Perth property breaking traditional income rules
Property markets have always served as economic barometers, reflecting broader shifts in capital flows and investment sentiment.
When residential assets begin generating annual returns which systematically exceed what their owners earn through employment, it represents a fundamental market dynamic demanding strategic attention from investors and developers alike.
Recent analysis from Ray White reveals an unprecedented phenomenon in Australian property markets, which challenges conventional investment wisdom.
According to the firm's research, Perth has become the only Australian city where residential property appreciation exceeds personal income, highlighting the city's unique position in the national property landscape.
Ray White Senior Data Analyst Atom Go Tian identifies Perth as delivering the best of both worlds for residents.
Not only do Perth workers earn Australia's second-highest annual incomes but their residential properties also generated the nation's strongest capital appreciation over the 12 months to April.
Perth house prices surged by $95,022, climbing from $812,482 to $907,504, exceeding even Canberra's substantial annual personal incomes of $93,351.
This represents a fundamental shift in how property investment returns are distributed across Australian markets.
Nationally, the typical relationship sees personal earnings outpacing property appreciation by
about 1.5 times, with median annual income at $72,592 compared to national house price growth of $46,625.
Perth's inversion of this relationship – where property assets generate more annual value than their owners typically earn – creates a unique investment dynamic.
The implications extend beyond individual wealth creation to broader questions about market sustainability and capital allocation strategies.
When property assets consistently outperform personal income generation, it suggests either exceptional market fundamentals or potential structural imbalances which require careful evaluation.
What makes Perth's performance noteworthy is its occurrence alongside strong personal income levels, rather than in spite of weak earnings growth.
This combination suggests genuine economic strength supporting asset appreciation, rather than speculative activity disconnected from underlying fundamentals.
Other major markets present contrasting dynamics. Adelaide demonstrates near equilibrium with both personal income and property appreciation sitting at about $63,000 annually.
Brisbane maintains modest personal income advantages, with residents earning roughly $2000 more than their properties appreciated.
Melbourne and Canberra show the greatest disparities in favour of personal earnings, with workers earning 5.5 and five times their property appreciation respectively.
According to Ray White's analysis, this represents a significant geographical shift in Australian property investment performance.
Previously, Sydney's premium eastern and northern suburbs led national growth, outpacing local incomes by six to eight times.
These luxury markets have now cooled, with growth migrating to Perth's mid-tier segments as investors seek enhanced value propositions in markets delivering both income and capital growth potential.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Death of old money: Young richlisters drive luxury surge
Self-made entrepreneurs are reshaping the prestige property market, with the Gold Coast emerging as the nation's second most expensive city to own a luxury home. Australia's Luxury Report 2025 by Ray White reveals luxury property sales are booming across Australia, pushing the price tag for a high-end home up 72 per cent from 10 years ago to a minimum of $2.52m. And while Sydney remains the top market – with an eye-watering luxe buy-in of $4m – the Gold Coast has claimed the next spot at $2.6m, eclipsing Melbourne's $2.49m entry point. The Sunshine Coast also ranked in the top five at $2.4m, followed by Brisbane and Perth, where the average luxury home now costs $2.1m. Ray White Group managing director Dan White said south east Queensland had become 'the clear success story in Australia's high-end property market', with Gold Coast luxury home prices more than doubling from $1.14m in 2015. Gold Coast blue-chip markets of Mermaid Beach to Broadbeach and Surfers Paradise featured among the report's top 10 luxury suburbs by price growth since 2015, recording jumps of 4.73 and 4.64 per cent respectively. The city's top local sale of 2025 to date was $22m for a Main River estate at 7-9 McMillan Ct, Southport, followed by a Surfers Paradise mansion at 8 Southern Cross Dr sold for $18.5m. In third place was Bartinon, an opulent riverfront home at 26 Marseille Ct, Bundall snapped up for $18m this week after two years on the market. Ray White Senior Data Analyst Atom Go Tian said a staggering $663m changed hands across just 20 transactions. Buyers were mostly self-made entrepreneurs from diverse sectors including e-commerce, property development, financial services, fashion, and technology. 'Today's ultra-luxury property buyers are primarily self-made business owners, especially those who built digital and tech companies, rather than corporate executives who once dominated this market,' Mr Go Tian said. 'The wealth behind these purchases now comes from a much wider range of industries, with online businesses and technology ventures leading the way. 'While buyers in their late 40s to 50s continued to form the core market, we're witnessing increasing participation from millennial entrepreneurs, particularly those who have built wealth through digital businesses,' he said. Hugh Jackman-linked health retreat listed as first guests arrive AFL legend's side hustle flipping homes Mr Go Tian said luxury homes varied dramatically by location, generally including premium materials and exceptional finishes, such as marble countertops, hardwood floors, and custom cabinetry. 'More than just a price point, luxury represents the pinnacle of craftsmanship, attention to detail, and scarcity within a market,' he said. 'As our data reveals, the concept of luxury continues to transform across Australia's diverse regions, shaped by changing demographics, wealth distribution, and lifestyle preferences.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Tax on superannuation robs retirees of self-respect by turning them into wards of state, a ploy straight out of the socialist playbook
If you earn more than $350 a week and are not yet old enough for retirement, you are classified as a "taxable person" by the Australian government. The income tax the Australian Taxation Office claws from your pay packet provides services for non-taxable citizens, be they young, old, poor or infirm. The social compact, in which the nation insures its citizens against misfortune, works well as long as the number of net-contributors and net-recipients remains in balance. Yet the inescapable fact is that the number of taxpayers relative to the number of non-taxpayers will shrink over the next half century as Australians grow older and fewer future taxpayers are born. The old-age dependency ratio, which measures the number of people aged 65 and over for every 100 working-age people, is expected to increase from 26.6 per cent to 38.2 per cent by 2062. This explains why Jim Chalmers is looking to retirement savings rather than income, as he seeks ways to increase government revenue. The $4.4 trillion we have collectively invested in superannuation is too tempting to resist. The government's plan to extract money from superannuation savings by taxing unrealised gains on investments is partly born out of desperation and partly because taxing and spending are what socialist governments like to do. The $3 million threshold will fool few. The Treasurer's refusal to link it to inflation means it will eventually apply to most superannuation savers. Like all forms of taxation, it will transfer wealth from private citizens to the public purse, where it will be spent on the whim of politicians and bureaucrats rather than at the discretion of individuals. Taxing people's retirement savings is particularly egregious. Thrifty individuals who forgo spending during their working years to provide for the necessities of old age should be given every incentive to do so. Every self-funded retiree is one less recipient of public pensions. Those who accumulate enough capital are more likely to maintain their private health insurance payments and enjoy the added comforts of private aged care homes. A tax incentive for working-age individuals to save reduces the burden on future generations of taxpayers. When the government pockets that tax, it improves the books in the short term but creates a long-term public liability. The costs quickly add up. The nominal lifetime cost of paying the average pension is $430,000 for men and $550,000 for women. When you add to that the average cost of public health in retirement ($140,000 for men, $180,000 for women) and aged care, the case for allowing people to look after themselves becomes clear. Yet the explicit assumption in Treasury's forecasts is that an expanded welfare state will provide those things. Treasury's 2023 Intergenerational Report (IGR) frames the ageing population as an inevitable fiscal and economic burden — a "challenge" that will strain public finances, depress productivity, and expand the cost of government services. In the Treasury's perverse logic, the absence of tax on superannuation savings is branded as an expenditure. Yet, if we follow this twisted line of thinking and assume that refraining from taxing superannuation is a cost to the state, it must be set against the money the government will save on pension spending. As the report concedes, while the cost of public pensions is expected to increase by an average of 1.4 per cent of GDP in most OECD countries by the middle of the century, in Australia, it will decrease from 2.3 per cent of GDP in 2022-23 to two per cent in 2062-63. For this, we must thank the Hawke and Keating Labour governments, who had the foresight to use both carrots and sticks to encourage workers to save for retirement. Today, 44 per cent of retirees claim the full government pension, while 25 per cent are self-funded. By 2063, however, those figures are expected to be reversed, as 43 per cent of retirees will be fully self-funded, and only 21 per cent will rely on the state, according to the IGR forecast. The report misses a fundamental opportunity: to recognise older Australians not as dependants but as contributors. From the outset, the report assumes that an ageing population means fewer workers, slower economic growth, and ballooning government expenditure on health, aged care and pensions. It tells us, for example, that government payments for health, aged care, and the NDIS will rise from 6.2 per cent to 10.7 per cent of GDP over the next 40 years. It forecasts the need to double the size of the care workforce, funded primarily through public outlays. It fails to explore how those costs might be reduced, or at least better managed, with the right incentives to encourage personal responsibility. It ignores the potential for Australians of independent means to contribute more directly to their own health and aged care costs if given the freedom and incentive to do so. There is no meaningful discussion of co-contribution models, private health strategies, or reforms that might allow wealthier retirees to opt out of publicly funded care in favour of private arrangements. If government policy continues to penalise thrift and reward dependency, we should not be surprised that more Australians turn to the public purse. The government appears to accept the rise in state dependency as a given. The old are to be cared for, not empowered. Indeed, this will become a self-fulfilling prophecy if the government discourages people from saving for retirement. It presents us with a fatalistic vision of a dystopian welfare state, the kind of future Robert Menzies railed against in 1942 Forgotten People radio talk, a world in which an all-powerful State "will nurse us and rear us and maintain us and pension us and bury us". Menzies's objection to the dependency-driven welfare state was not primarily fiscal or even against the evils of big government. It was that it robbed individuals of the dignity that comes from paying their way in life and the freedom to strive for something better. 'If the motto is to be 'Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow you will die, and if it chances you don't die, the State will look after you; but if you don't eat, drink and be merry and save, we shall take your savings from you', then the whole business of life would become foundation-less,' he said. If today's Liberal leaders remain true to the principles of their intellectual founder, they will oppose Chalmers' superannuation tax unconditionally. Taxing paper profits that may never be realised is fundamentally unfair. Nick Cater is a senior fellow at Menzies Research Centre and a regular contributor to Sky News Australia
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians curb their enthusiasm for US holidays
Flight Centre chief executive Graham Turner said business travel to the US was holding up, but fewer Australians were booking holidays there. 'Certainly compared to the pre-Trump era, everything that we see … is the leisure market in particular is down. There's no doubt that April and May have been down,' Turner said. 'US carriers have increased their capacity [to Australia] over the last six to 12 months, and there's no doubt they'll be suffering a bit. 'There's been cheaper airfares through sales and there will be [more] over the next few months unless things dramatically improve.' More than a million Australians visited the US last year. The country's latest official figures show 291,230 Australians visited the US from January to April, down 0.2 per cent on the same period last year. In April, Australian visitor numbers to the US grew 1 per cent year-on-year to 89,363. Meanwhile, 83,460 Americans arrived in Australia this March, making the US the second-largest source of visitors behind New Zealand. Australia's favourite destinations over the same period were New Zealand, Indonesia and Japan. Mitchell said young people most affected by the cost of living were choosing cheaper destinations such as Latin America or Asia, instead. He said the April slump in the Australian dollar sparked by Trump's tariff wars had 'spooked a lot of people' from booking trips to the US. 'The feedback we're getting is the US is an expensive destination to go to, with the service taxes and the tipping. And I think that word of mouth has honestly been getting around for a while now,' Mitchell said. He said even those who could afford to visit the US were cutting back on costs. 'I don't think it's stopping some people from going there, but it probably does change how they travel a bit. They might not go for 2½, three weeks; they might go for two weeks. They might not go five-star, they might go four-star or three-star,' he said. Qantas, which operates about 40 return flights a week between Australia and the US, said demand for US travel was holding up locally. Chief executive Vanessa Hudson recently said the airline was feeling optimistic about demand for the US, and 'business-purpose travel and business travel in premium cabins remains strong'. The airline said this year's sale for flights to the US had outperformed similar sales last year. Loading Michael Feller, an ex-diplomat and foreign policy adviser, said the second Trump presidency had caused enormous damage to US soft power and prestige. But he said it was difficult to trace that into consumer behaviour beyond unique cases like Canada. 'Boycotts are really tricky,' said Feller, who is now chief strategist at Geopolitical Strategy, which provides advice to companies around the world. 'US products are ubiquitous. And when you consume a quintessential US product like Coke, it's manufactured and bottled in Australia. And then there are other quintessential products like iPhones, which are manufactured and assembled in China. So, it's hard to disentangle 'Brand US'.' Despite gloom over Trump's trade wars, Feller said there were two silver linings for Australia. Loading 'The Australian consumer will probably benefit from Trump's trade wars insofar as cheap Chinese goods will be dumped on our shores, leading to lower costs,' he said. 'And if Trump cracks down on international students, those students will presumably look to a country like ours to study.'
