Five things to look for in Canada's election
Voters will be mulling which party should govern the country just as the US - its neighbour and largest economic partner - launches a trade war and President Donald Trump muses about making Canada the 51st US state.
Domestic issues like housing and immigration will still be important, of course, but for the first time in decades, Canadians will also be grappling with fundamental questions about the country's future when they head to the ballot box on 28 April.
Here are five things to watch as the campaign unfolds.
The ties between Canada and the US have been remarkably strong - until now. The neighbours share deeply integrated economies, a long-standing security partnership and the longest "undefended" border in the world.
So when President Donald Trump says he wants to use "economic force" against Canada, calls the border an "artificially drawn line" and imposes tariffs on imported goods, it marks a profound shift in the relationship between the two allies.
"It is impossible to overstate the impact of the president's actions on Canadian politics, on Canadian psyche, on Canadian business," said Marci Surkes, chief strategy officer at public affairs firm Compass Rose and a former policy director to ex-prime minister Justin Trudeau.
That means this general election is as much about the US's relationship with Canada as it is about domestic policies within Canada itself.
On Sunday, all the party leaders focused their campaign launch messages heavily on the US threats.
What Trump says and does over the next few weeks will inevitably factor into the race. On April 2, for example, in just the second week of campaigning, the White House is expected to announce more global tariffs.
His interventions have already reshaped politics in Canada, helping transform what seemed like a certain Conservative victory into a too-close-to-call battle with the Liberals.
The US president weighed in recently, telling Fox News host Laura Ingraham - without naming either major party leader - that the Conservative is "stupidly, no friend of mine" and that it may be "easier to deal actually with a Liberal".
Ultimately, he added, who wins "doesn't matter to me at all".
Who's who in Canada's federal election
Canadians know their next PM will have no choice but to deal with Donald Trump.
So the question on many voters' minds is: Who can most capably handle the unpredictable US president?
The contest essentially boils down to two men: Liberal Mark Carney and Conservative Pierre Poilievre.
Two other major parties will be contesting seats in Parliament - the left-leaning New Democrats (NDP) and the the Bloc Québécois - but Canadians have historically elected Conservative or Liberal governments.
The Green Party and the People's Party of Canada are also in the race.
Carney and Poilievre have very different resumes.
Carney is a former central banker who is new to politics - after taking over from Justin Trudeau, he became the first prime minister in Canada never elected to Parliament.
He brings experience on the world stage but lacks time spent in the cut and thrust of political campaigning, and will get his first real test in this general election.
If the Liberals fail to win the election, he could have the shortest tenure of any PM in the country's history.
Poilievre, 45, became party leader in 2022. First elected to the House of Commons at age 25, he has two decades of experience in federal politics, including time in cabinet, and is known for his political acumen.
He was quick to highlight the pain that inflation was inflicting on Canadian families, and capitalise on the broader anger at Trudeau and the Liberals on issues like immigration.
His tag line "Canada is broken" has in recent weeks become "Canada first". The shift in message from a country in decline to one of patriotism and strength comes as he tries to portray himself as able to stand up to Trump.
He is "the consummate retail politician", Ms Surkes said, but "suffers from having - right now - a brand and a narrative that no longer fits the moment".
This election is about the big, national questions: Canada's sovereignty and what the country must do to face an uncertain future with uncertain allies.
It's the first time in decades that an election is not focused mostly on domestic issues, said Ms Surkes. She pointed to the 1988 election, when Canada's relationship with the US was also at the centre of debate as the country mulled joining the North American Free Trade Agreement, a trade pact that was the precursor to the current trilateral USMCA.
"The same types of questions were being asked in terms of whether there would be a forfeiture of Canadian sovereignty, economic sovereignty, economic independence," she said.
This time, both parties are pushing a vision of growth - building much-needed housing, moving forward on major energy and resource projects, and bolstering Canada's defence capabilities.
They each speak of being willing to retaliate as Canada best can against US tariffs.
So where are the differences?
Carney, who has moved the Liberals more towards the political centre as he sought to distance himself from Trudeau's record.
He has promised to "spend less and invest more" and to boost capital investments in things like housing, and military infrastructure and computing resources.
Poilievre, a fiscal hawk, is taking a small government approach by focusing on cutting red tape and taxes to boost industry and spur infrastructure investment and home building.
The Conservatives have also focused more sharply on issues like crime.
The major domestic concerns that Canadians have had in recent years - affordability, housing, healthcare - remain.
But pollster David Coletto, CEO of Abacus Data, said they have been subsumed by the "existential threat" of the trade war with the US.
Two words - Trump and tariffs - "sum up the psyche of the country right now", he said.
He adds: "Even if the cost of living is still the top issue, it may not be as powerful a motivator to drive voting behavior."
So the parties will need to come up with convincing policies to address these concerns - but frame them in the context of the wider economic threat.
The Trump levies on Canada's exports, the uncertainty caused by their on-again-off-again nature, and Canada's C$60bn in counter tariffs, are already being felt by businesses and communities across the country.
This week, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development more than halved its growth outlook for Canada this year and next due to the growing tariff threat.
National opinion polls have seen a stunning reversal in recent weeks, with the Conservatives losing the 20-point lead they had over the Liberals for the better part of a year.
As the race officially begins, it's a toss-up.
Mr Coletto said three factors led to the "perfect storm" in polling: the resignation of the deeply unpopular Trudeau, the Liberal leadership race which that sparked, and the return of Donald Trump to the White House.
The latter was by far the main driver "fundamentally shifting the trajectory of Canadian politics", he said.
Both candidates now are trying to "bring their enemies to the battlefield", he added - Carney is seeking to paint Poilievre as a "Trump-light", while Poilievre suggests Carney is "just like Justin".
Both campaigns have some natural advantages, he said.
The Conservatives have "an animated base who desperately want a change in government", along with a well-funded political machine.
The Liberals currently "have the advantage on narrative" that has helped shift the polls more in their favour.
The other two official parties - the NDP and the Bloc - have both seen their popularity diminish.
The left-leaning NDP, which had 24 seats at dissolution, helped prop up the Liberal minority government in recent years in exchange for support for progressive policies like dental care for low-income Canadians.
But leader Jagmeet Singh has been pushing hard against Carney, seeking to frame him as someone who will "protect billionaires and big business".
Bloc leader Blanchet said on Sunday he would fight for Quebec companies and workers struggling under US tariffs, especially in the aluminium industry.
One issue may cause fireworks in the campaign - an east-west energy pipeline. Western Canada is keen to build more capacity to gets its product to market, but the infrastructure in widely opposed in the province.
As Canada gears up for an election this year, the BBC wants to hear from voters across the country. Tell us here if you would like to be part of our coverage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America's F-22 Faces Off Against Russia's Rival Su-57 For First Time
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet with U.S. President Donald Trump later on Friday, marking the first time the Republican has spoken face-to-face with the Kremlin chief since returning to the White House. But the summit may mark another milestone. It could also be the first time Russia's fifth-generation Su-57 operates in the same airspace as the U.S.' F-22 Raptor jets. The meeting, described by Trump himself as "highly anticipated," is taking place at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson (JBER), home to a chunk of the U.S. Air Force's F-22s and key for U.S. power projection into the Arctic, a region where Russia is dominant and the U.S. is increasingly invested. If Putin flies into the base, it's likely he could be accompanied by the advanced Su-57s. Publicly-available information suggests F-22s and Su-57s have not crossed paths, although an Su-57 and an American F-35 fifth-generation jet both participated in an air show in India in February, which the Indian government described as a historic moment. The Su-57, also known by its NATO moniker, Felon, is often positioned as the Kremlin's rough equivalent of the F-22. Both are fifth-generation stealth fighter jets, which means they have advanced radars and avionics, designed to fly undetected and take out enemy air defense systems. A Russian Sukhoi Su-57 stealth fighter jet is seen at the 15th China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition, or Airshow China 2024, on November 7, 2024 in Zhuhai, China. A Russian Sukhoi Su-57 stealth fighter jet is seen at the 15th China International Aviation and Aerospace Exhibition, or Airshow China 2024, on November 7, 2024 in Zhuhai, China. VCG/VCG via AP Fifth-generation jets are the most advanced generation of aircraft currently in operation, although programs to get sixth-generation jets airborne are well underway. The U.S. is the only country to operate F-22s, but 19 militaries fly the Lockheed Martin-made F-35. "If both aircraft meet up over the skies in Alaska, you can be sure both sides will try to learn as much about the other as possible, and both sides will try to hide as much as possible about the true capabilities of their aircraft as they can," said Frederik Mertens, a strategic analyst with TNO, a Dutch think tank. "As far as I know, Su-57 and F-22 have never met each other in the same airspace," he told Newsweek. "There aren't that many of both around." The U.S. has an estimated 165 F-22 Raptors, according to the 2025 edition of the Military Balance, the annual count of the world's armed forces compiled by the British defense think tank, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). Russia, meanwhile, has roughly 19 Su-57s. Unlike other jets widely used in Ukraine, such as Russia's Su-35 aircraft, Su-57 stealth fighters have not played a major role in the Kremlin's air campaign against its neighbor. Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. When it has been used, the stealth fighter has generally remained far away from frontline clashes, intelligence reports from the British government indicated in early 2023. But reports filtering out of Ukraine have suggested Moscow has upped its use of the Su-57 in recent weeks. Ukraine said in mid-2024 it had successfully struck an Su-57 on an airfield hundreds of miles across the border. Although much about the exact specifications of the Su-57 and the F-22 are shrouded in secrecy, the Raptor generally comes out on top as the most advanced aircraft, Mertens said. "The F-22 has far superior stealth characteristics, where the Russian aircraft still shows its direct descendance from the Su-27 line," Mertens added. Several features of the Su-57 make it easier to pick up on radars or infrared sensors than the F-22, which is also kitted out with a very advanced radar, he said. However, the Su-57 is still a "very capable and very dangerous aircraft," Mertens continued. F-22s likely use radar reflectors, much like those on the F-35s that fly around NATO's eastern flank, he said. "If the Russians are smart, they will do the same." "But whatever happens, having the F-22 and the Su-57 next to each other will be a propaganda boon to the Russians, as this will at least give the impression that these aircraft are true equals," Mertens said.


CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
Oil maintains gains ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Oil prices nudged higher on Friday to fresh one-week highs after U.S. President Donald Trump warned of "consequences" if Russia blocked a Ukraine peace deal, injecting concerns about supply. Sentiment was also boosted by strong economic data out of Japan, which is among the largest global crude importers. Brent crude futures gained 16 cents, or 0.2%, to $67.00 a barrel by (0017 GMT). U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 14 cents, also 0.2%, to $64.10. All eyes are on Friday's meeting of Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska where a ceasefire in the Ukraine war is at the top of the agenda. A continued conflict between Russia and Ukraine supports oil markets by limiting the supply of Russian oil. Trump, however, also said he believes Russia is prepared to end the war in Ukraine. Fresh Japanese government data released on Friday showed the economy expanded an annualized 1.0% in the April-June quarter, compared with a median market forecast for a 0.4% increase. The rise in gross domestic product (GDP) translated into a quarterly increase of 0.3%, compared with a median estimate of a 0.1% increase. Strong economic activity typically spurs oil consumption. Prospects of higher-for-longer U.S. interest rates, however, kept oil prices from rising further. Higher-than-expected inflation data and weak jobs numbers out of the U.S. raised concerns that the Federal Reserve would keep interest rates high, usually a dampener of oil consumption.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'safe and beautiful' move against DC homeless camps looks like ugliness to those targeted
WASHINGTON (AP) — Ms. Jay didn't wait for the authorities to come before packing her tent and carrying what belongings she could across Pennsylvania Avenue on her way to whatever comes next. She'd been living her 'Girl Scout life,' she said, saving money and looking for work while homeless. When she got word that the law was on its way, she found herself living the scouting motto: Be prepared. 'Last night was so scary,' she said, recalling when federal law officers, in concert with local police, began fanning out across Washington to uproot homeless encampments. 'I don't want to be the one to wait until the last moment and then have to rush out.' President Donald Trump's housecleaning started with official Washington and the denizens of its marbled buildings, back in the bureaucracy-scouring days of the Department of Government Efficiency. Now he is taking on the other side of Washington, having sent some 800 National Guard troops to help local police go after crime, grime and makeshift homeless encampments. First came the spring cleaning Back in early spring, Trump's efforts upended the U.S. Institute of Peace, among other institutions and departments. On Thursday, authorities brought in an earth mover to clear out an encampment within sight of that hollowed-out institute's handsome Constitution Avenue headquarters. The mission to clean the capital of criminal elements and ragged edges comes under Trump's Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force. Some in D.C. believe a different kind of ugliness is playing out. 'From the White House, the president sees a lawless wasteland,' said leaders of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington. 'We see fellow human beings — neighbors, workers, friends and family — each made in the image of God.' For Andrew S., 61, the ugliness came Wednesday when agents he identified as being with the federal government treated him like an eyesore. They asked him to move from his resting place along the route where Trump would be driven to the Kennedy Center. 'You have to move because you're in eyesight of the president,' Andrew, originally from Baltimore, said he was told. He added, 'I didn't really take it serious until today, but the president really doesn't want us here.' He, Ms. Jay and some others interviewed and photographed by The Associated Press declined to give their full names in the midst of the heavy law enforcement presence in Washington. Saying goodbye to his belongings At the encampment near the peace institute, a man named George, 67, walked away Thursday carrying an umbrella in one hand and a garbage bag with some of his belongings in the other. City workers put his mattress and other possessions in a garbage truck idling nearby. He waved goodbye to it. It was that kind of day for others at the same site, too. 'I have known homelessness for so long that it is part of normal life at this point,' Jesse Wall, 43, said as he cleared his belongings Thursday from the site near the peace institute. 'What are you trying to prove here?' Wall asked, as if speaking with the law. 'That you're a bully?' David Beatty, 67, had been living at that encampment for several months. On Thursday, he watched as parts of it were roped off. Beatty and others were allowed to pack up what they could before the heavy machinery cleared remaining items from the area and dumped them into trucks and receptacles. What about the Golden Rule? He quoted a variation of the Bible's Golden Rule — 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' — and said, 'The idea that he's targeting us and persecuting us feels wrong to me.' Much of the clearing out Thursday was at the hands of local police. D.C. officials knew federal authorities would be dismantling all homeless encampments if local police didn't. Wayne Turnage, a deputy mayor, said the district has a process to do it 'the way it should be done.' The expectation was clear, if not overtly stated: Local police would go about the work in a more humane way than the feds. Jesse Rabinowitz from the National Homelessness Law Center said that, according to the briefing he received on the operation, people would be given the choice to leave or be detained at eight federal and 54 local sites. The intent, Rabinowitz said he believed, was to trash tents in the daylight (because authorities want the public to see that) and do the bulk of arrests in darkness (because they don't want that widely seen). Once penniless, he's now an advocate Born and raised in Washington, Wesley Thomas spent nearly three decades on the streets, struggling with drug addiction, until other homeless people and charitable organizations helped him get clean through therapy and back on his feet. Now he has had a place to live for eight years and works as an advocate for a nonprofit group that supported him, Miriam's Kitchen, where he's helped dozens find housing. 'The first day I was out there I was penniless, homeless, frightened, only the clothing on my back, didn't know where I was gonna sleep nor eat,' he said. 'Fortunately, there were some homeless people in the area, gave me blankets, showed me a safe place, St. John's Church, to rest my head for the night.' St. John's is across from Lafayette Park, which is across from the White House. It is known as the Church of the Presidents, because its sanctuary has seen all presidents since James Madison in the early 1800s. Thomas wanted the public to know that most of the people being moved off are not 'uneducated, dumb or stupid,' even if they are down on their luck. 'You got doctors, lawyers, businessmen, Navy SEALs, veterans, mailmen,' he said. 'Poor people come in all races, ethnicities and colors.' ___ Kinnard reported from South Carolina. Associated Press journalist River Zhang contributed reporting. Solve the daily Crossword