Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories
The Conservative leader also appealed to business leaders to support her party, suggesting there was no credible alternative which would represent their interests.
Speaking at the FTSE 250+ conference in central London, Mrs Badenoch said: 'My message to business is: I'm on your side, but I need you to be on mine too.'
The Tory leader's appearance at the gathering came as the latest gross domestic product (GDP) figures showed the UK economy shrank more than expected, the day after the Government unveiled spending plans prioritising health and defence over the next few years.
Speaking to an audience of business and investment chiefs, Mrs Badenoch hit out at Labour's tax rises, including the inheritance tax on family farms and national insurance employer contributions.
She added: 'You need to support policies that back enterprise, and you need to challenge those who want more state control.
'Don't just wait for other politicians to do it.
'You need to get on the pitch too.'
The Tory leader claimed the UK has 'forgot that business is a good in and of itself, and it pays for everything. It is the source of our prosperity'.
Mrs Badenoch added: 'The challenge all of us in this room have now is that many people don't believe this anymore.'
People instead believe 'business hoards wealth' and is 'greedy and needs to be taxed more', she said.
Mrs Badenoch continued: 'This is a crisis.
'And the question before us is simple: Who has credible solutions?
'And I know many of you will be asking, 'Why should we trust the Conservative Party?'
'And I say because no-one is making the argument for business … except me and my party.'
At PMQs I talked about Labour creating an economic spiral.
A reminder we have 4 more years of this… pic.twitter.com/epCeUsau2N
— Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 12, 2025
Mrs Badenoch's rallying call to businesses comes after the most recent political donations data showed a boost to the Tory war chest.
The Conservatives raised nearly £3.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, the Electoral Commission revealed this week, outstripping Labour's £2.4 million and Reform UK's £1.5 million.
Labour offers only 'managed decline', Mrs Badenoch also told business chiefs, before taking aim at Nigel Farage's Reform UK party.
Mrs Badenoch appealed to the audience, signalling voters cannot 'allow Farage, with no experience of legislating – he's never in Parliament, let alone government – to just come in'.
She added: 'Can you imagine 360 random people suddenly taking over government saying they are going to fix everything?
'We were there for 14 years, sweating and labouring, it was unbelievably difficult.
'How many of you would allow your businesses to be run by people who have never been in that business and say 'Come on in, I'm sure you can fix it'?
'That's what he's offering, it's not real.
'It is a scam, and it's my job to expose that scam.'
A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Kemi admits they had 14 years and yet all they achieved was sky high taxes, low growth and open borders.
'The only scam is her telling the British public that the Tories have changed.
'It's the same people and the same old failed ideas.
'Quite simply, the Tory party is irrelevant.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
SNP's wish to ‘throw open our borders' would risk security
Writing in the Daily Mail ahead of the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mrs Badenoch said the SNP's position 'is not remotely serious'. The Scottish Government is much more liberal than both the UK Labour Government and the Tories on immigration, repeatedly calling for more people to be allowed to come to Scotland, but Holyrood does not have the powers to make changes. Ministers have pushed for a shift in the system on a number of occasions, going so far as to propose a separate Scottish visa in 2020 under Nicola Sturgeon – a pitch which was quickly rejected by the Conservative-led government of the time. Mrs Badenoch wrote: 'We need a new, sustainable system that only admits a strict number of people who come here legally, do the right thing, and who contribute to society. 'That means we must introduce a strict numerical cap on legal migration, ensure there is zero-tolerance for foreign criminals, and pass the Deportation Bill to remove those who should not be here. 'The left-wing parties at Holyrood – not just the SNP, but also Labour and the Lib Dems – don't believe tougher action is necessary. Scottish Conservative Party Conference is now in full swing. Follow along to see how @RussellFindlay1 is bringing common sense to Scottish politics 🏴🇬🇧#SCC25 — Scottish Conservatives (@ScotTories) June 13, 2025 'On immigration, those parties have policies student politicians would be ashamed of. 'The SNP's stance, in particular, is not remotely serious. 'If they ever got their way, they would put our citizens' security at risk. It's the nationalists' view that we should just throw open our borders, without any checks or limitations on who comes into the country.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
ITV News
33 minutes ago
- ITV News
Jails in England and Wales 98.3% full as prison crisis continues
Prisons in England and Wales are 98.3% full, despite the population falling slightly since the government accepted recommendations of a recent sentencing review. There are now 1,448 prison places available - up from 961 last month, when the estate was running at 98.9% capacity. But HM Prison and Probation Service says it can't run the estate efficiently at over 95% occupancy. The UK's prisons estate has been under so much pressure that thousands of inmates have been released early to prevent the system clogging up, a situation that the justice secretary warned could lead to the "break down of law and order". If prisons are full, police cells would have to be used to house offenders - but when they reach capacity, officers would no longer be able to carry out arrests, Shabana Mahmood said last month. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'We are building new prisons and are on track for 14,000 places by 2031 – the largest expansion since the Victorians. "Our sentencing reforms will also force prisoners to earn their way to release or face longer in jail for bad behaviour, while ensuring the most dangerous offenders can be kept off the streets.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced an extra £7 billion to fund 14,000 more prison places in her spending review on Wednesday, and up to £700 million per year into reform of the probation system. Unveiling the funding in the Commons, she said "must feel safe" in their local community, "safe in the knowledge that when people break the law, they feel the full force of the law". "But the party opposite left our prisons overflowing and on the brink of collapse, and they left it to us to deal with the consequences." Unions welcomed the cash but questioned whether it would be enough to fix alleviate pressures on the system. Rachel Harrison, GMB national secretary, said "fresh money for the police, prisons and probation is something we've long called for... but, as ever, the proof will be in the pudding as to whether this is enough money – and if it ends up in the right places.' The government, which commissioned a review into prisons by Conservative former justice secretary David Gauke, has accepted many of his recommendations. New policies include allowing well behaved offenders to serve one third of their sentence, rather than half and scrapping short sentences of less than 12 months, apart from in exceptional circumstances such as domestic abuse cases. There have also been calls to improve rehabilitation inside prisons, given 53% of those released commit crime again within a year, while 80% of offenders are reoffenders. But the justice secretary said it's much harder to rehabilitate offenders with the prison system "permanently on the point of collapse". She was asked by Labour MP Clive Efford in the Commons last month how the government would reduce reoffending, which is "costing us £22 billion a year". Mahmood responded: "One of the problems of running a prison system at absolutely boiling hot, where you're permanently on the point of collapse... it means that within the prison estate you're not able to make much progress on the sorts of programmes that offenders would need to access to begin a rehabilitation journey." The Gauke review recommended introducing an 'earned progression model' inspired by reforms in Texas. Under the scheme, prisoners could be released earlier for good behaviour and be supervised on licence for a period of their sentence. They would then remain unsupervised in the community for the final period of their sentence, but could be recalled to prison if they commit another crime. Violent or sexual offenders who are serving sentences of four years or more could be released into the community on licence after spending half of their sentence behind bars, or longer if they do not comply with prison rules. The review also suggested for the most dangerous offenders on extended sentences to be eligible for parole at half-way through their sentence, instead of two-thirds, if they earn credits to take part in rehabilitation activities in prison. They would only be released if the Parole Board decided it was safe to do so.
The Herald Scotland
34 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Warning over assisted dying TikTok adverts as MPs further debate Bill
The Bill is undergoing a second day of report stage on Friday, with various amendments being debated and possibly voted on. Its third reading – where a vote is taken on the overall Bill – could take place next Friday. Opening debate, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater proposed an amendment to her Bill which would impose a duty on the Government to make regulations prohibiting advertisements to promote services relating to voluntary assisted dying should the legislation pass. She has previously said it 'would feel inappropriate for this to be something which was advertised'. Bill opponent and fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh warned of 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', adding he had put forward a tighter amendment to 'strengthen the Bill on this issue and to better protect the vulnerable'. Addressing the Commons, he said: 'Advertising works because we human beings are suggestible. Prone to messaging, visual clues and hints. Older people are bombarded with adverts for everything from stairlifts to care homes. 'One person's advert, though, is another person's public information campaign.' A person holds a hard copy of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Stefan Rousseau/PA) He added that unless Ms Leadbeater's amendment is tightened to limit the exceptions to a ban, social media ads on the issue in future would be possible. He said: 'Many in this House rightly try to protect teenagers from online harms. But the online harm of an ad for a website about assisted dying shared on TikTok could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment.' Other issues being debated on Friday include an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which has been tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Ms Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Dame Rachel de Souza the Children's Commissioner for England has repeated her call for children's voices to be heard in the conversation (Aaron Chown/PA) Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the Bill. The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the Bill. The Bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Campaigners supportive of a change in the law outside Parliament (James Manning/PA) Various media reports have indicated some MPs who voted in favour last year could withdraw their support amid concerns around safeguards and how much scrutiny the proposed legislation has received, while others might switch to supporting a Bill that backers argue has been strengthened over time. Opinion in the medical community has been divided, with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) expressing concern, but some MPs who are doctors are among the Bill's strongest supporters. Seven RCPsych members, including a former president and vice president, have written to MPs to distance themselves from their college's concern, instead describing the current Bill as 'workable, safe and compassionate' with a 'clear and transparent legal framework'. Meanwhile, the Children's Commissioner for England has repeated her call for children's voices to be heard in the conversation, saying their views had been 'at best been sidelined, at worst written off entirely simply because they would not fall within the scope of the current scope of legislation'. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the Bill. Campaigners against a change in the law gather outside Parliament (James Manning/PA) Disability campaigner George Fielding, representing campaign group Not Dead Yet UK, argued the Bill 'risks state-sanctioned suicide' but Claire Macdonald, director of My Death, My Decision said 'no-one should be forced to suffer, and the British public wants politicians to change the law on assisted dying'. In a letter to MPs this week, Ms Leadbeater said supporters and opponents appear in agreement that 'if we are to pass this legislation it should be the best and safest Bill possible'. She added: 'I'm confident it can and will be.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
