Eby ends Downtown Eastside consultancy contract that came under fire
British Columbia Premier David Eby has terminated a consultancy contract to improve conditions in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside that came under fire from critics, who called it a political favour that lacked transparency.
Eby's office said in a statement on Tuesday that the debate about Michael Bryant's contract had become a distraction from work to improve the neighbourhood.
It said the contract with the consulting company owned by Bryant – a former CEO of Legal Aid BC and Ontario attorney general – ended on Sunday, and Eby later clarified that it was his decision.
"We have a shared dedication towards improving conditions in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, and thank him for his work to this point," the statement said.
"However, debate and discussion around this time-limited contract is distracting from the important work underway."
The statement said the government remained committed to making life better for people who live in the area.
In a news briefing in Vancouver, Eby said Bryant would receive no severance, and he had been paid up to Sunday, an amount in the neighbourhood of $75,000.
Asked why an outside consultant was needed, Eby said that Bryant checked many boxes.
"I wanted someone to come in with fresh eyes, to have a look at the thing with no connections to the neighbourhood, but who had an empathy and understanding for the challenges of addiction, an understanding of the law, and an understanding of the realities of politics," he said of Bryant, who has written of his past struggle with alcoholism.
Eby said he did not know the circumstances behind Bryant's exit from his role at Legal Aid BC, which the Opposition BC Conservatives have said "ended abruptly" last year.
Eby said his relationship with Bryant began in his Legal Aid BC role, when Eby was attorney general.
Pressed whether Bryant was fired from Legal Aid BC or left of his own accord, Eby said the questioning "illustrates exactly" why the government had to terminate the contract.
"Because it became about Michael Bryant, and apparently about Legal Aid BC, when it needs to be about the Downtown Eastside ... that's why we terminated the contract."
The Conservatives have attacked Bryant's contract, saying no reporting benchmarks have been disclosed or met.
The contract instructing Bryant to develop a 'framework' for co-ordinating services in the neighbourhood was worth up to $325,000, including $25,000 in expenses.
Opposition Leader John Rustad said the government had hired Bryant without announcing the contract first, then got rid of him after being caught "red-handed."
Rustad said the situation showed the "arrogance of David Eby, thinking that he could just hire anybody he wants, friends, relatives, and get away with it."
Rustad said the hiring and firing of Bryant showed a "pattern of disrespect" to the public from a government acting without transparency.
Rustad said Bryant would not have made any "difference one way or another" to the problems of the Downtown Eastside.
Malcolmson has blamed a 'communication problem' between her ministry and the Premier's Office for not having announced Bryant's appointment earlier.
Eby acknowledged that "there was definitely an issue in our communication shop" in informing the public about Bryant's appointment.
"I agree it would have been a lot better had the information bulletin been released as planned, and it wasn't," Eby said. "That was a serious mistake, and unfortunately, it ended up where we are today."
But Eby disagreed with suggestions that Bryant was working without the public's knowledge. "He was operating quite openly," he said.
Opposition MLA Trevor Halford said last week of Bryant's contract that there were "no public deliverables, no transparency, and no justification for why this appointment wasn't disclosed.'
The contract with Bryant's company, the Humilitas Group, is dated Feb. 12. It says the company is to engage with government and non-government sectors to align Downtown Eastside services with provincial policy objectives.
It also says the company is to support the development and implementation of "operational frameworks to address systemic challenges in the DTES."
The contract says the government wishes for a framework to support improvements for the people, public spaces, infrastructure, health care and housing of the DTES.
However, it says, "the parties acknowledge that the contractor does not warrant that these outcomes will be achieved."
When asked what Bryant had delivered, Eby said Bryant's work included multiple meetings with people living on the Downtown Eastside, leaders of non-profit organizations and municipal politicians.
Eby added that Bryant had also met with him, as well as Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction Sheila Malcolmson, to discuss his initial findings and recommendations, "that we will look at developing in the future."
He said he thought that Bryant was going to provide the government with "some very helpful work," adding that his briefings have provided a "foundation" for the government to move forward.
Bryant was involved in the 2009 death of a cyclist in Toronto. Charges against Bryant were withdrawn.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 20, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Canada's Conservatives still aren't serious about housing
He was so close to getting it. Jacob Mantle, the newly-elected thirty-something Conservative MP for York-Durham, rose in the House of Commons on Tuesday to make a point about housing costs. 'Oxford Economics reports that Toronto's housing market ranks among the worst in the world for affordability. At the same time, mortgage delinquency rates in Toronto are higher than at any time during the pandemic. The financial burden is suffocating the next generation of homebuyers.' But Mantle wasn't actually interested in proposing solutions to that problem. Instead, he wanted to whine about the fact that the Carney government isn't going to table a budget until the fall, which the government has defended on the basis that it will be better able to account for the fallout from Donald Trump's tariffs by then. And despite his supposed concern over housing, Mantle was dismissive of the government's plan to embrace and scale up modular housing in Canada. 'My generation refuses to live in a shipping container,' Mantle said. For what it's worth, I suspect many members of his generation (and mine) would be happy to live in the sort of modified shipping containers that are being designed and built right now, including the ones in his own city. But modular housing is so much more than just the use and conversion of shipping containers. It's an entirely new approach to homebuilding, one that uses factories and their inherent economies of scale to drive down costs. They can be one or two-storey, single or multi-family, and configured in any number of layouts and sizes. In an environment where driving down construction costs is a nearly existential issue for Mantle's generation, you'd think he would be more open to new ideas and economic innovation — especially when it promises to use more Canadian materials and labour. Then again, if you've been paying close attention to the Conservative Party of Canada's approach to this issue, his behaviour was entirely predictable. Under Pierre Poilievre's leadership, the party and its MPs have repeatedly highlighted the very real problem of rising housing costs in Canada and the disproportionate impacts they have on younger people. But when it comes to actual solutions to that problem — ones, at least, that don't involve cutting taxes or regulations and assuming the market will magically solve the problem it has helped create — those same Conservatives either disappear into the metaphorical bushes or come out on the other side of the issue. In Calgary, for example, opposition to a city-wide measure to increase affordability and density while reducing sprawl came mostly from Conservative-leaning councilors like Dan McLean, Peter Demong and Sean Chu, with some conspicuous cheerleading work coming from federal Conservative MP Greg McLean. In British Columbia, provincial Conservative party leader John Rustad decided to go to bat for the very 'gatekeepers' standing in the way of new housing that Poilievre had repeatedly promised he would eliminate. Even in Ontario, where Conservative politicians have been more visibly and vocally on-side with pro-supply measures, the results of the Ford government's efforts have been underwhelming, to say the least. We are not in a moment where we can afford to reflexively turn our noses up at potential solutions. And yet, Conservative politicians like Mantle seem determined to find fault in every proposed approach that doesn't flatter their own pre-existing ideological and political biases towards cutting taxes and reducing government involvement. Modular housing will not be, in and of itself, the solution to a problem that has been building for more than two decades. But that's only because nothing on its own will, or could, be the solution. The Carney government has embraced modular housing as a way to lower costs and improve affordability in Canada's housing market. Canada's Conservatives, on the other hand, seem determined to miss the mass timber for the trees. Instead, we need every possible lever being pulled right now, from regulatory reform and improved operating efficiencies to direct government involvement, procurement, and even development. Mantle is right that the status quo has failed his generation. But he's wrong to indignantly oppose a good-faith effort at challenging and changing it, and all the more so as he pretends to speak on behalf of an entire generation. We can only hope that his party and its online proxies don't decide to turn modular housing into this year's iteration of the 15-minute city and throw a self-evidently good and decent idea into the stew of online conspiracies it always seems to have at low boil. Yes, that might feed the eternally hungry appetites of their increasingly online political base. But it won't do anything to address the problem Conservatives like Mantle claim to care about. At some point, Canadians may conclude that they're not actually all that interested in solving it.
CBC
12 hours ago
- CBC
Is Ford's government conservative enough? One group says no
Doug Ford is facing a fresh call from within his party to be more fiscally conservative. As CBC's Mike Crawley explains, this comes from an anonymous group describing itself as a grassroots movement of conservatives who want change in the province.
Globe and Mail
14 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Post-Mulroney, the Conservatives' brand is ‘loser.' It's time for an overhaul
How have Conservatives fared since making the big swerve rightward in the early 1990s? We recall that under Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservative banner they won majority governments in 1984 and 1988. Then along came the dividers, the ideologues of the Reform Party, who grabbed 52 seats in the 1993 election and then proceeded to swallow the old Tories whole. And the rest is history – a primarily painful party history. Since the late Mr. Mulroney's departure from the party leadership in 1993, the Liberals have won eight elections to the Conservatives' three. The question now is whether the party will continue on its Liberal gift-giving track or clue in and opt, like the Liberal Party has just done, for a change of course: in the Conservatives' case, a change that broadens their identity beyond their Prairies-driven populist brand. Lawrence Martin: Why the Conservatives should dump Poilievre – but won't To be sure, the Conservatives' tradition is to lose most of the time. But in being bracketed further on the right in recent decades, they've lost even more of the time. If we count the four years (or so) to come under Mark Carney, the Liberals will have been in power for 27 years since 1993. The Conservatives? Nine. Their three victories came under Stephen Harper, who also lost two elections. Whether the wins were on account of ideology is doubtful. Two of the three wins came against Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff, arguably two of the weakest leaders in Liberal Party history. As for the Conservatives' defeats, three came courtesy of Jean Chrétien, one from Paul Martin, three from Justin Trudeau and one so far from Mr. Carney. In the meantime, a more moderate form of conservatism, as practiced by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, has resulted in three straight majority victories in the province. On that more centrist side is where the federal party has been most successful, as exemplified by multiple election winners John A. Macdonald, John Diefenbaker and Mr. Mulroney. More bad news for the Conservative Party in its current form is the advantage the collapsed NDP gives the Liberals. Their plight, and Mr. Carney's shift away from left-leaning Trudeauism to the centre, means Liberals' available real estate has significantly expanded. It is especially the case if the Conservatives are cocooned on the right. Another factor that suggests the Conservatives need a big rethink is the plight of the populist brand. Leader Pierre Poilievre, who joined the Reform Party as a teenager, is an embedded populist. What Donald Trump is doing to the image of populism is ghastly. Under him, it is authoritarian, xenophobic, demagogic, vulgar, imperialist ... and I'll stop there. Lawrence Martin: How the Conservatives can save themselves: Changing Canada's image as the great white weakling of the North With the election of Mr. Carney – a big banker, an establishment man, a globalist respected for his knowledge – Canadians have signalled a turn away from populism. They're fed up with the politics of polarization. Mr. Carney might even bring back a modicum of respect for elites. His Liberals are popular in Quebec. As Mr. Mulroney argued, without Quebec the Conservatives' chances of winning a majority are scant. Post-Mulroney, the party has scored low in the province. A political party's deficiencies can be overcome with a popular leader, but the current Conservatives are saddled with one who lost his own seat and who, according to a new Nanos poll, is almost 25 points behind Mr. Carney in approval ratings. In the election campaign, many of Mr. Poilievre's economic policies were welcome enough, so much so that they were copied by the Liberals. Policy was less his problem than personality, likeability and his concocted look. Having been an MP for 20-plus years and party leader for almost three, that image is ingrained, hard to change. There's an old saying about all politics being local. That is not the case now. With foreign threats on the rise, with the country being bludgeoned by Donald Trump's tariffs, with Big Tech and AI posing new challenges, politics is becoming more and more global. The Liberals found a man of global stature to meet the times. Ironically, given all his political experience, Mr. Poilievre looks unseasoned by comparison. He has spent precious little time abroad. He gives no sense of having an informed global perspective. Hard economic times are ahead for the country. The Carney honeymoon will likely end before long. How he hopes to pay for all his wide-eyed promises is a mystery. There's a good chance the Conservatives will benefit in the polls, thus dampening momentum for bold change. But that would be folly. The trajectory Conservatives have been on since being overtaken by the Reform ideologues has been predominantly a failing one. They need put this phase of their history behind them.
