In a statement posted on Facebook, Ian Lavery, the Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, admitted that public services are crumbling, and ended by saying: 'But let's be clear: the people responsible for this decline are not those fleeing war or persecution. They are not the vulnerable seeking sanctuary.' Would that be sanctuary from war-torn France, perhaps? Ian Burns Storrington, West Sussex