United Auburn Indian Community files lawsuit over casino project
(FOX40.COM) —The United Auburn Indian Community announced they have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of the Interior's approval of the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians' casino project in Vallejo, California.
Video Above: Sky River Casino announces expansion plans with hotel
In the lawsuit, UAIC claims the approval violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Indian Reorganization Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.
UAIC also states that the approval of the casino project was, 'rushed and politically motivated, occurring just days before the end of the Biden Administration.'
Uproar over national security lapse
The lawsuit also said the Department violated federal policy by not consulting with impacted tribal governments.
'The approval of this casino is a blatant violation of federal law and sets a dangerous precedent for tribes that have followed the established rules for Indian gaming,' said John L. Williams, Chairman of the United Auburn Indian Community. 'For decades, our tribe has worked to uphold the integrity of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and prevent opportunistic gaming proposals that ignore history and harm responsible tribal governments.'
According to UAIC, the proposed casino would be a massive, 615,000-square-foot development in a high-traffic corridor, on a sensitive habitat at the intersection of Highway 80 and Highway 37, near the gateway to the San Francisco Bay Area. They said the location is far from the tribe's aboriginal homeland.
Some of their concerns include:
Encroachment upon the ancestral lands of other tribes
The environmental impact
Increased congestion
The protection of tribal cultural resources
The precedent of placing casinos in densely populated urban areas under questionable legal authority.
UAIC highlights the history of the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians attempting to implement off-reservation casinos, claiming they attempted it in 1991, 2012 and 2019.
The Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians the U.S. Department of the Interior have not made a statement regarding the lawsuit.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill O'Reilly: Chinese espionage rose 1,000% under Biden
(NewsNation) — Political commentator Bill O'Reilly said Chinese espionage in the United States increased by approximately 1,000% during the Biden administration, citing evidence including Chinese property purchases, spy balloons and recent arrests of individuals involved in suspicious activities. O'Reilly said Wednesday on NewsNation's 'CUOMO' that he had spoken with President Donald Trump and found him 'very optimistic about the trade with China improving dramatically,' though O'Reilly expressed neutrality on the prospects for improved relations. O'Reilly said he recently traveled to Beijing at Chinese officials' invitation, paying his own way to advance potential U.S.-China cooperation. He said FBI Director Kash Patel has been quietly tasked with monitoring the growing espionage threat from China. Rep. Luna: China is dangerous, behind funding of protests His comments come as Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., is pushing to investigate possible foreign influence behind U.S. protests. Luna announced a formal document request to Shanghai-based billionaire Neville Singham, who she claims is tied to the Chinese Communist Party and funding anti-ICE and anti-Israel demonstrations. If Singham refuses to comply, Luna says she'll refer him to the DOJ for prosecution. O'Reilly said the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, which he characterized as 'militant far left,' received $34 million from California in 2023 and coordinated with unions to plan the demonstrations. O'Reilly said the group has ties to George Soros' Open Society Foundation and received $200,000 from the Biden administration. He claimed California taxpayers effectively funded protests. Bessent testifies as US, China reach trade deal framework Regarding Middle East tensions, O'Reilly said Trump does not want to participate in bombing Iran because it would disrupt potential China negotiations, Ukraine policy and the global economy. But he predicted weekend negotiations between Trump envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian leaders represent 'the last chance' for a diplomatic solution. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Transgender community faced with legal document hurdles
MANHATTAN, N.Y. (PIX11) — Transgender people are still struggling to figure out their legal documents amid the Trump Administration changes to U.S. Passports. In January, President Trump issued an executive order stating that the federal government recognizes only two sexes, male and female. More Local News The U.S. State Department then eliminated the X gender as an option and stopped allowing transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people to change the sex field on their passports. The ACLU and other plaintiffs sued the Trump administration, arguing that the policy violated the Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act. A federal judge in Boston granted a preliminary injunction. The ruling means that six transgender and nonbinary plaintiffs can obtain passports reflecting their gender identity. While the case makes its way through the courts, Allie Bohm, with the New York Civil Liberties Union says 'one of the things people have been doing is going out and getting a REAL ID now in New York and in other states that will recognize the gender identity so that they have an accurate gender marker.' More: Latest News from Around the Tri-State Taylor Hubbard, who is transmasculine, told PIX11 News, 'It is helpful to have a document that says, and affirms who I am. If I go to a bar and I'm dressed up very masculine, and they see my driver's license and they see female, at that point they now know I'm trans, and so it can also be a safety issue.' Robert Vitelli, the CEO of the LGBT Network, said, 'This country was based on freedom … what we're seeing is a rollback of true American values in terms of who were are.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Pentagon Is Reviewing Deal to Equip Australia With Nuclear Submarines
The Trump administration is reviewing whether a security pact between the United States, Britain and Australia meant to equip Australia with nuclear submarines is 'aligned with the president's America First agenda,' a U.S. defense official said on Wednesday. When the deal was reached under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s administration in 2021, it was billed as crucial for countering China's growing military influence in the Asia Pacific. Now, its review appears to reinforce President Trump's skeptical and transactional approach to longstanding alliances, including demands that allies spend more on their own defense. The Pentagon official said the review would ensure that the pact, known as Aukus, met 'common-sense, America First criteria,' including ensuring that U.S. forces are at 'the highest readiness,' that allies are doing their part, and that 'the defense industrial base is meeting our needs.' The review was first reported by The Financial Times. Australia's defense minister, Richard Marles, said both Australia and Britain had been notified about the review and that all three nations were still committed to the deal. 'We've been aware of this for some time. We welcome it,' Mr. Marles said in a radio interview with ABC Melbourne on Thursday, Australia time. 'It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do.' Australia sees the Aukus agreement as central to its defense strategy in the coming decades in a region increasingly shaped by China's assertive military posturing. Nuclear submarines can travel much farther without detection than conventional ones can and would enable the Australian Navy to greatly extend its reach. Under the pact, Australia is scheduled to receive secondhand Virginia-class nuclear submarines from the United States in the 2030s while scaling up the capacity to build its own, using a British design. But there has been concern in both Washington and Canberra about whether the United States can build new submarines to replenish its fleet quickly enough for the older ones to be transferred to Australia. Elbridge Colby, the U.S. under secretary of defense for policy, said during his Senate confirmation hearing in March that he was skeptical about the pragmatic feasibility of the deal. The Financial Times reported that Mr. Colby was heading up the Pentagon review. 'So if we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great,' Mr. Colby said at the hearing. 'But if we can't, that becomes a very difficult problem.' Even before the review was announced, concern and anxiety had been building in Australia over whether it could continue to depend on its longstanding relationship with the United States, given the Trump administration's treatment of allies. Mr. Marles, the Australian defense minister, said in the radio interview that he was confident the Aukus deal would proceed because 'it's in the interests of the United States to continue to work with Australia.' Michael D. Shear contributed reporting from Washington.
