Council Votes To Establish New Water Services Organisation
The decision continues the Local Water Done Well process, as mandated by the current Government.
Mayor Nadine Taylor said it was a very important decision for the region.
'We have decided to take a once-in-a-generation opportunity to do things differently to build better three waters infrastructure and provide greater intergenerational equity, spreading the costs over the long term.'
'The Government requires councils to financially ringfence their water services and by setting up a new, water-focussed organisation it will be easier to sustainably deliver efficiencies and savings for residents on Council's drinking and wastewater supplies.'
'Costs will be spread over a longer period of time through borrowing, leading to lower water charges when compared to retaining water services internally at Council.'
'Other notable benefits are the new WSO will have a singular focus on the delivery of water infrastructure and be better positioned to attract the specialist staff we will need in the future.'
'By removing three waters debt from Council's books, we will have an improved ability to deliver other key Council activities to support the Marlborough community, including responding to and funding unforeseen circumstances such as natural disasters.'
Mayor Taylor noted that almost all of Marlborough's townships need upgrades to pipelines, pump stations and wells, with treatment plant upgrades required in Blenheim, Havelock, Riverlands and Awatere.
'Blenheim, Havelock, Riverlands, Seddon and Renwick also need wastewater upgrades. Many of Picton's and Blenheim's stormwater assets have an expected life of less than 10 years. In addition we have requests from the community to provide new water reticulation services - for example in Ward, Rarangi and Dry Hills in Blenheim.'
'While Council has done a good job of building and maintaining its current three waters infrastructure, a big step change is required if we are to face head-on the challenges of the future,' she said.
'This step change is best delivered through a new water services organisation.'
Council received 44 submissions on its Local Water Done Well proposal.
The WSO would be incorporated from 1 July 2026 with a one year transition to full operations from 1 July 2027. Marlborough District Council will be its sole shareholder, appoint its board of directors and set its direction via a binding Statement of Expectations, holding it accountable to the people of Marlborough.
Council will also establish a water services governance and oversight committee made up of the mayor, the three committee chairs and chief executive.
Notes
The Government's Local Water Done Well process requires all councils to develop a Water Services Delivery Plan (WSDP) by 3 September 2025 which describes how drinking water, wastewater and stormwater services will be delivered in ways that are financially sustainable, meet regulatory quality standards, meet water quality standards and support housing growth and urban development.
Other considerations include:
• New ring-fencing rules that require water delivery services to be financially separate from Council's other functions and activities.
• Water services being subject to new economic regulation and a consumer protection regime.
• Access to the Local Government Funding Agency to help fund the needed investment in water infrastructure.
By 2034, $410 million of investment is needed in Marlborough's water infrastructure. The renewal list for pipelines, pump stations, treatment plants and dams is considerable. About $45 million of water assets, $20 million of wastewater assets and $45 million of stormwater assets are due for replacement within the next nine years. The renewal profile will likely increase as assets built in the 1950s and 60s, including much of Blenheim and Picton's stormwater network, requires replacement over the next 40 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Tyres Now Free To Recycle At Lincoln Street Resource Recovery Centre
Tired of all those old tyres laying about? Hamiltonians can now drop off their old clean tyres (without their rims) to the Lincoln Street Resource Recovery Centre for free. Hamilton City Council has opted in to the national initiative, which allows up to five tyres to be disposed of at registered businesses and organisations across the country for free. Tyrewise is a Ministry for the Environment-accredited scheme for tyre disposal. Council's Head of Resource Recovery, Nicole Bradbury hopes the new initiative will minimise the number of tyres Council sees illegally dumped around the city. 'In the last month alone, Council collected almost 250 illegally dumped tyres from around the city costing ratepayers around $5000 in clean-up costs,' said Bradbury. 'The cost of disposing tyres could've contributed to this dumping, and we want to help eliminate any barriers to recycling tyres for Hamiltonians.' Previously, the cost to dispose tyres was $21.19 each at the Lincoln Street Resource Recovery Centre. 'It's great to get behind the work that Tyrewise are doing and join the tyre disposal programme. It helps to create more accessible and affordable ways of meeting our waste minimisation goals for Hamiltonians. 'Council's involvement in this programme contributes to the city's goal of increasing innovation and opportunity from resource recovery. The tyres will be collected and recycled into products that benefit Council, such as playground matting. There is no cost to Council for its part in the scheme. As well as the Lincoln Street Resource Recovery Centre, you can see which businesses are registered here.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Fiji: Concerns Over Suspected Price Manipulation Ahead Of VAT Reduction
26 July As Fijians anticipate relief from the upcoming VAT reduction, slated to drop from 15% to 12.5% on 1 August 2025 - discovery of unjustified price increases by some eateries have sparked serious concern. The Consumer Council of Fiji has uncovered evidence suggesting businesses are pre-emptively raising prices to offset the tax cut, effectively depriving consumers of the intended financial benefits. Through 530 market surveillances conducted before and after the National Budget announcement, the Council identified a troubling trend: certain food establishments have deliberately inflated prices in recent weeks leading up to the VAT reduction, in order to negate effectivelythe intended consumer benefit. 'This is a strategic manipulation of pricing,' said Seema Shandil, CEO of the Consumer Council of Fiji. 'By raising prices now, these eateries can later claim to have passed on savings while keeping actual costs the same or even higher, undermining the intended financial relief for consumers. This behaviour is not only unethical but directly sabotages the government's policy intent to alleviate the cost-of-living burden for ordinary Fijians'. Notable examples include a fast-food outlet's curry meal rising from $2 to $3, a Suva restaurant's two-person meal increasing from $49.95 to $54, and menu hikes at multiple food courts. A prominent restaurant chain also raised its king-sized pizza price to $56.30, while a major supermarket's chicken pie now costs $9.95 up from $7.95. The Council urges transparency and accountability to ensure the VAT reduction delivers its promised advantages to the public. 'We are extremely concerned that such behaviour not only rips off consumers but also erodes public trust in the fairness of the market. The VAT reduction has been announced to provide financial relief to Fijians, not to pad the margins of restaurants and eateries,' Ms. Shandil said. The Council notes that food establishments are often harder to monitor due to variable pricing and the ease with which cost justifications, such as ingredient or labor costs, can be used to mask unjustified increases. When traders manipulate prices to suit their own interests, especially under the guise of 'justified' cost increases, it sends a clear message that consumer welfare is secondary. This erosion of trust damages the relationship between businesses and the public, and if left unchecked, can weaken confidence in the broader market system. The Council firmly believes that ethical conduct and transparency must be upheld, particularly during times when government initiatives are aimed at easing the cost-of-living burden for ordinary Fijians. The Council is urging all traders and businesses to act responsibly and ensure that the benefits of the upcoming VAT reduction are fully passed on to consumers. This is not just a matter of regulatory compliance, it reflects their broader duty of care and ethical responsibility to the public. As essential players in the economy, businesses must align their pricing practices with the government's objective of easing the cost of living for all Fijians. Absorbing the VAT cut for profit undermines consumer trust and defeats the purpose of a policy designed to provide financial relief. Consumers are the backbone of every business, and treating them fairly through transparent and ethical pricing is vital, not only for maintaining customer loyalty and brand integrity, but also for upholding the principles of a just and fair marketplace. Consumers are also encouraged to retain receipts and, where possible, compare past and present prices of the same item or meal. If a price increase is suspected, consumers should keep both the old and new receipts or take photos showing the change and report the matter to the Consumer Council of Fiji by calling toll-free 155 or emailing complaints@
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Government to ban card payment surcharges, businesses to pick up the tab
The cost of providing contactless payments will fall on merchants. Photo / Andrey Mikhaylov Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Government to ban card payment surcharges, businesses to pick up the tab The cost of providing contactless payments will fall on merchants. Photo / Andrey Mikhaylov The Government is planning to ban merchants from adding surcharges to most in-store card payments. The change will save shoppers, but cost merchants, who will need to absorb the cost of offering contactless payments or pass it onto customers by hiking prices. The change is expected to be made by May next year. It will apply to payments made in-store using Eftpos, Visa and Mastercard but won't apply to purchases made online or with foreign-issued cards, prepaid gift or travel cards, and cards issued by networks like American Express or UnionPay. Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson said: 'Surcharges are a hassle and an unwelcome surprise when shoppers get to the till.
