Malta to recognise Palestine as state next month, says PM Abela
Maltese Prime Minister Robert Abela announced on Sunday that Malta will recognize the State of Palestine next month.
The announcement came during a political event in which Abela raised local and global matters, with a particular focus on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, according to Malta Today.
"We cannot close our eyes to this human tragedy that is getting worse every day," Abela was quoted by the newspaper as saying about Israel's brutal bombardment of Gaza, which killed nearly 54,000 Palestinians, the majority of whom were women and children.
Abela said the move is a moral responsibility and that Palestine will be recognized following a conference on June 20.
The premier was also shocked by the tragic deaths of nine children of Palestinian pediatrician Dr. Alaa Al-Najjar on Saturday when Israeli forces bombed their home in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, critically injuring her doctor husband and leaving only one of their children to mourn.
Malta is ready to welcome Dr. Alaa Al-Najjar and her family to the country, Abela said.
Israel's war on Gaza
Israel's atrocities have displaced around 90% of Gaza's estimated 2 million residents, created a severe hunger crisis, and caused widespread destruction across the territory.
The Israeli army has pursued a brutal offensive against Gaza since October 2023, killing more than 53,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children.
The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants last November for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza.
Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war on the enclave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Ceasefire opportunity
After 22 months of relentless bloodshed in Gaza, Hamas has accepted a ceasefire proposal put forward by Egypt and Qatar, opening what may be the first real window in months for an end to the carnage. The deal, which promises a 60-day truce and the release of hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, among other things, carries the seeds of both respite and a potential path toward a lasting peace. The responsibility now lies squarely on Israel to accept it. Yet, if history is any guide, skepticism is warranted. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made no secret of his refusal to end the war until Hamas is "defeated and disarmed." His insistence on indefinite military control over Gaza and thinly-veiled plans for the "voluntary emigration" of Palestinians — widely seen as forcible displacement — undermine any hope that Israel is prepared to negotiate in good faith. Ceasefires, in Israel's playbook, have too often been treated as tactical pauses rather than steps toward peace. Humanitarian aid is allowed in only after international pressure mounts. Prisoner exchanges are used as bargaining chips rather than reconciliatory gestures. And promises of de-escalation give way to renewed offensives the moment political expediency demands it. It is not surprising, then, that the global community views Israel's potential acceptance of this deal with deep suspicion. This is where the global community must step in. If this cycle is to end, the world must make it clear that continued intransigence will carry serious consequences. The ceasefire proposal is not perfect, nor is it likely to resolve the deep wounds of decades-long conflict. But it represents a lifeline in a war that has cost the Palestinians dearly. To spurn it would be to send a global message that Israel values military dominance over genuine peace. Israel must be pressed to act.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US sanctions four ICC judges, prosecutors over war crimes investigations
The International Criminal Court building is seen in The Hague, Netherlands. Photo: Reuters/ File US President Donald Trump's administration on Wednesday imposed sanctions on two judges and two prosecutors at the International Criminal Court, as Washington ramped up its pressure on the war tribunal over its targeting of Israeli leaders and a past decision to investigate US officials. In a statement, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the court "a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare" against the United States and Israel. The move drew ire from France and the United Nations. Paris urged Washington to withdraw the sanctions, while the ICC said it deplored the designations, calling them "a flagrant attack" against the independence of an impartial judicial institution. Washington designated Nicolas Yann Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji, Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal, and Kimberly Prost of Canada, according to the US Treasury and State Department. All officials have been involved in cases linked to Israel and the United States. Also Read: Pakistan, China, Afghanistan forge deeper alliance with CPEC extension "United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach," Rubio said. "I urge countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to resist the claims of this bankrupt institution." The second round of sanctions comes less than three months after the administration took the unprecedented step of slapping sanctions on four separate ICC judges. The escalation will likely impede the functioning of the court and the prosecutor's office as they deal with major cases, including war crime allegations against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli defense chief Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim al-Masri last November for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. In March 2020, prosecutors opened an investigation in Afghanistan that included looking into possible crimes by US troops, but since 2021, it has deprioritized the role of the US and focused on alleged crimes committed by the Afghan government and the Taliban forces. Read: India test-fires nuclear-capable Agni-5 missile amid US tariff tensions The ICC, which was established in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the UN Security Council. Although the ICC has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in its 125 member countries, some nations, including the US, China, Russia, and Israel, do not recognise its authority. It has high-profile war crimes investigations under way into the Israel-Hamas conflict, as well as in Sudan, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Venezuela. Undermining international justice Both France and the United Nations said the judges' work is crucial for international justice. "Their role is essential in the fight against impunity," a statement from the French Foreign Ministry said. The US sanctions undermine the foundation of international justice, UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said, adding: "The (US) decision imposes severe impediments on the functioning of the office of the prosecutor." Netanyahu's office issued a statement welcoming the US sanctions. The designations freeze any US assets the individuals may have and essentially cut them off from the US financial system. Guillou is an ICC judge who presided over a pre-trial panel that issued the arrest warrant for Netanyahu. Khan and Niang are the court's two deputy prosecutors. Canadian Judge Kimberly Prost served on an ICC appeals chamber that, in March 2020, unanimously authorized the ICC prosecutor to investigate alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Afghanistan since 2003, including examining the role of US service members. Also Read: Trump rules out US troops for Ukraine The Trump administration's dislike of the court goes back to his first term. In 2020, Washington imposed sanctions on then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and one of her top aides over the court's work on Afghanistan. Countering Rubio's call to other countries to oppose the ICC, the court urged member states to stand in solidarity. "The Court calls upon States Parties and all those who share the values of humanity and the rule of law to provide firm and consistent support to the Court and its work carried out in the sole interest of victims of international crimes," it said.
Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Selective patriotism
It was Ramazan, and a friend of mine refused to fast. When I asked why, he said that his doctor had advised against it due to health reasons. Yet, the same friend smoked incessantly. I tried to argue and asked whether the same doctor had advised against smoking as well. He made a poker face and said no such advice was given to him. I am not sure what kind of doctor would not advise against smoking. Even cigarette brands advise against smoking at the end of their ads. Life is a game of what one chooses to believe, practise, avoid and adopt. Just like religion, citizenship and patriotism are practised quite selectively as well. In the US, a specially tailored form of patriotism is in fashion, especially with the ascension of Trump to the White House. He was really voted in due to the poor situation of the US economy and the miserable conditions that the citizens found themselves in. Credit card debt had grown over a trillion dollars and even the paycheck-to-paycheck life that was once ridiculed had become an ambitious milestone quite far from the reach of the citizens. Immigrants were not really on people's minds when dealing with the inability to pay their bills. The genocide in Gaza and Elon Musk's tweets also played a serious role in defeating Biden. However, once Trump started his term, one of the first major things that he did was an intense crackdown on illegal immigrants, legal residents and even naturalised US citizens. ICE raids have become the norm in this society. The broader promise of America First and Make America Great Again (MAGA) did include this racist and violent practice but it meant that the interests of the US would be put ahead of the interests of any other state. Just like my friend who followed his doctor's advice on fasting but ignored it on smoking, when it comes to Israel, America is not first. The same politicians that make noise about patriotism and making America great again sacrifice all that in the interests of Israel. Ted Cruz, one such politician, proudly said that he had joined the US Senate with the goal of defending Israel and Israeli interests. Jews are disliked by this crowd but not when it comes to Israel. One US politician is quite interesting. Her name is Marjorie Taylor Greene. She is MAGA on steroids. She supports Trump and his racist anti-immigration policy. She is all about America First. But that same ideology, if that is what one wants to call it, also compels her to question the blind support the US provides Israel. She started making noise against supporting Israel, Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza. She even calls it a genocide, which is a term the mainstream Americans like to avoid uttering. She perhaps does not like immigrants like me in the US, but she doesn't practise a selective belief system. So, as part of that same mindset, she also wants the US focus its own citizens and improve their lives instead of blindly giving Israel billions of dollars when the US itself is drowning in debt. Moreover, politicians who care about keeping the US safe and loved around the world should also stick to the advertised image of America where it stands against the bullies and supports the oppressed. Supporting Palestine against Israel's terrorist actions is what America — if it truly prides itself on being the saviour of humanity — should be doing. This will not only be the right thing morally, but will also not generate anger against the US, which has always resulted in attacks against innocent Americans. This will be a policy very much in line with America First and MAGA.
