
OPEC back in control, but faces balancing act on market share and price stability
Investing.com -- OPEC has slid back into the driver's seat of global oil markets after the oil cartel's aggressive output hikes put the squeeze on U.S. shale growth. But with the market now bracing for oversupply through mid-2026, the cartel must now balance its appetite for market share without triggering a price rout that could backfire on its own members.
'OPEC+ has shifted to market share over price support. Given the impact of this switch (plus tariffs), oil prices have fallen to the low $60s/bbl, and E&Ps have trimmed capex and D&C plans,' Wells Fargo analysts said in a recen note, underscoring the consequences of OPEC's more aggressive production strategy.
With U.S. shale output now more price-sensitive and production forecasts trimmed for 2025 though 2027, OPEC+ has 'slid into the driver's seat,' the analysts said.
While U.S shale isn't finished, its growth has plateaued without higher prices, the analysts added, leaving OPEC+ with more leverage to steer the market. The maturity of US shale means breakevens have stabilized around $50–55/bbl, and further cost reductions look unlikely without a major technological breakthrough or a new upcycle.
Despite the potential for OPEC+ to slow the pace of output hikes, recent actions suggest otherwise. Wells Fargo has cut its oil price deck, now expecting crude to remain in the low- to mid-$50s per barrel through mid-2026. 'We expect crude oil prices to continue falling and then remain in the low- to mid-$50/bbl range through mid-2026,' the analysts said, adding that only a significant overshoot—where oil falls below $50—would likely force OPEC+ to reconsider.
The firm expects a strong price recovery by the second half of 2027, with prices rebounding above $80/bbl, assuming no global recession and steady demand growth.
Saudi Arabia remains central to OPEC's power, frequently acting as the 'central bank' of oil by swinging production up or down by as much as 2 million barrels per day--within 12-month periods multiple times since 2000--to stabilize markets. 'Saudi Arabia has walked the talk when it comes to global oil market equilibrium,' the analysts saidm and its commitment to avoiding a price collapse is key to the long-term outlook.
OPEC's spare capacity, meanwhile, is sufficient to suppress prices further if needed, with the core group able to add up to 2.2 million barrels per day by simply 'turning on the taps.' The risk of oversupply, however, is real, especially as discipline within OPEC+ ebbs and non-OPEC members produce at capacity.
"While the global S/D balance in H1'25 has been tighter than we expected, this is mostly due to OPEC+'s production discipline and restraint," Wells Fargo said. "With that restraint and discipline ebbing, those oversupply risks appear more likely from mid-2025 through mid-2026 at least."
Related articles
OPEC back in control, but faces balancing act on market share and price stability
Gold prices sink as Trump EU tariff delay spurs some risk, yields retreat
Oil prices dip slightly in thin holiday trading

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
6 minutes ago
- CBS News
GOP-friendly group pouring in millions to try to boost support for Trump tax agenda
A leading GOP friendly group supporting President Trump's "one, big, beautiful bill" is readying a $4 million advertising buy aimed at helping steer the effort through the Senate after a number of Republicans voiced concerns about the legislation as it stands. The plans from Americans for Prosperity, first reported on by CBS News, come as the GOP-controlled Senate is expected to focus on the sprawling bill key to Mr. Trump's agenda after it narrowly passed the Republican led-House last month. The messaging from AFP includes "video and digital ads that will air on cable, connected TV, and other digital platforms," according to the organization. Television advertisements from the group will initially air in North Carolina, Louisiana, Maine, Idaho and the District of Columbia but could expand further. "The sooner the Senate advances the bill, the sooner Americans start seeing relief where they need it most," said Brent Gardner, the organization's chief government affairs officer in a statement. The statement also noted the group is well aware that as the process being used to fast track the bill progressed "the hill to climb was only going to get steeper." Crucial to the GOP bill is its continuation of key parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was a legislative trademark of Mr. Trump's first term in office. But the expansive bill that passed the House also includes Medicaid work requirements, a raise of the debt ceiling and a bevy of other major measures that could prove politically difficult to pass even with the relatively strong GOP majority in the Senate. "Look, I want to vote for it. I'm for the tax cuts. I voted for the tax cuts before. I want the tax cuts to be permanent, but at the same time, I don't want to raise the debt ceiling $5 trillion," Kentucky GOP Sen. Rand Paul said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." The new advertising move from AFP include testimonials that show not only the impact of the 2017 tax cuts but also what could happen if Congress does not act soon to extend those earlier changes along with "ads encouraging fiscal hawks in the Senate to find spending offsets by further eliminating wasteful Biden-era spending programs," according to details set to be released by AFP. Democrats in Congress have so far strongly resisted the Trump agenda legislation. While most legislation in the Senate typically requires bipartisan support because of the chamber's filibuster threshold, Republican leaders are using a procedural route that would allow them to pass the bill on the strength of their partisan majority alone. Already a messaging standoff has emerged around the bill that could play a major role in the 2026 midterms. "Senate Republicans are doing everything in their power to rip away health care and spike costs for hardworking families, all to give billionaires a massive tax handout," Maeve Coyle, a spokesperson for the Senate Democrats campaign arm said in a recent statement. "Under the leadership of Senate Republicans, millions of people are at risk of losing their health insurance – and voters will hold them accountable for it at the ballot box in 2026." The Republican Party doesn't need every one of its Senators to vote for the bill in order for it to pass due to the party's successful 2024 election that saw the right take back the majority in the chamber and finish with a total of 53 seats. But losing the support of just four GOP senators could doom the push. "The Senate will have their differences, but focusing on where Republicans are unified is what will drive this bill forward – permanent tax cuts, energy abundance, secure borders, and the elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse," Gardner, with Americans for Prosperity, said in a statement.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysts' Bullish Reviews Mask Weak Conviction in US Stock Rally
(Bloomberg) -- After a furious May rally, Wall Street analysts now have more buy ratings on individual companies in the S&P 500 Index than at any time in more than two decades, according to a Jefferies LLC analysis. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months That's usually a sign of froth in a market poised for a pullback, but Jefferies' Andrew Greenebaum sees fewer reasons to worry once you look under the hood. His argument goes like this: While more than four of the five stocks in the S&P 500 have buy recommendations, the price targets underlying those assessments imply just a gain of 10% over the next 12 months, based on the firm's analysis. That's near the average for the US benchmark historically, and should allay fears the current rebound has run its course, he said. 'Wall Street's been upgrading names, probably using the selloff to do it,' said Greenebaum, senior vice president of equity research product management at Jefferies, who compiled the data. 'But I don't take that as overwhelming bullishness, because price targets are not that far away from where stocks currently sit.' The S&P 500 has jumped nearly 20% from the depths of April's rout on a reprieve from President Donald Trump tariff blitz. Yet analysts and strategists alike have been struggling to map out the path forward, penciling in, then erasing forecasts against a backdrop of back-and-forth policy pronouncements from Trump and his administration on trade. Greenebaum says analyst predictions on individual stocks are a better indicator of the market's direction than year-end S&P 500 targets since they more take into consideration individual companies' profits. He calculated the aggregated S&P 500 target over the next 12 months and landed at 6,528, a level that implies a 10% advance from Friday's close. If analyst ratings and price targets are any indicator of stock performance, things look like business as usual, he says. This hasn't stopped prognosticators from fretting. 'You can probably ignore strategy comments and focus on the fundamentals, because the analysts aren't seeing company fundamentals go down,' said Greenebaum. Forecasts Shredded Trump's on-the-fly tariff regime has forced wild swings in expectations from sell-side strategists. After furiously downgrading their US stock forecasts across April, some are starting to make U-turns on their calls once again. Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research and David Kostin of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. are among soothsayers who lifted their forecasts after lowering them. But economists are warning that although rhetoric around levies has calmed since Trump's April 2 rollout of steep levies, the damage on business and consumer confidence has already been done and could be reflected in economic data in the months ahead. From one vantage point, the economy is already showing cracks. Gross domestic product decreased at a 0.2% annualized pace in the first quarter, the second estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed Thursday. That compared with an initially reported 0.3% decline. On the other hand, the labor market has so far remained intact with investors looking ahead to next week's payrolls report as the next hurdle. 'The analysts are not actually getting reachy with their price targets,' Greenebaum said. 'When you look at that level, it's basically low, double-digit returns — it's kind of ho-hum boring.' YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The mail is slow ... and that's no accident
There's a concerted effort going on to tamper with the U.S. mail. Delivery times of mail through the U.S. Postal Service have become glacial. And I'm beginning to think that the problem is the plan. The postal service recently announced it was cutting 10,000 jobs while partnering with Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to find 'further efficiencies' in delivering the mail. One man's 'further efficiencies' is another man's sabotaging of what used to be a reliable government service. Part of those so-called efficiencies has been to re-route the mail through 60 Regional Processing and Distribution Centers, often sending undelivered mail through understaffed stops on long journeys far from its eventual destination. For the first time in my life, I don't trust the mail. And I've got good reason. My bank, Wells Fargo, put out a notice to customers, urging them not to pay bills through the mail because the delivery time was five or more days late for letters. Paying the bills through the U.S. Mail might result in late-payment fees on those bills due to long delivery delays, Wells Fargo advised. I mailed a first-class envelope to my son in Philadelphia on Friday, May 9. The postal clerk at the counter of the Boca Raton branch where I hand delivered the mail told me the mail would arrive at my son's apartment on Wednesday, May 14. More than two weeks after that due date, the envelope still hasn't arrived. It's apparently undergoing 'further efficiencies' somewhere in America. And that wasn't an isolated incident. I mailed a birthday card in March that arrived in the middle of April – weeks after the birthday had passed. It all seems very intentional. President Donald Trump has threatened to disband the postal service's governing board, and consolidate his control over the mail service by putting it in the Department of Commerce. For years, right-wing think tanks have been arguing that the U.S. Postal Service should be replaced by private companies. The Heritage Foundation in its 'Blueprint for Balance: A Federal Budget for 2017' called for 'eliminating restrictions on competition in the postal business, including the prohibition on private delivery of letter mail.' Making crippling cuts to the U.S. Postal Service, which then results in long delays of mail service seems more like a concerted attempt to turn the public against this public service. Cerabino: Don't tell Trump, but in Florida, voting by mail was once considered 'phenomenal' The more well-founded dissatisfaction with mail delivery gets generated, the fewer the objections will be when the architects of this chaos move in for the kill. You might want to write to your Congressman about this … on second thought, call. Frank Cerabino is a news columnist with The Palm Beach Post, which is part of the USA Today Florida Network. He can be reached at fcerabino@ This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: DOGEing the mail: Degrading "further efficiencies" in Postal Service