Tomorrow's Independence Day, not 'us vs them' day
GoI should issue a clear directive stating that valid IDs should suffice for hotel check-ins - which can, anyway, be verified with police if need be. The least it can do is condemn such divisive messagings before tomorrow, when all Indians celebrate freedom from a time when such nefarious conflations were the hallmark of colonial divide and rule. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulatory gray area makes investing in LVMH, BP tough For Indian retail
How IDBI banker landed plush Delhi properties in Amtek's INR33k crore skimming
As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy
Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive
Stock Radar: Astra Microwave showing signs of bottoming out after 16% fall from highs; time to buy?
F&O Radar | Deploy Broken Wing in Paytm to play stock's bullish outlook
These 9 banking stocks can give more than 28% returns in 1 year, according to analysts
Why 2025 Could Be The Astrological Turning Point We've Been Waiting For
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
We need a new national interest framework
Non-alignment and mixed economy were the two terms which described India's strategic and economic positioning when the generation to which this author belongs was in school. To be sure, the Soviet Union was history and the 1991 reforms had already happened by then, but textbooks and institutional wisdom were still wedded to old values in the Tier-3 town in Bihar where I grew up. The Raisina Hill illuminated during a ceremony in New Delhi (Virendra Singh Gosain/HT Photo) The next two decades would be transformational. Almost everybody from my school cohort went to a private engineering college in some state in west or south India and landed a reasonably well paying, and more importantly, prospect-enhancing IT job. Many of them went to the US to do 'on-site' jobs and made much more money. They came back and bought houses, cars and many more things. In 2008, India signed the nuclear deal with the US, heralding a new era of strategic alliance with the US even though we never really ended our relationship with the Russians, at least in terms of buying their weaponry. This was very different from the US or West at large which had put sanctions on India after our 1998 nuclear tests. Children of middle-class families that are in school now mostly aspire to land a high-paying job in the US or West Europe. They are also very unlikely to think about things such as strategic balancing or a hostile West. They are not wrong. This worldview has been shaped by recent experience . The polarising factors for this generation are political debates at home, more substantively about things such as religion in politics, and slightly superficially – because there is not much of a difference between various parties on these issues– about things such as economic policy and caste. The really privileged ones are actually more interested in debates outside than at home. This generation, unlike mine, and more importantly, previous generations, has not known scarcity, economic vulnerability or strategic arm twisting of India by stronger powers. Sure, China has been an adversary which is becoming stronger by the day, but things have never reached a point of criticality. None of this is to say that India has not had economic or strategic challenges in the past couple of decades. What is being argued is that the middle class, an extremely important and disproportionate driver of public opinion, and the proverbial glacial source of the downstream river which creates technocrats and future policy makers, was able to detach its material fortunes from the larger structural challenges facing the Indian economy in the post-reform period. The political-economy friction which exists because of the unequal nature of post-reform growth and opportunities which have been generated were left to be negotiated by the political class by way of palliative welfare measures which have proliferated in the post-reform period. This convenient, even if far from ideal arrangement, will cease to exist now as the West turns more protectionist on account of a working-class backlash because of what globalisation and its largest beneficiary China has done to it. There is good reason to believe that we are now past peak globalisation and the tailwinds it generated for the Indian middle class, which allowed it to decouple its material fortunes with the larger economic transformation problem of the Indian economy. This challenge will exist whether or not India pivots from a strategic alliance with the US towards a more multipolar attitude in its external outlook. In fact, a multipolar outlook will perhaps be worse for the middle class than a pro-US stance. China and Russia are not going to create opportunities for the Indian diaspora in sectors such as finance or knowledge-based services like the US or UK anytime in the future. Where does this leave India and its larger strategic discourse? Those who do not agree with the prognosis given above will, of course, say that things can be salvaged with deals and a little bit of give and take in the short turn and perhaps a regime change in the US in a few years. For those who find my arguments convincing, the answer has to translate into a longer-term pivot from the current political economy trajectory of India and the public discourse around it. To begin with, it requires doing absolutely nothing from our side which jeopardizes the existing economic tailwinds from the external economy. This will require a reasoned, restrained and calibrated response to our external engagements, the exact opposite of how public debate and posturing on this has evolved in the past. India's economic and strategic prowess must be celebrated and sold where it is required, but it must be accompanied with the underlining and amplifying of larger structural challenges facing the Indian economy and the constraints it puts on our ability to accommodate the demands of even our closest external partners. Some might dismiss this as needless tokenism, but one should never write off the appeal of the subjective factor in shaping perceptions and eventually politics in the world. Had we talked enough about these things in, say the US, rather than making it exclusively about the (deservedly praise-worthy) Indian Americans there or the Indian middle class back home, was there a possibility of forming a closer association with the blue-collar MAGA base which is, in many ways, as economically vulnerable and crisis-ridden as the Indian farmer?. Posturing alone is clearly not going to take care of our larger problems. This is where a larger economic policy, especially in the realm of industry, becomes important. The dogmatic laissez-faire types might scoff at the idea, but the more important debate around it is how rather than if. Getting such a thing right will take a fundamentally different approach than what India followed immediately after independence via the planned economy approach. Indian capital back then was weak, prone to being outcompeted by foreign capital and operating in an economy which lacked a productive base not just in industry but even in agriculture. Indian capital today is significantly stronger, well-endowed and has enough business opportunities in the home market despite our merchandise trade deficit and import dependence in many critical things. In many ways, like the middle class, it has also managed to decouple its fortunes from the larger structural constraints facing the Indian economy. Also, it is politically far more powerful than it was in the earlier period thanks to the deeper links of political finance and weakening of the rural economy in the larger political-economy bargain. The larger point is, disciplining this capital to serve the larger strategic interest of the economy, which could require moving away from short-term profit generating activities is going to be more difficult and chaotic than attempting an economic transformation via state-owned enterprises, which is what we did in the planned economy period immediately after independence. The same is going to be the case with the middle class. Imagine how a government mandate requiring people who go to subsidised IITs to serve in state-run or mandated core engineering projects aimed at buttressing the country's industrial prowess for a stipulated time rather than join high paying Wall Street jobs is going to be taken today. A lot of the points made here are not exactly new and this author has made them on earlier occasions as well. What they are trying to do is weave a simple narrative Destinies of countries, especially those as large as India, are made or unmade by how they handle contradictions in their larger political economy. At some point of time, handling these contradictions requires deciding on a conflict of individual or group interests with the larger national interest. India was deluded into believing that it had managed to bypass this conflict in the post-reform period where the relatively privileged had the world at large to benefit from and the poor were being offered palliatives out of the crumbs brought home by this 'Shining India'. It was good while it lasted. But a protectionist West, abrasive America and demands that the Indian poor be made to embrace more pain to allow the gains of the Indian elite to continue – this is what demands for opening up agricultural trade essentially are – has put an end to this convenient arrangement which was taken as granted. There is no reason a country of 1.4 billion people, which will have the third largest GDP in the world in a couple of years, cannot deal with the changed circumstances. But this requires, first and foremost, an admission that the new state of play requires a redefining of our national interest as we understood it in the last couple of decades and working on aligning group interests to this larger cause. Hopefully, the next generation of Indian children will read a condensed version of these debates in their school textbooks in an India which is more equal and economically secure at the same time. (Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa)
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
TOI Bharat Abroad: OCI Crackdown, Dublin Attacks, and an American Teen's Jana Gana Mana Goes Viral
Bharat in your inbox — every week. News, views, and stories that matter to the global Indian. Hello and welcome to TOI Bharat Abroad. This week: India tightens OCI rules, making serious charges grounds for losing long-term visa-free access. In Dublin, racist attacks on Indians force the postponement of India Day celebrations. And a 17-year-old American goes viral for belting out Jana Gana Mana with flawless pride. THE BIG STORY Tightened OCI Rules The Indian government has moved to make it easier to strip Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) status from holders facing serious criminal charges. A new notification says OCI registration will be cancelled if a cardholder is convicted and sentenced to two years or more in prison, or if they are charge-sheeted for an offence carrying a potential seven-year jail term. Why it matters: The rule change raises the stakes for Indian-origin foreign nationals living abroad, making even pending serious charges grounds for losing long-term visa-free access to India. For many, OCI status is their primary link to the country — losing it can mean restrictions on travel, property rights, and residency. Driving the news: In a gazette notification issued under Section 7D of the Citizenship Act, the Ministry of Home Affairs said the move is aimed at tightening eligibility and deterring criminal activity. The OCI scheme, launched in 2005, lets qualifying Indian-origin foreign nationals visit India without a visa, but excludes current or former citizens of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and other countries specified by the government. The changes come amid heightened scrutiny of diaspora links to India and follow similar tightening of visa and residency rules in other countries. Read article. NRI Watch Indians attacked in Dublin A spate of racist attacks in Dublin has left the Indian community fearful, prompting the postponement of the annual India Day celebrations. An Indian student assaulted by teenagers said he will return home to finish his studies online, while another incident targeted a 60-year-old Indian-origin man. Community leaders have urged stronger policing, blaming far-right groups for inciting youth violence, as Ireland's leaders condemned the attacks. Read article. OFFBEAT American Desi At 17, most American teens are busy with prom playlists or football practice. But one teen has gone viral for something far rarer — belting out Jana Gana Mana with the kind of gusto usually reserved for cricket finals. The Instagram clip, now past 41,000 views, shows him singing India's national anthem with flawless pronunciation and visible pride. Comments poured in: 'Making us proud,' wrote one. 'Best thing I saw today,' said another. The teen, who knows anthems from several countries, calls India's his favourite. Composed by Rabindranath Tagore in five stanzas, the anthem celebrates unity in diversity — a fitting choice for a young American whose voice just bridged two worlds. Read article. IN THE NEWS DID YOU KNOW? SPOTLIGHT INFOGRAPHIC Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Mandaviya namedrops Pakistan as National Sports Governance Bill puts restrictions on international participation: 'Safeguard for extraordinary circumstances'
Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya cited the example of Indian cricket teams not touring Pakistan since 2008, adding that the National Sports Governance Bill, which cleared both houses of the Parliament earlier this week, empowers the government to 'act decisively and lawfully in such situations'. Union Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya expects the National Sports Governance Bill to be implemented in the next six months. PTI The National Sports Governance Bill 2025 was passed in the Lok Sabha on Monday nearly three weeks after it was introduced in the Lower House of the Parliament, with Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya hailing the landmark moment as the 'single biggest reform in Indian sports since independence'. The National Anti-Doping Amendment Bill (2025) was also passed by the Lok Sabha at the same time, and the two Sports Bills cleared the Rajya Sabha, the upper house, on the following day. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The implementation of a National Sports Board and a National Sports Tribunal as well as the BCCI's exemption from the RTI Act are among the key takeaways from the Bill, which is set to replace the existing National Sports Development Code of India that was introduced in 2011. Another key provision in the Bill grants the government the ability to 'impose reasonable restrictions' under 'extraordinary circumstances' on the international participation of Indian teams and athletes. The provision appears to be aimed towards Pakistan, India's neighbour to the west that has largely shared hostile relations with New Delhi since the two nations gained independence in 1947. While the sporting relations between the two nations has had its share of ups and downs over the years, it has undergone sharp decline since the 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai in 2008. More recently, the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in April followed by a four-day military conflict between the two nuclear-armed nations has further hit Indo-Pak sporting ties. 'Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully' Mandaviya, however, insists that the provision in the NSG Bill does not target 'any particular country', and that it's a 'standard safeguard' against situations that cover national security threats, diplomatic boycotts and other exceptional circumstances. 'The provision empowering the government to stop international participation is a standard safeguard seen in sports laws globally, intended for use in extraordinary circumstances. It covers situations such as national security threats, diplomatic boycotts, or global emergencies, and is not directed against any particular country,' Mandaviya told PTI in his first interview since the two bills cleared both houses of the Parliament. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'In practice, decisions regarding sporting engagements with Pakistan have been shaped by broader government policy and security assessments, particularly after major incidents affecting bilateral relations,' he added. The BCCI had refused to send the Indian cricket team to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy earlier this year, forcing their games to be relocated to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. Reuters Mandaviya cited the example of Indian cricket teams refusing to tour Pakistan since the 26/11 attacks as a case in point. '…full senior men's cricket tours to Pakistan have not taken place since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and high-profile matches have often been moved to neutral venues. Such decisions are taken on a case-by-case basis in consultation with the Ministry of External Affairs and security agencies. 'The Act formalises the government's ability to act decisively and lawfully in such situations, while ensuring that any decision remains consistent with India's commitments under the Olympic Charter and the statutes of relevant international sporting bodies. 'This reflects the Modi government's clarity in protecting national interest while upholding global sporting obligations,' Mandaviya added. NSG Bill likely to be fully implemented in six months: Mandaviya Mandaviya, who also serves as the Minister of Labour and Employment, added that the Bill is likely to achieve full implementation in the next six months. 'This bill will be implemented as soon as possible. Within the next six months, all procedures will be completed to ensure 100 percent implementation,' Mandaviya continued. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Creation of posts and other administrative approvals will follow established procedures of the Department of Personnel and Training and the Department of Expenditure. 'The aim is to ensure that both institutions (NSB and NST) are fully functional at the earliest possible date consistent with statutory and procedural requirements,' he added, while reiterating that the bill is 'the single biggest reform in sports since independence,' he added.
