logo
Mozambican children die after US funding cuts: Who bears responsibility?

Mozambican children die after US funding cuts: Who bears responsibility?

Mail & Guardian5 days ago
Sign outside the offices of an organisation in Mozambique that was defunded by USAid. Photos: Jesse Copelyn
After the United States Agency for International Development (USAid) abruptly terminated billions of dollars' worth of overseas aid grants, the health system in central Mozambique was left in tatters. Earlier this year, I travelled to two badly hit provinces of the country to describe the toll.
In
In a
In the midst of all this chaos, I was often curious to know from people on the ground who they held accountable for this situation and who they believed needed to solve the problem. My assumption was that they would call for the Mozambican government to help them out.
I was surprised to find that in the affected villages I visited, this was far from anyone's expectation. For most, it was simply unthinkable that their government could do anything to save them.
'You mentioned the government,' one community leader said after I asked whether the state should intervene. 'But even these chairs we're sitting on are stamped with USAid logos. So what help can we expect from the government?'
Sign on the back of a chair in an organisation in Mozambique.
The more I learned about governance in Mozambique, the more understandable this attitude became. Throughout the country, core government functions have been outsourced to a combination of foreign governments, aid agencies, interstate bodies and private companies.
For instance, many of the country's essential medicines are procured by a large international financing body, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Until January, the transportation of these medicines to hospitals was overwhelmingly financed by US aid agencies, as were the pay cheques of many health workers.
Outside of the healthcare sector, the story is similar.
The main highway I travelled on was built and paid for by Chinese corporations and banks. To keep hydrated I relied on bottled water supplied by private companies because the taps either didn't run or produced contaminated water.
In many of the impoverished rural settlements, there was virtually no state infrastructure, and people received no financial support from the government. Instead, they primarily depended on aid organisations.
The country's national budget has historically been heavily supplemented by foreign bodies, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European Union, though much of this support was suspended in 2016-17.
Even national defence has been partially outsourced.
When Islamist militants began rampaging through the northern province of Cabo Delgado, the government struggled to contain it and contracted Russian and South African mercenary groups. When that failed, they authorised a military intervention by the Southern African Development Community and invited a parallel mission by the Rwanda Defence Forces.
It is thus no surprise that Mozambicans have virtually no expectation that their government will come to the rescue when facing an emergency. Instead, they look outward. As one community leader in a rural village told me, 'Here, we depend on Trump.'
Cash-strapped and corrupt
Mozambique has
The government is deeply cash-strapped. The South African government spends 10 times more per citizen than the Mozambican government does. A large chunk of its spending goes towards paying off debt.
Mozambique simply doesn't have the money to build an effective health system, though had it spent its limited budget reserves more effectively over the years it could have developed a health system that was at least a bit more independent of donor support.
Instead, the country's budgetary resources have often been wasted on corruption. Mozambique ranks 146th out of 180 in the world on
One clear example of this is the
As a result of those decisions, the country was swallowed by debt. And when the extent of the corruption was publicised in 2016, the IMF pulled its financial support for Mozambique.
A
The country's governance crisis is further demonstrated by the
An ambulance parked in the grass in the Dondo district of Sofala Province.
Even during the brief one-week period I spent in central Mozambique, signs of corruption and mismanagement filtered into my interactions with officials.
For instance, before I embarked on a multi-day tour of one province, government officials told me that someone from the provincial health department would need to accompany me on my trip. This was apparently to make formal introductions to district-level officials that I hadn't asked to meet. For this apparently vital service, the man would need to be paid a per diem of roughly R500 a day for two days, they said.
The civil servant in question was a very senior person in the provincial health department. Despite facing a collapsing health system in the wake of the US cuts, he was apparently ready to drop everything he had going for the rest of that week to follow me around.
When I explained that I wouldn't pay a government official to stalk me, I was told that saying no wasn't an option. This is unfortunately the way things are done around these parts, said a local who helped arrange the tour. Neither GroundUp, Spotlight nor I paid the bribe.
US responsibility
Against this backdrop, it is no surprise that defenders of the current US government have often resorted to arguments about moral responsibility when justifying the decision to abruptly slash aid. It is reasonable to ask why the American taxpayer should bear any of the brunt of Mozambique's public health system when so many of its problems have been caused by the Mozambican government itself.
But it's not so simple.
The
Moreover, Mozambique didn't develop its high level of dependency in isolation. For more than two decades, the US actively took responsibility for core functions of the country's health system. Until January, the US government continued to sign numerous contracts with local organisations, pledging millions of dollars to help run life-saving health programmes for years into the future.
The health system was consequently built around these commitments.
If the US was going to take that much responsibility for the wellbeing of some of the world's most vulnerable people, then it had a duty to at least provide notice before pulling the plug. Instead, it chose to slash the funds instantly, and in a manner that needlessly maximised damage and confusion.
Stop-work orders were issued overnight, which required that people who were doing life-saving work down their tools immediately. Organisations decided to adhere to these instructions rigidly in the hope that their funding would be reinstated. At that point the Trump administration said it was only pausing aid funding pending a review, and no one wanted to give the reviewers a reason to terminate their programmes.
The consequence was complete chaos.
Orphaned children in extremely rural parts of Mozambique waited for their case workers to bring them their medicines, but often they simply never came. Many of these children had no idea why they had been abandoned.
When certain case workers decided to defy the stop-work order and continue their work voluntarily, they had to do so in secret.
To add fuel to the fire, the Trump administration routinely provided contradictory information to its former recipients and to the public.
The initial executive order signed in January said all foreign development assistance would be suspended for 90 days, pending a review, and might be restored after this time.
Then US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a waiver stating that the suspension wouldn't apply to life-saving humanitarian services. He told the public that organisations providing these life-saving services could instantly resume their work under this order.
Yet the organisations themselves received different instructions from their USAid officers. Rather than immediately continuing their work, they were told to submit revised budgets that only covered life-saving services and to wait for approval.
Organisations rushed to submit these budgets by the deadline. But in the end, the green light never came and their funds remained frozen. This was not only the case in Mozambique;
In the meantime, Rubio
Later on, the organisations received explicit termination notices, ending their programmes.
Despite this, US embassies and several large media outlets continued to reference Rubio's order as if it was actually implemented en masse. Even as I write this, the on-again, off-again US aid story is unfinished.
This mixed messaging created an enormous amount of confusion for staff of these organisations and the recipients of their work, ultimately for no clear benefit to the American people.
There was simply never any reason to act this callously toward health organisations to whom USAid had pledged its support. In contrast to the rampant corruption that has plagued the Mozambican government, these organisations were heavily audited to continue receiving funding.
The work they were doing was clearly making a material difference to some of the poorest people on Earth. In the far-flung settlements that I visited, villagers told me about how their lives had been transformed by these organisations. Many were only put on life-saving HIV treatment because of them.
Whatever arguments one may want to advance about the importance of self-sufficiency and national responsibility, none of this justifies the US government administering the aid cuts in such a callous and confusing manner.
This story was originally published by
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA
Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA

The Herald

time11 hours ago

  • The Herald

Drowning rates in SA go up while global figures drop, says Lifesaving SA

Drownings in South Africa are increasing, bucking the global trend where the rates are dropping, Lifesaving South Africa (LSA) warned in a statement to mark World Drowning Prevention Day on Friday. 'While global drowning deaths have dropped by 38% over the past two decades, South Africa's rates are rising,' the federation said, adding the World Health Organisation (WHO) estimated at least 2,700 drowning deaths a year, with children under five at the greatest risk. Africa has seen a 3% decline, while South Africa has struggled to deal with the threat. WHO statistics showed at least 1,600 drowning deaths a year in the country, but these figures did not include deaths from flooding disasters, LSA said. 'In South Africa the crisis is worsened by climate change and flooding disasters, such as those in the Eastern Cape in June, and preventable risks such as unsafe farm dams and canals, inadequate water and sanitation infrastructure and traditional baptism ceremonies at rivers and along coastline.'

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say
US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say

TimesLIVE

time15 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burnt in France, sources say

US-funded contraceptives worth nearly $10m (R177.15m) are being sent to France from Belgium to be incinerated after Washington rejected offers from the UN and family planning organisations to buy or ship the supplies to poor nations, two sources told Reuters. A spokesperson for the US state department confirmed to Reuters on Wednesday that a decision had been taken to destroy the stock. The supplies have been stuck for months in a warehouse in Geel, a city in the Belgian province of Antwerp, after President Donald Trump's decision to freeze US foreign aid in January. They comprise contraceptive implants and pills as well as intrauterine devices to help prevent unwanted pregnancies, according to seven sources and a screengrab shared by an eighth source confirming the planned destruction. The US government will spend $167,000 (R2.95m) to incinerate the stocks at a facility in France that handles medical waste, the US state department confirmed. The spokesperson said a preliminary decision had been made to destroy certain products from terminated US Agency for International Development contracts (USAID). 'Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal,' the spokesperson said via email, adding that no condoms or HIV medications would be destroyed. US legislators have introduced two bills this month to prevent the destruction of the supplies after Trump's decision to shut down USAID, but aid groups say the bills are unlikely to be passed in time to stop the incineration.

Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase
Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase

Mail & Guardian

time2 days ago

  • Mail & Guardian

Poultry sector recovering, prices not expected to increase

South Africa's poultry sector is recovering from a devastating outbreak of bird flu and has capacity to meet local consumer demand. (Madelene Cronje) South Africa's The department of agriculture rolled out mass inoculations earlier this month to protect the industry from highly pathogenic In 2023, millions of birds had to be culled, hampering production and driving up poultry and egg prices. The inoculation campaign kicked off with the vaccination of 200 000 broiler breeders at poultry producer Astral. The birds represent 5% of the company's total breeding stock, the department said. Industry experts have welcomed the inoculation drive. 'We had two cases of HPAI in the country, but both were contained and did not spread with minimum losses in terms of production,' said Izaak Breitenbach, the chief executive of the South African Poultry Association. 'We still have an additional one million birds per week slaughter capacity. We currently slaughter about 21.5 million birds per week.' That number reflects normal production levels, which may rise slightly toward December because sales typically increase in the second half of the year. Breitenbach said the industry also has the capacity to exceed this demand if needed 'The industry can cover an increase in demand of about 10% with local production in the short term and probably more in the long term.' Agriculture economists said the success rate for the inoculations will depend on how well future outbreaks are contained. (Graphic: John McCann/M&G) 'There are great expectations that South Africa's recent efforts to vaccinate poultry against avian flu will lessen the likelihood of another devastating outbreak similar to the one that occurred in 2023. Particularly in light of the seasonal influenza outbreak, which usually starts in April and peaks in September each year,' said Thabile Nkunjana, of the National Agricultural Marketing Council. 'However, the initial vaccination is reportedly for at least 200 000 broilers, which is extremely small compared to the size of the industry as a whole. As a result, there is still a chance of an outbreak related to South African poultry production, as well as a current risk of disruptions in the poultry supply, which frequently results in prices that have a negative impact on consumers The layer side of the poultry industry, which raises chickens specifically for egg production, is still producing at lower levels comparable to those before the 2023 outbreak, Nkunjana noted. 'If an outbreak were to occur, the industry would likely experience the same level of pressure as it did in 2023, and egg prices would probably rise once more,' he said. Experts warned that the cost of bird feed could hamper poultry production. Prices have increased on the back of climate conditions as well as international supply. 'Initially feed costs rose when world prices increased sharply in the aftermath of the pandemic and associated supply chain challenges, challenging weather in some key production regions and Russia's invasion of Ukraine,' said Tracy Davids, the executive director for commodity markets and foresight at the Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy. 'When world prices came down, South African prices stayed higher due to the summer drought of 2024. So, feed costs have increased much more than meat prices over the past five years, making life difficult for all livestock producers, but particularly poultry that use feed very intensively. It's the biggest cost component in the sector.' With feed prices declining and the partial lifting of the ban on Brazilian chicken imports earlier this month, the prospects for the sector are looking positive, Davids added. The ban was implemented after Brazil also reported disease outbreaks, but was lifted to support South African consumers' food security, alleviate cost pressures, and help stabilise the supply chain, said Nkunjana.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store