logo
Bill to repeal PA's Sunday hunting ban heads to Senate

Bill to repeal PA's Sunday hunting ban heads to Senate

Yahoo4 days ago

(WJET/WFXP) – A House bill impacting Pennsylvania hunters will soon be making its way to the Senate.
On Wednesday, June 11, House Bill 1431 was approved by the House Game and Fisheries Committee by a vote of 131-72.
Union City student in the running for wildlife magazine feature
The bill, introduced by Representative Mandy Steele, would fully repeal Pennsylvania's Sunday hunting ban.
While some exceptions have been made for the Sunday hunting ban, such as Act 107, which allowed for the hunting of foxes, coyotes and crows, House Bill 1431 would fully rescind the ban and allow the PA Game Commission to include Sundays during hunting seasons.
Where's Lady Kate? Erie sightseeing boat delays season
The PA Game Commission Executive Director, Steve Smith, spoke about his support for the bill.
'Though hunters play an active role in helping to manage wildlife populations, through the purchase of their licenses and other revenue they generate, they also fund wildlife conservation at a larger scale, for all species,' said Smith. 'For those reasons and others, it's important to keep hunters engaged and providing the valuable service they do. These bills would help accomplish that.
To stay up to date on the latest PA Game Commission news, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The next phase of California's Resistance
The next phase of California's Resistance

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

The next phase of California's Resistance

Presented by NOT GOING ANYWHERE — Saturday's mass 'No Kings' protests are a wrap, but the points of tension animating California's reenergized resistance to the Trump administration are very much unresolved. The administration continues daily immigration raids in the state, even if President Donald Trump has reportedly asked federal agents to lay off workers in some industries, including agriculture, amid intense industry lobbying. Trump will be allowed to keep National Guard troops and Marines in Los Angeles until at least tomorrow, giving California Democrats more time to sound off on the unusual militarization of the nation's second-largest city before an appeals court considers the state's challenge to the deployment. Sen. Alex Padilla and other Democrats continue to seize on the senator's handcuffing at a Department of Homeland Security news conference last week as representative of the administration's treatment of political opponents. Others have been fundraising off the incident, our Brakkton Booker and Andrew Howard report. 'All Alex was trying to do was ask a question and do his job of oversight,' read one email from the campaign of Sen. Adam Schiff, who asked supporters to split donations between his campaign and Padilla's. But but but … Officials from both parties tried to temper partisan animosity upon learning that former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman was killed, in what Gov. Tim Walz described as a politically motivated attack. As our Zach Montellaro reports, California's Democratic Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Republican Minority Leader James Gallagher issued a rare joint statement Saturday afternoon. 'This horrifying act of political violence has no place in America, and we stand together in condemning it in the strongest possible terms,' they wrote. 'Americans can disagree, but we must always do that without violence. As leaders on both sides of the aisle, we call on everyone to take down the temperature, respect differences of opinion and work toward peace in our society.' They were followed by the leaders of the California state Senate, Democratic Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire and Republican Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, who said 'no cause, no grievance, no election justifies the use of fear or force against our fellow human beings.' Close to home … Officials are all too familiar with political violence in California, where Rep. Nancy Pelosi's husband was bludgeoned by a man who broke into his home in 2022 and former San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk was assassinated decades earlier. Hortman's death, and the shooting of another Minnesota state lawmaker, prompted sitting officials to open up about what they face personally. 'We're all getting death threats pretty regularly, and violent threats,' California Rep. Jared Huffman said of his congressional colleagues. 'You go online and you just see all of the vile and hate and vitriol that is pulsing through mostly right wing politics and platforms, but there's some of it on the left too.' Our colleagues reported that Huffman and other members of Congress are 'taking all kinds of precautions' to boost their safety that they never before would have thought necessary in the U.S. Federal campaign finance officials signed off last year on allowing members of Congress and candidates to use campaign cash for a wide array of personal security measures due to the threats they now routinely face. Seas of protesters … The weekend's demonstrations in Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego drew tens of thousands of attendees and remained largely peaceful. The events, planned in coordination with thousands of others nationwide, gained momentum after Trump unleashed a barrage of broadsides against California and its leaders while deploying the National Guard over Gov. Gavin Newsom's objections. 'We're at DEFCON 1 in the conflict between California and the Trump administration,' Democratic strategist Katie Merrill told our own Jeremy B. White for his latest on the administration's hyper-focus on California. 'It's orders of magnitude more than what we've seen, ever.' Importantly for Democrats, the demonstrations didn't produce the kinds of chaotic images that the White House used as justification for intervening in Los Angeles-area immigration protests last week. Still, Los Angeles police forced demonstrators to disperse Saturday before an 8 p.m. curfew took effect downtown, the Los Angeles Times reported. The limited curfew, imposed last week to stem vandalism and looting, remains in effect indefinitely. GOOD MORNING. It's Monday. Thanks for waking up with Playbook. You can text us at ‪916-562-0685‬‪ — save it as 'CA Playbook' in your contacts. Or drop us a line at dgardiner@ and bjones@ or on X — @DustinGardiner and @jonesblakej. WHERE'S GAVIN? Nothing official announced. ON THE HILL SUNDAY SHOWS — Padilla on Sunday denied that he was deliberately trying to make a scene at the Department of Homeland Security press conference, as White House and DHS officials have claimed. 'Nothing could be further from the truth. Again, what are the odds?' the Democrat told CNN's Dana Bash on Sunday on 'State of the Union.' The senator said he asked the FBI agents escorting him around the building if he could listen in. 'When I heard the secretary, not for the first time in that press conference, talk about the needing to liberate the people of Los Angeles from their duly elected mayor and governor, it was at that moment that I chose to try to ask a question,' Padilla said. Read more from his cable news appearance from our Gregory Svirnovskiy. REPUBLICANLAND ESSAYLI'S ASCENT — Former California Assemblymember Bill Essayli has been on something of a revenge tour since Trump appointed him to be U.S. attorney for California's central district, our Will McCarthy reports. Already, he has charged SEIU leader David Huerta with felony conspiracy for allegedly impeding an ICE arrest by participating in a protest. And he has been Trump's man on the immigration battlefield of Los Angeles — a rapid status shift for a politician who not long ago was a junior, little-liked Republican state lawmaker. 'The Democrats that bullied Bill Essayli should be very worried,' said Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, a Republican who worked to get Essayli elected before serving alongside him. 'They've never been held accountable. But life changes.' CLIMATE AND ENERGY FROM PAIN TO POLITICS — There's a new climate advocacy group in town trying to make disasters personal — and taking lessons from the anti-gun violence movement. Read California Climate's interview with Chris Kocher, an Everytown alum who now co-leads Extreme Weather Survivors to connect disaster victims and advocate with them in Sacramento and beyond. Top Talkers RULES IN REVERSE — Trump just revoked California's authority to set its own electric vehicle rules. In her latest column, California climate editor Debra Kahn questions the degree to which California is to blame. CHANGE OF GUARD — Marines replaced National Guard troops in protecting a federal building in Los Angeles amid the legal back-and-forth over the Guard's deployment, the New York Times reports. One man was briefly detained by the troops after he ducked caution tape to reach the Veterans Affairs office there. AROUND THE STATE — California legislators passed their budget proposal on Friday. They'll vote on a final budget after leadership finishes negotiations with Newsom. (POLITICO Pro) — SF Mayor Daniel Lurie is facing backlash for proposing cuts to immigration services funding to address the city's budget deficit. (SF Standard) — Personal information about immigrants who receive health insurance through Medi-Cal has been handed over to federal immigration officials. (POLITICO Pro) PLAYBOOKERS BIRTHDAYS — POLITICO's Nicole Norman (favorite cocktail: martini with two blue cheese olives) … Hailey Heer … Alison Gopnik … Alissa Anderson, policy director at the California Budget & Policy Center ... BELATED B-DAY WISHES — (was Sunday): Former House Majority Whip Tony Coelho … Rebecca Rutkoff … Liz Bourgeois … Daniel Lacesa … Jeffrey I. Abrams … (was Saturday): Lilly Rapson … Beryl A. Geber … Annie Olson … YouTube's Alexandra Veitch … Campbell Brown … President Donald Trump … Los Angeles City Councilmember Timmy McOsker (favorite birthday treat: crab cake and a crispy Corona with lime) WANT A SHOUT-OUT FEATURED? — Send us a birthday, career move or another special occasion to include in POLITICO's California Playbook. You can now submit a shout-out using this Google form.

Editorial: Stopping future Harvey Weinsteins — The NY Assembly must join the state Senate and pass the similar crimes bill
Editorial: Stopping future Harvey Weinsteins — The NY Assembly must join the state Senate and pass the similar crimes bill

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: Stopping future Harvey Weinsteins — The NY Assembly must join the state Senate and pass the similar crimes bill

Harvey Weinstein is guilty, in a Manhattan state courtroom, of a 2006 sexual assault, again, just like he was found guilty in a Manhattan state courtroom five years ago of the same 2006 sexual assault. Weinstein's first conviction was thrown out and a new trial was needed because New York law does not allow the use of evidence from other, prior sexual offenses. That law needs to be changed and the state Senate passed a reform last year sponsored by chamber's No. 2 leader, Sen. Mike Gianaris, with a remarkable and overwhelming tally of 55-4. The Assembly and Speaker Carl Heastie need to match that before they break for the summer next Tuesday or another year will go by and prosecutors won't have all the tools they need to pursue horrible monsters like Weinstein. This is not a partisan matter; Gianaris is a Democrat, but every Republican senator voted for his measure, along with almost every Democrat. The numbers in the Assembly will be similar, provided Heastie brings forward the bill, sponsored by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin. Under the fix put forward by Gianaris and Paulin, New York would join the federal standard, which is also used by a good number of states, which permits admitting evidence of a defendant's prior sexual offenses in certain circumstances. What happened in the initial Weinstein prosecution in 2020 was the Manhattan district attorney asked the trial judge if it was permissible to use such testimony and the judge approved it, as did a unanimous appellate bench. Under New York law, that is occasionally allowed, on a case by case basis. But when it reached the state's highest court, it was narrowly overruled, tossing the whole Weinstein case and forcing this new trial. This time, the Manhattan DA didn't include any witnesses to testify about Weinstein's previous assaults and the jury still convicted him. But the law still must be reformed. As one expert points out, this verdict is yet further evidence that juries are capable of hearing evidence about multiple charges involving different victims without being overcome by prejudice, as they convicted Weinstein on one 2006 sex charge yesterday, but acquitted him of another from that same year. As to the third charge, from 2013, the jury will continue its deliberations today. The Gianaris/Paulin similar crimes bill, which 16 other states have, is fair to defendants and fair to victims. Such laws have been challenged in state and federal courts and determined to be constitutional. The sponsor's memo in the bill's justification mentions Harvey Weinstein and the reverse of his first conviction as the need for the legislation. That such an awful criminal is being invoked for something constructive to improve New York's criminal prosecution system is a tiny bit of justice. If the Assembly passes the bill and Gov. Hochul signs it, Weinstein can spend his coming many years in state prison thinking how he helped change the laws of New York in a positive way. But should Heastie not even allow a vote, Weinstein will still be heading to prison, but the law will remain badly out of date, denying future victims their chance for justice. Bring the bill to the floor, Mr. Speaker. _____

Reporter's Notebook: Why the Senate is unlikely to debate the 'big, beautiful bill' until next week
Reporter's Notebook: Why the Senate is unlikely to debate the 'big, beautiful bill' until next week

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Reporter's Notebook: Why the Senate is unlikely to debate the 'big, beautiful bill' until next week

Fox has learned it is doubtful that Senate Republicans will put the "big, beautiful bill" on the floor for debate and a vote this week. That will likely wait until the week of June 22. This potentially jeopardizes final passage of the measure through the Senate and House by July 4. The Senate Finance Committee is expected to release its text of the bill as early as Monday. That section of the legislation is the most expansive and probably the most controversial. Key tax provisions like SALT (state and local tax reductions), potential spending cuts and changes to Medicare and Medicaid all appear in this section of the legislation. Senators and Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough will then begin the process of weeding out provisions that do not comport with strict Senate Budget provisions. That's why the plan probably isn't ready for debate and a "vote-a-rama" until the week after next. If the Senate advances the bill, the House will have a tight window to either accept the Senate changes and green-light the bill before July 4 – or bounce it back to the Senate with yet another set of changes. Such a scenario would most certainly stretch out the process beyond the July 4 deadline. It would also compel the Senate to take a fourth vote-a-rama in just a matter of months. That's where the Senate votes for hours on end with one roll call after another. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPKeep in mind that July 4 is merely an aspirational deadline, not a hard one. The true deadline is early August. That's when the Treasury Department says the U.S. will collide with the debt ceiling. A debt ceiling increase is part of the big, beautiful bill.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store