French Open 2025: First round draw, how to watch on TV, prize money
Emma Raducanu could face four-time French Open champion Iga Swiatek in the second round after the draw was made for the clay-court grand slam.
The British No 2, who is enjoying her best run of results on clay, will face China's Wang Xinyu before a possible clash with Swiatek, who needs to come through Slovakia's Rebecca Šramková in the opening round.
Elsewhere for the Brits in women's draw, Katie Boulter will start against a qualifier, Sonay Kartal takes on Erika Andreeva and Jodie Burrage faces Danielle Collins of the United States.
In the men's draw, Jack Draper was drawn in the same quarter as top seed and Jannik Sinner but faces a tricky path to reach the world No 1 with the likes of Gael Monfils, Joao Fonseca and Alex de Minaur standing in his way.
Cameron Norrie gets the daunting task of facing Daniil Medvedev while Jacob Fearnley takes on 2015 champion Stan Wawrinka.
The tournament starts on Sunday and concludes with the men's final on June 8.
The women's final will be played on June 7 and the men's final takes place on the following day.
You can buy tickets for the French Open here.
TNT Sports replaces Eurosport as the broadcaster for the French Open.
There will be comprehensive multi-platform live coverage with every match available to stream live on discovery+. Fans will have the option to watch every court, plus live timeline markers will enable a seamless transition between key moments to re-live the action.
A star-studded lineup of match and studio analysts has been assembled, including: Mats Wilander, Alex Corretja, Tim Henman, Boris Becker, John McEnroe, Jim Courier, Chris Evert and Caroline Wozniacki.
Laura Robson and Craig Doyle will present from an on-site studio across the two-week tournament.
In the United States, the French Open will also be shown on TNT Sports.
The likes of Venus Williams, Andre Agassi, Lindsay Davenport, Sloane Stephens, Chris Eubanks and Darren Cahill will provide analysis for US viewers.
The total prize money for this year's tournament comes to £47.4 million, up 5.21 per cent on last year.
Seven British players have direct entry into the main draw: Jack Draper, Katie Boulter, Emma Raducanu, Sonay Kartal, Jacob Fearnley, Jodie Burrage and Cameron Norrie.
Francesca Jones is one qualifying wins away from reaching the main draw.
Billy Harris, Jan Choinski, Harriet Dart and Heather Watson lost in the first round of qualifying while Dan Evans lost in the second round.
Carlos Alcaraz claimed his 3rd major title when he stormed back from two sets to one down to beat Alexander Zverev in five sets.
Iga Swiatek claimed her fourth French Open title when she overcame Jasmine Paolini in straight sets, dropping just three games.
The men play for the Coupe des Mousquetaires (Musketeers' Cup), named in honour of the four Musketeers of French tennis: Jean Borotra, Jacques Brugnon, Henri Cochet and René Lacoste.
The women play for the Suzanne-Lenglen Cup, named after the woman who won the title six times.
To win the men's title
Carlos Alcaraz 6/4
Jannik Sinner 2/1
Alexander Zverev 14/1
Novak Djokovic 16/1
To win the women's title
Aryna Sabalenka 5/2
Iga Swiatek 11/4
Coco Gauff 7/1
Mirra Andreeva 8/1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bath's second-half revival carries them past Bristol and into Premiership final
Bath's oval-ball custodians have spent years trying – and failing – to construct a team to match the striking nature of their home city. Now, finally, they are within 80 minutes of claiming their first domestic league title since 1995-96 after a storming second-half revival put paid to a gallant Bristol side who had led by seven points at half-time. If the outcome was still theoretically up in the air at the interval there was not a shred of doubt by the hour mark, Bath launching a blistering fusillade that yielded four converted tries without reply and underlined their status as short-priced favourites to lift the Premiership trophy at Twickenham next Saturday. 'This team is tough to beat,' said their head coach, Johann van Graan. 'Bristol asked some questions but effort-wise I couldn't be prouder. That is what it takes to get to Twickenham.' Advertisement Related: Bath 34-20 Bristol: Premiership rugby union semi-final – as it happened The final margin was slightly harsh on a Bears team who played a full part in a stonking contest that, once again, ticked pretty much every box from an entertainment perspective. Bristol were thrilling to watch in the first half but never quite managed to build the kind of scoreboard pressure that might have caused a famous upset, eventually disappearing beneath a quartet of third-quarter tries from Ted Hill, Joe Cokanasiga, Will Muir and Max Ojomoh, all converted by a nerveless Finn Russell. The British & Irish Lion did limp off towards the end but Bath's management insisted he was primarily suffering from cramp. Van Graan, though, was more direct regarding some of the pre-match remarks made by Bristol's director of rugby, Pat Lam, who referenced Bath's more expensively assembled squad and advised his wife not to attend because of the probability of her being soaked if she sat out in the famously exposed – not to mention pricey – open stand at the Rec. 'Our team certainly did their talking on the pitch,' retorted Van Graan. 'We certainly got a lot of motivation from Bristol. It was brilliant all the commentary we got from the opposition. We didn't say a word and the scoreboard speaks for itself.' It was always destined to be a passion filled evening on the banks of the River Avon and a fast and furious game matched the febrile atmosphere. Bristol had won 11 of the previous 14 matches between the clubs and it was the Bears who attacked with most relish in perfect dry conditions. Fly-half AJ McGinty slotted the game's first points after Guy Pepper was slightly too enthusiastic at the breakdown and a shaken Bath found themselves 10 points down when a spectacular long-range counterattack launched by Kalaveti Ravouvou and some deft forward interplay ended with the second-row James Dun galloping over by the posts. Advertisement Dun's father, Andy, was once a Bristol stalwart and the whole crackling occasion felt deeply personal, with more than simple bragging rights at stake. It was definitely not helpful to the Bears' cause, then, when Ravouvou was shown a yellow card for trying to stop Bath taking a quick tap and cost his side a further three points in the process. Even with 14 men, though, Bristol kept on coming. Bath's defence were pulled this way and that, the point of attack constantly shifting. Only a desperate rearguard action prevented the Bears from scoring another belting multi-phase try and a botched lineout drill five metres out then allowed Bath to escape again. When Bristol do flick the turbo switch they look irresistible but games of top-level rugby are not definitively settled inside the first 40 minutes, particularly at this venue. Bath's strength in depth has frequently been their trump card this season so it was doubly worrying for the Bears when the effervescent Harry Randall was led away with a damaged shoulder and replaced by Kieran Marmion. A penalty just before the interval from MacGinty, though, extended Bristol's advantage to 13-6 and caused a slight hush to fall around the ground. Losing in the final is one thing but going down at home to Bristol in a massive semi-final? The onus was on Bath's familiar match winners to come up with the antidote to the onrushing grizzly Bears for whom Viliame Mata, Steven Luatua and Benhard Janse van Rensburg were all exerting their usual influence. Advertisement And, sure enough, in the first 19 minutes after the restart four servings of much-needed relief duly materialised. First the visitors messed up the restart, conceded a soft penalty and gave Bath the platform from which to launch a purposeful attack which ended with Hill scoring in the left corner. Russell's wide-angled conversion was a further bonus and there was even better to come, a horrible bounce eluding Ravouvou and allowing Cokanasiga to strike. Now the tide was turning and some tight refereeing calls were also going Bath's way. A pass by Noah Heward was adjudged fractionally forward and, once again, the home side were instantly energised. Muir crashed over in the left corner to extend the lead further and, within five minutes with Bristol again down to 14 players, Ojomoh inflicted further hefty damage. Even when sorely tested this stacked Bath squad, having already topped the regular season table by 11 points, tend to come up with a resounding answer.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Are you not entertained? Thrilling club finales show tribal rugby at its best
The final week of every domestic season is always an indicator of rugby's underlying health. Are supporters crawling over their grandmothers in their haste to buy a finals ticket? Is the entertainment value of the product trending upwards year on year? And are there collective signs of rising positivity among players, tournament organisers and fans alike? These are especially relevant questions right now amid all the exciting/delusional (take your pick) chatter about a possible breakaway global franchise league. And before we contemplate this year's answers let's hope those looking to flog the concept of a Formula One-style circus featuring the world's top players were watching last Friday night's game in Bath. Advertisement Related: Rugby's breakaway R360 league labelled 'delusional' by leading TV sport executive Because it could be that club rugby, too often dismissed in certain circles as tired old hat, has never enjoyed a more vibrant, upbeat few weeks out on the field. The first half between Bath and Bristol Bears was as thrillingly watchable and intense as the Premiership has ever been. The pace and ambition, the handling and defensive desire … all of it was spectacular with the atmosphere similarly super-charged. Driving home – and leaving aside the losing side's' natural disappointment – it was hard not to think 'what more could anyone want'? A brilliant spectacle, a riot of passion and colour, an outstanding advert for the sport. Along with the French Open tennis men's final it refreshed parts not all sports are able to reach. And then the following day, albeit in a contrasting way, there was more to relish. Rugby is not solely about fleet-footed wingers pulling rabbits from a hat but Adam Radwan's airborne second try was absolutely out of the top drawer. These were club fixtures masquerading as something else, as the Tigers' head coach Michael Cheika duly confirmed on Monday. 'As competitions get towards the end of the season the big games look like Test matches. The physicality, the speed … if you look at the data they start to look similar. Test matches are a unique entity but this competition prepares players equally as well as any other. There's no doubt about that.' Advertisement Which is interesting, coming from someone who has coached all over the world. Above all, though, the outcome seriously mattered. The best sport is not about artifice or glossy marketing: it is wincingly authentic and, ideally, tribal. Bath have not won a domestic league title for 29 years and now stand 80 minutes away from breaking that drought. You could absolutely feel that pent-up desire at the Rec on Friday evening. No wonder this Saturday's Twickenham final sold out weeks ago. All this on the back of Northampton's remarkable Champions Cup semi-final win over Leinster in Dublin last month, another occasion that ranked up there with the greatest away wins the competition has ever witnessed. The final in Cardiff between the Saints and Bordeaux-Bègles was another exhilarating cracker. Ambassador, you really are spoiling us. The situation in the United Rugby Championship, admittedly, is more complex, with only a strictly limited period available in which to sell the final between Leinster and the Bulls in Croke Park. The organisers will be happy if the attendance creeps up to the 50,000 mark; being able to pre-sell tickets to a final at a venue confirmed well in advance would clearly help. But overall this season the URC expects to announce another overall attendance record and in the Premiership average attendances are up 10% this year with a million new fans attracted to games. While none of this can airbrush away all the sport's wider issues around financial instability and player welfare concerns, it should not be entirely dismissed either. If rugby is appealing to newbies and simultaneously delighting its existing followers, it must be doing something right. Advertisement So the first couple of questions posed in the opening paragraph can pretty much be ticked off. The third step to heaven now involves sustaining that momentum into this weekend and learning lessons from last year. Then, as now, Bath were involved in the Premiership final and were looking good in the first-half against Northampton until Beno Obano was sent off for a marginally high tackle on Juarno Augustus. In that split second the mood of the whole occasion completely changed. A year on, the game is still trying to balance on the same precarious high wire, caught between a well-intentioned desire to make the game safer and wanting to protect its physical appeal. History may well conclude that these twin aims have long since been incompatible, with the science suggesting repeated small blows to the brain over a long period can ultimately be worse than one or two clear-cut knock outs. Perhaps the biggest passion killer on high-profile days, accordingly, is the sight of referees staring endlessly at big screens, trying to make definitive calls based on selective slowed-down replays or the opinions of a bossy television match official in a booth somewhere. Even then the truth is frequently elusive. In the recent Challenge Cup final, Sam Underhill was shown just a yellow card for his head-on-head tackle on Davit Niniashvili; subsequently the England flanker was banned for four weeks and misses this weekend's Twickenham finale. Go figure. Such maddening inconsistency continues to do rugby a disservice at precisely the moment the players are ramping things up. Imagine an oval-ball world where the skill, speed, commitment and collective enjoyment on display in Bath last Friday was the consistent takeaway. Hopefully this weekend will be similarly uplifting and restore a little more faith in the battered old game. Opt, instead, for the empty-headed, soulless R360 proposal and rugby union will reap what it sows. One to watch Leicester's return to Twickenham for the Premiership final offers a fitting stage for Ben Youngs and Dan Cole to bid farewell on their last appearances for the Tigers before their top-level retirement. With Michael Cheika, Handré Pollard and the popular Puma hooker Julián Montoya, among others, also about to depart the club, there will no shortage of emotional energy for the Tigers to feed off. Should they win on Saturday there will certainly be requests for a repeat performance from Montoya's father, who marked his first visit to Welford Road with an impromptu celebratory dance in the stands after last Saturday's semi-final. An Argentinian version of Tiger Feet – the Tiger Tango? – may be called for if Bath are unexpectedly beaten. French test Talking about brilliant viewing, did you see the sensational try that helped to propel Montauban back into the Top 14, at Grenoble's expense, for the first time in 15 years? If you live in the UK there is now more chance you will have done so: the play-off games in the French Pro D2 have been available for free on the FR-UK Rugby channel on YouTube, the rights having been secured by the podcaster and broadcaster Tim Cocker with the former England flanker Joe Worsley – now coaching at Brive – as a co-commentator. It is a smart move, with the French second tier increasingly supplying both excellent rugby and intriguing storylines. Can Grenoble now win the Top 14/Pro D2 Access match against Perpignan – who beat Toulouse in their final game of the regular season – this Saturday and join Montauban in the top flight? What a compelling prospect it is – and, hopefully, one which will remind England's rugby authorities about the value of end-of-season promotion/relegation jeopardy. Memory lane In September 1998, Australia faced Fiji in Sydney in, of all things, a RWC qualification match. The Wallabies, captained by John Eales who went on to lift the trophy again the following year, ran out 66-20 victors at Parramatta Stadium, in the only Test played between the two sides between 1985 and 2007. Lock-forward Eales kicked nine conversions and a penalty for 21 of Australia's points. Still want more? Is the R360 breakaway league the cure to rugby union's ills, wonders Andy Bull. And check out our weekly email of editors' picks, The Recap. Sign up here to receive it every Sunday morning.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner's French Open final said about five-set tennis
Case closed. The end of the argument. Best-of-five-set-tennis haters in shambles. Whether tennis should eliminate its longest format is an ongoing discussion, but for its advocates, Sunday's instant classic French Open final between Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz was the ultimate endorsement. Advertisement Five and a half hours of undulating tension and elite-level competition, given deeper meaning by how its length raised the significance of the match's decisive moments. The format allowed the match to take on an epic quality, elevating Sinner and Alcaraz's rivalry, previously incipient to the wider world outside of tennis, into something transcendental. The Wimbledon finals between Björn Borg and John McEnroe in 1980, and then Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal in 2008, had the same effect. The highs of matches like Sunday's is a compelling, possibly inarguable, case for the upsides of the format outweighing the downsides, but for dedicated tennis followers, the downsides are harder to ignore. But for regular watchers of the sport, there most certainly are downsides. Five-set matches like the Sinner-Alcaraz classic are rare. While their computer-game fast, extremely physical and incredibly powerful tennis is awe-inspiring, it's more often the case that even matches between two of the world's best players have sags and dips. Alcaraz and Sinner met in last year's French Open semifinal in another five-set match. That one was scratchy and strange. They rarely played well at the same time, and with both of them having physical issues toward the end, there was a lot of energy conservation at the end of sets. A more typical five-set Grand Slam match would be something like Tommy Paul vs. Karen Khachanov, from this year's fourth round. Two well-matched players — the No. 12 seed and the No. 24 seed — swapping sets for four hours, seven minutes. On Sunday, no one wanted Sinner vs. Alcaraz to end. More often, five-set matches ebb unsatisfyingly before eventually reaching the end. Advertisement Tennis was not designed to take anywhere near this long. It was conceived of as a sport where even five-set matches would take a maximum two hours. The first Wimbledon final that went to five sets, in 1887 between Herbert Lawford and Ernest Renshaw, lasted 120 minutes. More than 50 years later, the 1949 final between Ted Schroeder and Jaroslav Drobný lasted 100 minutes. That's only 15 minutes longer than just the second set of the 2023 final between Alcaraz and Novak Djokovic. A glance at five-set Wimbledon finals from the first half of the 20th century shows matches between 95 and 135 minutes. Match lengths have steadily increased since, and the rate of rise has steepened since the turn of this century. As of June 2023, they had become 25 percent longer on average since 1999. Three-hour matches, previously the marker of something epic, had become close to the average. This is due to a complex combination of surface and equipment changes, advances in fitness and changes in dominant gamestyles, but the net result is more long matches, more often. The increased length and physicality has a knock-on effect through tournaments. Players that come through a five-setter at a Grand Slam may be wiped out for their next match, or by the start of the second week, if they've had a few long ones. At the Australian Open in January, a number of fourth-round matches included either blowouts or mid-match retirements from players who had burned themselves out physically in the first week. Jack Draper withdrew at the end of the second set against Alcaraz having played five-setters in all three of his previous matches. With Grand Slams drawn such that high-seeded players like Draper are drawn to face weaker opponents early on, there are some who like this karmic aspect of the best-of-five format: mess around against an overmatched opponent and pay for it down the line. But density and depth of quality on the ATP Tour has grown in line with match lengths to the point that sometimes, players just get dragged into a war of attrition that leaves one player losing and the other scoring a pyrrhic victory. Advertisement The longer format also drastically reduces the number of viable champions. Very few players can consistently withstand the demands of best-of-five tennis against the best in the world; upsets are less likely because the better player has more time to work things out. All of which raises questions about who the formats are there to serve. For fans, the tension is between how much intrigue is generated by the best matches and how dull the worst can be. Matches like Sinner vs. Alcaraz catapult tennis into the wider sporting consciousness; when a less interesting match is tied at one-set all after two hours, its conclusion can feel so far away that changing channel is an entirely reasonable response. Then there's the question of the players, who generally like best of five because it's seen as the ultimate test and one that will typically lead to the best player winning. It's a lot harder to sneak a best-of-five win than a best-of-three one. One would be for the Grand Slams to have a hybrid system: best of three for the first three or four rounds; best of five for the last three or four rounds. The biggest matches could go long, but without so much accumulated fatigue from earlier in the tournament, and the early-round grinds would be eliminated. The switch from shorter to longer matches mid-tournament could be problematic for the players physically, but they already make have to make that adjustment for majors, with all other tour events played to three sets. Advertisement This hybrid format could also be used in the women's events, creating equality and taking away situations like at the French Open, where men are given the prime scheduling slots because, according to tournament organizers, they are longer and therefore offer fans better value for money. WTA players are generally not enthused by the idea of playing five sets, however. There is precedent — between 1984 and 1998, the final of the year-ending WTA Finals was best of five. All of this remains theoretical, because the slams have never shown any inclination to tweak the best-of-five format. They post record attendances and revenues, and longer matches generally means people in the grounds for longer with more scope to spend more of their money. And while the Sinner vs. Alcaraz final is proof of the majesty of tennis' most gladiatorial format, it's important to remember that matches of that level are the exception rather than the norm. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Sports Business, Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company
