Islamic Cultural Centre in Dublin temporarily closed after alleged incident
A notice posted on the gates of the centre in Clonskeagh, which also houses a mosque and Muslim school, detailed that the campus will remain closed until a full investigation is carried out and robust safety and security protocols are implemented.
Advertisement
The notice said the incident was "unprecedented and distressing" which left management with no choice but to temporarily close the south Dublin centre and the mosque to the public.
"The decision has been made with the utmost concern for the safety and well-being of our community, especially the children of the Muslim National School."
Photo: Sarah Slater
It said the move was "a deeply sorrowful moment in the history of the Mosque and Centre," which has been operating here for 29 years.
It is understood that the closure is due to internal issues by the management board.
Advertisement
The centre serves the majority of the more than 80,000 Muslim population.
It organises large celebrations, such as Ramadam and Eid, and has hosted several high-profile visits and services.
Attempts to contact the ICCI to comment on the matter were unsuccessful.
Ireland
An Post offers to send Mass cards to the Vatican f...
Read More
A petition to stop the closure of the centre has been organised on change.org titled "Save our mosque ICCI from the closure".
The petition, started on Tuesday and which has garnered more than 1,900 signatures, states that members of the community are deeply concerned and strongly opposed to the 'proposed closure of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Ireland (ICCI), the biggest place of worship for Muslims in Ireland.'
The petition continues: 'Closing ICCI would not only disrupt the spiritual and social life of its congregants but would also deeply wound the multicultural fabric of our wider community. In a time when unity, understanding, and inclusion are more critical than ever, closing ICCI would send a message of division and exclusion.'
A call for transparent and open dialogue with community leaders and representatives was also made.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
4 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Former Aberdeen charity campaigner fined after racist rant at hotel receptionist
A former Labour MP candidate and Aberdeen community charity champion had admitted to racially abusing a hotel receptionist. Sumon Hoque, 42, flew into a rage with the African woman at The Rox Hotel in the city after she didn't give him a napkin. Aberdeen Sheriff Court heard Hoque – who was dropped by the Labour Party a decade ago when he was convicted of drink-driving – told the woman 'go back to your own country' during the racist rant. Hoque, who also has previous convictions for abusive behaviour and was commended for his charity work with Aberdeen Muslims in 2021, admitted one charge of racial abuse. He is no longer associated with that charity. Fiscal Lindsay Shields said Hoque was known to the staff at the hotel, as he was living there at the time, October 30 last year. Hoque had been using a microwave in the reception area when his outburst occurred. Mr Shields said: 'The female receptionist was checking another guest into the hotel when Hoque approached her, asking for a napkin. 'She told him she did not have any and he became verbally abusive – shouting and swearing at her. 'He said she was 'useless at your job' and told her 'nobody likes you here'.' The court was told Hoque then told the woman to 'go back to your own country' and 'go back to Mozambique', Mr Shields added. The fiscal said Hoque was 'pacing back and forth in front of the reception desk' and the woman was frightened for the safety of not only herself, but the other hotel guests too. Hoque pleaded guilty to acting in a manner which was racially aggravated, repeatedly shouting, swearing and being aggressive, whilst uttering racially offensive remarks towards the female. Speaking on his behalf, John McLeod said his client accepted full responsibility for his behaviour, after a phone recording of the incident was disclosed as evidence. Mr McLeod said Hoque was now living and working in Bolton and was able to pay a financial penalty. Sheriff Graham Buchanan said he would impose a fine, as there may be difficulty in imposing and enforcing an order in England. Sheriff Buchanan did not read out the contents of Hoque's background report, but said: 'Your report has various things to say, but it does not amount to mitigation – although it gives an indication of your frame of mind. 'This was obviously quite an unpleasant incident, and I notice that you have previous convictions for abusive behaviour. 'So far as these circumstances as concerned – a significant fine is required.' Hoque, of Bridgeman Street, Bolton, was fined £640 and ordered to repay it at £100 per month.
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Over 100 women's rights groups warn linking sex abuse to migration is 'racist diversion'
In a letter to Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper, organisations including Rape Crisis England and Wales, the End Violence Against Women Coalition and Refuge called on ministers to stand up to the 'dangerous narrative' More than 100 women's rights groups have warned "racist" attempts to link sexual violence with immigration are putting victims at increased risk. Rape Crisis England and Wales, the End Violence Against Women Coalition and Refuge are among the organisations warning anti-migrant groups and politicans are "hijacking" survivors' trauma. They have signed a letter to Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Coooper warning that sexual abuse must not be used for political gain - and those who spread misinformation must be held to account. They pointed to demonstrations outside asylum hotels and comments by senior Reform and Tory figures, including Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick. In a joint statement the groups wrote: "We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers." They warn that hijacking the issue "ultimately impedes" efforts to tackle the root causes, and told the PM: "We write as organisations on the frontlines of combatting VAWG to urge the Government to address this dangerous narrative." In their statement, co-ordinated by End Violence Against Women Coalition, Women for Refugee Women, Hibiscus and Southall Black Sisters, the groups said linking sex offences with migration is a "racist diversion". They said violence against women and girls must be tackled with investment in prevention services and support for survivors, but state: " Instead, the issue is being hijacked by people seeking to use women and girls' pain and trauma - and the threat of it - for political gain. "Over recent weeks, people claiming to care about the 'safety of women and children' have left families, women and children living in temporary asylum accommodation afraid to leave their front door. "They follow in the footsteps of the rioters who used the appalling murder of three young girls as an excuse to bring violence to our streets; with targeted attacks against migrant, minoritised and Muslim communities." Last month it emerged that over 40% of 899 people arrested over last summer's riots had previously been reported to police for domestic abuse. The statement said: "That two out of five of those arrested for that disorder themselves had police histories of domestic abuse illustrates not only the pervasiveness of gender-based violence but the disingenuous nature of many of those who claim to have the interests of women and children at heart. "Meanwhile, members of Parliament freely share false statistics about the nationality of perpretators . Government ministers have even endorsed some of this summer's demonstrators as having 'legitimate' concerns , which risks normalising and enabling the spreading of racist narratives by the far-right.." Last month Mr Farage claimed there was an "alarming parallel" between reported rates and "wholly irresponsible immigration and asylum policies". And Tory Mr Jenrick was criticised after saying 40% of all sex offences were committed by foreign nationals - with experts saying the numbers used to calculate the figure are not robust. The women's rights groups said: "Not only do these falsehoods fail to keep women safe, they serve as a racist distraction that actively impedes the urgent work of addressing gender-based violence." Their statement said "myths and misconceptions" about sexual violence allow perpetrators to "hide behind racial stereotypes and scapegoating". And they also warn marginalised survivors are put at even greater risk. They said: "We urge the Government to show leadership in responding to the weaponisation of VAWG, including changing its framing of migration, promoting an accurate picture of violence against women and girls, and holding those who spread misinformation to account." The groups point out that a women is killed by a partner or ex-partner every four day on average, and more than 90% of rape and sex assault are known to their victims. One in two rapes are committed by a partner or former partner, and one in three adult rape survivors are attacked in their own homes. Women and girls who do not qualify for public funds are three times more likely to experience violence. Andrea Simon, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition (EVAW), said: "The far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda. "These attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms. What's more, they ignore the reality that most violence against women and girls is perpetrated by someone known to them." And Dr Baljit Banga, chief executive of feminist support organisation Hibiscus, said: 'The far right's weaponisation of VAWG undermines efforts to safeguard victims and survivors. "Moreover, targeting Black, minoritised, and migrant communities by distorting public debate and misinterpreting data only serves to exacerbate racial and social inequalities, to the detriment of women experiencing VAWG." And she added: "We refuse to let women's safety be turned into hate speech." A Reform spokesman responded: "Latest polling shows Reform has gained 14% among women, while Labour have lost 12%."
Spectator
16 hours ago
- Spectator
It feels good to see the return of the St George's Cross
There you have it: in certain parts of England it's easier to fly the Palestine flag than the English flag. Take Tower Hamlets in London. The Palestine colours fluttered from lampposts there for months in the aftermath of Hamas's 7 October pogrom. Yet when patriots tried to hoist up the St George's flag this week, they found themselves surrounded by officious council workers. Their flags were unceremoniously yanked down. Seems English pride is haram in modern London. The flag wars in Tower Hamlets are so telling. There was a period when the Palestine flag was omnipresent there. It was untouchable. That perhaps wasn't surprising: the council is led by Lutfur Rahman of the pro-Palestine Aspire party. His office said it would 'destabilise community cohesion' to take the flags down. It was only following a legal threat from UK Lawyers for Israel in March last year that the council finally dismantled all the bunting. The borough's jobsworths were far quicker to act when some white fellas tried to fly the St George's flag this week. Within hours council officials had their poles out to dislodge these wicked emblems from local lampposts. One of the men confronted the busybody flag-draggers. 'The whole of the Isle of Dogs has paid for these flags to be hung', he said, so who are you to demand they 'be taken down'? Then he asked the killer question: 'What about all the Palestine flags?' We should all be asking this. We should all be asking how on earth there's a borough in the capital of the United Kingdom where you'll get an easier ride if you fly the flag of a foreign nation than if you fly one of the flags of the kingdom itself. I won't lie, that there are communities in London that felt more chilled around the flag under which more than a thousand Jews had just been murdered than they do around the flag of England itself worries me enormously. It horrifies me, in fact. It isn't just Tower Hamlets. It isn't only boroughs with large Muslim populations. You see the Palestine flag everywhere. It flies on university campuses. Bourgeois leftists wrap themselves in it on their depressing weekly trudges against the Jewish state. A vast Palestine flag hangs from the Cotswolds HQ of the green energy firm owned by sexagenarian hippy Dale Vince, much to the chagrin of locals. Never mind Israel's supposed colonisation of Palestine – it sometimes feels like Palestine has colonised Britain. It feels good – admit it – to see the St George's Cross make a comeback in the midst of this Palestine mania. The England-loving insurgents in Tower Hamlets who had the temerity to fly the flag of their own country were part of a digital movement called 'Operation Raise the Colours'. The flag bug is spreading. From Swindon to Bradford, Norwich to Newcastle, the English flag and the Union flag are being raised by men and women sick of being told by their supposed betters to feel ashamed of their nation. These are stirring acts of resistance. The guerrilla wavers of the kingdom's flags are implicitly revolting against the post-national, post-borders delirium of our technocratic ruling class. It sometimes seems you can wave any flag in the UK as long as it isn't any of the UK's flags. The Pride flag is festooned in military formation across London's boulevards every Pride month, like we've been conquered by some genderfluid militia. The Palestine flag is inescapable. The Black Lives Matter flag was all the rage a few years back. Liberals wear Ukraine pins on their collars. Some of these people – not all, I know – would run a mile if they ever encountered an 'oik' with a St George's pin on his jumper. So in 21st-century Britain you can be a 'flag-shagger' so long as you aren't 'shagging' the St George's Cross or the Union flag. Wave those flags and you'll be branded a xenophobe, a ruffian, one of the dim little people who hasn't quite caught up with globalist correct-think. The Raise the Colours people are pushing back against the noise and nonsense. Against the hyper-individuating flag of Pride, which promotes the sin of pride in the self, and the anti-Western flag of Palestine, which is really about expressing a frothing hostility to our great ally of Israel, they are waving the unifying flags of this nation. They're hoisting up our kingdom's great emblems of collectivity to counter the divisive, separatist drift of British life under the unforgiving boot of multiculturalism. I'll be honest with you, reader: I was brought up to be wary of the Union flag. In the London-Irish community I come from, no one would have dreamt of waving it. Britpop, with its Union paraphernalia, was a nightmare for us foreign-origin teens. Now? Now I love to see Britain's flags. Symbols of national interest and national pride in an era of woke Balkanisation and anti-Western hysteria? Yes please. Hoist 'em up.
