logo
2 lawsuits filed over St. Petersburg's high water bills, city provides relief to homeowners

2 lawsuits filed over St. Petersburg's high water bills, city provides relief to homeowners

Yahoo21-02-2025
The Brief
Attorney Matt Weidner is suing the City of St. Petersburg over abnormally high water bills.
The city took steps on Thursday to help homeowners through the process.
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - This week, an attorney filed two lawsuits against the City of St. Petersburg for abnormally high water bills. This comes after thousands of customers received bills hundreds of dollars more and, in some cases, thousands of dollars more than typical bills.
Big picture view
FOX 13 first broke this story weeks ago.
On Thursday, St. Petersburg City Council made moves to help homeowners who are dealing with extraordinarily high water bills. Among them: you will not have to hire a plumber or repair a leak in order to get a refund.
RELATED: St. Pete families left with extremely high water bills after hurricanes may be getting relief
While the city took steps to help homeowners through the process, there still was not a substantive explanation for how it happened.
Now, at least two lawsuits have been filed against the city alleging breach of contract and deceptive trade practices.
What they're saying
"I'm just dumbfounded, even worse today than when we first started this process," said Attorney Matt Weidner. He is among those fighting high water bills. His Snell Isle home was gutted after Hurricane Helene and he still received a $1,000 bill.
He filed a lawsuit Monday against the city alleging breach of contract and deceptive trade practices.
He also filed suit on behalf of a 92-year-old woman who has a $10,000 dollar bill for a vacant home, since she resides in a nursing home.
PREVIOUS:High water bills: St. Pete leaders vote to stop late fees, water shut offs after resident complaints
"Nobody was in that house. Makes no sense whatsoever," he said.
He says Thursday's meeting was frustrating. Though staff insisted it's not an issue with the city's meters, Weidner is not convinced of that.
"The analysis was wholly unsatisfactory. I heard almost no discussion at all of what is the real issue, which is consumption," said Weidner.
Staff presented several theories, but there has yet to be a definitive determination for the issue.
"Whether it's a glitch in the matrix, it's a hardware issue, it's a software issue, there is something there that needs to be recognized, and I think we will figure it out as time goes on," said City Councilman Mike Harting.
As our reporting highlighted, the current process put the burden on homeowners to prove a negative.
MORE:Homeowner gets $6,000 water bill amid irregular bills in St. Pete
"They hired a plumber. The plumber can't find a leak. Our response is, 'no leak, no repair, no refund.' I'm not comfortable with that. I looked at Sarasota. They have this abnormal circumstance language. I think that can help people," said City Administrator Rob Gerdes.
The city can now help homeowners without jumping through as many hoops.
"It gives us some flexibility to help homes outside of, you have to prove to us that you had a leak. Now there are some departmental procedures, you don't have to go to the (Utility Billing Review Committee) so there's a couple less steps to get relief, so it comes faster," said City Council Chair Copley Gerdes.
Weidner is hoping his lawsuit will answer some of the accountability questions, and is encouraging those with high water bills to make noise.
"Listen, my phone is ringing off the hook. I can't possibly help any fraction of the people that are calling in here. What people have to do is e-mail city council with their examples, because the only way this is going to get fixed is if city council can wrap their brain around this problem," said Weidner.
CLICK HERE:>>>Follow FOX 13 on YouTube
What's next
In the meantime, the city has paused late fees and disconnections for people with high bills.
The city council will also be looking to make some ordinance changes to better help homeowners in the future. They will take that up in March.
The Source
Information for this story was gathered by FOX 13's Genevieve Curtis.
STAY CONNECTED WITH FOX 13 TAMPA:
Download the FOX Local app for your smart TV
Download FOX Local mobile app: Apple | Android
Download the FOX 13 News app for breaking news alerts, latest headlines
Download the SkyTower Radar app
Sign up for FOX 13's daily newsletter
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former city manager sues Santa Clara, claims scrutiny of 49ers led to her firing
Former city manager sues Santa Clara, claims scrutiny of 49ers led to her firing

San Francisco Chronicle​

time4 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Former city manager sues Santa Clara, claims scrutiny of 49ers led to her firing

The former city manager of Santa Clara filed a lawsuit alleging a pro- San Francisco 49ers bloc on the City Council harassed, bullied and ultimately fired her because she insisted on scrutinizing the team's financial management of Levi's Stadium. In the lawsuit against the city filed Thursday, Deanna Santana accused the so-called '49ers Five' of orchestrating a campaign of intimidation to prevent her from 'blowing the whistle' on suspected legal violations involving the city and 49ers. At one point, the lawsuit claimed, the city even hired an unknown person to conduct surveillance on her and her family when they were on a weekend trip to their vacation home in Pacific Grove. Santana, who served as city manager from 2017 until her 2022 firing, reported the alleged surveillance to police, 'who said they feared for her safety,' according to the complaint. The incident caused her and her family to suffer 'extreme fear, stress, anxiety, insomnia and health consequences," she complained. Soon thereafter, Santana told the council 49ers President Al Guido had potentially illegal conflicts of interest in connection with the team's effort to bring World Cup soccer matches to publicly owned Levi's Stadium. Two days later, she was fired. The council's rationale for firing Santana was a 'lack of confidence' in her, according to actions passed on the day of her dismissal. Mayor Lisa Gillmor had said she believed the 49ers wanted Santana fired because of her suggestion Guido had conflicts of interest involving the World Cup bid. Guido and the 49ers have denied wrongdoing. Thursday's lawsuit, filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court, said her firing was orchestrated by council member Anthony Becker, leader of the 49ers' bloc. Becker was convicted of perjury last year and lost his council seat in connection with election improprieties involving a 49ers lobbyist. A Santa Clara spokesperson declined comment, beyond acknowledging the city has been 'engaged in ongoing settlement negotiations' with Santana and her attorneys. After she was fired, Santana contends the city failed to comply with her termination agreement, withholding promised severance pay and even meddling with her CalPERS pension to deprive her of benefits. The lawsuit doesn't specify how much money is at stake in the dispute. As city manager, Santana was paid about $469,000 per year, according to the Openpayrolls website. She is now acting city manager of Milpitas. Many of the lawsuit's allegations concerning the 49ers and the City Council were first contained in a 2022 civil grand jury investigative report called 'Unsportsmanlike Conduct.' The watchdog agency rebuked pro-49ers officials, saying they 'put the 49ers' interests ahead of the city's interests.' The report also praised Santana and Gillmor for raising 'financial, safety and ethical concerns' about the city's relationship with the team. Santana, a former Oakland city administrator, came to Santa Clara when the council was dominated by 49ers critics. She led a move to replace the 49ers with an independent stadium management company, saying she feared the city was being short-changed on revenue from concerts and other non-NFL events at the stadium. The effort infuriated the 49ers, and in 2020 then-CEO Jed York (now owner) spent $2.9 millionto elect a team-friendly council majority. The new council dropped efforts to replace the 49ers as stadium manager and fired city attorney Brian Doyle, who had defended the city in a series of lawsuits brought by the team. The new council members also began complaining Santana was overpaid and rebuked her, often in sharply personal terms. At one point, council member Kevin Park referred to her as a "dog," the suit says. The allegations about surveillance appear related to a Jan. 26, 2022 article posted on a news website called San Jose Inside. The story accused Santana of being overpaid and reported that she and her husband had just bought the Pacific Grove home. The post was illustrated with a photo of the home, with Santana's car in the driveway. Both the story and photo were attributed to a writer named Alexander Cicak. Days later, the website re-posted the story, replacing the photo of Santana's house with a photo (credited to Cicak)of a public beach. The website soon re-posted the story yet again, this time removing the writer's name from both the byline and photo credits.

Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage
Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Brooklyn Democratic Party hacks' support of Zohran Mamdani is really about the next council Speaker and patronage

We had to laugh when everyone present tried to spin this week's Brooklyn stop on Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour as a dramatic show of Democratic Party unity, when it was plainly nothing more than an alliance of convenience with the Kings County's most prominent Dems conspicuously absent. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams insisted that the media needed to 'understand what's going on right now, because I don't think this group of people agree about nothing' — yet they still don't. Williams and other radicals (including supposed reformers) were basking in the glow of fellow-traveler Mamdani's primary triumph, but the machine politicians like Assemblywoman Rodneyse Bichotte Hermalyne, the county Democratic boss, were just trying to make sure their bread will still be buttered. Bichotte Hermalyne and her allies had endorsed ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary, obviously because he seemed the sure winner, but Andrew's political corpse wasn't even cold when she announced in a NY1 News interview her support for Mamdani in the general election. Beyond other patronage, she and her 'regular' Democrats are likely also hoping to cut some deal that nabs their faction the City Council speakership next year as a reward for jumping so quickly behind Mamdani. Not all pols are that squalid: House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and other notable Brooklyn Dems very much did not turn out for the 'unity' farce. Then again, Jeffries and Schumer are actually working ceaselessly to counter Trump, not just posturing about it so they can avoid addressing other issues. The point is that these politicians (like others across town) are 'uniting' behind Mamdani because it serves their factional interests, not because they think he'll be good for the city. The Democrats who truly care about New York are conspicuous by their silence.

New Orleans mayor indicted on federal corruption charges
New Orleans mayor indicted on federal corruption charges

The Hill

time8 hours ago

  • The Hill

New Orleans mayor indicted on federal corruption charges

New Orleans Mayor Latoya Cantrell (D) was indicted on federal charges Friday after an alleged affair with a local police officer. Cantrell, the city's first female mayor, is accused of engaging in a romantic relationship with Jeffrey Paul Vappie II, a police officer in the executive protection unit. Court documents allege she orchestrated out-of-state trips to maximize their opportunities to engage in 'personal activities' that cost the City of New Orleans over $70,000 in addition to travel expenses for Cantrell. Prosecutors say both Cantrell and Vappie were warned about misconduct in 2022. The Democratic mayor is in her final term as the city's leader and is now charged with making false statements and false declarations before a grand jury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and conspiracy to commit wire fraud. 'Aware their conduct violated rules, policies, and criminal laws, Cantrell and Vappir attempted to distract and impede inquiries and investigations, including a federal grand jury investigation, about the true nature and circumstances of their relationship and their scheme to defraud,' the indictment reads. 'They did this by using an encrypted messaging platform, intimidating and punishing subordinates, lying to colleagues and advisors, making false public pronouncements, harassing a o colleagues and advisors, making false public pronouncements, harassing a private individual who took pictures of them in public together, deleting electronic evidence, making false statements to federal law enforcement agents, authoring an affidavit signed under oath and penalty of perjury containing false information, and testifying falsely while under oath before a federal grand jury,' it continues. Cantrell will face charges in the U.S. District Court's Eastern District of Louisiana. This is a sad day for the people of New Orleans,' said Monet Brignac, a spokesperson for City Council President JP Morrell told The Associated Press. 'Our thoughts and prayers are with the Cantrell family as they navigate through this difficult time.' Cantrell previously alleged she was targeted as a Black woman and faced 'very disrespectful, insulting, in some cases kind of unimaginable' treatment, according to the AP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store