logo
The mystery of Tibet's missing monk, three decades on

The mystery of Tibet's missing monk, three decades on

SBS Australia6 days ago
Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is one of the most famous missing persons in the world. To many Tibetans, his detainment three decades ago made him the world's 'youngest political prisoner'. Since then, a single photograph has been used to tell his story. In May 1995, a six-year-old Nyima was appointed the Panchen Lama — one of the highest spiritual authorities in Tibetan Buddhism — by a committee of Buddhist leaders. China quickly rejected the announcement and three days later, Nyima and his family were taken into what Chinese authorities described as protective custody. He has not been seen since.
But Tibet specialist Kate Saunders believes she may have received an image of the Panchen Lama and his family, taken several years after their disappearance.
Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is believed to be sitting in the front left. At the top of the photograph, the Tibetan script reads "Photograph of a family reunion". Credit: Hardcash Productions "It seems to show Gedhun Choekyi Nyima. He's got a toy helicopter, he's sitting on his father's lap. He could be around 10, around 11 [years old]," she said. "This looks as though it's in some sort of official compound, and it does show us that the family was still together at that point." Saunders believes the limited evidence of the boy since he was taken by Chinese authorities "shows how successfully China has been able to disappear not only the child, but also his entire family".
Since his disappearance, the Chinese government has said Gedhun Choekyi Nyima is not the reincarnation of the Panchen Lama, as claimed by the Dalai Lama, instead "he is only a common Chinese citizen" who received his education in China, went to university and has started working.
'A momentous struggle' More than 30 years later, Saunders believes the story of the Panchen Lama's disappearance is one "not only of an individual but of a civilisation". In 1950, Chinese troops marched into Tibet in what China officially termed a "peaceful liberation". A Tibetan resistance movement formed quickly but within a decade Tibet's spiritual leader the Dalai Lama had escaped across the Himalayas to India, where he remains in exile. Today, Tibet is governed as an autonomous region within the People's Republic of China. For many modern-day Tibetans, Saunders believes, life is "a momentous struggle between a Communist Party and Tibetan civilisation". Namkyi has been caught up in this unrest from a young age.
In 2008, aged eight, she took to the streets demanding the return of the Dalai Lama.
Namkyi also recalls seeing protesters setting themselves alight during the wave of demonstrations that swept the Tibetan plateau that year. Approximately 150 monks, nuns and ordinary people have set themselves alight and ultimately died since 2009. "They protested and peacefully sacrificed their bodies by burning themselves. Many of my relatives and friends and neighbours have set themselves on fire," Namkyi said. "Many protesters were arrested and tortured ... We were all together, there was a lot of pain and suffering." The 2008 protests were the biggest against Chinese rule in more than two decades. Seven years later, Namkyi staged another protest — this time armed with photos of the Dalai Lama. "We walked past a police station. They stood around and beat us up. I was worried I would be killed."
Namkyi alleges she endured days of interrogation and torture, before being held without trial in a detention centre for the next 13 months.
While in prison, Namkyi said she was held in solitary conferment. Her only contact was with a Chinese government officer who she claims forced her to undergo political re-education. Credit: Hardcash Productions According to Human Rights Watch, 479 Tibetans were detained or tried for "political offences" between 2013 to 2015. However, due to limited access to Tibet , the organisation says "the actual number of Tibetans detained and prosecuted during this period for political offences was likely significantly higher".
In 2023, Namkyi fled from Tibet. Like the Dalai Lama, she made the dangerous journey across the mountains to India, where she now lives, separated from her family and friends.
'Religion is a poison' It's been 25 years since Tibetan Arjia Rinpoche went into exile in the United States. Before he escaped, the senior Buddhist teacher said he was made to serve the Communist Party in China and was even privy to preparations for the appointment of a new Panchen Lama. "I was named as one of the great secretaries of the committee. The Chinese government said the Dalai Lama's opinions would be taken into consideration. However, the final decision would be made by the Chinese government." After the Dalai Lama announced Gedhun Choekyi Nyima as the 11th Panchen Lama, China immediately opposed his pick for the position. "They said it was an illegal act … the Chinese government made him [Nyima] disappear. I witnessed things with my own eyes. We were all shocked."
Instead, Gyaltsen Norbu was appointed. He's the son of two Communist Party members and is known by some Tibetans as the Panchen Zuma — meaning 'fake Panchen'.
Arjia Rinpoche said he was inside the temple when China selected the 11th Panchen Lama. Credit: ITV "I was being forced to have faith in someone I didn't believe in and do things I didn't want to," Rinpoche recalls. He alleges the Chinese Communist Party refers to Tibetan religion as a "poison". "I managed to escape from the danger of the dragon's mouth," he says, referring to his decision to leave Tibet.
As surveillance technology has evolved, UK-based cybersecurity expert Greg Walton believes life for many Tibetans has become increasingly challenging.
Tibet is monitored in ways that no one [outside] of North Korea probably can really understand. Greg Walton "Everyday activities such as language preservation, passing on traditional Tibetan practices, these are being criminalised. Surveillance is at the heart of this process of subjugating the Tibetan people, of making them Chinese.
"The government has concentrated surveillance resources on having facial recognition cameras in monasteries like no other aspect of Tibetan life. The desire [is] to control, to instil a sense of fear."
Cybersecurity expert, Greg Walton believes the government is focused on monitoring religious life. Credit: Hardcash Productions The Chinese Embassy in London has responded that these allegations are "filled with bias and false accusations". "Xizang [Tibet] has been part of China since ancient times, has seen continued and sound economic growth, social harmony and stability, and significantly better life for its people.
"The human rights conditions in Xizang are at their historical best."
Breaking with tradition? Earlier this month, the Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, celebrated his 90th birthday. To mark the occasion, he issued a statement that also laid out his plan for the future of the Buddhist institution.
But as Gedhun Choekyi Nyima's disappearance remains controversial and China's pick for the position continues to be contested, the selection of the next Dalai Lama may break with tradition.
On 6 July, Dalai Lama Tenzin Gyatso celebrated his 90th birthday with a large gathering of Tibetan religious leaders, Indian politicians and monks. Source: AP / Ashwini Bhatia The Dalai Lama announced his charitable foundation, Gaden Phodrang , will be the only authority to choose his successor. The announcement ended speculation that the current Dalai Lama would be the last person to hold the title. According to Rinpoche, China's battle for Tibet will continue. "In the future, they will interfere with the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama. It's [all] about the struggle for power to gain authority."
The Chinese government has responded that it respects "the reincarnation of Living Buddhas, [and the] procedures [that] have been established over the centuries. The religious rituals, historical conventions [and] Chinese laws need to be complied with in this process".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Korea's jailed ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol takes off prison uniform, resists questioning
South Korea's jailed ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol takes off prison uniform, resists questioning

ABC News

time31 minutes ago

  • ABC News

South Korea's jailed ex-leader Yoon Suk Yeol takes off prison uniform, resists questioning

South Korea's jailed former president, Yoon Suk Yeol, has again refused to attend questioning by investigators, using a new method to resist — taking off his prison uniform and laying down on the floor at his detention room. Removed from office in April over his ill-fated imposition of martial law, Yoon was sent back to prison last month as he stands a high-stakes trial over rebellion and other charges. He faces investigations into other criminal allegations that are not related to his martial law decree in December but target him, his wife and others. On Friday, Min Joong-ki, a special counsel named by his liberal rival and new President Lee Jae Myung, sent investigators to retrieve Yoon from a detention centre near Seoul after the former president twice defied requests to attend questioning. The team was tasked with delving into allegations surrounding Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee, including that she and her husband exerted inappropriate influence on the then-ruling party's election nomination process in 2022. The team had a court-issued detention warrant that authorised them to bring Yoon out of his detention facility by force, but said they were hoping for his voluntary cooperation. "Without wearing his prison uniform, the suspect lay down on the floor and strongly resisted his detention," assistant special counsel Oh Jeong-hee told a televised briefing. Justice Minister Jung Sung-ho separately told politicians that Yoon took off his shorts and short-sleeved shirt and put them back on after investigators left. Ms Oh said her team members refrained from using physical means out of safety concerns, but notified Yoon that they would execute the warrant next time. She urged Yoon to cooperate as the Korean people are closely watching whether the enforcement of law is applied to everyone equally. Yu Jeong-hwa, a lawyer for Yoon, accused the special counsel team of trampling on his client's dignity and honour by discussing his dress in prison, according to local media reports. Yoon's defence team earlier said he was unable to attend his trial and undergo questioning by investigators because of heath problems. They said in a statement on Thursday that Yoon has cardiovascular, autonomic nervous system and eye issues. They cited an unidentified hospital as saying that Yoon faces the risk of blindness because he failed to receive medical treatment for the past three months. Yoon's imposition of martial law, which brought armed troops into Seoul streets, lasted only several hours before politicians voted down his decree unanimously. He argued his decree was a desperate attempt to draw public support of his fight against the "wickedness" of Mr Lee's Democratic Party, then the main opposition party, which had obstructed his agenda, impeached top officials and slashed the government's proposed budget. AP

Trump's new tariffs reveal somewhat vindictive and irrational strategy
Trump's new tariffs reveal somewhat vindictive and irrational strategy

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

Trump's new tariffs reveal somewhat vindictive and irrational strategy

Myanmar, Laos, Serbia and Syria. They seem unlikely targets for some of the most aggressive moves in Donald Trump's war on the global trading system. Yet these small and troubled nations are among those facing the highest tariffs from the United States in the wake of its president's slew of August 1 trade announcements. Myanmar, which mostly exports clothing to the US, and Laos, which predominantly exports electronics equipment, now face 40 per cent tariffs on the goods they sell to America, while Serbia will be hit with a 35 per cent tariff and Syria 41 per cent. None of these countries have been notably the subject of the same public Trumpian wrath as, say, Canada (35 per cent) and Brazil (50 per cent) since "Liberation Day" on April 2. And the country which is arguably the biggest target or threat to the US in terms of world trade — China — was not mentioned at all but will be engaged with in further negotiations. Having said that, there is still a 40 per cent on goods regarded as being "trans-shipped" to avoid higher tariffs (for which read "trans-shipped from China"). And the tough treatment on Friday of South-East Asian nations which are manufacturing hubs for China must be seen as an indirect assault on the regional economic superpower. In Australia, the focus on Trump's tariff announcements on Friday (AEST) was of course primarily on the "relatively" good news that we were still only facing a 10 per cent tariff, when the spectre of a 15 or 25 per cent generic rate had been mentioned by the US president in the days leading up to the announcement. The outcome somewhat took the wind out of the sails of those who have been criticising the prime minister for not getting to the White House, or into any meeting with Trump, and instead boosted the argument that there was little to be lost from staying out of his uniquely coiffed hair. Australia will enjoy the 10 per cent tariff rate being applied to those countries that buy more goods from the US than they export to America: that is, that run a trade surplus with one of the world's biggest economies. The new tariff regime starts at 10 per cent, based on trade balance, lifts to a 15 per cent rate for countries that only have a small deficit, while those with big deficits, that haven't negotiated, or that have otherwise incurred the ire of the president face this much wider and more unpredictable range of outcomes. It's worth pausing for a moment of silence to mark the momentous shift in global affairs that the Friday announcement confirms: the shift not just from a free trade ambition to a protectionist one by the United States, but a shift to a system of fairly arbitrary, vindictive and sometimes irrational decisions. Beyond that, though, the patterns in the trade deals that have been done to date — or perhaps more appropriately the lack of patterns and rigour — raise a range of other questions about their impact, and the extent to which they appear in some cases to be little more than standover tactics of lesser or greater actual import. Take the deals struck with Japan and the European Union last month. Both exemplified some striking features of the "deals" being done. In both cases, the parties documented very different understandings of the deals they thought they had done. There were also glaring holes in the deals in terms of major sectors about which there was only a conspicuous silence. For example, the EU deal was silent on wine and spirits. Most of the deals have yet to be formalised or legislated. Finally, the US has been claiming in almost all of the deals that it struck prior to August 1 that they involved massive commitments of investment in the US by the trade partners involved. For example, in Japan's case, the White House announced that Japan would create a $US550 billion fund to invest in the US, with Trump making the investment decisions and the US government receiving 90 per cent of the profits. It seemed this astonishing deal was news to Japanese negotiators who, the New York Times reported, had already made an offer (which in itself seemed extraordinary): to create a $US400 billion investment fund with half the profits going to the US government. The US president subsequently referred to the deal that he announced as a "signing bonus", which underpinned Japan "only" facing a 15 per cent tariff impost, even as doubts were aired about whether the investment would ever materialise. The NYT reported that Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa told Tokyo that the deal was that Japan would offer a blend of investment, loans and loan guarantees, totalling up to $550 billion, with profits to be allocated based on each side's committed risk and financial contribution. There have been similar scenes unfolding over possible investments from the European Union and South Korea. Equally unsettling has been the increasingly blatant intrusion of non-trade factors into the tariff decisions announced by the White House. Brazil is facing 50 per cent tariffs because Trump doesn't like the way former president, strongman and Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro is being treated by the Brazilian judicial system, where he is facing up to 40 years in prison for allegedly plotting a coup to stay in power after losing the 2022 election. By agreeing this week to a Trump demand for a ceasefire, Thailand and Cambodia appear to have ended up with lower 19 per cent tariffs they had originally been proposed. Canada appeared to be facing a more punitive tariff regime than Mexico at 35 per cent — which Trump said was due to Prime Minister Mark Carney signalling Canada would recognise statehood for Palestine. But it turns out the higher tariff rate will not apply to goods covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. That covers an estimated 94 per cent of Canada's exports to the US. The tariff decisions will have a very different impact to those suggested by the headline numbers in other countries too. For example, Germany may only face a 15 per cent tariff as part of the EU deal but is particularly exposed through its big automotive exports to the US. Another shock was the 25 per cent rate applied to India. This caused immediate political blowback for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi who claims "bestie" status with the US president but who immediately faced intense criticism at home that this elevated position had not saved India from a punitive tariff rate. What happened in India is just one of the examples of the political shock waves caused around the globe by Trump's moves, in addition to any economic impact they may have. There is considerable concern in Europe, for example, about how European Union member nations react to its deal. The federated nature of the EU structure lends itself to a lot more public debate about a deal not directly negotiated by national leaders. The concern among European political analysts this week is that the deal will play into the hands of far-right and nationalist groups in fuelling resentment against both the EU and sitting governments. It will take countries around the world some time to see how these domestic pressures play out. And then there's the question of how such a deliberately uneven playing field affects their relative competitiveness to each other, even when direct trade with the US is left out of the calculations. It feels like a certain resignation has crept into global trade discussions in the past few months. It is driven as much by a trade-off between uncertainty and certainty as specific tariff numbers. If there is one thing we seem to know about Donald Trump, it is that all that uncertainty is unlikely to end any time soon. Laura Tingle is the ABC's Global Affairs Editor.

Pro-democracy politician who lit candles for Tiananmen Square victims arrested under China's ‘chilling' new law
Pro-democracy politician who lit candles for Tiananmen Square victims arrested under China's ‘chilling' new law

News.com.au

time14 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Pro-democracy politician who lit candles for Tiananmen Square victims arrested under China's ‘chilling' new law

Macau's best-known democracy advocate has become the first person detained under China's newly expanded national security laws. 68-year-old Au Kam San, who has spent the past two decades as a lone dissenting voice in Macau's tightly managed legislature, now finds himself behind bars for allegedly 'colluding with foreign forces'. According to a statement from Macau's Public Prosecutions Office, 'compulsory detention' was imposed on Au following a 'preliminary investigation' after police arrested him at his home on Wednesday. Authorities claim Au maintained contact with an unnamed 'anti-China organisation' abroad since 2022, and accuse him of spreading 'false and seditious information' to incite hatred against the Chinese government. The charges also allege Au attempted to disrupt Macau's 2024 leadership election and provoke 'hostile actions by foreign countries against Macau.' 'The Public Prosecutions Office will fully hold accountable those who attempt to disrupt national security,' the statement reads, promising to 'confront hostile forces to the end.' Au Kam San, a former school teacher and founding member of several moderate pro-democracy groups, became a quiet but consistent critic of the opaque governance and social inequality in the ritzy gambling enclave. On the 36th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown in June 2025, Au said he lit candles in remembrance and posted on Facebook it was 'the best way I can honour the memory of the event'. 'My stance is very clear, and I am not someone who changes easily. I won't alter my approach simply because someone shows a bit more 'concern',' he wrote. In mainland China, it is effectively illegal to speak about the Tiananmen Square massacre in any public or commemorative context. Since the 1990s, authorities have banned all public mourning, detained individuals who attempted memorials, and suppressed the memory of the event through pervasive censorship. Even the words 'June 4' and 'Tank Man' are barred on Chinese social media. Unlike the more combative pro-democracy figures in neighbouring Hong Kong — where mass protests in 2014 and 2019 brought international attention and brutal crackdowns — Macau's opposition has long existed on the margins. Through the 2000s and 2010s, Au stood largely alone in Macau's Legislative Assembly, pushing back against authoritarian drift and warning of rising inequality in a city flush with casino money. He openly criticised the handling of corruption cases involving senior officials like Ao Man Long and Ho Chio Meng, who were both jailed in high-profile graft trials. 'Chilling effect on Macau' Jason Chao, a Macau-born activist now based in the UK, said the arrest was disproportionate. 'Au had occasionally made mildly critical online posts against the Chinese and Macau governments but nothing to warrant his arrest,' Chao said via Reuters. 'There will be a profound chilling effect on the people of Macau.' Au's detention marks the latest episode in Beijing's relentless campaign to crush dissent under the banner of national security. In Hong Kong, sweeping national security laws imposed in 2020 have led to the closure of newspapers like Apple Daily, the arrest of virtually all opposition lawmakers, and the effective end of its once-thriving civil society. When local authorities still found pockets of resistance, a second, even tougher, security law was rammed through in 2024. In 2023, Macau's security laws were expanded again to include vaguely defined threats like 'external interference' and 'provoking hatred against the government.' Civil rights groups warned at the time that it would become a tool to stifle legitimate political expression. Au is one of many prominent dissidents to be detained in China in recent years. Among the most high-profile cases is that of Ilham Tohti, a respected Uyghur economist who was sentenced to life in prison for 'separatism' after promoting peaceful dialogue between Uyghurs and Han Chinese. His jailing sent a warning that even moderate calls for understanding would be treated as existential threats. A similar message was delivered in 2023 with the 14-year sentence handed to Xu Zhiyong, a former legal scholar who led the New Citizens' Movement, a grassroots push for transparency and rule of law. In the same year, media mogul Jimmy Lai, founder of the now-shuttered Apple Daily, was put on trial under the national security law, accused of collusion with foreign forces in a case widely condemned by press freedom advocates. Joshua Wong, the student activist who became the face of Hong Kong's 2014 Umbrella Movement, has also faced repeated arrests under similar charges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store