Russian innovation to revolutionize oil industry
A team of Russian and foreign experts and scientists at Kazan Federal University have developed and started to successfully apply the revolutionary concept of refining oil underground. The idea was presented at the Future Technologies Forum in Moscow on Thursday.
Specialists from Mexico, Yemen, China, and Chad are part of a laboratory that developed the idea of combining two processes – oil extraction and refining, according to Mikhail Varfolomeyev, the head of the Department for Developing and Operating Hard-to-Recover Hydrocarbon Deposits at the university.
'Essentially, we created a new industry. We learned how to partially process oil underground and significantly increased oil recovery,' Varfolomeyev said at a session on chemistry.
The research into underground refining is particularly important for the Republic of Tatarstan, where Kazan University is located, as half of the region's oil reserves consist of heavy crude, a highly viscous substance that cannot easily flow from production wells, Varfolomeyev noted.
Tatneft, a major oil and gas company headquartered in the republic, has helped put the concept into practice.
'Experiments in wells exceeded expectations several times over. We anticipated a 40-50% increase in oil production, but it reached 200%. This goes beyond import substitution, rather becoming a case of innovative import substitution, or leapfrogging industrial development,' Varfolomeyev said.
Import substitution is a term that refers to replacing foreign imports with domestically produced goods or equipment, something that Russia has made strides in since 2022, when Western-imposed sanctions severely limited the country's foreign trade.
Russia is going through 'hard times,' as it cannot freely buy technology and goods it needs, according to another participant at the forum, Presidential Aide for Science and Education Andrey Fursenko, who added that the country has the resources to overcome the issue.
The Russian Science Foundation, a state-funded organization that supports scientific research and innovation, has contributed to the funding of the research. Russia's largest integrated petrochemical company, Sibur, and Gazprom Neft, the oil subsidiary of energy giant Gazprom, have also come on board, Varfolomeyev said.
Russia is one of the world's top three crude producers, vying for the top spot with Saudi Arabia and the US, according to the International Energy Agency.
In January, the US imposed new sanctions against Russia's oil production and exports, aiming, among other things, to limit the provision of technical know-how and equipment to the country's oil industry.
The Future Technologies Forum is taking place in the Russian capital February 20-21.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Kiev sends the living to die, but won't accept its dead
It is sad, but peace remains elusive in the war between, on one side, Ukraine and – through Ukraine – the West and, on the other, Russia. Recently, the US has at least admitted that Moscow has plausible and important interests at stake and that the West has been using Ukraine to fight a proxy war against Russia. While very late and still incomplete, such truthfulness could help fashion the kind of realistic compromise needed to end this war. Yet Washington's European vassals have chosen this moment to discover their usually terminally atrophied capacity for talking back to the US: They clearly want the war to continue, even though that means Ukraine – about which they pretend to care – will lose even more people and territory. Against this backdrop, it was no wonder that the latest round of the renewed Istanbul talks between Russia and Ukraine produced no breakthrough, little progress, and only very modest concrete results. Also, on the eve of the talks, the Zelensky regime launched terror attacks on civilian trains in western Russia and a series of sneak drone strikes throughout the country that – in the most generous reading – involved the war crime of perfidy: That, obviously, did not help find a way forward either. Indeed, by now it is clear that Kiev's sneak drone attacks in particular have only further undermined the Zelensky regime's already fragile standing in Washington: US President Donald Trump has been explicit that he accepts Russia's right to massively retaliate, or, in the original Trumpese, 'bomb the hell' out of Ukraine. Luckily for Ukraine, Moscow is generally more restrained than America would be in a similar situation, and it should stay so. Yet the fact remains, Kiev's sneak drones have made no substantial military difference in its favor, but they have done significant political damage – to Kiev, that is. Regarding the Istanbul talks, it is likely that these assaults were meant to torpedo them. Yet Moscow did not fall for that rather transparent play. Its delegation turned up; so the Ukrainian one had to do the same. In addition, Russia ended this round of the negotiations with several good-will gestures, including an agreement to exchange POWs who are particularly young or in bad health and the offer to hand over the frozen (a common practice in war) bodies of 6,000 fallen Ukrainians. Both initiatives have run into trouble. To be precise, both are being impeded by the Ukrainian leadership. The POW swap has been delayed, and Ukrainian officials have failed to show up at the border to receive the first 1,212 of their deceased soldiers. Regarding both, Kiev has blamed Russia. Yet, remarkably, the Ukrainian statements, in reality, prove that it is indeed Kiev that is – at the very least – slowing these processes down. For what Ukrainian officials are really accusing Russia of is moving faster. The reasons for this obstructionism are unclear. The Ukrainian authorities have not shared them with the public. But there are some plausible guesses. One very likely reason why Kiev is reluctant to accept the 6,000 bodies of its own fallen soldiers is that the 'preponderant majority' of them, according to a Ukrainian member of parliament, were killed specifically during Ukraine's insane and predictably catastrophic incursion into Russia's Kursk region. Started on August 6 of last year, the operation was initially hyped by Ukrainian propagandists and their accomplices and useful idiots in the West. For the clear-eyed, it was obvious from the beginning that this was a mass kamikaze mission, wasting Ukrainian lives for no military or political advantage. Was the Zelensky regime trying to create a territorial 'bargaining chip'? Or once more 'shift the narrative,' as if wars are won by rewriting a movie script? Influence last year's US elections? Prepare for a possible victory by then presidential candidate Donald Trump? All of the above? We don't know. What we do know is that nothing Kiev may have fantasized about has worked. Indeed, by now the Kursk fiasco has only made Kiev's situation worse. Russia has retaken the territory in Kursk Region that Ukraine had seized and is advancing on the Ukrainian side of the border, taking settlements at an accelerating pace and getting close to the major regional city of Sumy. Clearly, those fallen during that particular suicide mission are evidence of Kiev's recklessness, hypocrisy, and incompetence. No wonder they seem to be less than welcome at home. A second reason for Kiev's reluctance may be even more sordid. There is speculation, for instance on social media, that it is financial. More importantly, a Russian diplomat, Sergei Ordzhonikidze, has made the same claim on the Telegram channel of the Izvestiia newspaper. For according to Ukrainian legislation, the families of the fallen soldiers are entitled to substantial compensation. Painful as it may be to acknowledge it, the Zelensky regime is not incapable of such a massive lack of piety. Whatever the precise reasons for Kiev's odd refusal to take back its prisoners and dead, they are certain to be base. This may jar with the West's well-organized and stubbornly delusional Zelensky fan club. But the best they could do for 'ordinary' Ukrainians is to put pressure on their worn-out idol to accept the prisoners and the fallen. And, of course to finally end the war.
Russia Today
20-05-2025
- Russia Today
Telegram's Durov says French spies pressed him on Eastern European geopolitics
Telegram founder Pavel Durov has revealed more details about an alleged attempt by France's foreign intelligence agency to pressure him into censoring conservative voices on his platform, dismissing their purported humanitarian concerns as a 'manipulation tactic.' On Sunday, Durov accused the head of the Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE), Nicolas Lerner, of asking him to take down Romanian Telegram channels ahead of the country's presidential runoff. The DGSE rejected the allegations of political interference, insisting that it had contacted Durov on multiple occasions only to 'firmly remind him of his company's responsibilities, and his own personally, in preventing terrorist and child pornography threats.' 'French foreign intelligence confirmed they met with me – allegedly to fight terrorism and child porn. In reality, child porn was never even mentioned. They did want IPs of terror suspects in France, but their main focus was always geopolitics: Romania, Moldova, Ukraine,' Durov said in a post on X on Monday. The Russian-born entrepreneur argued that Telegram has long combated child abuse through 'content fingerprint bans, dedicated moderation teams, NGO hotlines, and daily transparency reports on banned content.' 'Falsely implying Telegram did nothing to remove child porn is a manipulation tactic,' he added, insisting that Telegram's extensive moderation efforts have been 'verifiable' since at least 2018. Durov, whose company is headquartered in Dubai, was arrested in France last August and charged with complicity in crimes allegedly carried out by Telegram users, including extremism and child abuse. He was released on €5 million ($5.46 million) bail and dismissed the charges as baseless. He was eventually permitted to leave France in March after assuring the court that Telegram had increased cooperation with authorities worldwide. In September 2024, the encrypted messaging service updated its privacy policy to allow the collection of metadata – such as IP addresses, device information, and username changes – for up to one year. According to the policy, this data may be shared with 'relevant judicial authorities' if a user is suspected of engaging in illicit activity. Late last year, Telegram channels belonging to major Russian news outlets were rendered inaccessible across the EU. Durov criticized the move, claiming the bloc imposes more censorship and media restrictions than Russia. The latest controversy emerged as Romania held a runoff presidential election. The vote followed a Constitutional Court ruling that overturned the initial result after right-wing independent candidate Calin Georgescu unexpectedly won the first round. The case was cited by US Vice President J.D. Vance during a February speech in Munich as an example of EU governments undermining democratic norms.
Russia Today
20-05-2025
- Russia Today
Trump reveals difficult relationship with Zelensky
President Donald Trump has expressed hope that 'something is going to happen' following his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, although he said it remains unclear whether Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky is fully committed to ending the conflict with Moscow. Trump, who has repeatedly said he found it easier to deal with Moscow than Kiev while seeking to broker peace between the two countries, reiterated similar sentiment on Monday when asked if he believes Ukraine is 'doing enough' to end the hostilities. 'I'd rather tell you in about two weeks from now, because I can't say 'Yes' or 'No'… Look, Zelensky is a strong guy, and he's not the easiest person to deal with. But I think that he wants to stop… I hope the answer is that he wants to get it solved,' Trump told reporters at the White House, following separate conversations with Putin and Zelensky earlier in the day. Trump stated last week that 'nothing is going to happen until Putin and I get together,' as he urged Kiev to 'immediately' accept Moscow's proposal for direct negotiations. Asked whether he still felt that way following the Istanbul talks and his latest calls, Trump said he remains cautiously optimistic. 'I tell you, big egos involved, but I think something's going to happen. And if it doesn't, I just back away and they're going to have to keep going,' he said, while declining to explain what might cause him to abandon efforts to mediate the conflict. 'I would say I do have a certain line, but I don't want to say what that line is because I think it makes the negotiation even more difficult than it is,' he added. Trump said that his phone call with Putin 'went very well' and that 'progress is being made,' but offered few details of his follow-up call with Zelensky. The US president has long suggested that Kiev is harder to work with, recalling a heated Oval Office meeting in February where the Ukrainian delegation was told to leave prematurely and only return when Zelensky was 'ready for peace.' Zelensky said he spoke with Trump twice on Monday – before and after the US president's call with Putin – and warned him against any decisions on Ukraine being made without Kiev's participation. While insisting that Ukraine wants to 'stop the war,' Zelensky said Kiev would not agree to any Russian 'ultimatums' and again demanded nothing short of a 'full and unconditional ceasefire.' Putin, for his part, described the two-hour call with Trump as 'frank' and 'quite useful,' announcing that Moscow is ready to work with Kiev on a memorandum envisioning a future peace agreement. 'In general, Russia's position is clear. The main thing for us is to eliminate the root causes of this crisis,' Putin said.
