Three contributions to the nation's collective memory
My hair stands up when the bugler blasts the Last Post across a silent crowd on Anzac Day or Remembrance Day.
It triggers memories of friends and family who have served in the military, of those who answered the call to arms, or those conscripts left with little choice. It reminds me of the stories of my great-grandfather who served in both world wars and his struggles adjusting to normal life in times of peace. I also remember the stories I've been told about others' ancestors while standing with a notepad beside cenotaphs in far-flung country towns during my time as a small-town reporter.
Anzac Day's standing as a time of reflection for the nation's collective memory is treasured by many, not least of all those who huddle together at dawn services around the country. This is what makes this morning's stunt by neo-Nazi Jacob Hersant particularly galling. In selfishly disrupting Melbourne's dawn service to voice his objection to Welcome to Country speeches, he disrespected the memory of the Anzacs by hijacking this time of memorial and quiet reflection for his own purpose. You can read more about The Age 's view of this and other recent public interventions by far-right groups in tomorrow's editorial.
What I want to do with this newsletter is to explore that idea of the nation's collective memory and look at The Age 's contribution to that with its coverage today.
If you read only one story about Anzac history today, it should this one from The Age' s Europe correspondent, Rob Harris. Beautifully told in Harris' inimitable style, it tells the story of the Anzacs' arrival at Leighterton in the English countryside during the dwindling days of World War I. Many died there as they sought to establish a significant air force in the Australian military. Many died there during training mishaps in unreliable aircraft, others married local women and some returned home months later.
Every year on the Sunday closest to Anzac Day, since 1931, their contribution to the area and the war effort is marked by the town.
Tony Wright today brought us an equally compelling but very different story about a veteran who was called up for compulsory military service during the Vietnam War via the National Service Scheme lottery. Decades later when he checked the list of lottery dates held by the National Archives, he discovered his birthday had never been drawn.
And then for a change of pace, we bring you the story of Aussie rules clubs in Vietnam who unwittingly revived a tradition from the Vietnam War, by playing annual matches on the same ground once used by 'Nashos' like Stan Middleton, who served at Vung Tau and played in the Vietnam Football League. This story by Alexander Darling explains how the footy tradition continued in Vietnam after half a century.
These recollections of the past can sometimes be heartwarming, but they are rarely comfortable. We all have a duty to remember the stories of the brutal reality of war and the lives lost on all sides of historic conflicts not for the purposes of glorification, but so we don't forget the cost.
I want to leave you today with a recommendation on the same theme. I recently visited Melbourne's Shrine of Remembrance and was impressed by the way it neatly balanced education and reflection. If you've never been, or haven't visited for a while, I highly recommend it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Albanese should remember courage on housing cuts both ways
It takes a certain audacity to be both attacker and conciliator, except perhaps in politics, where this is often just part of the job, a dark art of the profession. This week we saw federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil take on both roles. In an interview with The Age, the minister offered a defence of Labor's housing policies and its struggles to hit its targets, and in the process undertook a thinly veiled attack on the states. 'Planning laws at the state level are being used much too much to protect existing residents, and not enough to address the fact that we've got millions of people who are in housing distress. We need more housing of all kinds, and medium-density housing in the middle-ring suburbs is obviously going to be a really important part of the mix,' she said. This pivot on planning was noted in The Age's reporting as a notable shift. Three years ago, when federal Labor pledged in its budget to build 1 million properties between 2024 and mid-2029 (since upgraded to 1.2 million) it had very different avenues of action. It is likely to fall almost 300,000 short of the later target, according to the recent report State of the Housing System from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council. In fact, new housing supply was at its lowest point in a decade and woefully trailing demand. So what then of Labor's policies? At the recent election, it said it would guarantee 5 per cent deposits of all first home buyers to ease the burden of lenders' mortgage insurance. It would also provide $10 billion to equity programs with state government and private developers to build 100,000 homes for first-time buyers. In June 2023, Albanese announced a $2 billion fund called the Social Housing Accelerator. This was at a time when the Greens were blocking moves in the Senate related to Labor's $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund. Loading Having fought loudly for various of these measures against the opposition and the Greens, the government now appears to be crab-walking towards the last refuge of scoundrels in our Federation – blame-shifting. There were signs of this shift last week too when Andrew Leigh, assistant minister for productivity, competition, charities and treasury, gave a speech noting 'many of the levers lie with the states. And the systems need to change'. He launched a stinging attack on North Sydney Council in particular.
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
Scott Morrison honour exposes a system divorced from public sentiment
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. KING'S HONOURS The King's Birthday honour awards are rendered meaningless by Scott Morrison's inclusion, a decision that insults Australians (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', 8/6). His legacy, marred by robo-debt's heartless assault on vulnerable citizens, leaving families shattered, alone disqualifies him. But it doesn't end there. His sluggish COVID response, driven by others, not conviction; his callous 'I don't hold a hose' remark during the bushfires; and his dismissive stance on gender issues reveal a so-called leader who tarnished Australia's values. Awarding Morrison cheapens these honours. It's a stinging betrayal of robo-debt victims and all who suffered under his policies. Honours should celebrate integrity and selflessness. This decision exposes a system divorced from public sentiment. Australians deserve better: honours that inspire pride, not ones that reopen wounds and glorify failure. Sue Barrett, Caulfield South Brightening lives The name of the honours may have changed from Queen to King but the same old selection criteria still exists with many receiving honours for doing their jobs. The reasons set out for Scott Morrison's award includes: 'leadership of the national COVID-19 response' and 'leadership of Australia's contribution to AUKUS', both up for debate as to whether there was any leadership shown and whether many decisions were the right ones. Let's be realistic, the award was for being prime minister. However, it was great to see awards for people such as those on the front page of The Age who have done extraordinary things for many years, outside their jobs, to 'brighten lives from beyond the spotlight'. Phil Mackenzie, Eaglemont His duty to lead Scott Morrison was awarded the Companion of the Order of Australia but it was his duty as prime minister to take a leadership role in the COVID crisis, as with any crisis the country may experience. As for AUKUS, its worth is yet to be proven and indeed it may be very destructive in the future, both financially and its capabilities to keep us safe. By awarding him the highest honour only diminishes the whole system of awards, especially to those who are truly worthy. Judith Morrison, Nunawading Doubts about his achievements It would have been better if the award to Scott Morrison had read only 'For service to the people and parliament of Australia as prime minister'. His leadership of the COVID response was successful only because the states pushed him and his approach on the vaccines puzzled many. His leadership on AUKUS omits the breaking of the contract with France and the loss of international good behaviour it generated as well as doubts about the AUKUS deal itself. Robo-debt, his alienation of China and the dislike he received from people affected by the fires and floods don't rate a mention. He claimed the 2019 election result was a miracle but not that the 2022 election result was too. Adrian Tabor, Point Lonsdale Doing his job The award for Scott Morrison brings into question the very nature of the awards process. This is meant to be a criterion-based assessment process. The criteria includes that the 'outstanding achievement' should be 'above what might be expected through paid employment' – the former PM does not meet this criteria. Warren Prior, Williamstown Short memories I have vivid memories of both Daniel Andrews' and Gladys Berejiklian's relentless battle to cajole Morrison into action at the time. Morrison was also seen to be needlessly slow in co-ordinating the country's vaccine roll-out. Andrews has been repeatedly vilified for his and his team's exemplary actions in Victoria, which had some of the lowest fatality rates globally. I honestly wonder how far and how deep some people's memories run. Robert Boelen, Waratah Bay
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Morrison ‘saved lives': Why former PM deserves highest honour in the land
Every Australian former prime minister since 1975 – except Paul Keating – has been offered and accepted the appointment to the Companion of the Order of Australia. However, reaction to Scott Morrison receiving the nation's highest honour has been mixed. Speaking to our deputy federal editor Nick Bonyhady on The Morning Edition podcast, The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald's senior economics correspondent Shane Wright discusses the 830-name-strong 2025 King's Birthday honours list and why, despite some branding it 'the worst insult to all Australians', there is a case that the 30th prime minister of Australia deserves to be included on it. Click the player below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Bonyhady: What's the reaction been like [to Scott Morrison's King's Birthday honour]? Wright: Well, a bit like the reaction to Scott Morrison in general. I think that'd be the best way to describe it. There are those who recognise that this is a recognition of just how hard the job is and the period in which he was prime minister. So remember, he gets elected in 2019 … he is in charge during COVID-19, which, by any stretch of any imagination, [was] one of the more telling and difficult periods for administrations around the world ... plus they've tacked on AUKUS and striking the deal with Britain and the United States for a large number of very expensive submarines right into the defence space. So that's what the recognition is. But the reaction is falling a bit on political lines, so former prime ministers don't often get much love, especially if they've been voted out of office ... you can see some of that is, 'Why the hell did ScoMo get this? It should be going to somebody more deserving.' But of course, you then have to ignore the fact that every prime minister has had recognition of them because ultimately, running the country for however long is almost the pinnacle of political life, of public life in this country. So that's a recognition of that. Bonyhady: You covered the ups and downs of his time in office, the JobKeeper payments, but also the scandals around robo-debt. On balance, do you think he deserves the award?
