Councillor suspended over code of conduct breach
A Highland councillor has been suspended for two months after breaching the councillors' code of conduct.
The Standards Commission found that Liberal Democrat Michael Baird was "disrespectful" towards the chair and committee of a local community group over plans to transform Carbisdale Castle near Ardgay.
Mr Baird, who represents the North, West and Central Sutherland ward, told the group he would not support future funding for the village hall unless members backed a land purchase.
He has accepted he breached the code and has apologised "unequivocally", accepting that his correspondence may have been interpreted as "discourteous".
Culrain Hall committee were approached by Forestry and Land Scotland on a land purchase by a local constituent, according to the Standards Commission.
It is understood that it related to the redevelopment of Carbisdale Castle, which is owned by barrister Samantha Kane.
Mr Baird became involved when he sent the committee's chairperson an email stating that he would not support future funding for their village hall if they refused to back the land purchase.
Ward councillors can advise council officers on how local budgets should be spent.
The Standards Commission, which oversees standards in public life, found the Sutherland councillor "effectively threatened to use his position and influence" to pressure the group.
The commission also said Mr Baird had made repeated calls to the committee chair and "several unannounced visits" to their home.
Responding to the result of the standards hearing, Mr Baird apologised and said it had been "a stressful time".
He said he was pleased the panel acknowledged that his email correspondence was "motivated by the good of the community, and the creation of jobs that the project at Carbisdale Castle will bring".
Mr Baird expressed his desire for members of the community to enjoy a "peaceful coexistence".
Samantha Kane said the purchase of land was necessary for the castle to remain an "iconic asset for Sutherland and the Highlands as a whole."
"While I admire Michael's passion, I wasn't aware that he had written a discourteous email; and I'm pleased that he apologised and that this is the extent of the finding," she added.
"I understand that he apologised sincerely, and I'm sure that it was a solitary incident that he will not repeat."
Additional reporting by Local Democracy Reporting Service reporter Will Angus
The Standards Committee Scotland
The Highland Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Tesla Stock Was Slumping Again Today
One Wall Street analyst downgraded Tesla stock today. CEO Elon Musk's feud with President Trump may hurt the EV company. Expectations for Tesla's upcoming robotaxi reveal event may be too high. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) stock had a rough week last week, dropping nearly 15%. Shares fell again today with its robotaxi launch in Austin, Texas, coming soon. While the company hasn't confirmed the specific June date for the launch, reports say it could be Thursday, June 12. One Wall Street analyst thinks investors are going to be disappointed by the much-hyped event. That helped push Tesla stock lower by as much as 4.5% early Monday. Shares had recovered from that drop and even turned slightly positive at 12:33 p.m. ET. Baird analyst Ben Karrow downgraded Tesla shares from a buy to a hold rating for reasons that include high expectations for the upcoming robotaxi launch as well as the very public feud CEO Elon Musk had with President Trump last week. Regarding the robotaxi introduction, Musk has said much of his company's value should be based on Tesla's self-driving technology. Investors anticipating that event have helped push Tesla stock higher by more than 12% in the past month, even including last week's decline. The Baird analyst thinks lofty expectations for the event are already built into Tesla's share price. He also cited uncertainty and potential blowback from the public spat between Musk and President Trump, reports Barron's. Tesla needs government support in the form of favorable autonomous driving regulations, among other matters, beyond any electric vehicle (EV) credits that have been used to help spur demand for its products. More news came from the EV leader this weekend, too. Milan Kovac, Tesla's executive in charge of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robotics segment, said on Friday that he is moving on from the company. He started at Tesla in 2016 and reported directly to Musk. Kovac expressed confidence in Tesla's future, and Musk thanked him for his "outstanding contributions." That just adds more uncertainty for investors, though, as Optimus is another key future catalyst for Tesla. For now, all eyes will be on the robotaxi news coming soon. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $367,516!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,712!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $669,517!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Howard Smith has positions in Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Tesla Stock Was Slumping Again Today was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Temporary congestion charge considered for city
Car drivers could be forced to pay a £5 temporary congestion charge to access a city centre. Oxfordshire County Council said it was considering setting up a two-year scheme in Oxford from the autumn. It said action was needed due to traffic issues caused by the long-term closure of Botley Road for works. However, Oxford City Council leader Susan Brown said the proposal would "allow people who can afford to do so to buy access to our streets". Paying the £5 charge, which would only apply to cars, would allow drivers to go through the six charge locations until the end of the day. Permits would be available for carers, traders, blue badge holders and those commuting to or living in a central area of the city. The county council said action was needed because of delays to a planned trial of traffic filters, which cannot be introduced until Botley Road is reopened. The route is currently shut because of overrunning works at Oxford Station and the railway bridge, which are now not due to finish until August next year. The charging points for the congestion zone would be in the same places as the planned traffic filters: Hythe Bridge Street St Cross Road St Clement's Street Thames Street Marston Ferry Road Hollow Way Andrew Gant, in charge of transport for the Liberal Democrat-run county council, said: "We urgently need to see improvements to travel around the city, better bus services and less traffic overall, to help people get around. "We must take action for our residents, businesses and visitors while Botley Road remains closed." However, Oxford City Council said there has been no previous consultation on the plan. Labour leader Susan Brown said: "Yet again the city is being done to rather than engaged with in preparing transport proposals. "We need a full review of transport policies with a view to tackling congestion in our city. This is something a Greater Oxford Council would do." Campaign group Cyclox welcomed the proposals, saying Oxford's congestion had "reached crisis point". "We can't leave things as they are; if nothing is done the city will grind to a halt under the weight of car traffic," it said. "We cannot build more roads to magic congestion away." Previously Oxford Bus Group warned that congestion was at "emergency levels". The proposals will be discussed by the council's cabinet on 17 June and, if approved, a six-week public consultation would start later this month. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. City traffic filters postponed by Botley Road delay Call for city's traffic filter plans to be scrapped Council urged for 'Plan B' to tackle congestion Oxfordshire County Council
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Tesla hit with a pair of downgrades amid fallout from Trump feud
Tesla Inc. was hit with a pair of downgrades on Monday, underscoring mounting concerns on Wall Street about the electric-vehicle maker's outlook following last week's clash between Chief Executive Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Both Argus Research and Baird cut the stock to the equivalent of hold ratings, cementing Tesla's reputation as the least-loved megacap stock among analysts. Shares fell 1.6% in premarket trading. The downgrades mark the latest hurdle for Tesla, shares of which are down about 27% in 2025, making it the weakest performer of the so-called Magnificent Seven stocks. Tesla shares had rallied in the wake of Trump's reelection, which Musk vigorously supported, but are down almost 40% off their peak in December. Much of the stock's recent decline came after the high-profile blowup between Musk and Trump last week. While Musk subsequently suggested he was open to making amends, the tensions are seen as a significant headwind overhanging the shares. 'Looking ahead, we are concerned that the war of words between President Trump and Elon Musk, along with expiration of EV credits, could further weaken demand for new Teslas,' wrote analysts at Argus Research, who downgraded the stock to hold from buy. The feud, they added, is emblematic of how the stock 'appears to be currently trading on non-fundamentals events.' This view was echoed by Baird, which cut the stock to neutral from outperform. 'The recent incident between Musk and President Trump exemplifies key-person risk associated with Musk's political activities,' analyst Ben Kallo wrote. 'While we have no indication of how the relationship may change or what either will do, we see the situation as adding uncertainty to TSLA's outlook. Additionally, we believe this may heighten questions regarding brand damage, which we expect will persist until sustained evidence of volume growth avails itself.' Musk's comments about Tesla's robotaxi program 'are a bit too optimistic, and we believe this excitement has been priced into shares,' Baird said. The service, which focuses on driverless vehicles and artificial intelligence, is scheduled to launch in Austin this week. The two downgrades underline how Tesla is the megacap viewed most skeptically by Wall Street. Fewer than half of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the shares, by far the weakest such ratio among the market's biggest companies. To be sure, the stock still has 30 buy ratings, compared with 18 hold ratings and 13 analysts who recommend selling. Tesla trades basically in line with the average price target for the stock, suggesting analysts aren't looking for a rebound in shares. Vlastelica writes for Bloomberg.
