
Robodogs, digital forensics and ghost guns: inside Interpol's innovation lab
A fleet of underwater drones, gleaming and ready for action, is lined up along the wall. Nearby, a small armoury of brightly coloured, 3D-printed guns is displayed on a side table. A robot dog, named Inno, lies prone on the floor, waiting to be activated.
In the leafy Singapore suburb of Tanglin, over the road from the British high commission and the US embassy, and a block away from the botanic gardens,
Interpol
's innovation centre is where law enforcement officers from around the world come to analyse the latest strategies of organised criminals and develop techniques for bringing them down.
One side of a global arms race is being waged here, as the international police organisation tries to stay ahead of its increasingly sophisticated and professionalised criminal adversaries.
For a decade this modest research facility, kitted out with technology at the forefront of policing, has been a mecca for forensic scientists. The centre is set within Interpol's large, fortified complex in Singapore, its second biggest office behind its headquarters in Lyon, France.
READ MORE
The site also includes one of Interpol's three global command and co-ordination centres which, along with facilities in Lyon and Buenos Aires, provide 24-hour monitoring for police in nearly 200 countries. If a suspect on Interpol's most-wanted list crosses an international border, they will be flagged here. In 2024, 215 fugitives were caught this way. This year, Mohamed Amra, the gangster known as 'The Fly', who was named France's public enemy number one after
his escape
from custody left two prison guards dead last May, was arrested in Romania following an operation involving an international network of police.
The Singapore office is where Interpol studies a range of modern criminal activities, including cyber crime, digital piracy and counterfeit pharmaceuticals.
As in many industries, the business of crime has been profoundly affected by developments in
artificial intelligence
, upending the cat-and-mouse game played by the police and criminals. 'The changes in criminality we have seen over the last two to three years because of advances in technology are bigger than at any point in my career,' says Fabio Bruno, a bespectacled Italian, who started as a fraud investigator in the late 1990s and now runs Interpol's digital forensics team.
Bruno and his colleagues – Paulo Noronha, a Brazilian, and Abdulla al-Jalahma, from Bahrain – take me on a tour of the digital forensics lab. Here the team uses an array of gadgets, from chip readers to smartwatch testing tools, to disassemble digital devices before extracting and analysing their precious data.
Near the door sits a bulky suitcase, heavily padded with a dozen or so cartridges that resemble retro video games. These are readers for the infotainment systems of a variety of car models. Each cartridge can be hooked up to the mini computer that sits inside most modern cars and stores huge amounts of data on their movements. Vehicle digital forensics is one of the fastest-growing areas of criminal investigation.
'Sometimes if the suspect connects their phone to their car entertainment system, we can even access their messages and call history,' says Noronha with a mischievous grin.
The mobile phone has become arguably the most important piece of evidence for criminal investigators. It holds a wealth of information on communication, movement and search history, as well as personal media files. Criminals often try to break or discard their phones when they realise they are about to get caught. But even if the screen or the handset is damaged, the most valuable information is stored in a labyrinth of microchips. Half the Interpol lab is dedicated to workstations for extracting circuitry from broken phones and other devices, using digital microscopes and tiny precision tools.
Around a corner is a portable 'clean room', a glass box with an extractor to purify the air and keep out dust. The chips are highly sensitive to contamination.
Next to it is a thick metal door leading to a windowless office. This is a Faraday room, Jalahma explains, which blocks electromagnetic signals. It is here that investigators take phones that are off or dead and turn them back on for inspection.
'It is like an underground bunker,' says Jalahma. 'If you turn a phone on and it connects to a network, there is always the risk that someone will be able to connect to it and wipe it remotely. We cannot take that risk.'
A logo at Interpol's Global Complex for Innovation building in Singapore, which aims to strengthen global efforts to fight increasingly tech-savvy international criminals. Photograph: Roslan Rahman/AFP via Getty Images
The lab also features a range of 3D laser scanners: special cameras that capture a 360-degree impression of a crime scene. Set atop a 6ft tripod, the tall black dome head resembles a sleeker version of a surveying tool common on most building sites. During a 20-second rotation, its multiple sensors and cameras can map out a high-definition 3D image, limiting the chances of contamination.
'You can have fewer people walking around, adding their own footprints and potentially accidentally tampering with evidence,' says Bruno. Investigators can revisit the scene remotely with more accurate measurements of bullet trajectories or bloodstain patterns than by traditional methods. The virtual crime scene provides juries with a more immersive way to assess evidence.
The International Criminal Police Commission, as it was known, was founded in 1923 as a group of police forces from 20 countries. Interpol today counts 196 countries as members, a global organisation that unites the US, China, Russia, Ukraine and Iran. Just a handful of countries are not members, including North Korea, Kosovo and Taiwan.
More than 10,000 of Interpol's famous red notices – international alerts for wanted individuals – are issued every year. The first was for a Russian man accused of killing a police officer in 1947. Since then, Interpol has launched a rainbow of different notices: yellow for missing persons, black for unidentified bodies, silver for criminal assets.
Interpol encourages members to share investigative techniques, and it hosts centralised criminal record systems. One of its first priorities was cracking down on counterfeit currency, cheques and passports. It was through Interpol that fingerprint identification techniques, developed by Danish police, spread globally.
The organisation now hosts 19 separate databases, centralising more than 225 million police records on areas as diverse as travel and identity documents, firearms and stolen property. One tracks lost artwork, containing descriptions of cultural objects stolen from museums or looted from war zones such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. Another logs incidents of maritime piracy. In total the databases were searched some 7.4 billion times in 2023.
[
Interpol being misused by China to target dissidents and others, ICIJ investigation finds
Opens in new window
]
Sharing information between police forces is a key part of Interpol's mission. At the Singapore complex, a dedicated team of cyber crime experts from police forces around the world work together to assess emerging cyber threats and alert countries that are under attack. Working at desks in rows and facing a screen showing live data on cyber attacks, the team gathers and analyses information on one of the fastest-moving areas of organised crime.
The Singapore office was opened in 2015 to act as a global hub for tackling the emerging threat of cyber crime. As AI-enabled crime has risen to prominence, the team is now focused on deepfake romance scams, sextortion and multimillion-dollar phishing attacks.
'AI has completely changed the criminal's business model,' says Huanzhang Fu, a former policeman from China who leads the AI lab.
A decade ago, a widely attempted fraud was the 'Nigerian prince' scam, wherein a victim is emailed by supposed foreign royalty, with the promise of shared riches if they provide an upfront payment. Today's AI-enabled scams are far more sophisticated.
Large language models strip out telltale signs of a scam, such as spelling mistakes or syntax errors. Meanwhile, deepfake audio and video are used to provide 'proof' of the scammer's credentials. Southeast Asia is the global centre for romance-baiting scams, where fraudsters strike up phoney relationships with victims, convincing them to hand over ever-greater sums.
The day I visit, the cyber centre is monitoring close to 3.5 million attempted attacks – a fairly typical day, I'm told, with education institutions, telecommunication companies and government agencies the hardest hit.
The screens being analysed by the cyber specialists, on secondment from countries as diverse as Ukraine and Sri Lanka, show a particularly effective malware attack emanating from eastern Europe and targeting countries across north Africa and Asia.
Advances in AI have brought about a new age in the global arms race between police and criminals – one that Interpol is battling to stay ahead of.
[
https://www.irishtimes.com/podcasts/in-the-news/can-ai-help-gardai-detect-future-crimes/
Opens in new window
]
Dogs have aided law enforcement since at least the Middle Ages. The word 'sleuth' is derived from bloodhounds in 14th-century Scotland, known as 'slough dogs' for their ability to track miscreants through boggy ground.
The latest iteration of the police dog is the robotic K9, used to assess potentially dangerous scenes before entering. These robodogs, metallic and faceless with spindly legs, are packed with sensors to detect the presence of a range of hazards, from drugs and explosives to chemicals and radiation.
Interpol's Chinese-made model is roughly the size of a German shepherd. It lies dormant during my visit, but I'm told it can run at up to 12km an hour and jump more than a metre high. The dogs' ability to climb stairs, carry phones or medical supplies, and send and receive audio messages makes them handy in hostage negotiations.
Interpol's battles are also naval. Its collection of remote-controlled, blue submersible drones highlights the way criminals and police often use the same technology, in an escalating battle. Much like the flying drones gangs use to smuggle drugs and mobile phones over prison walls, their underwater cousins are used to transport contraband along rivers and out at sea.
From Brazil, drugs and weapons are transported overseas strapped to the hulls of ships. In this so-called parasite smuggling, cocaine traffickers hire skilled divers to attach torpedo-shaped, waterproof containers to cargo ships bound for European and Asian ports. The ships' crews may have no idea they are part of a global smuggling operation. Interpol's drones monitor for parasites at major ports.
[
Ireland is awash with cocaine, but how does it get into the country?
Opens in new window
]
Another area where police are catching up with criminals is the proliferation of 3D-printed firearms. A type of 'ghost gun', the plastic weapons first appeared just over a decade ago.
The availability of 3D printers and print-to-order services online means criminals are finding it easier to manufacture bespoke firearms. Luigi Mangione, the suspect accused of shooting UnitedHealthcare chief executive Brian Thompson, was in possession of a pistol and silencer that police believe was 3D-printed. More than 27,000 ghost guns were seized by US police in 2023, up from 1,629 in 2017.
Despite their flimsy appearance, each one can sell for as much as $2,000 (€1,750) on the black market.
The replica gun parts on display at Interpol's lab are manufactured here to use in research into ghost guns' traceability. Unlike traditional firearms, which have serial numbers, it seems impossible to track the origin of a ghost gun. Researchers at the lab are working to link ghost guns to their specific printers, analysing distinctive production patterns.
But for every success, the researchers at Interpol are acutely aware that the game of one-upmanship will continue, Bruno says forlornly. 'They are clearly learning from us just like we are studying them.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Post
2 days ago
- Irish Post
Ireland and UAE issue statement following extradition of suspected Kinihan cartel member
THE JUSTICE ministers of Ireland and the UAE have issued a joint statement confirming their solidarity in the fight against organised crime following the extradition of an Irish man from Dubai. On May 29 Sean McGovern was arrested in Dublin following an extradition from the United Arab Emirates at the request of the Irish authorities. The 39-year-old, who is believed to be a key figure in Dublin's Kinahan cartel, had been the subject of an Interpol Red Notice prior to his arrest in Dubai in October 2024. He is accused of murder and involvement in a criminal organisation. In a phone call, Ireland's Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan, and the UAE's Justice Minister Abdullah bin Sultan Al Nuaimi discussed the operation which followed a decision to extradite McGovern issued by the Dubai Court of Cassation. Sean McGovern has been extradited from Dubai 'This positive development is further evidence of the excellent criminal justice cooperation between the governments of the UAE and Ireland and highlights our joint dedication to ensuring that criminal prosecutions may be brought against those who attempt to evade justice,' the ministers said in a statement. Both ministers went on to commend the Dubai Police and An Garda Síochána for their 'ongoing engagement and commitment to enhancing police-to-police cooperation, recognising their vital role in joint efforts to combat the global threat of organised crime'. Speaking following the successful extradition, Deputy Garda Commissioner Shawna Coxon said: "I would like to acknowledge this is another significant development in on our continued work with international law enforcement partners to disrupt and dismantle transnational organised crime gangs.' She added: "This work has involved extensive meetings by senior garda officers here and abroad with international law enforcement partners, as well as highly detailed and intricate investigative work with those partners. "This has been supported by our network of garda liaison officers stationed in key locations abroad. "This work is not possible without the assistance of the Department of Justice, the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Director of Public Prosecutions. "I want to particularly thank the Ministry of Justice at a judicial level in the United Arab Emirates. Our police-to-police co-operation globally is critical to the dismantling of organised crime. "Transnational organised crime gangs cause misery to communities not only in Ireland but throughout the world. "They engage in murder, human trafficking and drug dealing. "Tackling these gangs not only makes Ireland safer, but all the other countries they operate in as well.' See More: Dubai, Dublin, Ireland, Kinahan, Sean McGovern, UAE


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
In war-torn Nations, Trump's travel ban brings a new hardship
In recent years, people in Myanmar have endured a military coup, civil war, enforced conscription, aerial bombardment and a devastating earthquake. A new hardship landed on Thursday morning, as US president Donald Trump ordered a sweeping travel ban that included the citizens of Myanmar. The action is an effort to stop immigration from nations that Trump deemed to have a 'large-scale presence of terrorists,' among other concerns. The travel ban, announced by the president Wednesday night in Washington, is set to take effect Monday. It applies to the people of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Many of these countries have been wracked by conflict, while others are ruled by repressive regimes. In both cases, Trump's proclamation closes the door on those hoping to flee to the United States to build new lives. Citizens of seven other countries – Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela – will be barred from entering the United States on tourist and student visas. They also will not be able to settle permanently in the US. READ MORE 'We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,' Trump said in a message on social media. 'As soon as I woke up, bad news was already waiting for me,' said Ko Min Nwe (35), an accountant in Myanmar who last month won a US immigration lottery that put him on the path for a green card next year. 'Being a Myanmar citizen means that wherever we go, we face discrimination and now, even this rare stroke of luck feels like it's been stolen from me.' [ What is Trump's new travel ban and which countries are affected? Opens in new window ] [ Trump suspends entry of international students studying at Harvard Opens in new window ] Trump said that his new travel restrictions also apply to countries that do not have proper ways to vet travellers to the United States, that have a track record of citizens who overstay their American visas and that have not easily accepted back their nationals. But the restrictions overwhelmingly target nations with vulnerable populations eager for sanctuary in the US. [ News: Trump signs ban on citizens entering the US from 12 countries Opens in new window ] 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, the president of Oxfam America, a charity dedicated to fighting global inequality and poverty. The ban provides for certain exceptions. For instance, Afghans can still apply for special visas designed to safeguard those who worked for the US government or military as translators and other assistants before the American withdrawal in 2021. Legal permanent residents of the United States are exempt from the order. So are athletes and their entourages visiting for big sporting events. Adoptions from the restricted nations will be allowed. During his first term, Trump imposed a series of travel bans on mostly Muslim-majority nations, some of which were countered by the courts. Former president Joe Biden revoked the immigration restrictions when he took office, calling them 'a stain on our national conscience'. Some of the countries affected by Trump's latest travel ban reacted quickly, vowing to tackle problems. Somalia, according to Trump's proclamation, was targeted because it lacks a central authority that can properly screen travellers and it is a 'terrorist safe haven'. 'Somalia values its long-standing relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the US, said in a statement. Myanmar erupted into full-blown civil war four years ago, following a military coup that ousted an elected government. Criminal networks in the country's poorly governed borderlands have filled war chests and flooded the world with synthetic drugs, cyberscams and dubiously sourced minerals. Still, there is scant evidence that Myanmar is exporting terrorism, much less to the United States. Most immigrants from Myanmar arrived in the United States as refugees escaping persecution. Waves of immigration to the United States by Myanmar nationals have followed moments of political turmoil, such as crackdowns on democracy movements in 1988 and 2007. More recently, more than 3.5 million people in Myanmar, out of a population of about 55 million, have been uprooted from their homes because of the civil war. Millions more have sought shelter abroad, mostly in neighbouring Thailand and Bangladesh. Starting last July, a resettlement initiative brought Myanmar refugees living in camps in Thailand to the United States. But that programme has effectively stopped since Trump's second inauguration. American aid for Myanmar refugees in Thailand and Bangladesh has been slashed, too; without access to medical care, babies and elderly patients have died, doctors say. From 2005 to 2015, about 100,000 refugees from camps in Thailand were resettled overseas, mostly in the United States, according to the UN refugee agency. Myanmar is now a fractured nation. Most of the heartland of the country is controlled by the military junta, while ethnic armed groups and pro-democracy forces have carved out territory in the vast outer areas. Air strikes by the Myanmar military have destroyed hundreds of villages. Thousands of people have been imprisoned and tortured for daring to oppose the military junta and call for democracy. Since the coup in 2021, the United States has imposed sanctions on top junta officials and the business cronies who prop them up. But some critics say Washington's actions don't have enough bite. Ma Mya Thiri Lwin (24), was accepted at a college in Minnesota to study computer science beginning in August. As part of a large student-led boycott of government institutions, she had not attended university in Myanmar. Now, she said, her dreams of one day working in Silicon Valley have withered. 'It feels like Myanmar is cursed,' she said, learning that Trump's travel ban included her homeland. 'Even the US, which claims to be a stronghold of human rights, has turned a blind eye to people like us who are poor, oppressed and at risk.' - This article originally appeared in The New York Times .


Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Do we need more CCTV cameras for safer streets? A politician and a civil liberties campaigner debate
Olga Cronin: No. Reducing crime is much more complex than simply flooding cities with CCTV Flooding our streets with CCTV is a bad idea. And fortunately, it would also be unlawful, for now. CCTV has legitimate purposes, such as securing premises and assisting gardaí to investigate crimes and uphold the rights of victims of crime. An Garda Síochána has the power to install CCTV in public spaces for preventing, investigating, detecting or prosecuting criminal offences, and local authorities can also have CCTV installed to assist gardaí with those same purposes. However, when CCTV is deployed in a manner that is neither necessary nor proportionate, it raises legitimate concerns of unreasonable and unlawful intrusion into our data protection and privacy rights. It can also lead to excessive monitoring of people's movements. This approach to crime prevention has been the norm for over a decade in the UK . The Home Office's biometrics and surveillance commissioner described the country as an 'omni-surveillance' society' . Such surveillance, real or perceived, risks undermining our fundamental freedoms as it can deter people from freely expressing themselves or participating in public life. READ MORE This is why An Garda Síochána cannot simply erect cameras without justification. Our laws require that gardaí justify the use of a CCTV system as necessary to achieve their given purposes and proportionate in its impact upon those who will be recorded before any deployment. There are other requirements too. [ Just over 200 Garda CCTV cameras in operation in Dublin Opens in new window ] The laws in place to protect our data protection and privacy rights are not minor, nor are they purely technical or administrative limitations. They stem from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and reflect the core principle of human dignity that underpins the entire EU legal framework. This is why we must carefully guard them. But, of course, their effectiveness depends entirely on how rigorously they are enforced. When oversight fails, the consequences can be devastating. Irish activist and journalist Dara Quigley died tragically in 2017 after a garda at Pearse Street Garda station recorded, on their mobile phone, CCTV footage of her walking naked in Dublin city before being forcibly detained by gardaí under the Mental Health Act . The garda recorded the footage from a monitor at the station and shared it with another person before it was uploaded to social media. Dara knew of the footage before she died. Over a year after Dara Quigley's death, the Data Protection Commission (DPC) found that there was excessive access to the CCTV monitoring room in Pearse Street where all Garda members had access to the station's then 34 live-feed cameras. In 2019, the DPC found that gardaí in Duleek and Donore, in Co Meath, routinely failed to manually return their 'pan, tilt and zoom' CCTV cameras to their original focus. Some cameras were left directed at private homes in Duleek, while one camera in Donore was fixed on the front door of a priest's home, resulting in his home activities, and those of his visitors, being permanently on view at Ashbourne Garda station . Olga Cronin, Irish Council for Civil Liberties It was deeply troubling therefore, but not surprising, when it emerged three years later, in 2022, that issues concerning CCTV persisted in An Garda Síochána, with an internal data protection audit identifying the handling of CCTV footage as an area of high risk . We must also consider whether CCTV is actually effective in reducing crime, since the necessity and proportionality of any technological tool depends on its effectiveness. In the Republic, the research on CCTV and crime prevention is mixed. A 2012 study examined the effectiveness of CCTV in four undisclosed locations. Crime data was collected pre and post installation, and the results were inconclusive. The impulse to reach for technology to solve social problems is understandable, but short-sighted. CCTV may have a role, if used in a rights-respecting manner, but it cannot be championed as a 'silver bullet' crime prevention measure, or the most important. The difficult work of reducing crime is a more complex task than just potentially improving the ability to catch alleged offenders. It involves gardaí building trust through effective community policing, especially in communities that have been badly hit by austerity and failing public services. It requires real effort to solve our crises in housing, health and education. It also demands commitment to fostering a sense of pride in our localities, supporting people on the margins of our society and ensuring our young people have opportunities, facilities and support to thrive. True community safety comes not from surveillance, but from solidarity and the vindication of our socio-economic rights. Olga Cronin is surveillance and human rights senior policy officer at the Irish Council for Civil Liberties James Geoghegan: Garda presence alone isn't enough. We need more CCTV to help make Dublin safer Only one in three Dubliners say they feel safe in the capital city at night. That is according to a recent survey from Dublin City Council, and it matches what I hear on the ground. The organisation Dublin Town has reported similar findings. It's not hard to understand why. There are parts of the city that feel unsafe, especially after dark. That is a reality we need to face and change. Dubliners want more gardaí on the streets. People don't want vague reassurances, they want visible policing. James Geoghegan TD That work is now under way. This spring, 66 newly qualified gardaí were deployed to the Dublin Metropolitan Region to support high-visibility patrols in key areas like O'Connell Street and Henry Street. This targeted approach, based on community concerns and crime data, is starting to make a difference. But Garda presence alone isn't enough. Gardaí can't be everywhere at once, and we shouldn't expect them to be. We need to support them with the right tools. That is why I believe we need to invest in our CCTV network: more cameras in key areas, better system integration, and quicker access to footage for gardaí investigating crimes. [ The Irish Times view on CCTV in Dublin: Light camera action Opens in new window ] At the moment, there are just 209 Garda-operated CCTV cameras in all of Dublin, or one for every 6,000 people. By comparison, the borough of Hammersmith and Fulham in London has one for every 73 residents. Westminster has one for every 1,000 and is planning to expand that coverage. Gardaí can also access footage from about 400 Dublin City Council cameras and, in some cases, private systems. But the process is too often slow and bureaucratic. Officers shouldn't be left waiting for paperwork while crucial evidence is lost. To be clear, I'm not suggesting we mirror London's scale. But we do need more cameras in areas where crime and antisocial behaviour are common, and we need to make access to footage more efficient. Some raise civil liberties concerns. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties, for example, has pointed out that gardaí accessed thousands of private cameras after the Dublin riots. That's true, but those riots were an extraordinary event. In more routine cases, such as assaults or vandalism, access is much slower, and victims can be left without timely support. A business group I met recently pointed out this inconsistency. Thanks to new legislation, it is now far easier for authorities to access CCTV footage in cases of illegal dumping. Yet when a business is vandalised in the same area, gardaí often face significant delays trying to get the same kind of footage. That doesn't make sense. I've seen this issue close-up. A constituent had his wallet and glasses stolen in a gym. He reported it immediately. But when he followed up with the Garda, he was told it could take up to two weeks to get the footage. By then, it had already been deleted. The case went nowhere. With proper legal safeguards, giving gardaí faster access to video footage does not pose a serious threat to civil liberties. The evidence supports this too. Studies show CCTV can reduce crime by between 13 per cent and 20 per cent. It is not a silver bullet, and it works best when combined with measures like public realm improvements and strong community policing. But it helps. The Government is rightly pursuing a mix of those approaches. But a modern capital city also needs a modern system for gathering and using video evidence. People expect to feel safe in our capital. It's time we made sure that they can. James Geoghegan is a Fine Gael TD for Dublin Bay South