Arkansas attorney general rejects first ballot measure under new law
The League of Women Voters of Arkansas on Wednesday decried the attorney general's rejection of its proposed constitutional amendment under a new law that prohibits ballot titles from being written above an eighth-grade reading level.
This is the third time Attorney General Tim Griffin has rejected the nonpartisan organization's proposal to amend the state's initiative and referendum process and the first time he has rejected any proposed ballot measure under Act 602, which became law last month.
Sponsored by Rep. Ryan Rose, R-Van Buren, Act 602 prohibits the attorney general from certifying a proposed ballot title with a reading level above eighth grade as determined by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula. The test uses word complexity and sentence lengths to calculate what grade of education is needed to comprehend written material.
The law cannot be retroactively applied to proposals that were already certified for circulation before the act's effective date. The attorney general's office has already certified three other ballot title proposals that address education, government transparency and taxes on feminine hygiene products for the 2026 election cycle.
Because Act 602 had an emergency clause, it went into effect when the governor signed it into law on April 14. Legislation generally takes effect 90 days after the Legislature adjourns sine die. The 2025 legislative session officially concluded Monday.
The League of Women Voters of Arkansas expressed frustration with Griffin's decision in a statement issued Wednesday.
'Our ballot title has now been rejected three times, and each time we've addressed the Attorney General's concerns,' said Bonnie Miller, president of the League of Women Voters of Arkansas. 'This latest hurdle has nothing to do with accuracy or clarity. It is a technicality designed to keep citizens from having a say.'
The organization is preparing a revised version of its proposal and is exploring legal options to challenge Act 602, according to the statement.
'We're not going anywhere,' Miller said. 'We've seen this kind of pushback before, and we know what's at stake. We will keep working to protect the right of Arkansans to bring issues directly to the ballot.'
The League of Women Voters of Arkansas submitted its first proposal in March with the goal of strengthening direct democracy, according to a press release at that time. Direct democracy is the process by which Arkansans can propose new laws or constitutional amendments and place them on the ballot for a statewide vote. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allow citizen-led initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Let us know what you think...
If approved, the League of Women Voters of Arkansas' proposed constitutional amendment would prohibit the General Assembly from amending or repealing with a two-thirds majority vote a constitutional amendment approved by voters, which it currently has the authority to do.
The group's proposal would also prohibit Article 5, Section 1 — the section of the state constitution that permits citizen-led initiatives and referendums — from being amended by a ballot measure referred to voters by the General Assembly.
State lawmakers can refer up to three proposed constitutional amendments to voters each legislative session. This year legislators referred proposals concerning gun rights, economic development and affirming that only U.S. citizens can vote in Arkansas to the 2026 ballot.
Additional provisions of the LWVA's proposed constitutional amendment include requiring a separate vote for an emergency clause to occur at least 24 hours after the passage of a measure, and to allow for the substitution or rejection of ballot measure language by the attorney general to be immediately reviewable by the Arkansas Supreme Court.
In Monday's opinion, which was prepared by Senior Assistant Attorney General Kelly Summerside, Griffin said the League of Women Voters of Arkansas resolved issues identified with previous submissions, but he must reject their most recent submission because of Act 602. Griffin said the submitted ballot title 'ranks at grade level 12.2,' above the now required eighth-grade reading level, and therefore 'requires significant revisions' to comply with the new law.
'Any ballot title I could substitute would amount to a wholesale rewrite, but it is the sponsor's duty to craft a ballot title that complies with Act 602,' the opinion states. 'As a result, my statutory duty is to reject your popular name and ballot title because it does not comply with the requirements of Act 602 and instruct you to redesign the proposed ballot title in a manner that does not violate the requirements of the Act.'
The opinion noted additional problems with the proposal, including grammatical issues and challenges to the measure's popular name.
'After the Secretary of State assigns a popular name, certain parties 'may contest the popular name.' But your proposed measure does not provide any standards for the popular name or basis upon which it can be challenged,' Griffin wrote. 'Thus, the ballot title misleadingly presents the matter as if there is some basis upon which the popular name could be challenged, even though your proposed measure includes no such basis.'
In addition to its proposed constitutional amendment, the League of Women Voters of Arkansas is also addressing the state's initiative and referendum process through a lawsuit it filed last month that alleges eight new laws governing direct democracy are unconstitutional.
Act 602 is not part of the lawsuit, which challenges another law that would expand the attorney general's existing authority to reject a proposal if it conflicts with the U.S. Constitution or federal statutes. The suit also challenges laws that affect the petition-gathering process by requiring canvassers to file a 'true affidavit' with the secretary of state, to request a photo ID from signers and inform them that petition fraud is a criminal offense, among other things.
Following the 2023 legislative session, the League of Women Voters of Arkansas filed a lawsuit challenging a law that requires ballot initiative groups to gather signatures from 50 counties instead of 15. A final decision in the case is still pending.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
9 hours ago
- NBC News
Failed New Mexico candidate gets 80 years in prison for shootings at officials' homes
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A failed political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in Albuquerque in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials, including the current state House speaker. Prosecutors, who had sought a 90-year sentence, said Peña has shown no remorse and had hoped to cause political change by terrorizing people who held contrary views to him into being too afraid to take part in political life. Peña's lawyers had sought a five-year sentence, saying their client maintains that he is innocent of the charges. They have said Peña was not involved in the shootings and that prosecutors were relying on the testimony of two men who bear responsibility and accepted plea agreements in exchange for leniency. 'Today was a necessary step toward Mr. Peña's continued fight to prove his innocence,' said Nicholas Hart, one of Peña's attorneys. 'He looks forward to the opportunity to appeal, where serious issues about the propriety of this prosecution will be addressed.' The attacks took place as threats and acts of intimidation against election workers and public officials surged across the country after President Donald Trump and his allies called into question the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. Prosecutors said Peña resorted to violence in the belief that a 'rigged' election had robbed him of victory in his bid to serve in the state Legislature. The shootings targeted the homes of officials including two county commissioners after their certification of the 2022 election, in which Peña lost by nearly 50 percentage points. No one was injured, but in one case bullets passed through the bedroom of a state senator's 10-year-old daughter. Two other men who had acknowledged helping Peña with the attacks had previously pleaded guilty to federal charges and received yearslong prison sentences.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
CT Sen. Fazio officially enters race for governor in 2026 against Lamont, Stewart, others
State Sen. Ryan Fazio is no longer considering the idea but is instead heading full steam ahead into the 2026 race for governor. Unlike some other candidates who have launched exploratory campaigns, Fazio announced Wednesday that he is all-in for the governor's race. In a 90-second campaign commercial that outlined his views, Fazio pledged to reduce electric rates, his signature issue as the ranking Senate Republican on the legislature's energy committee. 'Connecticut was once an affordable place where families could build a future,' Fazio says in the online video that is available on YouTube. 'But after years of failed leadership in Hartford, it's where dreams get buried under sky-high electric bills and taxes.' Fazio said the state's economic issues are obvious as many families are struggling from paycheck to paycheck. 'We all see it. We all feel it,' Fazio says in the video. 'Families are hurting. There is something broken in our state Capitol. But it doesn't have to be this way. Connecticut is a great state with great people. It's time for leadership that lives up to both. I'm Ryan Fazio, and I'm running for governor because this state is my home, and I refuse to just sit back and watch the decline. I still believe that Connecticut's best days are ahead of us. Together, let's cut electric rates by 20% and eliminate the public benefits charge. Let's reduce income taxes by $1,500 for the average family and cap property taxes.' Fazio is the second Republican to launch an official campaign, following First Selectman Jennifer Tooker of Westport. New Britain mayor Erin Stewart has filed an exploratory campaign, which sets limits on the amount of money that can be raised to qualify for public campaign financing. The final amounts that candidates can receive in public dollars will be adjusted by inflation and will not be released until next year, but candidates predicted that the total for the general election campaign in November 2026 will be around $15 million. While many political insiders expect Gov. Ned Lamont to seek re-election, he has not yet made any official announcements. He is expected to face state Rep. Josh Elliott, a liberal Democrat who has filed a gubernatorial campaign committee. 'Look, he's a good guy,' Lamont told reporters recently of Fazio. 'I've gotten to know him along the way down there in Greenwich. He can do what he wants to do. I like working with him. … I worked with him on the energy bill, for example.' When asked by a television reporter if he would rather run against Fazio or Stewart, Lamont said, 'That's probably not a great issue for me to get into. Look, I think I saw Ryan is going to run as a fiscal conservative. He doesn't want to raise taxes. Keep the balanced budget. I think we've done a pretty good job of that over the last six years.' Despite an amiable relationship on a personal level in their hometown, Fazio's campaign video is not complimentary of Lamont. 'Under Ned Lamont and his radical legislature, electric rates and taxes have soared to the third-highest in the country,' Fazio narrates. 'They've undermined law enforcement and driven out jobs, opportunity, and hope.' On Wednesday, Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said, 'From cutting taxes for working families to championing free child care for families making less than $100,000, and getting our state budget and economy back on track, Governor Lamont is proud to put his record on affordability and opportunity up against anyone.' On the Republican side, Stewart has gained an early advantage by raising more than $300,000 in small contributions on her way toward qualifying for public financing against Lamont, a wealthy Greenwich entrepreneur who has spent millions to self-fund his statewide campaigns. Stewart has been campaigning for months in the race against Fazio, a fiscal conservative whose supporters say he will catch up in the fundraising battle. Another candidate in the race is perennial candidate Peter Lumaj of Fairfield, who ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2012, secretary of the state in 2014, and governor in 2018. A fiscal conservative who has been outspoken at the state Capitol on electricity and taxes, Fazio blames Democrats for the state's problems. 'Under years of one-party Democrat rule in Hartford, Connecticut has become simply unaffordable,' said Fazio. 'I believe our state deserves better than the third-highest taxes and electricity bills in the country and jobs and opportunity leaving our state.' Fazio, a Greenwich Republican who also represents parts of Stamford and New Canaan, won a hard-fought race in the 2024 cycle against Democrat Nick Simmons, a well-funded former Greenwich resident who moved to Stamford. Fazio reenergized Republicans statewide by winning his seat in a special election in 2021 after former Sen. L. Scott Frantz had lost the district in 2018 to Democrat Alex Bergstein, now known as Alex Kasser. Fazio then won a squeaker against Harvard graduate Trevor Crow in 2022 by a margin of only 89 votes after recounts in all three towns in the district. Fazio's supporters believe he can defeat Stewart in a primary, adding that the pair could be a strong ticket if Stewart runs for lieutenant governor as she did in 2018 after dropping out of the governor's race. She was defeated in a three-way race by state Sen. Joe Markley, a conservative Republican who later ran on the ticket with Madison business executive Bob Stefanowski in a losing effort against Lamont. As a fellow Greenwich resident, Lamont has worked together with Fazio on various issues, including the much-debated Senate Bill 4 that aimed to reduce the cost of electricity for consumers across the state. Without explicitly saying that both Lamont and Fazio live in wealthy Greenwich, Stewart said recently that her campaign contributors are trying to make ends meet in hardscrabble towns across the state. 'People are investing because they're looking for a leader that fundamentally understands their concerns and worries — someone who, like them, understands the financial difficulties of raising a family in Connecticut, someone who comes from a community like theirs,' Stewart said. Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Inside Newsom's ‘no regrets' strategy in fighting Trump, Texas
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is taking on what he calls a 'no regrets strategy,' saying he must 'fight fire with fire' in countering the President Trump-led redistricting efforts in Texas. In exclusive comments made to The Hill, Newsom said he is feeling 'very confident' about moving forward with his own redistricting plan, as the California Legislature returns to session next week. And while he acknowledged it's 'never a slam dunk,' he said he is optimistic about the signs of 'public unity' on the issue from Legislature leadership in his state. '[The] biggest risk is not taking one,' Newsom said to The Hill. 'Trump doesn't deserve the passivity, acquiescence. Democracy demands we at least try, eyes wide open, recognize the stakes.' 'I'm a longtime believer in independent redistricting, with receipts,' the governor said, acknowledging that 'these are not normal times.' 'As Lincoln said, 'The facts are new, we must think anew, we must act anew.'' Newsom sent a letter to Trump on Monday warning that if the president does not call off redistricting efforts in Texas, California would move forward with redistricting its own congressional lines to favor Democrats, nullifying any seats Republicans could gain. 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom wrote in the letter. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom added in the letter. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' When the California Legislature returns from summer recess next week, Newsom will need a supermajority in each chamber to move forward with a special election later this year. A redrawn congressional map for 2026, 2028 and 2030 would be on the ballot, after which California would return to its independent commission, Newsom told The Hill. In his comments to The Hill, Newsom said he was taking the action in order to stop Trump, saying he and his party shouldn't be 'bystanders watching our Democracy slip out from under our collective grasp.' 'We have agency and will ask voters to exercise it,' he said. The redistricting move is one in a string of resistance efforts he has led since Trump took office earlier this year, publicly contesting the administration while his name is bandied about as a leading contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028. Political observers say his next moves in the redistricting fight could be pivotal in steering his political future. 'If he counters the Texas power grab by nullifying or even perhaps exceeding the number of seats that they steal, he will be an instant national hero to Democrats, no doubt about it,' said longtime Democratic strategist Garry South, who is based in California and worked on Newsom's 2010 campaign for governor. 'Democrats nationally are desperately looking for someone to get in Trump's face and to take strong actions to counter his authoritarian moves, and this would be about as strong a countermove as any governor could take, and it would have instant national political implications.' 'Governors do a lot of things in their states that they brag about if they run for president. 'I started a program here. I signed a bill there.' But very few of those successes have had national political import, and this certainly would,' South added. An Emerson College poll out earlier this month showed Newsom in third place in the race for the Democratic nomination in 2028, with 10 percent of the vote. He trailed former Vice President Kamala Harris, who had 12 percent, and former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg, who led the field of would-be candidates with 17 percent. Newsom has distinguished himself as a competitive option in polls since Trump took office and even more so since June, when the governor publicly fought Trump over sending the National Guard into Los Angeles when protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement erupted across the city. But some operatives say Newsom can't push too hard or do too much. They say he has to walk a fine line between countering Trump and acting to advance his personal political aspirations. 'If this is seen as a 'Newsom special,' it fails,' said one California political operative who is close to the Newsom administration. 'If it's seen as good governance, it might win.' 'What's more likely to resonate with voters is Trump's awful track record with California and the threat of two more years of his unchecked clown show,' the operative added. Strategists have little doubt that with anti-Trump messaging, the redistricting ballot measure would pass with flying colors among California voters, especially those who turn out for special elections in the state. 'In an odd-year special election in California, the turnout is always more blue. It's older, it's better educated, it's better informed,' South said. 'This will simply be a vote to screw Trump and to some degree, Texas, the state that Californians love to hate.' 'You have a double whammy here. You have Trump, and you have Texas. Two T's, I guess you could call it,' South added. But political observers say th whether or not Newsom succeeds, the effort is still politically advantageous for him and Democrats more broadly. 'It's OK to put up a fight and lose, because people understand right now the system is not set up for the non-Trump party to win anywhere,' said Christina Bellantoni, the director of the University of Southern California Annenberg's Media Center. 'No Democrat that wants to be instrumental in nominating the next presidential nominee … wants somebody that's just gonna sit around.' 'They want a fighter,' Bellantoni added. 'Come on now. This is not about compromise or making deals. This is about putting up a fight. And putting up that fight, surely you might lose.' But in his comments to The Hill, Newsom said he is well aware of the stakes for democracy — and his political ambitions. Still, he added, 'If it fails, we did what we could.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
