Campaigners call for action on reusable packaging and cutting food waste
Campaigners and businesses are calling for the widespread adoption of reusable packaging as well as action to cut food waste across the grocery sector.
Reuse experts on Tuesday released research which suggests that adopting reusable packaging for 30% of goods in the UK grocery retail sector could deliver £136 million in annual savings for producers.
The packaging extended producer responsibility regulations (Perp), which came into force in January, require producers to pay for the management of packaging waste.
The report, commissioned by sustainability consultants GoUnpacked, found that producers could save between £314 million and £577 milllion annually in overall system costs compared to single-use packaging, accounting for the costs of transitioning.
It also suggests that shifting to reuse packaging could reduce both the products' carbon emissions and the waste from packaging materials previously used by 95%.
The research was developed with input from an advisory panel made up of stakeholders such as the Environment Department (Defra), Biffa, Tesco, the Waste and Resources Action Programme (Wrap), Innovate UK, and WWF.
It explored multiple product categories, such as coffee, ready meals and shower gel, using various reuse scenarios to provide an evidence-based picture of the potential impacts of reuse.
A 30% reuse target was found to be achievable by converting just 18 priority product categories, using 30 standardised repackaging types.
The report also outlined recommendations for industry and the Government to collaborate on a transition plan to reach the target by 2035, by co-ordinating retailers, supply chain logistics, waste management and local authorities.
Rob Spencer, Co-Founder of GoUnpackaged, said: 'It's time to move on from debate and focus on the facts: Reuse works.
'Our study shows that switching just 30% of goods to reusable packaging is a huge opportunity for producers and retailers to win – environmentally, financially, and even societally, creating jobs and reducing waste.
'That's why we're calling on the industry and Government to work together and take action to move towards 30% reuse, starting now. There's no excuse to delay tackling the single-use packaging crisis any longer.'
In a joint statement, the advisory panel said: 'The modelling results show, for the first time, an evidenced view of reuse working at scale in the UK for grocery retail, enabling industry and government to make insightful decisions about how to move forwards to co-create the necessary transition to reuse in the UK.
'We look forward to bringing the value chain together in June to kick-start the discussion of the next practical steps towards wide-scale reuse in the UK.'
It comes after campaign group Wrap and Tesco called for urgent action to reduce global food loss and waste as part of a collaboration to tackle the issue across global supply chains through a series of initiatives.
The two organisations cited the World Economic Forum, which estimates that food loss and waste also costs the global economy 936 billion US dollars (£693 billion) a year, when more than 783 million people go hungry every day, and a third of humanity faces food insecurity.
Tony McElroy, Tesco's head of circularity campaigns, said: 'We remain focused on driving forward action across our entire supply chain and in collaboration with our key partners as we accelerate progress to halve our food waste.'
Catherine David, chief executive of Wrap, said: 'The need to reset our global food system is imperative as our population grows and the climate changes.
'Food security will become a priority for governments as the real impacts of climate change bite harder in coming years, and tackling waste is a key step they must take.'
Wrap also warned that governments are falling far short when it comes to outlining their plans to cut emissions in line with UN targets, known as nationally determined contributions.
It found that just 12 of the 195 countries to attend the UN Climate Conference, Cop29, in November had committed to reducing food loss and waste in their plans.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Australia Must Choose Defense or Social Spending, Rabobank Says
Australia confronts a 'guns or butter' choice between a bigger defense budget and expanding national disability insurance and other social programs, according to Rabobank, which calls for economic statecraft to navigate a risky regional security environment. For now, the government is opting for 'butter,' but it retains substantial fiscal headroom to bolster military spending when compared to peer economies, Rabobank economist Benjamin Picton said in a research note on Tuesday. The nation's debt is lower than that of counterparts as a share of its gross domestic product.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Malaysia Offers Tax Incentives to Boost Venture Capital Industry
Malaysia is dangling new tax incentives to investors to boost its venture capital industry, according to Second Finance Minister Amir Hamzah Azizan. The government is offering a concessionary tax rate of 5% for up to 10 years for eligible funds investing at least 20% of their money in local startups, Amir said on Tuesday. It is also offering a 10% tax rate for venture capital and private-equity management companies registered with the Securities Commission. This incentive now extends to onshore limited liability partnership structures, further broadening the investor base to deepen the available pool of capital for local startups, he said.
Fast Company
3 hours ago
- Fast Company
Public sector AI will succeed (or fail) based on context
Public servants today face a double burden: They're simultaneously charged with running our most important community functions—like disaster preparedness and administering elections—while the technology at their disposal is outdated and ill-fitted to the job. The rise of AI has upended how private companies operate, but public servants across agencies lack AI tools designed specifically with government work in mind. In a perfect world, public servants could trust mass-market AI. But provisioning critical services requires a high bar. Quickly deploying technology prone to generating inaccuracies is an unacceptable tradeoff for those solving society's hardest problems. Few of us would be happy to get our mail a day earlier if it meant 10% of our mail never came. The tradeoff is more acute when public servants are working to end homelessness or reinvigorating economic development. AI is more accurate and useful for government employees when it's built atop core data assets like documents and emails and the contextual metadata around those assets—information like who shared documents, when they were shared, and the conversations that surrounded them. Public sector AI requires context The massive opportunity to empower public servants and improve government operations with functional, reliable AI tools comes not from training larger, smarter models, but ensuring AI has context. Context is everything because government operations depend upon the local partners, procedures, history, and regulations of a community of practitioners. For AI to work for public servants, it must understand the context well enough to generate accurate information. Today's AI tools fall short because they lack contextual metadata. Without this information, AI is not fit for purpose. Public servants cannot sacrifice accuracy for speed. Siloed technology destroys context Government work is inherently collaborative. Cybersecurity officials work with state and federal counterparts, and homelessness coordinators work with public health departments. But there is a fundamental mismatch between the collaborative nature of government work and the silos of most technology. Today's AI tools generally serve single organizations, lacking functionality to enable cross-agency collaboration. When FEMA responds to disasters, utilities, hospitals, shelters, and community organizations all play key roles. Public servants coordinate these nongovernment partners, but isolated AI systems can only access information within their own agencies—missing the context that lives across organizations. And the work doesn't happen in siloed agency folders. It happens in email threads, texts, unshared working documents, and view-only, versioned, and immediately outdated shared documents. These disconnected digital workspaces destroy context. But this is a technology problem—what does a context-rich technology look like? The government operations tech stack Effective government AI must be attentive to the different technology layers that underpin the work of public servants. We can visualize the government operations tech stack in four layers: Layer 1: Systems —The first, foundational, layer comprises the file storage systems: OneDrive, SharePoint, local folders, Outlook, and other repositories. While this is where key information often lives, it is rarely well-organized or accessible to outside partners. Layer 2: Resources —This refers to the resources themselves. Think individual files like memos, spreadsheets, SOPs, and more. While enterprise AI systems can access one organization's documents, they miss the critical context of how and why these resources were shared, who created them, and what discussions they generated. Layer 3: Coordination — The coordination layer encompasses emails, texts, events, direct messages, and video communications. This is where cross-organization collaboration happens and where ongoing discussions shape decisions. It contains the three sentence email from the 30-year department veteran, who succinctly explained where an internal policy originated, why it was created, and which parts no longer apply. This is institutional knowledge shared in real-time. AI tools without access to the coordination layer are set up for failure. Layer 4: Interface —The interface layer is where public servants make use of the data across layers. And this is where purpose-built AI can make an impact. Government officials should be able to get immediate answers without needing to recall whether information lives in a shared drive, email, video call, or calendar event. And the interface layer doesn't end with a search — it should enable the next step, whether that's drafting a policy, connecting with a subject matter expert, or reaching out to partners. Atop digital layers are public servants making decisions and taking action. This is where policy meets practice, where coordination becomes execution, and where community needs are met. Only context-rich AI can reliably scale public impact An AI interface with the full contextual metadata of government operations—the systems, resources, and coordination layers—becomes transformative. An elections official searching for polling center volunteers finds not just the sign-up sheet in their drive, but also the follow-up email from a facilities manager identifying the correct entrance, the text from a sick volunteer needing replacement, and the recent listserv discussion correcting the record about the polling location entrance. AI with this context provides a complete operational picture, not isolated documents that become outdated as soon as they're created. During emergency response, an AI with contextual access can connect FEMA policies with real-time partner communications, community feedback, and operational updates. Instead of just knowing what documents exist, the AI understands who shared critical information, when situations changed, and why certain decisions were made, enabling more effective coordination and faster response times. This contextual AI doesn't just provide information—it provides traceable, auditable insights that public servants can trust and act upon. It connects users not only to the right documents but to the right people and the right conversations, embedded within their specific community and operational context. The vision is clear: AI that lives where government work happens, with access to the full collaborative environment across organizations. When deployed with complete contextual metadata, AI can empower public servants to make a bigger impact while maintaining the accuracy and accountability needed. Government operations are fundamentally about coordination and context, and AI must reflect this reality to succeed in the public sector.
